Marjorie Forster, Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives, University of Maryland Baltimore M. Jeremy Trybulski, Consultant, formerly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Intellectual Property
Advertisements

University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Policies and Issues Regarding Intellectual Property Developed at Iowa State University Presentation to Energy Center Grantees/ BECON Users 12/12/03 Kenneth.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property Considerations in Joint Development Agreements Presented by H. Eric Fisher, Ph.D. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC Continuing.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
February 25, 2014 SERIES 4, SESSION 2 OF AAPLS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Material Transfer and Confidentiality Agreements.
R&R Consulting Approach
OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY COMMERCIALIZATION Title of Invention Invention Disclosure Form Date Name Department School CONFIDENTIAL.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
An invention is a unique or novel device, method, composition or process. It may be an improvement upon a machine or product, or a new process for creating.
Technology Transfer at Rice
1 TIA Engineering Committees - Policies and Procedures TIA Staff.
Intellectual Property. Edwin Land Harvard dropout used to sneak into Columbia U. to conduct research 22 years old, obtained $375,000 from investors to.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
10/19/2011F. B. Bramwell1.  Thanks to conversations with: ◦ HU Office of General Counsel  John Gloster  Dan McCabe ◦ University of Kentucky Intellectual.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
UARC Intellectual Property Management Burney Le Boeuf Director, Aligned Research Program of UARC Professor Emeritus UC Santa Cruz November 12, 2009.
Introduction to IP Ellen Monson Director Intellectual Property Office University of Cincinnati.
November 15, :30-300pm. Blackboard Update Blackboard Update Combining of Tickets – Only for cross-listed classes this spring Combining of Tickets.
What should you know about Intellectual Property? Katharine Ku Office of Technology Licensing.
Patrick Hogan Vice President and Associate General Counsel Intellectual Property & Technology Law L Seminar on R&D Commercial Practices and Government.
Reasonable is in Eye of the Beholder Vendor, Customer, & Litigator Perspectives on Software License Provisions Aaron Brodsky Greg Leibold Peter Gergely.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
How Commercial Firms Protect Intellectual Property In Transactions Daniel J. Mazella Celera Genomics Group, An Applera Corporation Business.
Training II: Software, Publications, IP, and Export Control Issues L. Meixler Many researchers tend not to regard software as IP. They often share software.
PatCom report to IEEE-SA Standards Board September 21, 2000 Met September 19, four members and number of guests present and participating Lively discussion.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems Intellectual Property Rights Review meeting Delft,
Commercializing Scientific Research and development Legislation, Contracts, Royalty rates Anne K. S. Jensen Senior Examiner, M. Sc. EE Danish Patent and.
Developing/Protecting Your Idea Peter H. Durant Nixon Peabody LLP March 30/31, 2005 Copyright © 2005 Nixon Peabody LLP.
Thomas Moreland Agricultural Research Service Office of Technology Transfer.
Oracle Fusion Applications 11gR1 ( ) Functional Overview (L2) Manage Inbound Logistics (L3) Manage Supplier Returns.
Stephanie Roof, CRA Proposal Manager Sponsored Projects Administration BALL STATE UNIVERSITY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Oracle Fusion Applications 11gR1 ( ) Functional Overview (L2) Manage Inbound Logistics (L3) Manage and Disposition Inventory Returns.
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
MTAs: BOTH SIDES NOW!. Marjorie Forster, Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives, University of Maryland Baltimore M. Jeremy.
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
1 Navigating the Award Kim Hayes Michael Lenetsky.
+ Departmental Research Administrator Training Series An Introduction to Contracts and OCIA James J. Casey, Jr., J.D. Director, Office of Contracts and.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
Copyright © 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Oracle Proprietary and Confidential. 1.
Article 4 [Obligations of Applicant] 4.1. As a sole and exclusive owner of the Application, Applicant warrants that.
Managing Collaboration Technology Transfer Contracts Turin, November 20 to 21, 2012.
Technology Transfer Office
The Basics of Intellectual Property Reporting
IP, Invention Disclosures and Commercialization
Clinical Trial Contracts Office -What’s the Hold Up?
International Shipping Training
Industry Funded Research - Process for Contracts
Internet2 Intellectual Property Framework Update
Protection of Intellectual Property Resulting from STCU Projects
Agreements OSR Symposium
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
Legal Issues Facing Start-Ups
Office of Technology Transfer and Economic Development
Presentation transcript:

Marjorie Forster, Assistant Vice President, Research and Global Health Initiatives, University of Maryland Baltimore M. Jeremy Trybulski, Consultant, formerly with the University of California, Office of the President Melissa White, Contracts Manager, Senior Intellectual Property Specialist, Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. MTA’s: BOTH SIDES NOW 1

Overview of Agenda  Definitions  Obligations  Definitions & Obligations…GONE WILD!!  Taming Negotiations: Mutual Compromise 2

MTA Definitions  Material  Progeny  Unmodified Derivatives  Modifications  Confidential Information  Research Results  Inventions 3

Material* Original Material, as described herein, to include Progeny, Unmodified Derivatives, and Confidential Information * The definition CAN contain one or more of these elements, but not necessarily all 4

Progeny Unmodified descendants from the Material 5

Unmodified Derivatives Substances created by the Recipient in the course of the Research that constitute an unmodified functional subunit or product expressed by the Material 6

Modifications Substances developed by the Recipient in the course of the Research that contain or incorporate the Material 7

Confidential Information Any information, know-how, and/or documentation related to the Material that is provided by Provider to Recipient and is marked as “confidential” by Provider 8

Research Results All research results created in the direct performance of Research defined in the Scope of Work 9

Inventions 10 Any patentable invention that is conceived AND first reduced to practice in the performance of the Research

