1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1ISO policy on global relevance MAS/PGR Jannuary 2006 ISO Policy on global relevance.
Advertisements

Standards Development: An Overview
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
Overview of the IEEE Process IEEE P1620 Working Group Meeting 18 September 2002.
Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September 2012 Officers Training Workshop Len Morrissey Tom OToole 1.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 11, 2006 ASTM Training Session Bob Morgan Brynn Iwanowski.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop MAIN COMMITTEE OFFICERS DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES September.
1 Balloting/Handling Negative Votes September 22 nd and 24 th, 2009 ASTM Virtual Training Session Christine DeJong Joe Koury.
September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop September 2013 ASTM Officers Training Workshop Membership & Roster Maintenance September 2013 ASTM Officers.
Task Group Chairman and Technical Contact Responsibilities ASTM International Officers Training Workshop September 2012 Scott Orthey and Steve Mawn 1.
North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Procedures (Note : Titles of Swim lanes change periodically) NAESB Office Triage Subcommittee Executive Subcommittee.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
North American Energy Standards Board (NAESB) Procedures (Note : Titles of Swim lanes change periodically) NAESB Office Triage Subcommittee Executive Subcommittee.
Development of Model Business Practices Process Flows (Note : Titles of Swim lanes change periodically) NAESB Office Triage Subcommittee Executive Subcommittee.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, June 20, 2013.
SEM14-05 Approving your draft ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
Dispute Settlement in the WTO
1 TSS Report PCC Meeting Salt Lake City, UT October 26-27, 2006.
Process for Developing and Approving WECC Regional Criteria Preschedule Process Regional Criteria Drafting Team Meeting Conference Call - Webinar October.
International Financial Reporting Standards The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenter, not necessarily those of the IASC Foundation.
Tutorial for leadership teams of ITU-T study groups, TSAG, tariff groups and focus groups Alternative approval process (AAP) for ITU-T Recommendations.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
The UEA House of Delegates Directing YOUR Association through the democratic process. 1.
Promotion and Tenure Workshop 1. Evaluation Procedure There is only one evaluation procedure leading to recommendations regarding promotion, tenure and.
Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Survey Design Workshop MICS Technical Assistance MICS Survey Design Workshop.
1. 2 Anyone can suggest an idea for a law. Only Members of Congress can introduce a proposed law to the House or Senate. 3.
SAS 70 Third Party Report on Controls Overview and Timetable Finance / Audit Committee Meeting Austin, Texas January 14, 2003/ February 18, 2003.
UR Financials Project Demo Days April UR Financials Demo Days – April 2014 Agenda Project Update and Delay Details Impact to Project Deliverables.
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes Results Based Drafting 2013.
May 2003 Brian Mathews - AbsoluteValue Systems, Glyn Roberts – ST Microelectronics IEEE doc: IEEE /342r0 Submission 1 Slide Publicity Committee.
Doc.: IEEE /0564r0 Submission May 2014 Marc Emmelmann, SelfSlide 1 Results of LB 201 on TGai D2.0 Date: Authors:
NISO - An Introduction for New Committees. NISO History Formed in 1939 Originally known as ANSI Committee Z39 ANSI Accredited - Follows ANSI consensus.
Week 1.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 5 – Immunity Stephen R Whitesell SC-5 Chair 11/13/2014.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5Consensus Process for Standards Development ASME S&C Training Module B5 Consensus Process for.
Copyright © AEA — Association of Enterprise Architects 2013 AEA Workgroup Procedures Version of 31 October 2013.
Overview of the IEEE-SA Process Maintenance of IEEE standards Soo H. Kim, Program Manager, Technical Program Development NPEC Subcommittee SC-3 Jan 24,
HAAGA-HELIA’s accreditation process stages for AACSB Fall 2010Spring 2011Fall The applicant school establishes AACSB International membership.
Overview of NSF Standards Process and Joint Committee Formation Sustainable Water Contact Products Stakeholder Meeting October 30, 2012.
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
1 Presented by Name Date. 2 Mission To enhance the global competitiveness of U.S. business and the American quality of life by promoting and facilitating.
NSF Standards Process Overview GEC Stakeholder Committee September 6, 2012.
11 Accreditation by ANSI as a Standards Developer Presentation to: ICSP & GMF April 30, 2008 Given by: Anne Caldas.
ASME C&S Training Module B5 MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity.
How an idea becomes an IEC standard Gary Johnson Chairman IEC SC45A
TAC July 2, 2003 Market Design Implementation Process Recommendation.
GAC-GNSO Consultation Group On GAC Early Engagement in GNSO PDP London Progress Report 22/06/2014.
IEEE-SA myBallot TM myBallot ™ IEEE Standards Association New Electronic Balloting System Sponsor Tools.
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC 1 Secretariat Update Patricia Roder C63 ® Secretariat May 7, 2015.
1 Accredited Standards Committee C63 ® - EMC Subcommittee 1: Techniques and Developments Zhong Chen SC1 Chair
3GPP2 Publication Process Training TSG-S PMT. December Presentation Overview Background OP Input and Intent Publication Process Overview The Revised.
FGDC Coordination Group Ken Shaffer April 13, 2010 FGDC Standards Process Review Survey.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
The IEEE-SA Standards Process Dr. Bilel Jamoussi IEEE Standards Education Committee.
Sponsor Ballot Process
Accredited Standards Committee C63® - EMC
Revisions to Codes and Standards
2017 Amendments to the INCITS Organization, Policies and Procedures
The Standards Development Process
Standards Development: An Overview
Standards and Certification Training
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
Standards Development Process
Presentation transcript:

