Cost Analysis of TeleHomecare Kathryn H. Dansky, R.N., PhD Liisa Palmer, PhD candidate Dennis Shea, PhD Kathy Bowles, R.N., PhD
Cost Analysis of TeleHomecare TeleHomecare Project Evaluation Cost analysis Lessons learned
Partners Penn State University The Visiting Nurse Association of Greater Philadelphia (VNA) American TeleCare, Inc.
Sponsor U.S. Department of Commerce National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA) Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program (TIIAP)
Project Objectives 1) Evaluate health status and quality of life 2) Evaluate health care costs 3) Evaluate patient satisfaction 4) Extend TeleHomecare technology to other underserved populations
System Description AVIVA 2020 (ATI) Patient station Clinician station Communication links
Research Design Sample: Homebound diabetics Randomization to experimental and control groups Pre- and post-testing (post-testing at 60 days or discharge)
Patient Demographics VideoControl % Female % Male Average Age Number 91 85
Patient Health Status VideoControl Mean Diabetes Severity Score Mean Number of Comorbidities
Evaluation: Indices 1. Health Status 2. Quality of Life 3. Self-Management of Diabetes 4. Patient Satisfaction 5. Health Care Costs
Evaluation Health Care Costs: Direct costs: physician, hospital, home health, pharmaceutical System and training costs Indirect costs: morbidity, mortality, QALYs
Home Health Costs: RN Care ** (p < 0.05)
Home Health Costs: RN Care ** (p < 0.001)
Home Health Costs: Project
Project Costs: Video Group Telehomecare units + upgrades Peripherals Printer Carts and bins Equipment installation, maintenance and removal Education, training and meetings Unsuccessful video visits
Considerations: Costs Equipment discounted over 5 years, but no secondary market for equipment (salvage value =0) Bureau of Labor average hourly wage for Registered Nurses in Philadelphia (1998) used for labor costs
Considerations: Uncertainty Equipment - technical - operator Appropriate number of video visits - substitution versus supplementation Evaluation design
Impact on Patients: Discharge Status VideoControl % Discharged Home % Recertified for HHA % Hospitalized % Other
Lessons Learned: Costs Technical support Staff buy-in Training Hidden costs Maximize potential
TeleHomecare Project Caring, Journal of Healthcare Information Management