Presentation by: Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Perspectives in Introduction to Competition Policy Gender Module #6 ITU Workshops on Sustainability in Telecommunication Through Gender & Social.
Advertisements

Redressal of Consumer Grievances in BSNL A Presentation by T.N.Sudhindra Kumar CGM, AP Telecom Circle.
RIGHT TO REPRESENTATION
Consumer Disputes Settlement under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 Presentation by: Madhav Joshi Chief Legal Officer Tata Teleservices.
Presentation By Mrs Roop Sharma President, Cable Operators Federation of India (COFI) On Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting Sector 17 th July, 2010, Raipur,
MS. PREMILA KUMAR CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CONSUMER COUNCIL OF FIJI.
Overview & Consumer Orientation of the DTH TDSAT Seminar ; Aug 22 nd 09 ; Lucknow Anshuman Sharma Chief Legal & Regulatory Affairs Officer, Tata Sky Ltd.
Pay Channel Market: Realities & Reforms TDSAT Presentation May 2010.
André Piérard, ERGEG Project Leader on Complaints Citizens’ Energy Forum, London, September 2009 Draft advice on Customer Complaint Handling, Reporting.
Historical Perspective of Regulations under TRAI Act 1997 and Future Trends K.Sridhara Member (T), TC.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 3 Energy Regulation Module 3: INTRODUCTION TO ENERGY REGULATION.
TDSAT Seminar 20 th October, 2007 Srinagar Consumer Rights under the TRAI Act, 1997 & Redressal of Consumer Grievances by Indu Malhotra Sr. Advocate Supreme.
Regulation & Implementation of Mobile Internet Quality of Service: Role & Scope of Civil Society Organisations PRESENTATION BY: NEHA TOMAR, RESEARCH ASSOCIATE,
1 The Telecommunications Consumer Board The Telecommunications Complaints Board International Seminar on Dispute Resolution Scenario in the Telecom Sector,
Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector BSNL Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom Sector A Management Perspective K.Sridhara,CGM,TN Telecom Circle.
Seymour Fortescue 12 September 2008 Chair, UK Remittances Task Force Vienna AN INTERNATIONAL REMITTANCES CUSTOMER CHARTER.
Efficacy Of Dispute Resolution in Broadcasting & Cable Sector © & Presented By: Ashok Nambissan Note: Views expressed are those of the author alone.
Cable TV Industry – INDIA
PRESENTATION ON DISPUTE SETTLEMENT AND PROTECTION OF CONSUMER RIGHTS IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS UPAMANYU HAZARIKA Advocate HYDERABAD.
Competition Policy Issues at Sub- National Level: Local Problems Need Local Solutions Pradeep S. Mehta CUTS International.
“Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in the Telecom Sector in India” 24 th March, 2007 Ahmedabad Presentation by A.K. Sinha CMD BSNL.
Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General CUTS International Jaipur, India CONSUMER REDRESSAL IN THE TELECOM AND CABLE SECTORS.
Regulatory Tools to Empower Consumers: A Zambian Perspective Presentation by Ms. Langiwe H. Lungu, Executive Director, Energy Regulation Board, ZAMBIA.
Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Telecom Sector in India MTNL Mumbai.
MANJUL BAJPAI AHMEDABAD STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MANJUL BAJPAI GOA EVOLUTION OF JUDICIAL MECHANISM IN TELECOM AND BROADCASTING SECTORS IN INDIA.
MSO and the Regulatory Framework. TRUTH AT THE GROUND LEVEL  The charges payable by MSOs to broadcasters are fixed on mutually agreed / lump–sum amounts.
CONSUMER RIGHTS UNDER TRAI ACT, 1997 TDSAT SEMINAR, BOMBAY 25 TH SEPTEMBER, 2004 RAMJI SRINIVASAN.
STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN THE TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
Digital Addressable Systems
Liberalization of Telecommunications in Europe Pál Belényesi 27 October 2006 Verona.
Prayas Energy Group, India Transparency in Electricity Service Delivery: Billing, Quality of Service and consumer issues Bishkek, September 2011 Presentation.
FAQs about the new regulatory framework Lucy Rhodes
Consumer Agenda at the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) Onica N. Makwakwa, Head Consumers International Office for Africa.
Consumer perspectives on the introduction of ENUM in Australia Teresa Corbin Acting Executive Officer Consumers’ Telecommunications Network.
