Joseph Tan Elenda Hessel Emily Loeb Megan Schad Joanna Chango Joseph Allen Long-Term Relational Sequelae of Adolescent Attachment State of Mind.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Long-term Sequelae of Sub-clinical Depressive Symptoms in Early Adolescence Joe Allen Joanna Chango David Szwedo Megan Schad University of Virginia Copies.
Advertisements

The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy of Adolescent Social Expectations. Emily L. Loeb, Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad, & Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.
Marital Satisfaction and the Development of Autonomy and Close Friendships in Early Adolescence Jessica R. Meyer L. Wrenn Thompson Kathleen Boykin McElhaney.
Adolescent Relationships as Predictors of Neural Measures of Early Adulthood Emotional Reactivity Rachel K. Narr, Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Lane.
Familial Roots of Adolescents’ Autonomy with Peers: Family Interactions as Predictors of Susceptibility to Peer Influence Joseph P. Allen University of.
Direct and Moderated Predictions to Late Adolescent Internalizing Symptoms from Emotionally Stressful Family Contexts Joanna M. Chango Ann Spilker Joseph.
What is the AAI Really Capturing? Long-term Links With Emotion Regulation, Peer and Parent Relations, & Psychological Functioning Joe Allen Nell Manning.
Late Adolescent Adverse Social Environments Contribute to Young Adult Physical Health and Functioning. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb, Jospeh S. Tan,
Unique Contributions of Attachment Security and Emotional Awareness for Predicting Adolescent Romantic Relationship Functioning Introduction Attachment.
Adolescent Romantic Relationships: The Impact of Rejection Sensitivity and the Moderating Role of Attachment Security By: Emily Marston, Amanda Hare, Erin.
Rejection Sensitivity as a Moderator of the Link between Adolescent Close Relationships and Depressive Symptoms over Time Joanna M. Chango Joseph P. Allen.
Paper Symposium: Toward a Differentiated Perspective on the Meaning of Adolescent Peer Relations for Adult Functioning in the Long-term.
I Think I’m OK, Why Don’t You?: The Saga of Disagreeable Youth Christopher A. Hafen, Megan M. Schad, Elendra T. Hessel, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia.
Predictors of Changing Attachment Security From 14 to 24: Autonomy Struggles, Supportive Behaviors & Parental Marital Quality Joseph P. Allen Joseph S.
Popularity and Conformity Predicting Romantic Relationship Quality, Academic Achievement, and Problem Behavior from Ages 13 to 20 Joseph P. Allen Amanda.
Similarly, rejection sensitivity tends to be negatively associated with being a perpetrator of relational aggression in romantic relationships for young.
Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Moderating Effect of Emotional Intelligence Introduction David E. Szwedo
Early Adolescent Peer Foundations of Late Adolescent and Young Adult Psychological Adjustment Joanna M. Chango Joseph P. Allen, Ph.D David Szwedo Megan.
Romantic Partner Selection and Relationship Quality in Adolescence: Do Parent or Early Peer Relationships Matter More? Joanna M. Chango, David E. Szwedo,
Experiences with Parents, Peers, and Romantic Partners During Adolescence as Predictors of Youths’ Emotion Regulation Strategies David E. Szwedo, M.A.
Loneliness-Mediated Long-term Associations Between Preoccupied Attachment and General Health Joseph S. Tan, Jessica Kansky, Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M.
Can Peer Pressure Be A Good Thing? Megan M. Schad, Meredyth A. Evans, David E. Szwedo, Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia We would like to thank the.
Farah Williams & Melinda Schmidt University of Virginia We would like to thank the William T. Grant foundation, Spencer Foundation, and National Institute.
Balancing Developmental Demands: Adolescent Autonomy and Relatedness Across Relational Contexts Physical Attractiveness as a Predictor of Adolescent Autonomy.
Maternal Conforming Values and Adolescent Psychosocial Adjustment Nell N. Manning, Joseph P. Allen, Ph.D. University of Virginia Kathleen B. McElhaney,
Adolescent Romantic Relationships and Depressive Symptoms: The Importance of Emotion Regulation and Close Friendships Introduction David E. Szwedo
The Lasting Lessons of Early Adolescent Friendships: The Benefits of Autonomy and the Mixed Blessings of Early Intensity Joseph P. Allen Amanda Hare University.
Expecting the worst often leads to poor outcomes. This process is particularly true in close relationships, as those who are most sensitive to rejection.
Against the Grain: Adolescent Help-Seeking as a Path to Adult Functional Independence Introduction David E. Szwedo David E. Szwedo 1,2,
