1 North Carolina National Assessment of Education (NAEP) 2009 LEA Training--Session A December 2008 Iris L. Garner, Ph.D. NAEP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

1 Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Future Ready Schools ABCs/AYP Background Briefing August 23, 2007 Lou Fabrizio, Ph.D. Director of Accountability Services NC Department of Public.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Division of Accountability Services/Testing Section September, Hope Tesh-Blum Division of Accountability.
Welcome ! NAEP 2011 Preparations The meeting will start in 2 – 5 minutes. Thanks.
1 North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Fran Hoch & Hope Tesh Accountability Conference 2002 Limited English Proficiency Policy Changes North.
1 North Carolina National Assessment of Education (NAEP) 2009 LEA Training --Session B December 2008 Iris L. Garner, Ph.D. NAEP.
Got NAEP ? Got NAEP ? Providing Nourishment for the Mind Iris Garner, Ph.D., North Carolina NAEP Coordinator.
Positioning Students for Success with NAEP Data The Clear Route Iris Garner, Ph.D., North Carolina NAEP Coordinator.
Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.
1 North Carolina Business Community for Education (NCBCE) and North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (NCDPI) Partnership Webinar Ms. Tricia Willoughby.
North Shelby School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
North Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
K-5 Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol (SIOP) Update
Transforming Secondary Education in New Jersey Lucille E. Davy, Commissioner Willa Spicer, Deputy Commissioner Jay Doolan, Assistant Commissioner New Jersey.
New Jersey Statewide Assessment Results: Highlights and Trends State Board of Education, February 6, 2008 Jay Doolan, Ed.D., Assistant Commissioner,
Dennis J. Kennedy NAEP State Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds
1 Citrus County 21 st CCLC Progress Report Larry Parman External Evaluator.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
Core Pre-K Standards Review & Comment
A presentation to the Board of Education
1 School Grades and Adequate Yearly Progress 2004 and Beyond.
AYP Plan Performance Reporting Division Texas Education Agency TETN Accountability Update November 14, 2006.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
Title I, Part A and Section 31a At Risk 101
Addition Facts
SPRING CREEK ELEMENTARY Title I For additional information contact the school at
Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.
Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut Academic Achievement Test (CAPT) Spring 2013 Presented to the Guilford Board of Education September.
Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting
Middle School 8 period day. Rationale Low performing academic scores on Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) - specifically in mathematics.
Read to Achieve Updates Newton Conover City Schools
District Advisory Council (DAC) 1 October 22, 2012 Westlawn Elementary School.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
1 Public Primary Schools and Making Connections Neighborhoods Denver CHAPSS Learning Exchange May 15, 2008 Tom Kingsley and Leah Hendey The Urban Institute.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Understanding Title I Programs: An Overview for Parents.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents
25 seconds left…...
Title I/AYP Presentation Prepared by NHCS Title I Department for NHCS PTA September 22, 2010.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Week 1.
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Southern Regional Education Board WELCOME Strategy Work Session For What Should the Tech Center of the Future Look Like? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Highlights From the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting San Diego Unified School District Attachment 4.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.
The Gold Standard The Nation’s Report Card NAEP 2013.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
NAEP 2012 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
Angelor Johnson, Training Coordinator Louisiana PROMISE Parent Information and Resource Centers What is PIRC?
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
NAEP 2014 Pre-Administration Workshop Bobbie Bable
National & International Assessments. INTERNATIONAL: Trends in International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) The Trends in International Math and Science.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
1 Preparing for 2014 NAEP Dr. Iris Garner ∙ NAEP State Coordinator North Carolina Department of Public Instruction ∙
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn.
NAEP and International Assessments
Discussion on Virginia’s State Assessment Program
EDN Fall 2002.
Presentation transcript:

1 North Carolina National Assessment of Education (NAEP) 2009 LEA Training--Session A December 2008 Iris L. Garner, Ph.D. NAEP State Coordinator North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

Did you know… In 2006, a Blue Catfish weighing 89 lbs. was caught in North Carolinas Badin Lake by Eric Fincher.

