Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 IDEA 2004 SPP Indicators Related to Transition: How We Collect the Data & What We Have Learned Ginger Blalock Summer Transition Meeting June 11, 2007.
Advertisements

Post School Outcomes – State Indicator 14 Chicago Public Schools Office of Specialized Services.
1 Early Childhood Outcomes: Early ACCESS and Early Childhood Special Education Presented by: Dee Gethmann Iowa Department of Education October 2006
4. NLTS2 Data Sources: Parent and Youth Surveys. 4. Sources: Parent and Youth Surveys Prerequisites Recommended modules to complete before viewing this.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
State Performance Plan (SPP) Indicator #14 Post School Outcomes Study Cohort III: Exiters Technical Assistance Session #2 Presented by The New.
Presented by The New Jersey Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Post-School Outcomes Issues for Large States.
Presented by Lawrence Dennis Education Consultant for the Office for Exceptional Children October 23, 2014 OCTA Fall Conference.
National Parent Technical Assistance Center Unified Technical Assistance System providing support to the PTI/CPRC network, as well as collaborating to.
STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 STEP Transition Workshop Memphis November 8, 2008 Secondary Transition Update Secondary Transition Update.
Coordinating the IEP and IPE YTP Fall Summit February 21, 2008 Clayton Rees, YTP Coordinator Barbara Garland, Madras HS SpEd Director.
This document was developed by the National Post-School Outcomes Center, Eugene, Oregon, (funded by Cooperative Agreement Number H326U090001) with the.
Each Year, nationwide, 1.2 million students fail to graduate from high school!
Pre-test Please come in and complete your pre-test.
Using and Understanding Post School Outcome Data Collection Presented by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Beth Miller Harrison, Ph.D. Tony LoBianco,
Special Education Director’s Conference Sept. 29, 2006 Prepared by Sharon Schumacher.
Charlotte Y. Alverson, Ed. S. Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May 8, 2008 Blueprint for Success: Helpful Hints for Writing.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Transition and the IEP Why is effective transition planning important?
A Model for Collaborative Technical Assistance for SPP Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14 Loujeania Bost, Charlotte Alverson, David Test, Susan Loving, & Marianne.
OAVSNP 2014 Charlotte Alverson, NPSO Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE 1.
11th Annual NDE Transition Conference
Your Students, Your Outcomes: Using Your PSO Reports Sally Simich, ODE Pattie Johnson, TRI Charlotte Alverson, NPSO 1.
1 Oregon Post School Data Collection Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education (ODE) Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute (TRI)
Clarification Week…. How’s it going? Do you need anything from us?
Got Data! Now What? Charlotte Y. Alverson April 14, 2011.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
Indicator 13 File Review 1)Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2)CCTS.
Examining Local Post-School Outcomes A guided dialog for using post- school outcomes for youth with disabilities to improve transition services and outcomes.
Indicator 14 and Kentucky’s Continuous Monitoring Process (KCMP) Prepared by Kentucky Post School Outcome Center (KyPSO) Human Development Institute University.
CCTS 1.Type your name and address (along with all team members participating with you) in the ‘Chat Box’ on the left. 2.CCTS will conduct a sound.
Do We Have all the Workers? Strategies for Gaining Representativeness Loujeania W. Bost, Ph.D. NDPC-SD & Deanne Unruh, Ph.D. NPSO State Planning Institute.
Everyone Counts, Everyone In: Essentials for Participation in the 2015 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Survey Requirements, Data Collection, and Results Spring.
1 Accountability Conference Education Service Center, Region 20 September 16, 2009.
Practical suggestions to increase the response rate when gathering post-school outcomes data. OSEP Approved January 2007 On the web at:
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools Programs for Exceptional Children State Performance Plan/ Annual Performance Report/Continuous Improvement Performance.
National High School Center Summer Institute What’s the Post-School Outcomes Buzz? Jane Falls Coordinator, National Post-School Outcomes Center Washington,
1 Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008 Jackie Burr, Oregon Department of Education Pattie Johnson, Teaching Research Institute.
Richard Henderson Evelyn S. Johnson A NNUAL P ERFORMANCE R EPORT U PDATE Richard O’Dell Division of Special Education Idaho State Department of Education.
New Mexico Post-School Outcomes Sub-group Analysis 2009 A Comparison of Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender and Strategies to Address Disparities NPSO Presentation.
Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions Revised May 2010 (Revisions indicated in red font)
New Indicator 14 Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions 3 rd Annual Secondary Transition State Planning Institute Charlotte, NC May12-14,
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network Pennsylvania Post School Outcome Survey (PaPOS) Utilizing the Data Results for Longitudinal Planning.
Indicator #14 SPP/APR Region VIII Employment Conference October 17, 2006 Dr. Greg Cooch BHSU.
National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center Connecting TA for Part B Indicators 1, 2, 13, & 14: Working Together to Support States OSEP Project.
North Carolina Post-School Outcomes (Indicator 14) January 14, 2016 David W. Test, UNC Charlotte.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Indicator 14 Post School Outcomes (PSO) Report
Appendix C Family Involvement in the Transition Process for Von Steuben Families Samantha Estrada SPED 591.
Cumberland County Schools Transition. Indicator 1 Graduation Percent of youth with IEPs graduating from high school with a regular diploma is.
The New York State Post School Indicators Longitudinal Study The High School Classes of 2000 and 2001 New York State Education Department, Office of Vocational.
Texas Effectiveness Study Mini-Grant Program for LEA Follow-up.
Transforming the Future with PSO Data.  Understand why collecting PSO data is so important for district decisions on how to best serve students  Learn.
Continuous Improvement Performance Plan (CIPP) New Hanover County Schools Students with Disabilities Data Story.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Transforming the Future with PSO Data
Transition Resources for Youth
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Trend Data Guest Speakers: Pattie Johnson, TRI Sally Simich, ODE
Post-Secondary Outcomes Data Collection 2008
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
Frequently Asked Questions (Revisions indicated in red font)
Post Secondary Outcomes Sally Simich, Oregon Department of Education
Utilizing Indicator 14 data and Evidence Based Resources 2017
Transition Outcomes Project Report Out Meeting
Ohio Longitudinal Transition Study (OLTS)
State performance plan indicator 14
State performance plan indicator 14
Presentation transcript:

Collecting and Using Post-School Outcome Data New Mexico Cadre Summer Camp June 11-12, 2007

IDEA Purpose (d)(1)(A) to ensure that all children with disabilities have available to them a free appropriate public education that emphasizes special education and related services designed to meet their unique needs and prepare them for further education, employment and independent living.

Indicator 14 Percent of youth who had IEPs, are no longer in secondary school and who are competitively employed, enrolled in some type of postsecondary school, or both, within one year of leaving high school.

Overview of Presentation The Who, What, When, & How of Indicator 14 Strategies for gathering post-school outcome data Strategies to report for use NPSO products and resources Question you have

The WHO: Who are data collected on? All graduates/completers Aged-out out of school (age 21) Early leavers/drop outs

The WHAT: What data are collected? In-School: Contact information Demographic characteristics Leaving status Post-School: Employment Post-secondary school & training

The HOW: How are data collected? Survey Methods Mail survey Phone survey for students need assistance with mail surveys Web-based survey (in process)

The WHEN: When are data collected? In-School: During last year of attendance Method for capturing early leavers Post-School: 1 year out of school Between April and September

By WHOM: Who collects the data? SEA staff Provide LEA excel file of names of students Training/compensation for LEA time and duties for survey administration LEA staff Provide staff to mail out surveys Provide liaison to assist students who need help in survey completion

Strategies for Data Collection to Increase Response Rate Obtain accurate exit contact information Obtain multiple methods of contact of individuals at exit Inform participants they will have opportunity to complete a survey 1 year out NPSO product: Collecting PSO Data: Locating Hard-to-Find Youth

Using PSO Data Define audience for use Present meaningful data –What does the audience want to know? –What decisions will be made from data? Future NPSO data use products & data templates

Using PSO data (cont.) Present data for best use –Trend (multiple year) data? –Comparison data (e.g., state, national, other populationse.g., gen. ed.)?

Some use questions What is our districts employment rate across time? How do our former students employment rates compare to the state/NLTS2s employment rates? How do our districts PSO rates compare to our States targets (benchmarks)? How do our female students compare with our male students on post-school outcomes? How do students with EBD compare with other youth with disabilities on post-school outcomes?

Data Presentation Clearly presented (tabular or graphically) Data described through legend or keys Visually appealing, yet will pass the copy test

Trend Data

Comparison Data

Resources:

Questions?