January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Minority Achievement and Achievement Gap.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ph. D. Completion and Attrition: Baseline Program Data

Advertisements

Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.

Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.

EDSTAR. Our Objectives Explain the evaluation requirements in terms of 21 st Century Education Initiatives in North Carolina Explain the record-keeping.

Shelby High School Performance Composite Components of the Performance Composite shown on the next two slides represent the adjusted data from.

Illinois. Graduating Class Of 2002 Demographics State And National Test Volume Source: State, National ACT Profile, 2002, Executive Summary.

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.

Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.

Annual Progress Report Submitted to The Iowa Department of Education by the Cedar Rapids Community School District.

South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.

Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.

Comprehensive Study Educational Conditions and Academic Performance A Focus on Male African American Students Presentation at Board Special Meeting Gongshu.

Knowledge is Power Pitt County Schools Title I Workshop.

10/17/2007GZHANG GCSNC C:\Presentation\2008\GEA_ Tough Accountability Situation Great GCS Achievement P resentation for Guilford Education.

Pitt County Schools Testing & Accountability The ABC’s of Public Education.

Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC

School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.

NHCS READY Report December Presentation Format Curriculum Change Rationale and Timeline Proficiency for Grades 3-8 School Growth Proficiency for.

Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd Jacob.

School Report Cards For 2003–2004

2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.

Superintendent’s Proposed Budget Recommendation April 12, 2011.

K-2 Assessments by Tara Roy 6-8 Common Exams by Myra Holloway 9-12 Common Exams by Allison Castle CTE Post-Assessments by Lynn Hartley High School Graduation.

Embargoed until 11:00 a.m. Wednesday, March 17, 2004 School Report Card Data 2002–2003.

K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August

How Does Secondary Education in Louisiana Stack up? Presented by Dr. Bobby Franklin January 31, 2005.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement

NOVEMBER 12, 2013 Math Department Team Leaders’ Meeting.

State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.

ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.

English Language Arts (ELA) & 2007 English Language Arts (ELA) Total Public In grades 5-8, the percentage of students meeting the ELA Learning.

Progress Update 1. Achievement Trends Change in % Proficient/Advanced.

2011 Achievement Gaps By Various Subgroups: Reading and Math EOG Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Board of Education October 11, 2011.

CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.

 Any high stakes testing report  AMRT Reports  Science Assessments Today we will go over an ARMT report.

Academic Excellence Indicator System Report For San Antonio ISD Public Meeting January 23, 2006 Board Report January 23, 2006 Department of Accountability,

Academic Growth in Math High Poverty Students – WASL and MAP Feng-Yi Hung, Ph.D Director of Assessment and Program Evaluation Clover Park School District.

Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December

Accountability & Quality Update. – ACCESS ELLs/Alternate ACCESS March 20 th end of testing window. Materials should be returned within two instructional.

Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 

State Test Results MSP/HSPE/EOC Presentation to the Shelton School District Board of Directors September 11, 2012.

Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS Presented To Raising Achievement, Closing Gaps Taskforce September 18, 2009 Wake County Public School System.

Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 1 ABCs/AYP Background Briefing Lou Fabrizio Director.

WCPSS Student Achievement Evaluation and Research Dept. August 19, 2008.

2009 Grade 3-8 Math Additional Slides 1. Math Percentage of Students Statewide Scoring at Levels 3 and 4, Grades The percentage of students.

1 School Report Cards 2002–2003 An Overview. 2 School Report Card: Overall Trends Elementary school achievement is up in English and math over Middle.

Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team

Administrative Conference, September 2013

Workshop 2S (Secondary)

2016 READY ACCOUNTABILITY DISTRICT RESULTS

Academic Achievement Gaps in WCPSS

Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)

National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016

2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_ PPT

Texas State Accountability

2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results

Analysis and Reporting, Accountability Services

GZHANG NCGCS C:\NCLBA\2006\UpdatePreliminaryAYP_BM_ PPT

Ola High School 11/12/16 Ola High School Data Team

USG Dual Enrollment Data and Trends

Presentation transcript:

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Minority Achievement and Achievement Gap End-Of-Grade & End-Of-Course Tests Results to Gongshu Zhang Evaluation Section Accountability Division NCDPI

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Part I Student Achievement Progress on End-Of-Grade (EOG) and End-Of-Course (EOC) Tests [Note that data collection for some tests and/or groups of students started after ]

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 1 All minority and white student groups have made progress since 1993 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level as well as mean scale score in EOG Reading and Math especially after implementation of the ABCs in

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement Grades EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement Grades 3 to 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score in by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement: Grades 3 to to 2000 Mean Scale Score in EOG Math by Ethnicity State of North Carolina Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 2 Most of the minority groups and the white group have made progress since 1995 in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level as well as mean scale score in EOC English I and Algebra I, especially after implementation of the High School ABCs in

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on English I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on Algebra I EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on Biology EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on US History EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Trend of Student Achievement on ELP EOC Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Before ABCs After ABCs

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Part II Student Achievement Gaps Where Are the Gaps? How Big Are the Gaps?

