Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBIS) – Implementers’ Blueprint Michael Mahoney, M.S., NCSP Safe & Healthy School Coordinator Oregon Department.
Advertisements

Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Working Your Way Up the Triangle: Systems, Data and Practices Mary Richter, Ph.D. Missouri SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
Got Green? Maryland PBIS Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
BUILDING CAPACITY FOR UNIVERSAL PREVENTION THROUGH STATE-NONPROFIT-UNIVERSITY- SCHOOL SYSTEM PARTNERSHIPS Philip J. Leaf, Ph.D. Johns Hopkins University.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Positive Behavior Support System Lovell Elementary School.
Lori Newcomer, Ph.D. University of Missouri - St. Louis Coaching for Capacity and Sustainability.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Renee Bradley, Ph.D. U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Maryland Susan Barrett
Creating a Positive Environment: P ositive B ehavioral I nterventions & S upports Carol Frodge Former Principal, Edmonds School District PBIS Trainer Fierce.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support February 24, 2004 Rachel Freeman, University of Kansas Beth Robinett, Topeka 501 (
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
BULLYPROOFING AND PBIS: PART II Teri Lewis Oregon State University.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
SW-PBS: Leadership & Sustainability George Sugai Center on PBIS University of Connecticut University of Oregon November 2, 2005
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
WELCOME PBIS Maryland Coaches & Administrators. Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Presented to the December 2008 State-Wide Coaches.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
1 EBISS Basics for New Districts Developing systems for the sustained implementation of school-wide PBS, Literacy, and RTI.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Lessons Learned in SWPBS Implementation: Sustainability & Scaling Up George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Connecticut January 15,
W. M. Anderson Primary: School- Wide Positive Behavior Support Plan James Carraway, Chairperson Macie Davis Debra Fulmore Pam Lee Lerlisa McKnight Gail.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
SWPBS: Sustainability
School-wide Positive Behavior Support
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon

Acknowledgements Students, educators, administrators, school staff, families,…. Community of researchers, personnel preparers, system changers, staff developers,…. Offices of Special Education Programs, US Dept. of Ed.

Research to Practice (Wing Institute, 2005) Efficacy (what works?) Effectiveness (when does it work?) Implementation (how do we make it work?) Monitoring (is it working?)

Challenges to Implementation (Kratochwill, Albers, & Steele Shernoff, 2004) Primary focus on education Lack of emphasis on prevention programs Organization impedes collaboration, working as team Lack of skills, training, resources

Positive Behavior Support (PBS) PBS is a systems approach to proactive school-wide discipline that is designed to increase the capacity of schools to adopt and sustain research-validated practices for all students. Systems Data Practices

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Decision Making Supporting Student Behavior Positive Behavior Support OUTCOMES Social Competence & Academic Achievement

Generic Model School-wide PBS Team Represent school, meet regularly, etc Coach Provide technical assistance to school Link school to state State Leadership Team Guide planning and development Coordinate Training Regional Teams/Structure

Year One Getting Started (Summer/Fall) Overview, School-wide, Non-classroom, Data Decisions, Team meetings, Team Planning Expanding Implementation (Winter) Classroom, Escalation Cycle, Team Status Check, Team planning Sustaining Efforts (Spring) Individual Student, Targeted-group, Team Planning, Long-term Action Planning

Year Two Intensive Behavior Support Linking with other initiatives (i.e., academics, bullyproofing, RtI) District/Regional Systems Working with Parents and Community Roadblocks and Challenges

Critical Features High status leadership team Active administrator participation High priority in school improvement planning Proactive (positive and preventive) systems approach Data-based decision making Continuum of behavior supports Long term commitment Research validated practices

Nonclassroom Setting Systems Classroom Setting Systems Individual Student Systems School-wide Systems School-wide Positive Behavior Support Systems

Emphasis on Prevention Primary Reduce new cases of problem behavior Secondary Reduce current cases of problem behavior Tertiary Reduce complications, intensity, severity of current cases

Academic SystemsBehavioral Systems 1-5% 5-10% 80-90% Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based High Intensity Intensive, Individual Interventions Individual Students Assessment-based Intense, durable procedures Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Targeted Group Interventions Some students (at-risk) High efficiency Rapid response Universal Interventions All students Preventive, proactive Universal Interventions All settings, all students Preventive, proactive Designing School-Wide Systems for Student Success

School-wide & Classroom-wide Systems  Common approach to discipline  Positive expectations  Teach expected behavior  Encourage expected behavior  Discourage inappropriate behavior  On-going monitoring & evaluation

Classroom Management Systems Behavior & classroom management Instructional management Environmental management

Specific Setting Systems Routines Active supervision by all staff Scan, move, interact Precorrections & reminders Positive reinforcement

Individual Student Systems Behavioral competence Function-based behavior support planning Team-based model Data-based decision making Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes

Maryland Model Collaboration between schools, MSDE, Sheppard Pratt, and Johns Hopkins Began in local school systems Over 230 schools About 120 coaches State Leadership Team

Maryland Model, cont. State Level State Leadership Team District/Regional Coordinators School Level Coaches Teams Training Summer Institute Regional Trainings

Overview of Evaluation Model What schools are involved in the implementation? How well are schools with implementation? What impact has implementation had on student success?

Who is Implementing? 232 School Teams have completed training (16% of Maryland Schools) 217 Currently active schools Attrition occurred early in the project when coaches and other regional technical assistance structures were not established

Schools Trained and Active

Expansion Highlights 65% of total schools were trained within the past two years 35% of total schools were trained last year (summer 2004) Anne Arundel (Ginny Dolan), Baltimore (Joey Levina- Parr) and Charles (Elsa Velez) Counties all have had rapid expansion as a result of identifying a facilitator (lead coach)

How Well are Schools Implementing? Systems-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Annually 7 features of SW implementation Interviews, product review, observations

SET 96 SETs completed during SY 50 schools have SETs for 2 years 80% Total score is considered sustainability level All regions met 80% criterion across schools This represents a 47% increase

Pre-Post SETs by Region

What is the Impact of Implementation? Team Checklist Staff Survey Student Behavior (ODR)

Two Levels

Staff Survey Only 7 staff surveys have been turned in Not enough data to make valid summary Only measure that includes staff feedback and perceptions Piloting on-line entry and summary of measures

Student Behavior (SWIS) 90% of elementary schools are reporting ODRs at.43 per day per 100 students or lower 94% of middle schools are reporting ODRs at.95 per day per 100 students or lower 75% of high schools are reporting ODRs at.95 per day per 100 students or lower

Fidelity of Data 85% of active schools are returning data to Coaches/State Leadership Team

Sustainability Assumptions Implemented with high accuracy Sustained to realize durable changes and expand efforts Implemented by local/natural resources Adapted to “fit” culture Guided by data-based decisions Supported by systems to support staff

Implementation Levels Student Classroom School State District

Leadership Team Funding VisibilityPolitical Support TrainingCoaching Evaluation Active Coordination Local School Teams/Demonstrations PBS Organizational Logic