AGENTS proposal dc-DC Nov.3, 1998 ad-hoc agents group drafting committee: Priscilla Caplan, Martin Dillon & David Bearman presented by David Bearman.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IDF Patent Policy & Core DOI Specification. DOI Encyclopedia to DOI Core DOI Handbook has been the DOI encyclopedia – main developments of the DOI framework.

Advertisements

1:1 Reconsidered DC-6, November 4, History zJuly 97: RLG Metadata Summit yArchives, museums, libraries yIdentified need for flexible description.

THE DONOR PROJECT Titia van der Werf-Davelaar. Project Financed by: Innovation of Scientific Information Provision (IWI) Duration: –phase 1: 1 may 1998.

T. Baker / 23 Sep 2000 Dublin Core Qualifiers and A Grammar for Dublin Core Thomas Baker DC-8, National Library of Canada, Ottawa 4 October 2000.

DC2001, Tokyo DCMI Registry : Background and demonstration DC2001 Tokyo October 2001 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of Bath Harry Wagner, OCLC

Agents and Authority Linking Breakout sessions Oct 4 2-4, Oct 5 3-4:30 Goals: Explore issues in Agent discovery. Do we need an Agents working group? If.

Putting together a METS profile. Questions to ask when setting down the METS path Should you design your own profile? Should you use someone elses off.

1 Demystifying metadata Ann Chapman UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is funded by Resource: The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries, the Joint Information.

UKOLN, University of Bath

A centre of expertise in digital information management UKOLN is supported by: XML and the DCMI Abstract Model DC Architecture WG Meeting,

UKOLN is supported by: Bridget Robinson and Ann Chapman From analytical model to implementation and beyond CD Focus Schema Forum, CBI Conference Centre.

Developing a Metadata Exchange Format for Mathematical Literature David Ruddy Project Euclid Cornell University Library DML 2010 Paris 7 July 2010.

Gathering Information Information Collection: Garbage In – Garbage Out.

An Leabharlann UCD Órna Roche UCD James Joyce Library Metadata Documenting your data

AACTE, 2007 Portfolios for Teaching and Learning A Longitudinal, Scaffolded Context Steve Head.

Natalia Wehler: Dublin Core Requirements on Metadata  multiple softwares to use metadata  management of changing standards  needs to be functional,

XML for Information Management – Day 2 Airi Salminen University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Computational Linguistics Instructor: Professor Airi Salminen

SLIDE 1IS 257 – Fall 2007 Codes and Rules for Description: History 2 University of California, Berkeley School of Information IS 245: Organization.

Agents and Authority Linking Breakout sessions Oct 4 2-4, Oct 5 3-4:30 Goals: Explore issues in Agent discovery. Do we need an Agents working group? If.

XML for Information Management – Day 2 Airi Salminen University of Erlangen-Nuremberg Computational Linguistics Instructor: Professor Airi Salminen

© Tefko Saracevic, Rutgers University1 metadata considerations for digital libraries.

Dspace – Digital Repository Dawn Petherick, University Web Services Team Manager Information Services, University of Birmingham MIDESS Dissemination.

DataCite: Making Data Citable Jan Brase (DataCite/TIB Hannover) Brigitte Hausstein (GESIS) Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen (GESIS)

A Metadata Framework for Resource Discovery of Agricultural Resources EDCL 2001 OAI Workshop September 4-9, Darmstadt, Germany Presented by Irene Onyancha.

UKOLUG - July Metadata for the Web RDF and the Dublin Core Andy Powell UKOLN, University of Bath UKOLN.

Metadata and identifiers for e- journals Copenhagen Juha Hakala Helsinki University Library

Publishing Digital Content to a LOR Publishing Digital Content to a LOR 1.

CHAPTER 5 Infrastructure Components PART I. 2 ESGD5125 SEM II 2009/2010 Dr. Samy Abu Naser 2 Learning Objectives: To discuss: The need for SQA procedures.

CEN/ISSS DC workshop, January The UK approach to subject gateways Rachel Heery UKOLN University of Bath UKOLN is.

IFLA Satellite Meeting, 13 August 2014, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany

Harmonising without Harm: towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology Maja Žumer (University of Ljubljana) & Patrick.

Report of the IOC Task Force on the GEOSS Common Infrastructure (GCI) Ivan DeLoatch, U.S. Geological Survey Alan Edwards, European Commission Co-chairs.