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 3 Gaps exist between most of the minority groups and the white group on: percentage of students at/above grade level, mean scale score, percentage of students at Achievement Level IV, and mean scale score for the academically gifted students in EOG Reading and Math

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Reading 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gaps for EOG Math 2000 Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Grades EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades EOG Reading: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trend for Academically Gifted Students Grades EOG Math: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 4 Gaps exist between the males and females within same ethnicity in percentage of students at/above grade level on EOG Reading and Math.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Gender Trends Grades EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 5 Gaps exist between Non-Free/Reduced Lunch and Free/Reduced Lunch Students within the same ethnicity in percentage of students at/above grade level on EOG Reading and Math.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades EOG Reading: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gaps for Non-FRL and FRL Student Grades EOG Math: Percent of Students at/above Grade Level by Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 6 Gaps exist between most of the minority student groups and white students in percentage of students at/above grade level, and in percentage of students at Achievement Level IV on Five Core Subject EOC Tests

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for English I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Algebra I EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for Biology EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for US History EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends for ELP EOC Percent of Students at/above Grade Level Ethnicity

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Percent of Students at the Four Achievement Levels on the 2000 ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 7 Gaps exist between the mean scale scores of Level IV students in all ethnic groups and the top margin of the Level IV score range on EOGs & EOCs. [Grade 3 only is shown as an example for EOG Tests.]

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range EOG Reading, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity 960 Level III Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range EOG Math, Grade 3: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level III Level VI Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range English I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range Algebra I EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Am. Indian Hispanic Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range Biology EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range US History EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends among Level IV Students and between Level IV scores and top of Level IV Range ELP EOC: Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Part III Reduction of Student Achievement Gaps How Fast Have the Gaps Decreased?

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 8 The gaps between most of the minority and the white student groups have decreased in EOG Reading and Math in percentage of students at/above grade level since 1993, especially after implementation of the ABCs.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 9 The gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority and the white student groups have increased somewhat in EOG Reading and Math from 1993 to 1996 but generally have held steady after implementation of the ABCs from 1997 to 2000.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Black & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Hispanic & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Am. Indian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Reading: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps Trends between Asian & White Students Grades 3- 8 EOG Math: Mean Scale Scores

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 10 The gaps between most minority students and white students have been reduced in percentage of students at/above grade level for E1 and in mean scale score for E1, BI, & USH; but increased in percentage of students at/above grade level for BI & USH and in mean scale score for A1 since 1995.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White: 1995 to 2000 Percent of Students At/Above Grade Level on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Black & White: 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Hispanic & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Am. Indian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on English I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Algebra I EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on Biology EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on US History EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement Gaps between Asian & White : 1995 to 2000 Mean Scale Score on ELP EOC

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 11 For three matched student cohorts: Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000 Grade 4 in 1997 to Grade 7 in 2000 Grade 5 in 1997 to Grade 8 in 2000, the gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority groups and white students have increased in EOG Reading and Math each year from 1997 to 2000.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level IV Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level IV Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV G3 G4 G5 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level III Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level III G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level III Asian White Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level III Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level III G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level III Asian White Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level II Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level II G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G4 G5 Level II Asian White Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level II Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level II G4 G5 G6 G7 G4 G7 G6 G5 Level II Asian White Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Reading for a Level I Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level I G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G4 G5 Level I White Asian Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Student Achievement Gap Trends in Math for a Level I Matched Student Cohort : Grade 3 in 97 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level I G4 G5 G6 G7 G4 G7 G6 G5 Level I Asian White Hispanic NC Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Finding 12 For three cohorts of matched academically gifted students, there were constant gaps in terms of mean scale scores on EOG Reading and increasing gaps on EOG Math between most of the minority student groups and white students from 1997 to 2000.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement of AG Student Cohort on EOG Reading Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV G3 G4 G5 G6 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level IV White Asian NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Achievement of AG Student Cohort on EOG Math Grade 3 in 1997 to Grade 6 in 2000 Mean Scale Score by Ethnicity Level IV G3 G4 G5 G3 G6 G5 G4 Level IV Asian White NC Hispanic Am. Indian Black

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Part IV Conclusions and Suggestions

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Conclusions All ethnic groups have made progress in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level as well as mean scale score since For EOGs, the gaps between most of the minority student groups and white students have been reduced in percentage of students at/above grade level but increased in mean scale score since For EOCs, the gaps have been reduced in percentage of students at/above grade level for E1 and in mean scale score for E1, BI, & USH, but increased in percentage of students at/above grade level for BI & USH and in mean scale score for A1 since The gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority groups and the white students were bigger at levels III & IV than at levels I & II. Also, there were big gaps among mean scale scores for all Level IV student groups and the top margin of the Level IV score range for all courses in EOG from 1993 to 2000 and in EOC from 1995 to 2000.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Conclusions (Continue) For matched student cohorts, the gaps in mean scale score between most of the minority student groups and white students have increased for EOG Reading and Math since For matched AG student cohorts, there were gaps in mean scale score among most of the minority student groups and white students in EOG Reading and Math from 1997 to The maximum gaps for the 2000 EOG, in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level, among the subgroups of students are: –about 25% by ethnic group (e.g., 85%-60%), –about 35% by ethnic group by gender (e.g., 87%-52%), –about 36% by ethnic group by poverty level (e.g., 89%-53%). Most of the gaps on EOGs and EOCs, in terms of percentage of students at/above grade level, have decreased since 1993 and 1995 respectively, especially after the implementation of the ABCs. However, the rate of reduction is slow.

January 2001GZHANG NCDPI Accountability Division Evaluation Section C:\Minority\Achievement&Gap_ncare2001.ppt Attending to All Students We should pay attention to the percentage of minority students, as well as economically & educationally disadvantaged students, at/above grade level. At the same time we should attend to the mean scale scores of those students. We should continue to work hard to help low achievement students move above grade level. At the same time we should work very hard to help minority students, as well as economically & educationally disadvantaged students at all four achievement levels to achieve higher scale scores. Also, we should work very hard to help high Achievement students including the academically gifted students in all ethnic groups to achieve continuous progress and to move to the top margin of the score range of Level IV.