PRESERV PReservation Eprint SERVices A two-year JISC 4/04 project: iii Institutional repository infrastructure development Steve Hitchcock and Jessie Hey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPrints - Introducing EPrints 3 Software William J Nixon Digital Library Development Manager, University of Glasgow With many thanks to Les Carr and the.
Advertisements

Search, access and impact: Web citation services Tim Brody Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia Group University of Southampton.
Preservation for IRs. Keep IR preservation in perspective You can't preserve an empty archive. Don't discourage deposits by making them more difficult.
Capturing preservation metadata from institutional repositories Preserv Project Presented by Steve Hitchcock Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School.
Preserv Preservation Eprint Services Simple Preservation Services – towards Proactive Support for the Institutional Repository.
PRESERV Repositories and stakeholders Jessie Hey PRESERV Partners Meeting 18 Nov 2005.
Preserv: Preservation architecture and interface A brief overview of ideas wrt to the project plan For Preserv partners meeting, BL, London, 18th November.
Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
Engaging repository policy with preservation Steve Hitchcock and Neil Jefferies* Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton.
Preserv Preservation Eprint Services Scenario: Digital lifecycle begins with author creation and deposit of paper or data content into the institutional.
TARDis Update Jessie Hey eFAIR Cluster meeting Southampton Oceanography Centre 21/03/03.
Preservation Features in Repository Software PRESERV: Tim Brody University of Southampton.
IRs: towards preservation services Steve Hitchcock Preserv Project Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS),
Reshaping Preserv 2 from a Life(cycle) perspective Steve Hitchcock and Dave Tarrant Preserv 2 Project School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS),
PRESERV a JISC 4/04 project Bid conditionally accepted Friday 24 th September Steve Hitchcock Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School of Electronics.
Repository models and policies for preservation Steve Hitchcock Preserv Project Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School of Electronics and Computer.
Repository preservation services: divisible, viable and sustainable? Steve Hitchcock Preserv 2 Project Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School of.
Data Publishing Service Indiana University Stacy Kowalczyk April 9, 2010.
Theses Alive! - an ETD management system for the UK Theo Andrew and Richard Jones Theses Alive! University of Edinburgh.
DRIVER Building a worldwide scientific data repository infrastructure in support of scholarly communication 1 JISC/CNI Conference, Belfast, July.
Open Access - Where are we so far? Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Creating Institutional Repositories Stephen Pinfield.
Practical Issues for Institutional Repositories Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Building Repositories of eprints in UK Research Universities Bill Hubbard SHERPA Project Manager University of Nottingham.
Electronic Theses The RGU Project Background to the Project Aims and Objectives Dr. Susan Copeland.
Supporting further and higher education The JISC FAIR Programme and International E-theses Developments.
Preservation for Institutional Repositories: practical and invisible Jessie M.N. Hey 1, Steve Hitchcock, Tim Brody, Leslie A. Carr Intelligence, Agents,
Preservation as a Process of a Repository David Tarrant University of Southampton (UK) Preserv Repository Preservation and Interoperability.org.uk.
Digital Preservation for Digital Repositories David Tarrant University of Southampton (UK) Preserv Repository Preservation and Interoperability.org.uk.
Digital Preservation: Logical and bit-stream preservation using Plato and Eprints Introduction: Digital Preservation Recap Hannes Kulovits Andreas Rauber.
University of Southampton EdSpace Hugh Davis, Leslie Carr, Jessie Hey and Debra Morris edspace.ecs.soton.ac.uk.