Profiling Metadata Specifications David Massart, EUN Budapest, Hungary – Nov. 2, 2009.

AACTE, 2007 Portfolios for Teaching and Learning A Longitudinal, Scaffolded Context University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Nancy Lawler U.S. Department of Defense ISO/IEC Part 2: Classification Schemes Metadata Registries — Part 2: Classification Schemes The revision.

Archival information system ARHiNET Croatian national archival information system Vlatka Lemić Croatian State Archives, Croatia.

The Final Study Period Report on MFI 6: Model registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Sydney May 26, 2008 H. Horiuchi, Keqing He, Doo-Kwon Baik SC32WG2.

Federal XML Naming and Design Rules and Guidelines Mark Crawford.

Metadata Modularization Concepts and Tools Carl Lagoze CS

Taxonomies for government interoperability e-Government Unit Colette Coles, Cabinet Office Ankara, Turkey March 2005.

Introduction to Omeka. What is Omeka? - An Open Source web publishing platform - Used by libraries, archives, museums, and scholars through a set of commonly.

1 Metadata –Information about information – Different objects, different forms – e.g. Library catalogue record Property:Value: Author Ian Beardwell Publisher.

Metadata and Versioning VIF workshop 22 nd April

Modularization and Interoperability: Dublin Core and the Warwick Framework Sandra D. Payette Digital Library Research Group Cornell University November.

Metadata and Documentation Iain Wallace Performing Arts Data Service.

 Why do we catalog?  Why do we classify?  What aspects are important?  What aspects can we let go of?

METS Application Profiles Morgan Cundiff Network Development and MARC Standards Office Library of Congress.

RDA: Benefits and opportunities Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde, Glasgow Presented at the CIG Standards Forum,

SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.

Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data

A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk DCMI Affiliates: Implications for Institutions Rosemary Russell UKOLN University.

May 2007 Registration Status Small Group Meeting 1: August 24, 2009.

1 Dublin Core and its implementation in RDF/XML Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UK Office for Library & Information Networking (UKOLN)

CTB CADDS Sally Valenzuela Director, Publishing Strategic Initiatives CTB/McGraw-Hill.

1 Educational Metadata Paul Miller Interoperability Focus UKOLN U KOLN is funded by Resource: the Council for.

Describing resources II: Dublin Core CERN-UNESCO School on Digital Libraries Rabat, Nov 22-26, 2010 Annette Holtkamp CERN.

Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 27, 2006 Rights Management Metadata.

Semantic Web Overview Diane Vizine-Goetz OCLC Research.

Metadata & Repositories Jackie Knowles RSP Support Officer.

International Planetary Data Alliance Registry Project Update September 16, 2011.

Attributes and Values Describing Entities. Metadata At the most basic level, metadata is just another term for description, or information about an entity.

IPDA Registry Definitions Project Dan Crichton Pedro Osuna Alain Sarkissian.

WHAT DOES THE FUTURE HOLD? Ann Ellis Dec. 18, 2000

Standardizing for Change

Secretariat Proposal Update

Alison Valk Georgia Tech

Attributes and Values Describing Entities.

Michael Lutz 18th MIG-T meeting, 30 April 2015

Proposal for Extensible Security

Suggested comment resolution on Mesh DTIM element

Presentation transcript:

AGENTS proposal dc-DC Nov.3, 1998 ad-hoc agents group drafting committee: Priscilla Caplan, Martin Dillon & David Bearman presented by David Bearman

AGENTS PROPOSAL In dc 2.0, we should have one element for AGENT (perhaps called contributor) in place of Creator, Contributor, Publisher AND we should employ a maintained scheme (such as LC Relator, Interested Parties etc.) to assign values specific to the nature of the actions to enable operation/interoperation

Discussion Does not undo/de-stabilize dc1.0 Will over time deprecate use of Publisher and Creator unless specifically intended to mean author and publisher of text resource Will enable, if we can find adequate schemes, the integration of metadata with precise operational implications (as in rights community, museum documentation,etc.)

Experience Each of the implementations reported yesterday had trouble with these elements; some only used one, others two, others wanted more qualifiers Instructors finding it difficult to clearly differentiate when to use which element Logical map shows close, but not precise, fit between the 3 and 3 concepts of stuff

Possible dc 2.0 item model