POSTAL CONFERENCE 25 th – 27 th February 2015 Nairobi, Kenya By Yvonne UMUTONI Chairperson of EACO Working Group 9 (Quality of Service and Consumer Affairs)
TDSAT SEMINAR Chennai 30 th August 2008 “Dispute Resolution Scenario in Telecom and Broadcasting Sector” Venue : Hotel Park Sheraton.
Slide 1.2 Introduction to Department of Telecommunications: Telecommunication services started in India in the year 1851 with the First Electric telegraph.
Seminar on Dispute Resolution in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors TDSAT 20 th November 2010, Bangalore.
Jump to first page MANJUL BAJPAI M U M B A I – DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA.
Reforming Non-Tariff Barriers in South Asia Case for a Participatory Approach Pradeep S Mehta Pradeep S Mehta Secretary General SASA VIII WESTMINSTER COLLEGE,
TDSAT Seminar 20 January 2008 Kolkata, India Settlement of Disputes & Protection of Consumer Rights by RAMJI SRINIVASAN Advocate.
1 Liberalization & The Telecommunications Sector In the Caribbean Presented by Regenie F. Ch. Fräser SECRETARY GENERAL CANTO.
1 CTO CONFERENCE ON “IMPLEMENTING WSIS ACTION PLAN” NAIROBI, KENYA, MARCH 2004 UGANDA’S REGULATORY INNOVATIONS By Patrick F. Masambu Executive Director,
Market Power, Consumer Interests, Regulation and Competition in the Electricity Industry S.Sundar Professor, TERI School of Advanced Studies & Distinguished.
COMMONALITIES AND EMERGING ISSUES: COURSE FOR THE FUTURE by Philippe Brusick Chairman, CUTS GRC.
Presentation By R K Arnold I.T.S. Secretary, TRAI TDSAT Seminar, Chennai on Dispute Resolution in Telecom.
"My journey as a social entrepreneur'" Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International TEDxDTU, Delhi Technological University, January 31, 2011.
QoS for Broadband Services, Consumer Perspective and Regulatory Challenges BEREC – EMERG – E A P E R EG - REGULATEL S UMMIT CHALLENGES FOR TELECOMS IN.
MAKING COMPLAINTS AND GETTING SATISFACTORY ANSWERS – A PAPER PRESENTED BY ALEX C. ANAMEJE, HCIB AT A FINANCIAL LITERACY PUBLIC ENLIGHTENMENT PROGRAMME.
CHO Code of Practice Alternative Dispute Resolution.
Empowerment and Protection of Consumers in ICT Market PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE 23 RD – 25 TH NOVEMBER,
PRESENTED AT THE STAKEHOLDERS FORUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE AND CONSUMER EXPERIENCE LAICO REGENCY HOTEL Creating Space for Consumer Rights in.
 To protect the interest of policyholder.  To have speedy and effective grievance redressal system  IRDA has issued guidelines on 27 th July,2010.
Status of Dispute Settlement Mechanism in Telecom and Broadcasting Sectors in India 25 th November 2006 Asim Abbas, Vice President (legal), Bharti Airtel.
Competition concerns in digital finance services in India Amol Kulkarni CUTS International 10 October
Private Sector Development Competition and Anti Monopoly The World Bank Mission February-March, 2004.
Chapter Twelve The European Information Economy. European Information Economy ` An economy in which the quality of life as well as prospects for commercial.
Consumer Rights under Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 & Consumer Protection Act, 1986 – a Background Analysis.
Botswana Institute for Development Policy Analysis Monnane M. Monnane Research Fellow COMPETITION OVERVIEW: BOTSWANA.
FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND CONSUMER PROTECTION – THE CASE OF THE PHILIPPINES JOSELITO S. ALMARIO DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL CREDIT COUNCIL PHILIPPINE.
1 MID TERM REVIEW MEETING RESA MEETING Plan for Stage II 2 nd April, 2009 RAJESH KUMAR, CUTS INTERNATIONAL.
Course 3.6 Regulatory Commissions: Management & Staff Functions, Bangladesh, Mar 31- Apr 4, 2002 SOUTH ASIA REGIONAL INITIATIVE/ENERGY Regulatory Commission.
SHAPING A REGULATORY AGENCY IN A PERIOD OF CONVERGENCE OR EUROPEAN TELECOM SYSTEM FROM A COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE - CASE STUDY: CABLE TV Krisztina Rozgonyi.
DIGITAL ADDRESSABLE SYSTEMS Vibhav Srivastava Advocate
Digital Addressable Systems, Challenges & Way Forward
DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM
MANJUL BAJPAI CHANDIGARH –
Pradeep S. Mehta, Secretary General Interim Review Meeting
COSMETOLOGY &HAIRDRESSERS ASSOCIATION WORKSHOP
Presentation transcript:

Presentation by: Pradeep S. Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International STATUS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM IN TELECOM SECTOR IN INDIA: CONSUMERS’ PERSPECTIVE Seminar on “Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Protection of Consumer Rights & Redressal of Public Grievances in the Telecom Sector” 3 rd September 2005, Jaipur

1. Introduction 2. Consumer Concerns in Telecom and Cable TV Sectors 3. Dispute Settlement System in India 4. Measures for Improving Consumer Disputes Resolution CONTENTS

Sector traditionally managed by government or Public Sector Enterprises Emerged as a vital utility service for the economy Opening up of telecom sector to competition in mid-1990s Tremendous growth in the recent past However, the quality of service has taken a beating too Data available with TRAI shows, quantum of consumer complaints is on the rise 1. INTRODUCTION

Service Charges Disputes in relation to types and amounts of charges levied Billing Dispute over bills for calls not made or services not requested Failure to provide accurate reporting/itemization of charges Poor Quality of Service Telemarketing / Privacy 2. CONSUMER CONCERNS: Telecom Services

Frequent hike in cable subscription charges No choice in selection of TV channels Proper money receipt not issued Lack of proper complaint redressal system Abuse of monopoly by MSOs/cable operators e.g. abuse of monopoly by Bhaskar and its franchisee cable operators in Jaipur Cable TV market Consumer victim of dispute between operators e.g. transmission of ESPN-Star Sports blocked due to dispute between Bhaskar and the broadcaster 2. CONSUMER CONCERNS: Cable TV Services Contd…

3. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT SYSTEM IN INDIA Measures by Service Providers: Common charter of telecom services adopted BUT no adherence by service providers Complaint cells operated by Service Providers BUT no proper handling of customer complaints Measures by TRAI: Issues Orders/Directives BUT lacks enforcement (e.g. Cable TV case of Jaipur); not effective in handling local-level complaints

3. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN INDIA Disputes Settlement by TDSAT Addresses disputes between service provider and group of consumers BUT not adequate for addressing local-level problems Consumer Fora Set up to address individual consumer complaints BUT already over-burdened and significant delay in disposing off cases Contd…

4. MEASURES FOR IMPROVING CONSUMER DISPUTES RESOLUTION Creating awareness among consumers Capacity building of consumer organisations Involvement of consumer representatives in adjudication of complaints Equip regulatory body with adequate resources Institute local-level redressal mechanisms Establishment of the Office of Ombudsman Alternate Dispute Redressal through Consumer Organisations

THANK YOU