We Do Not See The Same Landscape Perspectives and Development of A Common Spatial Framework By Robert A. Washington-Allen Research and Development Staff.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Overview
Advertisements

USDA May 21, 2003 Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable.
ESPON 2013 Programme – Open Seminar European Territorial Evidence for EU Cohesion Policy and Programming June Aalborg, Denmark Session 2 -
ECOLOGICAL SITES EXPANDING the CONCEPTS and APPLICATIONS of ECOLOGICAL SITES Joel Brown USDA NRCS Jornada Experimental Range Las Cruces NM.
History of Critical Loads meetings – how have we gotten to this point? Andrzej Bytnerowicz 1, Rich Fisher 2 and Al Riebau 3 USDA Forest Service 1 Pacific.
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
Ecology 14 Biogeography & Biodiversity Ralph Kirby.
Presenter Chris Zganjar Spatial Data Analyses Chris Zganjar, Barry Baker, Earl Saxon Multivariate Cluster Analyses Bill Hargrove, Forrest Hoffman Special.
THE BIOSPHERE: AN INTRODUCTION TO EARTH’S DIVERSE ENVIRONMENTS.
Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
CHAPTER 50 AN INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY AND THE BIOSPERE Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section C2: Aquatic and.
Created by Jennifer Peterson In Cooperation With Idaho Rangeland Resources Commission and the University of Idaho - Rangeland Ecology & Management Department.
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Principles of Landscape Ecology ENVS*3320 Instructors: Dr. Shelley Hunt (Module 1) Rm. 2226, Bovey Building x53065 Dr. Rob Corry (Module.
Introduction to Vegetation Classification and the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification System FRST 211: Forest Classification and Silvics.
Land Use Change And Diversity In Neotropical Savannas Juan F. Silva Center for International Development Harvard University.
Theories of Vegetation Change Mort Kothmann Texas A&M University.
3.2 Terrestrial Biomes.
Scale and Conservation Planning The scale of investigation may have profound effects on the patterns that one finds the obvious patterns of scale perceived.
Comparing Ecosystems Terrestrial vs. Aquatic Ecosystems Lesson 38
ECOLOGICAL SITES: DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION ESD Workshop Winnemuca NV 5 June 2012 Joel Brown USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Center /Jornada Experimental.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Ecoregion typing Ecological classification or typing will allow the grouping of rivers according to similarities based on a top-down nested hierarchical.
ECOSYSTEM STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION +How do we define ecosystem structure +Importance of ecosystem structure +Factors controlling ecosystem structure +Drivers.
Biomes FIELD BIOLOGY & METHODOLOGY Fall 2014 Althoff Lecture 04.
C H A P T E R Innisfree McKinnon University of Oregon © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline 2 North America's Environmental Setting.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Roger Sayre, PhD Senior Scientist for Ecosystems Land Change Science Program U.S. Geological Survey and GEOSS Task Lead for ECO-01-C1 Global Ecosystem.
Wayne A. Robbie, Supervisory Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Albuquerque, NM Common Elements: Ecological Sites Descriptions and.
Our Texas. Focus Which feature on the list can be found and observed in Texas? a. Deserts b. Canyons c. Mountains d. Beaches e. Meadows of wildflowers.
Components of Healthy Ecosystems/Ecosystem Management Wally Covington.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center.
What Is Ecology? What is Landscape? What is Landscape Ecology? A road to Landscape Ecological Planning.
Interpreting Ecological Sites for Grazing Management.
An Adaptive Management Model for the Red River Basin of the North.
Landscape Ecology: Conclusions and Future Directions.
Adjustment of Global Gridded Precipitation for Orographic Effects Jennifer Adam.
The Five Themes of Geography A Framework for Studying the World North Carolina Geographic Alliance PowerPoint Presentations 2007.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
Northern Michigan Forest Productivity Across a Complex Landscape David S. Ellsworth and Kathleen M. Bergen.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
BIOMES OF THE EARTH.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland. A0po&list=PL7CD3CD7A9350A858.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Iowa Rivers Information System Inventory, Modeling, and Evaluation of Basin, In-Stream Habitat, and Fishery Resource Relationships Kevin Kane, Iowa State.
Texas Ecoregions. Focus Which feature on the list can be found and observed in Texas? a. Deserts b. Canyons c. Mountains d. Beaches e. Meadows of wildflowers.
Maps. 3 types of maps  Physical  Political  Special purpose.
Developing the Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): Monitoring Vegetation Stress from a Local to National Scale Brian Wardlow National Drought Mitigation.
Maps.
An Introduction to Ecosystems SNC 1DI. Unit Objectives By the end of this unit, I should be able to: – Understand the similarities and differences between.
Ecology The study of interactions between organisms and the environment (biotic and abiotic factors)
Section 2: Terrestrial Biomes
Rangeland Ecosystems of Idaho
An Introduction to VegDRI
Ungrazed deep grassland
An Introduction to VegDRI
Biomes Biome From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Intro to Ecology Chapter 52.
Section 2: Terrestrial Biomes
World Cultural Geography
Landscape Approach to Resource Management
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
History of Landscape Ecology
Biomes of the World.
Rangeland Soil Carbon: State of Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

