The Collaborative Delphi Round 8 Helen Ivy Rowe. Definition The Delphi, as we use it, is a technique used for gathering and developing opinion to further.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definition of Rangelands and Forests Paul Geissler Alison Hill.
Advertisements

DELPHI #25 RESULTS SRR Strategic Planning Meeting Denver, CO July 27, 2005 Jaime Whitlock.
The Collaborative Delphi Helen Ivy Rowe. Purpose Finalize framework and data matrix developed in Delphi 12.
The Collaborative Delphi Helen Ivy Rowe. Purpose To involve SRR in revising the strategic plan in between meetings.
The Collaborative Delphi Helen Ivy Rowe. Purpose To better represent the views of the SRR we used the Delphi process to identify five key points that.
The Collaborative Delphi Helen Ivy Rowe. Purpose To better represent SRR at the ESA meeting and to elicit ideas for new example topics we used the Delphi.
July 24, 2001 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Process and Procedures Tom Bartlett.
November 7, 2001 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Process and Procedures Tom Bartlett.
March 26, 2002 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Process and Procedures Tom Bartlett.
February 17, 2002 SRM The Purpose & Process of the Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable E. Tom Bartlett, Helen I. Rowe, Kristie Maczko.
Indicators for Soil and Water Conservation on Rangelands Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
Oct. 29, 2002 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. Oct. 29, 2002 Rangelands 42% of continental U.S. 42% of continental U.S. 587 million acres non-federal.
Linkages Between Rangeland Indicator Efforts: Sustainable Rangeland Roundtable and Heinz Center Programs Duncan T. Patten Montana State University.
The Collaborative Delphi
The Collaborative Delphi Helen Ivy Rowe. Purpose Introduce a new variant to the Policy Delphi that I will call collaborative. Describe its use by the.
Our Delphi Process Rounds 3-5 Helen Ivy Rowe. Definition A method for the systematic solicitation and collation of informed judgments on a particular.
June 4, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable. June 4, 2003 A Strategic Course for the Future Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable June 4, 2003.
Our Delphi Process Rounds 6-7 Helen Ivy Rowe. Procedure A set of carefully designed sequential questionnaires interspersed with summarized information.
March 19, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
Intro Aug. 19, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.
The National Connection for Local Public Health Model Practice Reviewer Guide April - May 2010.
The Design Process The design process is achieve by following 10 stages. 1-Identify the problem/product innovation 2-Define the working criteria/goals.
Performance Management
Chapter 16 Consensus Methods © Nursing Research: An Introduction by Pam Moule and Margaret Goodman (2009, SAGE)
Customer Success is Our Mission MILCOM 2008 Reviewer Guidelines Rev B 8 July 2008.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Standards Definition of standards Types of standards Purposes of standards Characteristics of standards How to write a standard Alexandria University Faculty.
Building Code II ARC313. Building Code sets out technical requirements for the construction, renovation and demolition of buildings sets out technical.
2.06 Understand data-collection methods to evaluate their appropriateness for the research problem/issue.
Chapter 2 Analyzing the Business Case.
Harvard E -118 November 17,  UNWTO Initiative Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations (2004) Indicators of Sustainable Development.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
Forecasting Methods & Importance
Literacy Test Preparation
Ruth McWilliams National Sustainable Development Coordinator USDA Forest Service May 31, 2001 May 31, 2001 Science Day 2001 Sustainability Framework …
An evaluation framework
Computer Science Accreditation/Assessment Issues Bolek Mikolajczak UMass Dartmouth, CIS Department Chair IT Forum, Framingham, MA January 10, 2006.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas Member Survey of Process: Ratings of Satisfaction.
1 PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF SHA DATA COLLECTION UNDER THE CO-OPERATION BETWEEN OECD, EUROSTAT AND WHO 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
The vital cultural links between people and nature, encompassing values, security, and the set of economic activities that build upon natures’ services.
READING A PAPER. Basic Parts of a Research Paper 1. Abstract 2. Introduction to Technology (background) 3. Tools & techniques/Methods used in current.
Working Definition of Program Evaluation
Marketing Research and the Questionnaire
Public participation of EIA in R.O.C. Hsiao-Tien Wu, Wei-Chein Sun & Tung-Wang Chang Environmental Protection Administration Executive Yuan R.O.C.
Oklahoma State University DelphiDr. Camille DeYongSlide 1 Expert Opinion Three circumstances –No historical data –Impact of external factors is more important.
Loughborough London School of Sport & Exercise Sciences Evaluating the Competencies of Sports Managers in Taiwan: A Delphi Approach Ling-Mei Ko Professor.
1 A Process for Developing the Structure of Need-Based Web Sites: Technical Report 29 Julia Panke, Darrin L. Carr, Scott Arkin, & James P. Sampson, Jr.
Guide to Requirements Gathering. 2 Contents  What is requirements gathering?  Why requirements gathering is key  Requirements gathering activities.
Investigating service user ethical priorities in psychological research Rachael Carrick.
What is it? Is it a practice of sustainable agricultural practice?
Writing a Community Survey 1.It’s a good idea for the students to survey those in their school or community who are impacted by their chosen issue. (They.
Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.
Copyright © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 11 Specific Types of Quantitative Research.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Assessment Activities Presentation for the NC State Assessment Work Group May 2, 2007 Nancy Whelchel, PhD Assistant Director.
Thank you very much for including the HD*Calc software ( on your website or social media platform. The National Cancer Institute.
Investigating System Requirements
FINAL REPORT TECHNICAL WRITING NOOR SHAHARIAH BT SALEH
Figure 2 Recruitment of experts to the Delphi study
Digital Stewardship Curriculum
Presented to <name>
Revised Art 12 reporting format
Oh No! Will It Change Again!
Agenda item 5.3 EHIS - Implementing Regulation
Session 1: The report on CIS-members´ views on the experience in the implementation of the economic aspects of the WFD.
Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) Jürgen Vogt Land Management and Natural Hazards Unit Institute for Environment and Sustainability
Presentation transcript:

The Collaborative Delphi Round 8 Helen Ivy Rowe

Definition The Delphi, as we use it, is a technique used for gathering and developing opinion to further the work of the SRR.

Procedure A set of carefully designed sequential questionnaires interspersed with summarized responses.

Past Delphi Rounds Delphi 1 and 2 (between Denver and SLC): Worked on finding common ground through developing mission and vision statements. Delphi 3, 4, and 5 (between SLC and Reno): Reached agreement on definition of rangelands Finalized a vision/mission package Received input on most important issues work produced at SLC meeting

Delphi 6 and 7 Received input on Indicator Classification System.

Delphi 8 Questions requested by Criteria groups at the last meeting: What should be used as a reference point or time zero? Feedback to the Soil/Water group for dropping an indicator.

Delphi 8 Results 1. What will we use for reference states? What is time zero for these indicators? Now Earliest possible data (could include now) Reference state (ecological condition) should be considered rather than time In some cases minimum value might be more useful than a reference state

Delphi 8 Results 2. Do all indicators need reference states/time zero? Yes -10 No Will one reference state/time zero work for all indicators? Yes – 3 (time zero as now) No - 19

Delphi 8 Questions 4-6 Soil & Water Indicator 2: Area and percent of rangeland managed primarily for protective functions.

3--Unacceptable = disagree, indicator should be kept as written 4--Slightly acceptable = the indicator can be dropped, but only if another indicator is written to encompass specific aspects (please explain in #2) 6--Moderately acceptable = acceptable, but would support developing a new indicator to encompass protected areas 9--Highly acceptable = acceptable, indicator should be dropped 4. Rate your level of acceptance for dropping this indicator

Delphi 8 Results 5. If this indicator is dropped are there aspects of this indicator that should be preserved in another indicator? Soil and water conservation Management/use/control site Move to Ecological Health and Diversity or Legal, Institutional, and Economic Criteria groups Should not be preserved

Delphi 8 Results 6. Any other comments? Reword the indicator (from protection to conservation?) Area in land conservation should be measured

Delphi 8 Results Soil and Water Group results Two active members responded. Neither wrote comments. Highly acceptable to drop the indicator.

Mini survey.

Criteria group use of Delphi Criteria groups may request to use the Delphi. Here are some suggestions for application: 1. Technical questions that are not answerable yet, to get an expert spread of opinion. 2. If a group gets stuck and wants help from the SRR. 3. Theoretical questions that need buy in from the group or SRR. 4. Indicator review for individual indicators or as sets to check for gaps/overlaps/ acceptability.

Feedback Delphi design Responding to the Delphi Reasons for participation/non-participation General feedback