Institutional Repositories: Laying Foundations for a New Era of Scholarly Communication? Jessie Hey Online Information London, UK 1 Dec 2004 A practical.
Supporting education and research Repositories in Context Digital repositories as components of an integrated infrastructure for education Leona Carpenter.
The OAIS Reference Model: current implementations Michael Day, UKOLN, University of Bath Chinese-European Workshop.
The PREMIS Data Dictionary Michael Day Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath JORUM, JISC and DCC.
UKOLN is supported by: JISC Information Environment update Repositories and Preservation Programme meeting, October 24-25, 2006 Rachel Heery UKOLN
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation DigCCur2007 Symposium, Chapel Hill, N.C., April 18-20, 2007 Co-operation for digital preservation.
Digital Preservation and Trusted Digital Repositories Priscilla Caplan Florida Center for Library Automation ALA 2005 Chicago IL.
Preserving E-Prints: Scaling the Preservation Mountain Sheila Anderson, Arts and Humanities Data Service Stephen Pinfield, University of Nottingham.
Over 35 content sources relevant to engineering are searched including; Open Access repository content, Theses & Dissertations, Books, Technical Reports,
Electronic publishing: issues and future trends Anne Bell.
Technical Framework Charl Roberts University of the Witwatersrand Source: Repositories Support Project (JISC)
Transformations at GPO: An Update on the Government Printing Office's Future Digital System George Barnum Coalition for Networked Information December.
Towards smart storage for repository preservation services Steve Hitchcock, David Tarrant, Adrian Brown 1, Ben O’Steen 2, Neil Jefferies 2 and Leslie Carr.
Digital Library Architecture and Technology
Chinese-European Workshop on Digital Preservation, Beijing July 14 – Network of Expertise in Digital Preservation 1 Trusted Digital Repositories,
 EPrints & Preservation David Tarrant University of Southampton (UK) Preserv Repository Preservation and Interoperability.org.uk.
Geoff Payne ARROW Project Manager 1 April Genesis Monash University information management perspective Desire to integrate initiatives such as electronic.
Supporting further and higher education The UK FAIR Programme: OAI in context Chris Awre OAI3, CERN, February 2004.
OCLC Research: an update Lorcan Dempsey
A disaggregated model for preservation of E-Prints Gareth Knight SHERPA DP Project Arts and Humanities Data Service.
OAIS Open Archival Information System. “Content creators, systems developers, custodians, and future users are all potential stakeholders in the preservation.
File format registries - a global infrastructure for local persistence Andreas Aschenbrenner, ERPANET.
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II A NASIG 2006 Pre-Conference May 4, 2006 Technical Issues.
Funded by: © AHDS Preservation in Institutional Repositories Preliminary conclusions of the SHERPA DP project Gareth Knight Digital Preservation Officer.
From ePrints to eSPIDA: Digital Preservation at the University of Glasgow William J Nixon, Service Development DAEDALUS, University of Glasgow DPC: Digital.
The OAIS Reference Model Michael Day, Digital Curation Centre UKOLN, University of Bath Reference Models meeting,
Managing Access at the University of Oregon : a Case Study of Scholars’ Bank by Carol Hixson Head, Metadata and Digital Library Services
Institutional Repositories July 2007 DIGITAL CURATION creating, managing and preserving digital objects Dr D Peters DISA Digital Innovation South.
IPR and the EThOS Project 28 th October 2008 Dr. Susan Copeland Senior Information Adviser (Research)
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
PIRUS PIRUS -Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics
Building A Repository for Digital Objects
An Introduction to Tessella and The Safety Deposit Box Platform
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
PRESERV PReservation Eprint SERVices
Institutional Repositories
Implementing an Institutional Repository: Part II
How to Implement an Institutional Repository: Part II
Presentation transcript:

PRESERV PReservation Eprint SERVices A two-year JISC 4/04 project: iii Institutional repository infrastructure development Steve Hitchcock and Jessie Hey Intelligence Agents Multimedia Group, School of Electronics and Computer Science (ECS), Southampton University JISC 4/04 Preservation Programme Meeting March 07, 2005, British Library, London

PRESERV project partners Southampton University (IAM, Eprints) Lead site The National Archives (Pronom software) The British Library Oxford University

Why preservation based on Eprints? It is important to build the concept of preservation from the outset (JISC Circular 4/04, note 10). In the digital era, the outset for most new research and educational materials will be the institutional archive, or repository. The most widely used software for building institutional archives is Eprints (Crow 2004), developed at Southampton University and now used in over 130 archives in all regions of the world. Eprints is thus an established, flexible infrastructure that is used to collect and manage user-defined metadata, and can therefore be seen as contributing to a critical component in the widely accepted digital preservation reference model, the Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Specifically, it forms a process in what the OAIS refers to as ingest.

PRESERV view of OAIS ingest Accords closely with that of Wheatley (2004). Emphasises the need to automate and provide modular tools for the potentially high effort, high cost function of capturing metadata, and the capture of Representation Information (RI). RI is metadata that describes how the bytestream of a digital object can be turned into a human readable representation, and will play a crucial role in achieving long term digital preservation and data curation. RI is what in preservation metadata terms RLG-OCLC (2002) refers to as the viability of digital resources. According to Wheatley, a range of institutional repository ingest functions will need to be developed, including: Automated extraction of metadata Automatic identification of file formats Verification of an objects compliance to a relevant file format specification

Working with the National Archives (Pronom) The project will implement an ingest service based on the OAIS reference model for institutional archives built using Eprints software. Working with the National Archives, the project will link Eprints through a Web service to PRONOM software for identification and verification of file formats, the only such system currently in operational use. The project will emphasise automation, will provide modular tools for capturing metadata and will enable the identification and verification of file formats. The project will scope a technology watch service to populate and update PRONOM where full automation is not feasible for file format recognition.

Eprints-Pronom implementation As part of its work on PRONOM 4, Tessella, National Archives, will develop and host a file format identification tool which can be deployed: as free downloadable software which can be used either as a standalone tool via a Java GUI, or via an exposed programming interface, or API, which can be integrated with other software as a Web service hosted by TNA The tool will use file format signature information stored in PRONOM to perform the identification. Southampton will develop Eprints to allow it to use the tool in one or more of the above configurations. This interface will create an enhanced infrastructure service directly usable by institutional archives. Critical issue Full automation of this service is unlikely. This would depend on 100% format coverage in Pronom; otherwise alerts could be the result of outdated information. Instead there will be a manual check stage on all alerts.

Southampton and Oxford University archives This ingest service will be integrated into the Eprints deposit process for two existing institutional archives, subject to prior satisfactory testing on pilot archives: The institutional archive exemplar at Southampton produced by the TARDis project Oxford University Eprints service Critical issue Judging the moment to transfer an Eprints-PRONOM enabled service from pilot archives to full working institutional archives. Pilot archives are a limited version of real archives, circumscribed in terms of users and content. This project will work with substantial real archives, but by this stage in their development it can be anticipated these archives will be reaching levels of activity that will make administrators wary of changes to interfaces and key services without convincing evidence of the reliability and integrity of the new services.

Trusted digital repositories A trusted digital repository is one whose mission is to provide reliable, long-term access to managed digital resources to its designated community, now and in the future. Some institutions … may choose to manage the logical and intellectual aspects of a repository while contracting with a third-party provider for digital file storage and maintenance. (RLG-OCLC 2002)

Working with the British Library The project will build and test an exemplar OAI-based preservation service based on the digital preservation policies and practices of the British Library, a trusted digital repository. This exemplar will use metadata harvested from preservation-participating institutional archives, and will be independent of the software used to build the archive, which could in principle be based on Eprints, DSpace, or other software.

Future implications The project will work with other JISC approved projects in the JISC 4/04 programme and other JISC programmes to create institutional responsibility for preservation planning, data management, archival storage and administration, to effectively build a network of distributed and cooperating services that are based on the OAIS digital preservation reference model.

Conclusions Preservation is about people. In an institutional archive, based on author self-archiving, preservation begins with the author. Preservation will become an important component of Eprints, but Eprints will be only one component in a network of distributed and cooperating services based on the OAIS digital preservation reference model. Eprints is well suited to this role – by conforming with OAI it can be part of a network of OAI- based preservation services that would make preservation an external service to institutional archives, as proposed by James et al. (2003) and others. There may be tensions between the needs of eprints services and preservation requirements - different pace, timescales, chronology, and different selection criteria. Institutional archives require immediacy and access. What matters for institutional archives is preservation of access.

Footnotes Project Web site References Crow, R. (2004) "A Guide to Institutional Repository Software". Open Society Institute, v. 2.0, January James, H., et al. (2003) Feasibility and Requirements Study on Preservation of E-Prints. JISC, October 29 Lavoie, B. F. (2004) Introduction to OAIS. Digital Preservation Coalition, Technology Watch Series Report 04-01, January RLG-OCLC (2002) Trusted Digital Repositories:Attributes and Responsibilities May Wheatley, P. (2004) Institutional Repositories in the Context of Digital Preservation. Digital Preservation Coalition, Technology Watch Series Report 04-02, March Credits Southampton University Les Carr, Jessie Hey, Steve Hitchcock, Tim Brody National Archives Adrian Brown British Library Richard Boulderstone, Adam Farquhar Oxford University David Price, Frances Boyle