1 Standards Development: An Overview Discovery to Delivery Topic Committee Meeting October 30, 2007 Karen A. Wetzel NISO Standards Program Manager

October 30, Standards Development Phase 1: Idea to Proposed Work Item Phase 2: Approved Work Item Phase 3: Creating Work Plan Phase 4: Work Plan to Draft Standard Phase 5: Working Draft to DSFTU/Ballot Phase 6: Approval Phase 7: Maintenance

October 30, Phase 1: Idea to Proposed Work Item A work item can be proposed by the Topic Committee (TC) if: 1.the item is of sufficient value to warrant NISOs investment; 2.it fits within NISOs standards program as defined by the NISO Framework; 3.the standard is feasible from technical, economic, and political viewpoints; 4. no conflict exists with other standards inside or outside NISO; and 5.a working draft can be completed within 18 months.

October 30, Phase 1: Idea to Proposed Work Item, cont. Ideas for work items come from individuals, groups, TC plans, etc. The TC must evaluate and respond to formal proposals for standards. The proposed work item (see template) includes: –Working Group (WG) charter –description of the proposed standard –a suggested timeframe for development –a description of related standards

October 30, Phase 2: Approved Work Item NISO Office circulates proposed work item. –Members have 30 days to vote to express interest in the work item. –NISO also announces the work item in media to alert interested parties outside the NISO membership. Approval –10% of the membership votes in favor –Members voting yes join the Voting Pool –NISO Office alerts ANSI TC recruits Working Group –first the chair, then members –formally approves roster

October 30, Phase 3: Creating Work Plan Working Group expands Approved Work Item into Draft Work Plan. When Work Plan is approved by TC, WG begins work. Work plans include: –WG charge –description of the standard or other deliverable –scope of work –work approach –timeline (including proposed completion date) –budget

October 30, Phase 3: Work Plan (timelines) Work plan timelines typically account for: –data gathering –development of initial draft –review of draft –trial use –Ballot –ballot review –final editorial work –development of implementation and marketing plans Work should be scoped to fit development of a final standard for ballot or a draft standard for trial use within 18 months.

October 30, Reporting to TC WGs must submit quarterly progress reports to the TC and the Architecture Committee for review. Each progress report includes a comparison of work to date with the proposed timeline. A new timeline must be submitted if there is more than a 30-day delay beyond the current work target. A TC may disband any WG that fails to make continuous progress toward completion.

October 30, Phase 4: Work Plan to Draft Standard Data Gathering Process for data gathering developed by WG as part of its work plan. Actual work of data gathering should fit in a 3-6 month window.

October 30, Phase 4, cont. Data gathering may include: –Examining related standards –Questionnaires, surveys, or other techniques –Interviews that can provide in-depth information from potential users –Use cases or other usage scenarios –Working prototypes The WG must publish its findings in a public forum and gather feedback before preparing the draft for ballot or trial use.