We Do Not See The Same Landscape Perspectives and Development of A Common Spatial Framework By Robert A. Washington-Allen Research and Development Staff Scientist DOE Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, TN

A Spatial Framework is a mapped set of geographic regions that supports agency programs or studies McMahon et al. (2001) Environ. Manage. 28:

T4,T6 T4 Shrubland Native Grassland T3 T3,T5 Introduced Grasses> 60 % Shrub Dense Shrubland T1: fire, T2: grazing, T3: heavy grazing, T4: cultural inputs, T5: drought, T6: wetter than average years Threshold T5 T2 T1,T6 shrub grass/bare soil sparse grass/ bare soil dense grass/ bare soil denser grass/ bare soil Landscape Composition and Configuration

Each region is relatively homogenous and distinct from adjoining regions. Distinctions are of two types: Specific characteristics of interest Broader categories of resource potential

Specific characteristics of interest

Political

Regional GAP Analysis

NRCS STATSGO

Broader categories of resource potential Quantitative vs Weight-of-Evidence (Qualitative) Methods Visual Pattern Recognition vs Data-Driven Perspectives

Bailey (1995, 1996) delineated 52 ecoregions at the finest province level, increased from 30 in his original Bailey (1983) version. Other, different ecoregions, based on other criteria and for other purposes, have been specified by Holdridge (1947), Walter and Box, Thornwaite, Koppen and many others. Because the delineation is based on subjective criteria, there are as many sets of ecoregions as there are experts.

US EPA : Omernick's 1987 aquatic ecoregions were based on perceived patterns of a combination of causal and integrative factors, including land use, land surface form, potential natural vegetation, and soils. Although delineated for national- level studies of water resources, Omernick's 76 national ecoregions have been borrowed for many other kinds of ecological studies as well.

The National Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has developed a version of ecoregions called Major Land Resource Areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are much finer than most of the other types of ecoregions; for example, there are 78 MLRAs in the 13 southeastern states. MLRA boundaries are drawn with regard to edaphic and physiographic relationships, but are still subjective.

Major Land Resource Areas (MLRA)

Clustering is data-driven and empirical. This objectivity means that one obtains the same result every time, given the same data and a request for the same number of clusters. This is in contrast to regions drawn by expert opinion.

U.S. Forest Service Southern Global Change Program National map clustered on elevation, edaphic, and climate variables into 3000 ecoregions using similarity colors.

Towards a Common Spatial Framework Regions are areas within which abiotic and biotic capacities and potentials are similar. Foster an ecological understanding of a landscapes terrestrial and aquatic resources. Provide the basis for interagency coordination and collaboration in the design and implementation of ecosystem research, assessment, and management. Fully integrated Peer-reviewed (participating agencies) National Map developed with common objectives.