Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March 2009 Slide 1 Calibration of Local Areas 1 2 Headwater basin Local area.
WinTR-20 Course February Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
CHAPTER FOUR Stream flow measurement
Streamflow and Runoff The character, amount, and timing of discharge from a basin tells a lot about flow paths within the basin Therefore, important to.
Review of Flood Routing
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
March 24, 2014 Rosa Aguilar Computational Hydraulics and Hydrology
Kinematic Routing Model and its Parameters Definition.
FUNCTIONS AND MODELS Chapter 1. Preparation for calculus :  The basic ideas concerning functions  Their graphs  Ways of transforming and combining.
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
1 Numerical Hydraulics Open channel flow 1 Wolfgang Kinzelbach with Marc Wolf and Cornel Beffa.
HEC-RAS.
An analysis of MLR and NLP for use in river flood routing and comparison with the Muskingum method Mohammad Zare Manfred Koch Dept. of Geotechnology and.
Surface Water Equations
Hydrologic Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4.
Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers
Ch 8.1 Numerical Methods: The Euler or Tangent Line Method
© Arturo S. Leon, BSU, Spring 2010
Runoff Hydrograph and Flow Routing
WinTR-20 SensitivityMarch WinTR-20 Sensitivity to Input Parameters.
Feb 2003HEC-RAS Version 3.11 Slides adapted from HEC Unsteady Flow Course Unsteady Flow Course.
Flood Routing 2 Review of Energy Conservation Energy Grade Line Gradually Varied Flows, Head Loss Runge-Kutta Routing.
FLOOD ROUTING.
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS Module 5 Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E 29 July 2011.
Module 6: Routing Concepts Theodore G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E, M. ASCE, F. EWRI October 2013 Module 6 1.
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation.
March 2009WinTR-20 Course1 Muskingum-Cunge Flood Routing Procedure in NRCS Hydrologic Models Prepared by William Merkel USDA-NRCS National Water Quality.
Distributed Flow Routing Surface Water Hydrology, Spring 2005 Reading: 9.1, 9.2, 10.1, 10.2 Venkatesh Merwade, Center for Research in Water Resources.
Channel Flow Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.4, , 9.7.
Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme. Dynamic Channel Routing Preissmann Scheme unconditionally stable for  >=0.5 second-order accurate if 
Mathematical Background
MIKE 11 IntroductionNovember 2002Part 1 Introduction to MIKE 11 Part 1 General Hydrodynamics within MIKE 11 –Basic Equations –Flow Types Numerical Scheme.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
FLOOD ROUTING Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at School of Bioprocess Engineering, UniMAP.
Hydraulic Routing in Rivers Reference: HEC-RAS Hydraulic Reference Manual, Version 4.1, Chapters 1 and 2 Reading: HEC-RAS Manual pp. 2-1 to 2-12 Applied.
Flood Routing definitions
Basic Hydraulics: Channels Analysis and design – I
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
CE 3354 Engineering Hydrology
INTEGRALS We saw in Section 5.1 that a limit of the form arises when we compute an area. We also saw that it arises when we try to find the distance traveled.
5 INTEGRALS.
Accelerated Motion Chapter 3.
Flood Routing Applied Hydrology
FLOOD ROUTING Flood Routing Techniques Siti Kamariah Md Sa’at PPK Bioprocess
ERT 246 Hydrology & Water Resources Eng.
Team  Spatially distributed deterministic models  Many hydrological phenomena vary spatially and temporally in accordance with the conservation.
UNIT – III FLOODS Types of floods Following are the various types of floods: 1.Probable Maximum Flood (PMF):This is the flood resulting from the most sever.
Basic Hydrology: Rainfall-runoff based methods – III
Basic Hydrology & Hydraulics: DES 601
Routing-Hydrologic and Hydraulic
Flow Routing Flow routing is a procedure to determine the time and magnitude of flow (i.e. the flow hydrograph) at a point on a watercourse from known.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
03/02/2006 Flow Routing Reading: 8.1, 8.4, 9.1, 9.2.
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
FLOOD ROUTING Topic 5 River/Stream Routing Muskingum Method.
Distributed Flow Routing
CEE 3430 – Engineering Hydrology David Rosenberg March 26, 2012
Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel
Modelling tools - MIKE11 Part1-Introduction
Floods and Flood Routing
Flood Routing.
Assoc.Prof. dr.tarkan erdik
HEC-RAS US Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center
HEC-HMS Runoff Computation Modeling Direct Runoff with HEC-HMS Empirical models Empirical models - traditional UH models - traditional UH models - a.
Presentation transcript:

Channel Routing Simulate the movement of water through a channel Used to predict the magnitudes, volumes, and temporal patterns of the flow (often a flood wave) as it translates down a channel. 2 types of routing : hydrologic and hydraulic. both of these methods use some form of the continuity equation. Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation

Continuity Equation Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation The change in storage (dS) equals the difference between inflow (I) and outflow (O) or : For open channel flow, the continuity equation is also often written as : A = the cross-sectional area, Q = channel flow, and q = lateral inflow

Hydrologic Routing Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation Methods combine the continuity equation with some relationship between storage, outflow, and possibly inflow. These relationships are usually assumed, empirical, or analytical in nature. An of example of such a relationship might be a stage-discharge relationship.

Use of Manning Equation Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation Stage is also related to the outflow via a relationship such as Manning's equation

Hydraulic Routing Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Momentum Equation Hydraulic routing methods combine the continuity equation with some more physical relationship describing the actual physics of the movement of the water. The momentum equation is the common relationship employed. In hydraulic routing analysis, it is intended that the dynamics of the water or flood wave movement be more accurately described

Momentum Equation Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation Expressed by considering the external forces acting on a control section of water as it moves down a channel Henderson (1966) expressed the momentum equation as :

Combinations of Equations Simplified Versions : Continuity equation Hydrologic Routing Hydraulic Routing Momentum Equation Unsteady -Nonuniform Steady - Nonuniform Diffusion or noninertial Kinematic Sf = So

Routing Methods Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Modified Puls The modified puls routing method is probably most often applied to reservoir routing The method may also be applied to river routing for certain channel situations. The modified puls method is also referred to as the storage-indication method. The heart of the modified puls equation is found by considering the finite difference form of the continuity equation. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Modified Puls Modified Puls Continuity Equation Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes Continuity Equation Rewritten The solution to the modified puls method is accomplished by developing a graph (or table) of O -vs- [2S/Δt + O]. In order to do this, a stage-discharge-storage relationship must be known, assumed, or derived.

Modified Puls Example Given the following hydrograph and the 2S/Dt + O curve, find the outflow hydrograph for the reservoir assuming it to be completely full at the beginning of the storm. The following hydrograph is given:

Modified Puls Example The following 2S/Dt + O curve is also given:

Modified Puls Example A table may be created as follows:

Modified Puls Example Next, using the hydrograph and interpolation, insert the Inflow (discharge) values. For example at 1 hour, the inflow is 30 cfs.

Modified Puls Example The next step is to add the inflow to the inflow in the next time step. For the first blank the inflow at 0 is added to the inflow at 1 hour to obtain a value of 30.

Modified Puls Example This is then repeated for the rest of the values in the column.

Modified Puls Example The 2Sn/Dt + On+1 column can then be calculated using the following equation: Note that 2Sn/Dt - On and On+1 are set to zero. 30 + 0 = 2Sn/Dt + On+1

Modified Puls Example Then using the curve provided outflow can be determined. In this case, since 2Sn/Dt + On+1 = 30, outflow = 5 based on the graph provided.

Modified Puls Example To obtain the final column, 2Sn/Dt - On, two times the outflow is subtracted from 2Sn/Dt + On+1. In this example 30 - 2*5 = 20

Modified Puls Example The same steps are repeated for the next line. First 90 + 20 = 110. From the graph, 110 equals an outflow value of 18. Finally 110 - 2*18 = 74

Modified Puls Example This process can then be repeated for the rest of the columns. Now a list of the outflow values have been calculated and the problem is complete.

Muskingum Method Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes Sp = K O Prism Storage Sw = K(I - O)X Wedge Storage S = K[XI + (1-X)O] Combined

Muskingum, cont... S = K[XI + (1-X)O] O2 = C0 I2 + C1 I1 + C2 O1 Substitute storage equation, S into the “S” in the continuity equation yields : Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes S = K[XI + (1-X)O] O2 = C0 I2 + C1 I1 + C2 O1

