1 IDEA 2004 SPP Indicators Related to Transition: How We Collect the Data & What We Have Learned Ginger Blalock Summer Transition Meeting June 11, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

1 Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Question 8 Virginia Department of Education 8. Does the IEP consider the strengths, interests, preferences, and needs of the student? (34 C.F.R §300.43(a)(2)

A Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact The Study of State and Local Implementation and Impact of the Individuals with Disabilities Education.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Integrating SPP Indicators into EPSS Plans
Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 IEP Components.
Copyright © 2012 California Department of Education, Child Development Division with WestEd Center for Child & Family Studies, Desired Results T&TA Project.
Secondary Transition Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 1 – Graduation Rates, 2 – Dropout Rates, 13 – Transitional IEPs, and 14 – Post-school.
Student Performance Overview of State Performance Plan Indicators 3 – State Assessment Performance, 7 – Early Childhood Outcomes.
Indicator #13:Transition Services for Students Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measurable, annual IEP goals and.
Exit a Customer Chapter 8. Exit a Customer 8-2 Objectives Perform exit summary process consisting of the following steps: Review service records Close.
Erik McCormick Former OSEP Part B Data Manager September 29, 2006 Special Education Data – The Old, the New and the Huh?
Targeted Assistance & Schoolwide Programs NCLB Technical Assistance Audio April 18, :30 PM April 19, :30 AM Alaska Department of Education.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress January 2008, Updated.
Alaska Accountability Adequate Yearly Progress February 2007, Updated.
1 Career Pathways for All Students PreK-14 2 Compiled by Sue Updegraff Keystone AEA Information from –Iowa Career Pathways –Iowa School-to-Work –Iowa.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
Six Year Plan Meeting the state targets Region Meeting August 16, 2007.
1 R-2 Report: Graduation A presentation to the Board of Education by Brad Stam, Chief Academic Officer Instructional Services Staff Research and Assessment.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
Student-Directed Transition Planning 0. 1 Course of Study.
1 Quality Indicators for Device Demonstrations April 21, 2009 Lisa Kosh Diana Carl.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
Welcome to the Presentation on the Model IEP Form
Transition IEP Using Your IEP to Plan for Your Life After High School
School Improvement Advisory Committee October 15, 2008 Welcome!
Evaluation of an intervention to increase online filing of individuals’ tax returns Peter Lumb September 2009.
We know what we need to do for students what barriers prevent us from doing it? Transition 2011.
Why Take EXPLORE? EXPLORE shows your strengths and weaknesses in English, mathematics, reading, and science. EXPLORE helps you search for careers and.
The Transition Focused IEP/ITP: A tool for building lives Presenters: Presenters: Luther Waters and Shelia Jordan-Jones The District Office of Transition.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Deana Holinka, MA, CRC, Administrative Coordinator,
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
Clock will move after 1 minute
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
Transition Talk Webinar Series: State Performance Plan August 2013 Data Submission Presented by Brenda Bush & Elizabeth Danner Webinar handouts available.
TRANSITION SUMMER INSTITUTE 2014 INDICATOR 13 BASIC REQUIREMENTS.
Presented by The New Jersey Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Post-School Outcomes Issues for Large States.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
Rhode Island State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Stakeholder Input November 6, 2014.
1 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt 10 pt 15 pt 20 pt 25 pt 5 pt Transition.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Transition and Indicator 13 Writing Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) That Meet the Legal Mandate A Webinar Series Presented by The California Community.
Teaching and Learning Special Education Secondary Programs Transition Services.
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Office of Special Education Services Instructional Leaders Roundtable Oct. 16, 2014 John R. Payne, Director.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
What Is TRANSITION & Transition PLANNING?
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Beyond Perkins Addressing the Needs of Students with Special Needs.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
Secondary Transition Overview Douglas County ESD Jackie Burr Secondary Transition Specialist November 15, 2007.
What is “Annual Determination?”
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Presentation transcript:

1 IDEA 2004 SPP Indicators Related to Transition: How We Collect the Data & What We Have Learned Ginger Blalock Summer Transition Meeting June 11, 2007 Adapted from PPT by Sue Gronewold

2 Recent Transition Requirements IDEA 2004 – Transition strengthened: Changed minimum age to 16 (no effect in N.M.) (not a strength!) Summary of Performance required upon exit Measurable post-school goals and transition services (SPP Indicator 13) Postschool outcomes surveys (SPP Indicator 14)

3 IDEA 2004 Purpose: A free appropriate public education... designed to meet students unique needs and prepare students for further learning, employment, and independent living – measurable postschool goals Shift in emphasis to: Outcomes Results

4 Expectations: Students with disabilities will complete high school. Students are prepared for adult life whether that be employment, further education/training, and/or independent living. Students will successfully transition into adult life and systems.