October 30, Phase 4, cont. Preparing the Working Draft Working Groups responsibility Supported by NISO Office May submit the draft to reviewers for input or include an open comment period in this process

October 30, Phase 5: Working Draft to DSFTU/Ballot Submitting the Working Draft Two-thirds approval by the WG is required –The WG sends the final standard draft to the Topic Committee with a recommendation that NISO release it as a Draft Standard for Trial Use (DSFTU) or for ballot. –WG Chair must include any dissenting votes in the report to the Topic Committee.

October 30, Draft Standard for Trial Use (DSFTU) 1.WG recommends the length of the Trial Use to the TC (from 6-18 months). 2.TC must approve (by 2/3 vote) 3.TC posts the document to the NISO website 4.WG must develop an explicit description of the commitment sought from Trial Users 5.WG must monitoring usage during the trial period and responding to information requests and problem reports 6.WG is responsible for recruiting usage of the proposed standard (with assistance of TC & NISO Office). 7.WG must review and reports on trial results, and submit recommended action to TC within 60 days of trial end.

October 30, DSFTU: Recommended Actions WG must recommended an action within 60 days of trial period close: –Extend the Trial Use period with the current draft. –Release the current draft standard for ballot. –Revise the standard and re-release the revision for trial use or for ballot. –Release the document as a lower-level consensus document, e.g., a recommended practice or technical report. –Withdraw the document and disband the Working Group

October 30, Balloting NISO Office issues a standard ballot if it gets: –two-thirds vote of a Topic Committee, –two-thirds vote of the Architecture Committee, –majority vote of the NISO Board of Directors. –direction of the Managing Director, or –petition of five (5) or more NISO Voting Members. Members have 15 days to join Voting Pool –Voting Pool must consist of 15% of membership to move forward

October 30, Balloting, cont. With sufficient Voting Pool: NISO sends to ANSI for 60-day public review Ballot extends for 45 days NISO alerts Voting Pool members who havent voted two weeks before ballot closes –Ballot may be extended 45 days in the case of insufficient votes Ballot options: –Affirmative –Negative, with Comment –Abstain, with Reasons

October 30, Balloting, cont. At close of ballot, NISO sends report & ballot comments to: –Working Group –Voting Pool –Voting Members –Members of public who voted

October 30, Phase 6: Approval Approval: majority of Voting Pool and 2/3 votes are affirmative –Abstentions and negative without comment are excluded –Comments must be addressed and negative votes must be resolved –Once approved by membership, NISO submits standard to ANSI approval

October 30, ANS Approval Process Excerpted from American National Standards Process Summary (May 14, 2007) –Stage 1: PINS form to ANSI Announcement of project initiation PINS deliberation if claim of conflict or duplication is raised –Stage 2: Approval of draft Consensus body approves text of draft standard Must meet numerical requirements for consensus as described in developers accredited procedures (e.g. approval by a majority of consensus body and 2/3 of those voting, etc.) –Stage 3: Public Review BSR-8 form initiates announcement in Standards Action. Developer may also announce in industry publications, etc. (multiple public reviews are possible)

October 30, ANS Approval Process –Stage 4: Comment resolution Public and consensus body member comments –Stage 5: Recirculation (if applicable) Unresolved negative comments from consensus body members and public review commenters as well as any substantive changes to the text, must be recirculated to the entire consensus body to allow them to vote, reaffirm a vote or change a vote –Stage 6: Appeals at developer level

October 30, ANS Approval Process –Stage 7: Submittal to ANSI for approval Submittal of final standard for approval with evidence of consensus (BSR-9 form) –Stage 8: Notification Notification of final approval/disapproval –Stage 9: Appeal at ANSI Hearing is scheduled if appeal is filed

October 30, Phase 7: Maintenance A Maintenance Agency (MA) or a Standing Committee may be appointed by the Board at the recommendation of the managing TC MAs and Standing Committees report to a TC or to the Architecture Committee MAs and Standing Committees respond to requests for change, clarification, or interpretation Periodically maintained standards are sent for reaffirmation ballot every 5 years Maintenance plans should be created, at least in part, by the WG during development

October 30, Resources NISO Operating Procedures PDF: 9/18/07NISO Operating Procedures ANS Deliverables and Maintenance Options Matrix Word: 3/27/2007ANS Deliverables and Maintenance Options Matrix ANS Flow: Accreditation through final appeals Word: 5/14/2007ANS Flow: Accreditation through final appeals ANS Process Basic Overview Powerpoint: 5/14/07ANS Process Basic Overview NISO Proposed Work Item Template