Muskingum Notes : The method assumes a single stage-discharge relationship. In other words, for any given discharge, Q, there can be only one stage height. This assumption may not be entirely valid for certain flow situations. For instance, the friction slope on the rising side of a hydrograph for a given flow, Q, may be quite different than for the recession side of the hydrograph for the same given flow, Q. This causes an effect known as hysteresis, which can introduce errors into the storage assumptions of this method. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Estimating K K is estimated to be the travel time through the reach. This may pose somewhat of a difficulty, as the travel time will obviously change with flow. The question may arise as to whether the travel time should be estimated using the average flow, the peak flow, or some other flow. The travel time may be estimated using the kinematic travel time or a travel time based on Manning's equation. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Estimating X The value of X must be between 0.0 and 0.5. Modified Puls The parameter X may be thought of as a weighting coefficient for inflow and outflow. As inflow becomes less important, the value of X decreases. The lower limit of X is 0.0 and this would be indicative of a situation where inflow, I, has little or no effect on the storage. A reservoir is an example of this situation and it should be noted that attenuation would be the dominant process compared to translation. Values of X = 0.2 to 0.3 are the most common for natural streams; however, values of 0.4 to 0.5 may be calibrated for streams with little or no flood plains or storage effects. A value of X = 0.5 would represent equal weighting between inflow and outflow and would produce translation with little or no attenuation. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Lag and K is a special case of Muskingum -> X=0! Did you know? Lag and K is a special case of Muskingum -> X=0!

More Notes - Muskingum Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes The Handbook of Hydrology (Maidment, 1992) includes additional cautions or limitations in the Muskingum method. The method may produce negative flows in the initial portion of the hydrograph. Additionally, it is recommended that the method be limited to moderate to slow rising hydrographs being routed through mild to steep sloping channels. The method is not applicable to steeply rising hydrographs such as dam breaks. Finally, this method also neglects variable backwater effects such as downstream dams, constrictions, bridges, and tidal influences.

Muskingum Example Problem A portion of the inflow hydrograph to a reach of channel is given below. If the travel time is K=1 unit and the weighting factor is X=0.30, then find the outflow from the reach for the period shown below:

Muskingum Example Problem The first step is to determine the coefficients in this problem. The calculations for each of the coefficients is given below: C0= - ((1*0.30) - (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.167 C1= ((1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.667

Muskingum Example Problem C2= (1- (1*0.30) - (0.5*1)) / ((1-(1*0.30) + (0.5*1)) = 0.167 Therefore the coefficients in this problem are: C0 = 0.167 C1 = 0.667 C2 = 0.167

Muskingum Example Problem The three columns now can be calculated. C0I2 = 0.167 * 5 = 0.835 C1I1 = 0.667 * 3 = 2.00 C2O1 = 0.167 * 3 = 0.501

Muskingum Example Problem Next the three columns are added to determine the outflow at time equal 1 hour. 0.835 + 2.00 + 0.501 = 3.34

Muskingum Example Problem This can be repeated until the table is complete and the outflow at each time step is known.

Muskingum Example - Tenkiller Look at R-5

Reach at Outlet K = 2 hrs X = 0.25

K = 2 & 4 Hrs. X = 0.25

K = 2, 4, & 6 Hrs. X = 0.25

Let’s Alter X K = 2 hrs. K = 2 hrs X = 0.25 K = 2 hrs X = 0.5

And Again.... K = 2 hrs X = 0.5 K = 2 hrs X = 0.05

Muskingum-Cunge Muskingum-Cunge formulation is similar to the Muskingum type formulation The Muskingum-Cunge derivation begins with the continuity equation and includes the diffusion form of the momentum equation. These equations are combined and linearized, Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Muskingum-Cunge “working equation” Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes where : Q = discharge t = time x = distance along channel qx = lateral inflow c = wave celerity m = hydraulic diffusivity

Muskingum-Cunge, cont... Method attempts to account for diffusion by taking into account channel and flow characteristics. Hydraulic diffusivity is found to be : Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes The Wave celerity in the x-direction is :

Solution of Muskingum-Cunge Solution of the Method is accomplished by discretizing the equations on an x-t plane. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes X t

Calculation of K & X Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes Estimation of K & X is more “physically based” and should be able to reflect the “changing” conditions - better.

Muskingum-Cunge - NOTES Muskingum-Cunge formulation is actually considered an approximate solution of the convective diffusion equation. As such it may account for wave attenuation, but not for reverse flow and backwater effects and not for fast rising hydrographs. Properly applied, the method is non-linear in that the flow properties and routing coefficients are re-calculated at each time and distance step Often, an iterative 4-point scheme is used for the solution. Care should be taken when choosing the computation interval, as the computation interval may be longer than the time it takes for the wave to travel the reach distance. Internal computational times are used to account for the possibility of this occurring. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Muskingum-Cunge Example The hydrograph at the upstream end of a river is given in the following table. The reach of interest is 18 km long. Using a subreach length Dx of 6 km, determine the hydrograph at the end of the reach using the Muskingum-Cunge method. Assume c = 2m/s, B = 25.3 m, So = 0.001m and no lateral flow.

