Special Education Chairpersons as Instructional Leaders Facilitating Proper IEPs for Continuous Improvement Process in Student Academic Performance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Program Planning in NS Schools – a Team Approach AVRSB, 2012.
Purpose of Instruction
Parents as Partners in Education
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
1 Supporting Striving Readers & Writers: A Systemic Approach United States Department of Education Public Input Meeting - November 19, 2010 Dorothy S.
Differentiated Supervision
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
ASSESSMENT& EVALUATION Assessment is an integral part of teaching. Observation is your key assessment tool in the primary and junior grades.
1 Role of the Case Manager Cypress-Fairbanks Independent School District 2009.
The process of assessment: the role of the teacher Chapter 1 ~~~~~
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Academic Intervention Services: Deepening the Conversation District 75 NYCDOE.
Texas Education Agency Updated F-2 FOUNDATION.
TEXAS LITERACY INITIATIVE.  San Antonio Independent School District (SAISD) will partner with an approved service provider to deliver literacy readiness.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
SLOs for Students on GAA February 20, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Cindy Wenrich Principal Noname Elementary School Anytown, VA.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
TAKS-Alt ReportingInformation for Parents Copyright © 2007, Texas Education Agency. All rights reserved. Reproduction of all or portions of this work is.
SLOs for Students on GAA January 17, GAA SLO Submissions January 17, 2014 Thank you for coming today. The purpose of the session today.
Which Is Best For My Child? Inclusion or Pull Out?
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Ms. Boldt.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Instructional Accommodations/ Modifications in Cypress-Fairbanks ISD Teacher Implementation Guide.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
PROF190 PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES. Questions to consider: 1. What is a professional learning community?
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Eric M. Roubion EDLD 871. Online Teacher Professional Development Standard F.
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
MAKING ASSESSMENT DECISIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Presented by: Curriculum & Instruction Melissa Schramme, Supervisor of Elementary.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Individual Education Plans.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
MTT Competency 8 By Julieta Montes Assistive and Instructional Technologies, Integrating Diverse Needs And Abilities.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
The Standards-based IEP Process: What You Need to Know Standards-Based IEP State-Directed Project - January 2011.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K–12 Overview Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division. Joanna.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
 Description of Title I  Review of Needs Assessment and Goals  Role of Academic Administrators and Instructional Specialists  Introduction of staff.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Assistive Technology Marivel Rivera Garcia By: Marivel Garcia.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Navigating the ARD/IEP Process
What is Title 1? It is a federal formula grant.
Comprehensive Planning
Autism Supplement.
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Response to Intervention R. E. A. C. H
Human Resources Management: Module 2
Faculty Meeting Resource
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Chairpersons as Instructional Leaders Facilitating Proper IEPs for Continuous Improvement Process in Student Academic Performance

C/I/A-2 Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Goals & Objectives Strategies & Activities Professional Development & Sustained Support Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Ongoing Formative Evaluation Quality Summative Evaluation Student Performance

Special Education Chairperson  In order for students who receive special education services to gain the most from their educational experiences, the Special Education Chairperson must be knowledgeable of proper planning to facilitate an Admission, Review and Dismissal (ARD) meeting to develop an Individual Education Program (IEP). In other words, their role is imperative to the student’s continuous improvement process.

Needs Assessment According to the Operating Guidelines, the ARD committee consists of:  The parent of the child with a disability  At least one general education teacher of the child  At least one special education teacher  The campus principal  An evaluation specialist  The child with the disability, whenever appropriate  A member of the language proficiency assessment committee (LPAC)  The Career and Technology Education (CTE) teacher of the child Data Collection & Analysis

Goals and Objectives  The Chairperson must be able to communicate how to formulate appropriate goals and objectives to the committee members. The general education teacher is knowledgeable about the area curriculum and the special educators and evaluation representatives are knowledgeable of how the student’s disability affects how the student accesses the curriculum. The group works together, in conjunction with the parent and student, to promote success through measurable goals and objectives. Goals & Objectives

Strategies and Activities  Special Education Chairpersons support curriculum and instruction. This provides an avenue to help with curricular and instructional issues as well as extend training. Providing instruction on strategies and activities will catapult learning in the general education setting. Strategies & Activities

Implementation  The role of the chairperson is to assist the campus principal in finding the best combination of educational programing and other services for each individual student requiring special education services. Who? What? What do we need?

Implementation  The chairperson must not only serve as facilitator during the ARD but must be abreast of instructional implementations. In essence, they would serve as the instructional leadership in the area of special education. Who? What? What we need?

Professional Development and Sustained Support  Instructional support for implementing accommodations and the use of supplemental aids is vital to how students access grade-level curriculum. The chairperson should be able to train the campus instructional staff on not only how to navigate but properly use various accommodations and supplemental aids according to the student’s IEP. Professional Development & Support

Ongoing Formative Evaluation  Special educators must have insight to the general education curriculum well enough to adapt it to the student’s ability to access. Being able to recognize and utilize data to make data-driven decisions is of the utmost importance when facilitating the ARD committee. This provides a picture of continuous collective feedback on how well the student is progressing or if further changes should be made to the IEP. Formative

Summative Evaluation  When all goals and objectives have been measured and the data is collected, the team members can provide information on progress. This data will provide a picture of how the student has performed. This is the student’s Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP). This information allows the team to gather insight of the summative evaluation in terms of goals and objectives. Summative

Conclusion  The foundation of a student’s success, who requires special education services, is the Individual Education Program (IEP). The goals and objectives must be appropriate and measureable to provide substantial data. This will generate a road map of how the team should progress in making student success a reality. The facilitator in making sure all components are met is the Special Education Chairperson.

Resources  Concordia University Instructional Leadership Development (ILD) documents  Erickson, H. L. (2007). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom  Houston Independent School District.  Houston Independent School District. Special Education Leadership video  Special Education Operating Guidelines (2014)  Texas Education Agency  Webster, J. The gold standard for special education teachers  Winebrenner, S.(2006). Teaching kids with learning differences in the regular classroom