Portrait of the Secure Teen as a Young Adult: Predictions from Attachment to Family, Peer, and Romantic Relationship Functioning Joseph P. Allen University.
Early Adolescent Behaviors in Disagreement with Best Friend Predictive of Later Emotional Repair Abilities Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S.
Observed Autonomy And Connection With Parents And Peers As Predictors Of Early Adolescent Sexual Adaptation Joseph P. Allen Felicia Hall University of.
Early Adolescence Social Withdrawal as a Predictor of Late Adolescence Autonomy and Relatedness with Romantic Partners. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad,
Problems in interpersonal relationships, leading to aversive experiences in social interactions, have previously been identified as risk factors for depression.
The Role of Physical Attractiveness in Self-Worth Megan M. Schad, Christopher A. Hafen, Samantha R. Perry, Lauren E. Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L.
Results Time 2 (Age 18-20) Target teen and their romantic partner engaged in an 8 minute hypothetical disagreement task interaction. Hostile, relationship-undermining.
Adolescent attachment state-of-mind and parent-adolescent relationship quality: Joint longitudinal predictors of social and emotional functioning Kathleen.
When Friendships Bring You Down: Peer Relationship Predictors of Adolescent Depression Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia Gabriel P. Kuperminc Georgia.
Adolescent Peer and Romantic Predictors of Youths’ Emotion Regulation in Early Adulthood Introduction David E. Szwedo David E. Szwedo,
Elenda T. Hessel, David E. Szwedo, & Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia Copies of this and related research are available at:
Stability and Predictors of Change in Attachment Security Across Adolescence Joseph P. Allen University of Virginia Gabriel P. Kuperminc Georgia State.
Adolescent Emotional Repair Predicting Abusive Behavior in Adolescent and Young Adult Romantic Relationships. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M. Schad, Barbara.
From Managing Emotions to Improving Relationships: Higher Quality Best Friendships Predicted from Earlier Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Megan M.
Paper Symposium: Social Support and Social Trauma Predict Long-Term Physical Health Outcomes: Exploring Mechanisms and Sensitive Periods.
Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,
Attachment as a Relational Construct Beyond Childhood: Parent and Peer Relationship Qualities Linked to Adolescent Security Joseph P. Allen Maryfrances.
Can Pretty People Have Their Cake and Eat it Too? Positive and Negative Effects of Physical Attractiveness. Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Joanna M.
Does Preoccupied Attachment in Adolescence Have Long-term Implications for Physical Health in Adulthood – and How? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P.
Introduction Results Method Conclusions
Adaptive Social Regulation of Emotion and Adolescent Romantic Relationship Power: A Developmental Perspective Erin M. Miga, Joanna Chango, Meredyth Evans,
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Introduction Results Method Conclusions
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
1` Predicting Who Will be Most Susceptible to Peer Influence Regarding Substance Use: Individual, Familial, and Peer Risk Factors Joseph P. Allen Joanna.
Relationships among Adolescents’ Negative Interaction Styles with Friends and Romantic Partners and Depressive Symptoms Joanna M. Chango, Erin M. Miga,
Introduction Results Method Conclusions
Introduction Results Methods Conclusions
Negotiating Adolescence: The Importance of Close Relationships for Dismissing Adolescents J. Claire Stephenson, Nell N. Manning, Dave E. Szwedo & Joseph.
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
Does Adolescent Attachment Security Have Long-term Implications for Functioning in Adulthood? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P. Allen, & Alison Nagel.
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
Introduction Results Conclusions Method
Introduction Results Hypotheses Discussion Method
Introduction Results Conclusions Hypotheses Method
The Importance of Positive Peer Relationships in Predicting Decreases in Adolescents’ Depressive Symptoms over Time Joanna M. Chango, Erin M. Miga, & Joseph.
Does Preoccupied Attachment in Adolescence Have Long-term Implications for Physical Health in Adulthood – and How? Leah Grande, Joseph S. Tan, Joseph P.
Maddison Miles & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
General Social Competence (18)
Attachment, Coping, & Social Competence
The Effects of Childhood Emotional Abuse on Later Romantic Relationship Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Self-Worth, Alcohol, and Jealousy Madeline M.
Presentation transcript:

