Experimental Design An Experimental Design is a plan for the assignment of the treatments to the plots in the experiment Designs differ primarily in the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright (c) 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Chapter 10 The Analysis of Variance.
Advertisements

Test of (µ 1 – µ 2 ),  1 =  2, Populations Normal Test Statistic and df = n 1 + n 2 – 2 2– )1– 2 ( 2 1 )1– 1 ( 2 where ] 2 – 1 [–
Split-Plot Designs Usually used with factorial sets when the assignment of treatments at random can cause difficulties –large scale machinery required.
Split-Plot Designs Usually used with factorial sets when the assignment of treatments at random can cause difficulties large scale machinery required for.
Copyright 2004 David J. Lilja1 Comparing Two Alternatives Use confidence intervals for Before-and-after comparisons Noncorresponding measurements.
Types of Checks in Variety Trials One could be a long term check that is unchanged from year to year –serves to monitor experimental conditions from year.
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Design of Experiments and Analysis of Variance
Sub - Sampling It may be necessary or convenient to measure a treatment response on subsamples of a plot –several soil cores within a plot –duplicate laboratory.
Chapter 12 Simple Linear Regression
1 1 Slide © 2009, Econ-2030 Applied Statistics-Dr Tadesse Chapter 10: Comparisons Involving Means n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis of.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
The Statistical Analysis Partitions the total variation in the data into components associated with sources of variation –For a Completely Randomized Design.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft® Excel 5th Edition
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Chap 10-1 Analysis of Variance. Chap 10-2 Overview Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) F-test Tukey- Kramer test One-Way ANOVA Two-Way ANOVA Interaction Effects.
Chapter 12: Analysis of Variance
Control of Experimental Error Accuracy = without bias  average is on the bull’s-eye  achieved through randomization Precision = repeatability  measurements.
One-Factor Experiments Andy Wang CIS 5930 Computer Systems Performance Analysis.
Fixed vs. Random Effects
1 1 Slide © 2006 Thomson/South-Western Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
1 1 Slide © 2005 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 13, Part A Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design n Introduction to Analysis of Variance n Analysis.
INFERENTIAL STATISTICS: Analysis Of Variance ANOVA
Copyright © 2013, 2010 and 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter Comparing Three or More Means 13.
12-1 Chapter Twelve McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
© 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 9-1 Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel 3 rd Edition Chapter 9 Analysis of Variance.
1 1 Slide © 2008 Thomson South-Western. All Rights Reserved Chapter 15 Multiple Regression n Multiple Regression Model n Least Squares Method n Multiple.
The Scientific Method Formulation of an H ypothesis P lanning an experiment to objectively test the hypothesis Careful observation and collection of D.
1 1 Slide Simple Linear Regression Coefficient of Determination Chapter 14 BA 303 – Spring 2011.
So far... We have been estimating differences caused by application of various treatments, and determining the probability that an observed difference.
Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance.
Business Statistics: Contemporary Decision Making, 3e, by Black. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning 11-1 Business Statistics, 3e by Ken Black Chapter.
1 Chapter 13 Analysis of Variance. 2 Chapter Outline  An introduction to experimental design and analysis of variance  Analysis of Variance and the.
TOPIC 11 Analysis of Variance. Draw Sample Populations μ 1 = μ 2 = μ 3 = μ 4 = ….. μ n Evidence to accept/reject our claim Sample mean each group, grand.
Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft Excel, 4e © 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 10-1 Chapter 10 Analysis of Variance Statistics for Managers Using Microsoft.
Previous Lecture: Phylogenetics. Analysis of Variance This Lecture Judy Zhong Ph.D.
Control of Experimental Error Blocking - –A block is a group of homogeneous experimental units –Maximize the variation among blocks in order to minimize.
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means.
1 1 Slide © 2003 South-Western/Thomson Learning™ Slides Prepared by JOHN S. LOUCKS St. Edward’s University.
12-1 Chapter Twelve McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved.
Chapter 4 Analysis of Variance
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics Instructor: Yogesh Uppal
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics Instructor: Yogesh Uppal
Latin Square Design If you can block on two (perpendicular) sources of variation (rows x columns) you can reduce experimental error when compared to the.
1 1 Slide The Simple Linear Regression Model n Simple Linear Regression Model y =  0 +  1 x +  n Simple Linear Regression Equation E( y ) =  0 + 
ENGR 610 Applied Statistics Fall Week 8 Marshall University CITE Jack Smith.
 List the characteristics of the F distribution.  Conduct a test of hypothesis to determine whether the variances of two populations are equal.  Discuss.
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
Copyright © 2008 by Hawkes Learning Systems/Quant Systems, Inc.
Two-Way Analysis of Variance Chapter 11.
Factorial Experiments
CHAPTER 13 Design and Analysis of Single-Factor Experiments:
i) Two way ANOVA without replication
Comparing Three or More Means
Chapter 10: Analysis of Variance: Comparing More Than Two Means
Quantitative Methods Simple Regression.
Statistics for Business and Economics (13e)
Econ 3790: Business and Economic Statistics
Chapter 11 Analysis of Variance
The Analysis of Variance
One-Factor Experiments
Chapter 10 – Part II Analysis of Variance
Quantitative Methods ANOVA.
Week ANOVA Four.
STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA
Presentation transcript:

Experimental Design An Experimental Design is a plan for the assignment of the treatments to the plots in the experiment Designs differ primarily in the way the plots are grouped before the treatments are applied How much restriction is imposed on the random assignment of treatments to the plots A B C D

Why do I need a design? To provide an estimate of experimental error To increase precision (blocking) To provide information needed to perform tests of significance and construct interval estimates To facilitate the application of treatments - particularly cultural operations

Factors to be Considered Physical and topographic features Soil variability Number and nature of treatments Experimental material (crop, animal, pathogen, etc.) Duration of the experiment Machinery to be used Size of the difference to be detected Significance level to be used Experimental resources Cost (money, time, personnel)

Cardinal Rule: Choose the simplest experimental design that will give the required precision within the limits of the available resources

Completely Randomized Design (CRD) Simplest and least restrictive Every plot is equally likely to be assigned to any treatment A B D A C D B C B A D C

Advantages of a CRD Flexibility Simple statistical analysis Any number of treatments and any number of replications Don’t have to have the same number of replications per treatment (but more efficient if you do) Simple statistical analysis Even if you have unequal replication Missing plots do not complicate the analysis Maximum error degrees of freedom

Disadvantage of CRD Low precision if the plots are not uniform A B C D

Uses for the CRD If the experimental site is relatively uniform If a large fraction of the plots may not respond or may be lost If the number of plots is limited

Design Construction No restriction on the assignment of treatments to the plots Each treatment is equally likely to be assigned to any plot Should use some sort of mechanical procedure to prevent personal bias Assignment of random numbers may be by: lot (draw a number ) computer assignment using a random number table

Random Assignment by Lot We have an experiment to test three varieties: the top line from Oregon, Washington, and Idaho to find which grows best in our area ----- t=3, r=4 1 6 12 5 A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A A A

Random Assignment by Computer (Excel) In Excel, type 1 in cell A1, 2 in A2. Block cells A1 and A2. Use the ‘fill handle’ to drag down through A12 - or through the number of total plots in your experiment. In cell B1, type = RAND(); copy cell B1 and paste to cells B2 through B12 - or Bn. Block cells B1 - B12 or Bn, Copy; From Edit menu choose Paste special and select values (otherwise the values of the random numbers will continue to change)

Random numbers in Excel (cont’d.) Sort columns A and B (A1..B12) by column B Assign the first treatment to the first r (4) cells in column C, the second treatment to the second r (4) cells, etc. Re-sort columns A B C by A if desired. (A1..C12)

The Statistical Analysis Partitions the total variation in the data into components associated with sources of variation For a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) Treatments --- Error For a Randomized Complete Block Design (RBD) Treatments --- Blocks --- Error Provides an estimate of experimental error (s2) Used to construct interval estimates and significance tests Provides a way to test the significance of variance sources t test – used to compare two treatments F test – used when there are two or more treatments