MTA Obligations  Ownership  Publication  Confidentiality  Licensing Rights 11

WHAT HAPPENS WHEN THE “BIG BAD WOLF” ARRIVES? 12

Definitions and Obligations… GONE WILD!!! “Material” includes know-how and information related to the Material Research Results  Provider owns the Research Results and can use such for any purpose it determines  Provider shall have a non-exclusive right to use the Research Results for any purpose it determines, provided, however, that (a) it does not publically disclose such Research Results in advance of publication by Recipient, and (b) it will consult Recipient prior to filing a patent application that includes the Research Results so that the Parties can assess inventorship, etc. 13

Definitions and Obligations… GONE WILD!!! Modifications  Provider owns Modifications that includes data and IP created USING the Material Licensing Rights  Provider receives an outright grant of a license (exclusive or non exclusive) for anything conceived using the Material  Recipient shall, and hereby does, grant to Provider a worldwide, non-exclusive license for non-commercial purposes… 14

Definitions and Obligations… GONE WILD!!! Inventions  …shall mean any invention, whether patentable or not, that is conceived in the performance of the Research  …shall mean any invention that is conceived and/or reduced to practice in the performance of the Research  *…shall mean any invention that necessarily uses or incorporates the Material (NUNI)  Provider owns all Inventions and shall require that the Recipient assign all right, title and interest in and to all Inventions to Provider 15 * NUNI language proposed by University, NOT industry

Definitions and Obligations… GONE WILD!!! Publication  Recipient shall not publish or otherwise publically disclose the Research Results until it receives prior written authorization from Provider  Provider will have up to 60 days to review such publication submission… Confidential Information  *Recipient shall remove all Confidential Information of Provider from publication submission  … includes the Research Results and the MTA 16 *This is usually a standard term, BUT University must handle it carefully…

So how do you tame the “BIG BAD WOLF”? NEGOTIATING… through Mutual Compromise 17

“Material” BEFORE: “Material” includes know-how and information related to the Material REMEMBER: “Material” CAN include Original Material, as described herein, its Progeny, Unmodified Derivatives, and Confidential Information…which may include KNOW-HOW and other information related to the Material! BUT such information MUST BE MARKED! AFTER: ALL information provided by Provider to Recipient related to the Material will be marked as “confidential” by Provider and be considered as Confidential Information of the Provider. All [such] information, if delivered orally, will be reduced to writing and marked as “confidential” by Provider within [14] [30] days of initial disclosure. 18

Research Results BEFORE: Provider owns Research Results (and can use such for any purpose it determines) AFTER:  Recipient shall provide Provider with a summary of the Research Results (Deliverable) that will be owned by Provider.  Provider may have a time-limited, first right to negotiate a license for any Invention that necessarily uses or necessarily incorporates the Material. 19

Modifications BEFORE: Provider owns Modifications that includes data and IP created using the Material AFTER*:  Provider owns the Material (to include Original Material, Progeny, Unmodified Derivatives and Provider Confidential Information)  Recipient owns IP and data created at Recipient’s facility, to include any BIP utilized in the course of the Research. *Cookie Dough Concept 20

Modifications “Cookie Dough Concept”  Material from Provider = Chocolate Chips  IP created in the performance of the Research SOLELY by Recipient using the Material OR background IP of Recipient’s that is used in the performance of the Research = Cookie Dough  Chocolate Chips + Cookie Dough = Chocolate Chip Cookies  If a Chocolate Chip Cookie is created, Provider owns Chocolate Chips and Recipient owns Cookie Dough… 21

Licensing Rights BEFORE:  Provider receives an outright grant of a license (exclusive or non exclusive) for anything conceived USING the Material  Provider owns all Inventions and shall require that the Recipient assign all right, title and interest in and to all Inventions to Provider. AFTER:  Provider [may receive] or [shall be granted] a non-exclusive license to Recipient’s rights in and to all Inventions for non- commercial purposes  Provider [may receive] or [shall be granted] a time-limited, first right to negotiate a commercial license to Recipient’s rights in and to all Inventions 22

Inventions BEFORE:  …shall mean any invention, whether patentable or not, that is conceived in the performance of the Research  …shall mean any invention that is conceived and/or reduced to practice in the performance of the Research  …shall mean any invention that necessarily uses or incorporates the Material (NUNI) AFTER:  Any invention that is conceived AND first reduced to practice in the performance of the Research and is claimed in a patent application 23

Publication BEFORE:  Recipient shall not publish or otherwise publically disclose the Research Results until it receives prior written authorization from Provider.  Provider will have up to 60 days to review such publication submission… AFTER:  Provider will be notified of any publications being made as a result of the Research Provider will have up to [30] [*45] days to review such publication submission and notify Recipient of any Confidential Information contained therein  Recipient will remove all such Provider Confidential Information from publication submission of Research Results  Recipient will acknowledge Material and authorship, appropriately, in any such publications. Co-authorship will be determined in accordance with standard academic practices and acknowledged in such publication, as appropriate 24 * 30 is THE STANDARD, but 45 is OK so long as the PI is aware and agrees in advance

Confidential Information BEFORE:  Recipient shall remove all Confidential Information of Provider from publication submission upon Provider’s written request AFTER:  Recipient shall remove all Confidential Information of Provider from the publication submission upon Provider’s written request. Notwithstanding, Provider agrees to allow the use and disclosure of sufficient information regarding the identify, structure and properties of the Material to enable the complete and accurate publication of the Research Results by Recipient. 25

Confidential Information BEFORE: “Confidential Information” includes the Research Results and the MTA AFTER:  Remain Silent!!  Public benefit  Universities do not do secret work 26

Questions? 27

THANKS! 28