Muskingum-Cunge Example First, K must be determined. K is equal to : Is “c” a constant? Dx = 6 km, while c = 2 m/s

Muskingum-Cunge Example The next step is to determine x. All the variables are known, with B = 25.3 m, So = 0.001 and Dx =6000 m, and the peak Q taken from the table.

Muskingum-Cunge Example The coefficients of the Muskingum-Cunge method can now be determined. Using 7200 seconds or 2 hrs for timestep - this may need to be changed

Muskingum-Cunge Example The coefficients of the Muskingum-Cunge method can now be determined.

Muskingum-Cunge Example The coefficients of the Muskingum-Cunge method can now be determined.

Muskingum-Cunge Example The coefficients of the Muskingum-Cunge method can now be determined.

Muskingum-Cunge Example Then a simplification of the original formula can be made. Since there is not lateral flow, QL = 0. The simplified formula is the following:

Muskingum-Cunge Example A table can then be created in 2 hour time steps similar to the one below:

Muskingum-Cunge Example It is assumed at time zero, the flow is 10 m3/s at each distance.

Muskingum-Cunge Example Next, zero is substituted into for each letter to solve the equation.

Muskingum-Cunge Example Using the table, the variables can be determined. 10 18

Muskingum-Cunge Example Therefore, the equation can be solved.

Muskingum-Cunge Example Therefore, the equation can be solved.

Muskingum-Cunge Example This is repeated for the rest of the columns and the subsequent columns to produce the following table. Note that when you change rows, “n” changes. When you change columns, “j” changes.

Look again at the Discretization X

Things to Consider As the wave comes into a reach: the flow and depth go up and then down the wave speed and ALL coefficients would then change... What effect would this have?

Full Dynamic Wave Equations The solution of the St. Venant equations is known as dynamic routing. Dynamic routing is generally the standard to which other methods are measured or compared. The solution of the St. Venant equations is generally accomplished via one of two methods : 1) the method of characteristics and 2) direct methods (implicit and explicit). It may be fair to say that regardless of the method of solution, a computer is absolutely necessary as the solutions are quite time consuming. J. J. Stoker (1953, 1957) is generally credited for initially attempting to solve the St. Venant equations using a high speed computer. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Dynamic Wave Solutions Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes Characteristics, Explicit, & Implicit The most popular method of applying the implicit technique is to use a four point weighted finite difference scheme. Some computer programs utilize a finite element solution technique; however, these tend to be more complex in nature and thus a finite difference technique is most often employed. It should be noted that most of the models using the finite difference technique are one-dimensional and that two and three-dimensional solution schemes often revert to a finite element solution.

Dynamic Wave Solutions Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes Dynamic routing allows for a higher degree of accuracy when modeling flood situations because it includes parameters that other methods neglect. Dynamic routing, when compared to other modeling techniques, relies less on previous flood data and more on the physical properties of the storm. This is extremely important when record rainfalls occur or other extreme events. Dynamic routing also provides more hydraulic information about the event, which can be used to determine the transportation of sediment along the waterway.

Courant Condition? If the wave or hydrograph can travel through the subreach (of length Δx) in a time less than the computational interval, Δt, then computational instabilities may evolve. The condition to satisfy here is known as the Courant condition and is expressed as : Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes

Some DISadvantages Geometric simplification - some models are designed to use very simplistic representations of the cross-sectional geometry. This may be valid for large dam breaks where very large flows are encountered and width to depth ratios are large; however, this may not be applicable to smaller dam breaks where channel geometry would be more critical. Model simulation input requirements - dynamic routing techniques generally require boundary conditions at one or more locations in the domain, such as the upstream and downstream sections. These boundary conditions may in the form of known or constant water surfaces, hydrographs, or assumed stage-discharge relationships. Stability - As previously noted, the very complex nature of these methods often leads to numeric instability. Also, convergence may be a problem in some solution schemes. For these reasons as well as others, there tends to be a stability problem in some programs. Often times it is very difficult to obtain a "clean" model run in a cost efficient manner. Modified Puls Kinematic Wave Muskingum Muskingum-Cunge Dynamic Modeling Notes