Did you know… This year a Blue Marlin weighing 1,228 lbs. 8 oz was caught in North Carolinas Oregon Inlet by Trey Irvine.

Did you know… In 2006, a Blue Catfish weighing 89 lbs. was caught in North Carolinas Badin Lake by Eric Fincher.

North Carolina is known… Vitality Uniqueness Resiliency

1.4 Million

Session A--Training Objectives: 1) To provide an overview of NAEP 2) To establish the importance and purpose of participation

NAEP Overview Training Objective #1

9 NAEP Overview The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as "the Nation's Report Card," is the only nationally representative and continuing assessment of what America's students know and can do in various subject areas. NAEP is authorized by Congress and administered by the National Center for Education Statistics in the U.S. Department of Education.

10 NAEP Overview Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically in reading, mathematics, science, writing, U.S. history, civics, geography, and the arts. Starting in 1990, NAEP assessments have also been conducted to give results for participating states. Those that chose to participate received assessment results that report on the performance of students in that state. North Carolina has participated in the state-level assessments of NAEP since 1990.

11 NAEP Overview State-level NAEP: reading, mathematics, science, and writing Results: national and state level No individual scores for individual students or schools Results: are available for subgroups of the population (e.g., race/ethnicity, gender, free/reduced lunch eligibility, etc.) Reporting components: subject-matter achievement, instructional experiences, and school environment for populations of students

12 NAEP Overview State Public (Grades 4 & 8) State Public (Grades 4 & 8) National Public & Private (Grades 4, 8 & 12) National Public & Private (Grades 4, 8 & 12) National Public & Private (9, 13 & 17 yr olds) National Public & Private (9, 13 & 17 yr olds) District -Trial Public (Grades 4 & 8) District -Trial Public (Grades 4 & 8) The National Assessment of Educational Progress MAIN LONG-TERM

NAEP Importance & Participation Training Objective #2

14 NAEP Importance When NC fell behind the nation on the grade 8 reading NAEP assessment in 2005, the state board of education proposed literacy coaches at the middle grades. This initiative was added to the governors budget; we now have literacy coaches in the middle grades at several NC public schools. Literacy coaches have been in place since the school year.

15 NAEP Importance In the school year, the state board of education increased the standard for proficient on the new edition of the EOG Mathematics assessments. The following is a quote from the press release: The State Board of Education made good on months of discussion regarding the need to raise standards for student performance to more closely align with proficiency standards of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) and to be more challenging in preparing students for 21st century skills and learning.

16 NAEP Importance In the school year, the state board of education increased the standard for proficiency on the new edition of the Reading Comprehension EOG assessments. The Reading Comprehension EOG standards for student performance were also raised.

17 NAEP Importance Comparison of Achievement Levels on the North Carolina EOGs and NAEP School Year Percent at or Above Each Achievement Level Assessment Grade 4 Reading Grade 8 Reading Grade 4 Math Grade 8 Math NC EOG At or Above Level III 85%88%68%65% NAEP At or Above Proficient 29%28%41%34% NAEP At or Above Basic 64%71%85%73%

NAEP Participation

19 NAEP Participation "No Child Left Behind" legislation stipulates that states, districts, and schools within districts that receive Title I funds must participate in NAEP if selected. Reading and mathematics must be administered every two years in grades 4 and 8. Schools and students that are selected to participate are kept confidential.

20 NAEP Participation State Board of Education Policy HSP-A-001 (16 NCAC 6D.0302): To ensure adequate representation and generalizability of the data used to develop tests and to conduct evaluation studies, selected LEAs and schools, determined through stratified random samples, shall participate in field testing and other sample testing such as NAEP and other national or international assessments as designated by the department or the State Board of Education.

21 NAEP Participation "No Child Left Behind" legislation stipulates that states, districts, and schools within districts that receive Title I funds must participate in NAEP if selected. Reading and mathematics must be administered every two years in grades 4 and 8. Students and schools that are selected to participate are kept confidential.

Thank You The NAEP 2009 Administrations would not be possible without the efforts of each one of you.