5 Regulations Addressed IDEA Transition Requirements Pathways to the Diploma High Stakes Testing Next Step Plans

6 Accountability Process Also Changed OSEP now requires all states to collect data on 20 State Performance Plan (SPP) indicators which measure both compliance with IDEA regulations and performance on improving student achievement and outcomes. These are reported each year in the Annual Performance Report (APR).

7 4 Transition-Related Indicators Indicator 1 – graduation rate of students with IEPs on standard pathways Indicator 2 – dropout rate of students with IEPs, compared to peers Indicator 13 – writing measurable postschool goals and measurable transition services/annual goals to reach those L-T goals, within the IEP Indicator 14 – postschool outcomes one year after exit, in further learning and employment

8 New Mexico Statutes & Regulations (1999) Established pathways to the diploma for students with disabilities Established that graduation plans must be a part of all IEPs Established New Mexico High School Competency Exam as high stakes exit exam

9 SPP Indicator #1 – Graduation Rate How measured? ADS/STARS – every schools designee inputs data quarterly & end of year (EOY) This year added new field for pathway to the diploma Compares # of seniors on 40 th day to those who earn a diploma Compares # of seniors with IEPs who earn a diploma on standard pathway with peers without IEPs Schools report to district, which reports to PED after EOY

10 Standard Pathway State Average 53% State total % graduates = 86% State Average 49% State total % graduates = 73% State Average 58% State total % grads = 84%

11 The NMPED will meet the SPP Indicator One as measured by an increase in the percent of youth graduating from high with a regular diploma (standard pathway).

12 Career Readiness Pathway State Average = 26% State total % graduates = 86% State Average = 20% State total % graduates = 73% State Average = 21%

13 Ability Pathway State Average = 6% State total % graduates = 86% State Average = 4% State total % graduates = 73% State Average = 3%

14 SPP Indicator # 2 Percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school compared to the percent of all youth in the State dropping out of high school data:.69% rate

15 The NMPED will meet SPP Indicator Two as measured by a decrease in the percent of youth with IEPs dropping out of high school.

16 Graduation Plans Must be a part of all IEPs Beginning at the 8 th grade IEP When a student returns to school after an extended absence Subsequent times when evaluations warrant the need to modify Include projected date of graduation Address if student is on target or not; if not, must describe strategies to return to target

17 Indicator 13 – Measurable Postschool Goals & Transition Services to Reach Them Refer to goals after high school in the 2 big areas at minimum (further learning, employment) Activities/strategies to reach goals must be measurable while the student is still in school. Annual goals also lead to postschool goals.

18 How collected in NM? One-third of LEAs, state-supported schools, and charter schools annually Imbedded within Transition Outcomes Project IEP review process Last year (05-06), all of Item 12 reported for grades 8-12; average = 54.2% This year (06-07) will report ages 16+; same for will involve data collection in every district/school each year

19 IEP Process for Transition Services OLeary 5-Step Process Revised by N.M. PED Postschool Goals (Vision) Present Levels Course of Study Transition Services Needs Annual Goals Short Term Objectives/ Benchmarks Measurable Post-School Goals Results from Transition Assessments

20 What have we learned? Forms need improvement & clarity (IEP, Transition Requirements Checklist) Many districts have made great strides in key areas (student involvement, courses of study) All districts still have weak areas (agency collaboration, annual goals tied to postschool goals) Many districts still dont understand the intent of the transition requirements (not those represented at this meeting!) PLCs can provide a building, local, or regional structure for targeted improvement based on your data Ongoing training & TA is a must!