Joseph Tan Elenda Hessel Emily Loeb Megan Schad Joanna Chango Joseph Allen Long-Term Relational Sequelae of Adolescent Attachment State of Mind

Collaborators Co-authors Elenda Hessel Emily Loeb Megan Schad, Ph.D Joanna Chango, Ph.D Joseph Allen, Ph.D Collaborators Samantha Perry Rachel Narr Christopher Hafen, Ph.D Lauren Molloy, Ph.D Erik Ruzek, Ph.D We gratefully acknowledge grant support from NICHD (PI: Joseph P. Allen, 9R01-HD058305).

Attachment in Adolescence Extending what we know about sequelae of attachment into adulthood One domain to look at: romantic relationships

Primary Question What are the long-term implications of individual differences in adolescent attachment state of mind for romantic relationships?

Key Area: Romantic Relationships Why? –Normative developmental experience (Carver, Joyner, & Udry, 2003) –Primary relationship as adolescence transition into adulthood (Laursen & Williams, 1997; Kobak, Rosenthal, Zajac, & Madsen, 2007) –Developmentally significant (Collins, Welsh, & Furman, 2009) What might be important to know about romantic relationships?

Key Domains of Romantic Relationships Navigating emotionally-sensitive interactions –Predicts longevity of relationships (Bernier & Dozier, 2002; Shulman, Tuval-Mashiach, Levran, & Anbar, 2006) –Full of challenges (Furman & Shomaker, 2008; Kobak et al., 2007) Two examples of common emotionally- sensitive interactions –Support-seeking situations –Discussions of conflict in the relationships

Sample Subsample: 111 adolescents in romantic relationships at either age 18 or age 21 –Full sample: 184 Adolescents (followed from age 13 to 27), their Parents, Best Friends, Other Friends, Romantic Partners Intensive Interviews and Observations with all parties (Total N over first 13 years ~ 3200). Equal numbers of Males and Females Socio-economically Diverse (Median Family Income= $40- $60K) 31% African American; 69% European American Very Low Attrition (98% participation rate in current phase)

Attachment State of Mind Adult Attachment Interview (George, Kaplan, & Main, 1996) Interviewed at age 14 AAI Q-set (Kobak et al., 1993) –Security scale Spearman-Brown interrater reliability = 0.82

Results: Supportive Behavior Maintaining engagement while giving support (Supportive Behavior Task, Allen et al., 2001) –With a close friend (age 14) –With a romantic partner (ages 18 and 21)

Results: Supportive Behavior Typical support-seeking topics: –With close friend (age 14): Problems with siblings Joining a sports team –With romantic partner (ages 18, 21): Career choices Moving

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors Secure attachment state of mind Engagement with romantic partner Age 14Age 18 Note: All coefficients are standardized betas *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p < **

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors Secure attachment state of mind Engagement with romantic partner Age 14Age 21.23*

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s engagement Age 14Age 18.48** *

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s engagement Age 14Age 21.33**

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors over and above Covariates Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s engagement Engagement with close friend Age 14Age 18.36** *.40**.19

Prediction of Supportive Behaviors over and above Covariates Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s engagement Engagement with close friend Age 14Age 21.36** *.31**.11

Mediation Model for Supportive Behaviors Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s engagement Engagement with close friend Romantic partner’s engagement Age 14Age 18Age 21.36**.17.36** *.35* Total Indirect:.12 (95% CI: lower = -.01, upper =.26)

Results: Conflict Resolution Autonomy and relatedness behaviors during a disagreement (Autonomy Task, Allen et al., 2005) –With a close friend (age 14) –With a romantic partner (ages 18 and 21)

Results: Conflict Resolution Typical areas of disagreement: –With a close friend (age 14): “Sinking ship” paradigm: Decide together who to bring to a mission to Mars –With a romantic partner (ages 18, 21): Money Jealousy Moving

Prediction of Conflict Resolution Secure attachment state of mind Autonomy and relatedness with romantic partner Age 14Age 18.51** *

Prediction of Conflict Resolution Secure attachment state of mind Autonomy and relatedness with romantic partner Age 14Age 21.43** *

Prediction of Conflict Resolution Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Age 14Age 18.34**

Prediction of Conflict Resolution Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Age 14Age 21.30**

Prediction of Conflict Resolution over and above Covariates Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Autonomy and relatedness with close friend Age 14 Age 18.32*.07.31** *

Prediction of Conflict Resolution over and above Covariates Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Autonomy and relatedness with close friend Age 14 Age 21.26**.14.31** *

Mediation Model for Conflict Resolution Secure attachment state of mind Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Autonomy and relatedness with close friend Romantic partner’s autonomy and relatedness Age 14Age 18Age 21 Total Indirect:.09 (95% CI: lower = -.01, upper =.18).32**.27*.06.31** *.17.13

Summary of Findings Early adolescent attachment state of mind predicts: –Later supportive and conflict resolution behaviors with romantic partners –Later romantic partner’s supportive and conflict resolution behaviors –Over and above early adolescent behaviors with peers Developmental path?

Limitations Correlational data Other factors Sample size

Conclusions Contributions to understanding attachment in adolescence? –Long-term (adulthood) outcomes –Setting the stage for future relationships –Affect regulation? Implications for relationship functioning –Mechanisms: selection and evocation