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) Assumptions The error terms are… randomly, independently, and normally distributed, with a mean of zero and a common variance. The main effects are additive Linear additive model for a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) mean observation Yij =  + i + ij treatment effect random error

The CRD Analysis We can: Estimate the treatment means Estimate the standard error of a treatment mean Test the significance of differences among the treatment means

SiSj Yij=Y.. What? i represents the treatment number (varies from 1 to t=3) j represents the replication number (varies from 1 to r=4) S is the symbol for summation Treatment (i) Replication (j) Observation (Yij) 1 1 47.9 1 2 50.6 1 3 43.5 1 4 42.6 2 1 62.8 2 2 50.9 2 3 61.8 2 4 49.1 3 1 66.4 3 2 60.6 3 3 64.0 3 4 64.0 C P K 47.9 62.5 66.4 50.6 50.9 60.6 43.5 61.8 64.0 42.6 49.1

The CRD Analysis - How To: Set up a table of observations and compute the treatment means and deviations grand mean mean of the i-th treatment deviation of the i-th treatment mean from the grand mean

The CRD Analysis, cont’d. Separate sources of variation Variation between treatments Variation within treatments (error) Compute degrees of freedom (df) 1 less than the number of observations total df = N-1 treatment df = t-1 error df = N-t or t(r-1) if each treatment has the same r

Skeleton ANOVA for CRD Source df SS MS F P >F Total N-1 Treatments Within treatments (Error) N-t

The CRD Analysis, cont’d. Compute Sums of Squares Total Treatment Error SSE = SSTot - SST Compute Mean Squares Treatment MST = SST / (t-1) Error MSE = SSE / (N-t) Calculate F statistic for treatments FT = MST/MSE

Using the ANOVA Use FT to judge whether treatment means differ significantly If FT is greater than F in the table, then differences are significant MSE = s2 or the sample estimate of the experimental error Used to compute standard errors and interval estimates Standard Error of a treatment mean Standard Error of the difference between two means

Numerical Example A set of on-farm demonstration plots were located throughout an agricultural district. A single plot was located within a lentil field on each of 20 farms in the district. Each plot was fertilized and treated to control weevils and weeds. A portion of each plot was harvested for yield and the farms were classified by soil type. A CRD analysis was used to see if there were yield differences due to soil type.

Table of Observations, Means, and Deviations 1 2 3 4 5 42.2 28.4 18.8 41.5 33.0 34.9 28.0 19.5 36.3 26.0 29.7 22.8 13.1 31.7 30.6 18.5 10.1 31.0 19.4 28.2 Mean Mean 35.600 23.420 15.375 33.740 29.867 27.185 ri 3 5 4 5 3 20 Dev 8.415 -3.765 -11.810 6.555 2.682 Dev2 70.812 14.175 139.476 42.968 7.191

ANOVA Table Source df SS MS F Total 19 1,439.2055 Soil Type 4 1,077.6313 269.4078 11.18** Error 15 361.5742 24.1049 Fcritical(α=0.05; 4,15 df) = 3.06 ** Significant at the 1% level

Formulae and Computations Coefficient of Variation Standard Error of a Mean Confidence Interval Estimate of a Mean (soil type 4)

Formulae for Mean Comparisons Standard Error of the Difference between Two Means (for soils 1 and 2) Test statistic with N-t df

Mean Yields and Standard Errors Soil Type 1 2 3 4 5 Mean Yield 35.60 23.42 15.38 33.74 29.87 Replications 3 5 4 5 3 Standard error 2.83 2.20 2.45 2.20 2.83 CV = 18.1% 95% confidence interval estimate for soil type 4 = 33.74  4.69 Standard error of difference between 1 and 2 = 3.58 CV =( s/mean)*100

Report of Analysis Analysis of yield data indicates highly significant differences in yield among the five soil types Soil type 1 produces the highest yield of lentil seed, though not significantly different from type 4 Soil type 3 is clearly inferior to the others 1 4 5 2 3