A typical case of SD structure at high spin in 194Hg! sig_tot = 1barn Atarget = 186, thikness = 0.5mg/cm 2 beam intensity = 5pnA, N = 3.12. 10 10 which.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Advertisements

Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh).
Partitioning 2-digit numbers
Triple-GEM detector operation for high-rate particle triggering W. Bonivento, G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, C. Deplano, P. de Simone, F. Murtas, D. Pinci,
X5/GIF Test Beam: High Rate Analysis Manuela Cirilli.
The Antiproton-Ion Collider EC, 500 KV NESR R. Krücken Technische Universität München for the Antiproton Ion Collider Collaboration.
The High Intensity Stable Ion Beams Working Group HISIB-WG
N. Pietralla and K. Sonnabend for the SFB 634
Present and future limitations of SHE in-beam experiments R-D Herzberg.
Kerstin Sonnabend, IKP, TU Darmstadt S-DALINAC - Nuclear Astrophysics Nuclear Astrophysics at the Darmstadt superconducting electron linear accelerator.
Exotic Shapes and High Spin physics with Intense Stable Beams.
Decay- and in-beam spectroscopy of heavy nuclei at the proton dripline Triple-shape coexistence.
Future prospects and needs for nuclear structure studies with high intensity stable beams.
E status report Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Hall A collaboration meeting December 13 th 2007.
Towards a neutron target and Measuring (n, ɣ) cross sections of the r-process Lothar Buchmann TRIUMF.
1/2, 1/6, 1/6, 1/6 1)If you spin once, what is the probability of getting each dollar amount (fractions)? 2) If you spin twice, what is the probability.
December 12 Physics. In: A car (mass=500 kg) going 50 m/s north collides with a truck (mass=2000 kg) going 60 m/s south. Afterwards the car is going 20.
Irradiation of 300 m phi detectors from MICRON and HAMAMATSU cont. Second independent estimate: 6h 2 cycles, 12h 1 cycle, 14h no beam, 5.5h 1cycle estimated.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
The Central Straw Tube Tracker In The PANDA Experiment
Electron Recoil & Dark Matter Direct Detection
Radiation Levels in ALICE Andreas Morsch Meeting on ALICE Radiation Tolerance 30/8/2004.
Jim Thompson, Eric Anderson, & Rob Austin NC State University, Department of Soil Science Jim Thompson, Eric Anderson, & Rob Austin NC State University,
1 Electronics Simulation in the Photon Transport Monte Carlo Preamp model Receiver/discriminator circuit CAFÉ driver circuit model Examples Summary January.
Riccardo Raabe – Instituut voor Kern- en Stralingsfysica, K.U.Leuven Huelva 09/11/2011 IntroductionREX-ISOLDEResultsThe future Transfer reactions at ISOLDE:
Huiswerkoplossings.  1) As x = -1 dan is y = -2(-1) – 8 = 2 – 8 = -6 As x = -2 dan is y = -2(-2) – 8 = 4 – 8 = -4 As x = -3 dan is y = -2(-3) – 8 = 6.
WHEEL OF EOC CLICK THE SPINNER BANKRUPT $50 $5 $10 $20 $500 $100.
Pressure = force area = 12 N 25 cm 2 = 0.48 N/cm 2.
Created by Susan Neal $100 Fractions Addition Fractions Subtraction Fractions Multiplication Fractions Division General $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200.
Sets Sets © 2005 Richard A. Medeiros next Patterns.
1 LOA-ENSTA. 2 3 For PW class laser, a contrast better than is required I ASE has to be < W/cm² The ASE intensity is enough to generate.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Accelerators & Detectors
SNS Spallation Neutrino Source 1 SNS layout GeV proton linear accelerator Accumulator ring Main target Stripping foil.
Another Presentation © All Rights Reserved.
Developments of micromegas detector at CERN/Saclay
COMPTON POLARIMETRY Analysis status Scaling laws 3 GeV Toward 850 MeV.
NMR-Part CNMR Video 2 Features of 13 CNMR 1) Low Natural Abundance: Since most polymers are composed of hydrogen and carbon, the natural alternative.
Solid State Detectors- 3 T. Bowcock 2 Schedule 1Position Sensors 2Principles of Operation of Solid State Detectors 3Techniques for High Performance Operation.
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
Advanced GAmma Tracking Array
Data analysis BTF 23 e 24 mag 05 T1 T2 500MeV electrons Repetition Rate 50 Hz Pulse Duration 1-10 ns Current/pulse 1 to 8 particles σ XY ~2mm Max Electronic.
Direct measurement of 4 He( 12 C, 16 O)  reaction near stellar energy Kunihiro FUJITA K. Sagara, T. Teranishi, T. Goto, R. Iwabuchi, S. Matsuda, K. Nakano,
Pete Jones University of Jyväskylä INTAG Workshop GSI, Germany May 2007 Status of digital electronics at JYFL Pete Jones Department of Physics University.
February 8 th, 2001 Status Report: SciFi for MICE Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
Accelerator hall of the S- DALINAC – electron energies from 2 to 130 MeV available – cw and pulsed beam operation possible – source for polarized electron.
Superheavy Element Studies Sub-task members: Paul GreenleesJyväskylä Rodi Herzberg, Peter Butler, RDPLiverpool Christophe TheisenCEA Saclay Fritz HessbergerGSI.
30 Ge & Si Crystals Arranged in verticals stacks of 6 called “towers” Shielding composed of lead, poly, and a muon veto not described. 7.6 cm diameter.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
A scintillation detector for neutrons below 1 MeV with gamma-ray rejection Scintillators are 3 mm BC408, 10 layers total Adjacent layers are optically.
Conception of cross section 1) Base conceptions – differential, integral cross section, total cross section, geometric interpretation of cross section.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Uncertainty for NPDGamma experiment in reaction Pil-Neyo Seo U of Virginia/TUNL HIGS2 Workshop, June 3-4, 2013.
R&D on complementary detectors and devices for nuclear structure and reaction mechanism studies R&D on complementary detectors and devices for nuclear.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Direct measurement of the 4 He( 12 C, 16 O)  cross section near stellar energy Kunihiro FUJITA K. Sagara, T. Teranishi, T. Goto, R. Iwabuchi, S. Matsuda,
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
PSA: ADAPTIVE GRID SEARCH The Method Experimental Results Optimization aspects Roberto Venturelli (INFN Padova - IPSIA “Giorgi” Verona) SACLAY, 05-may-06.
RDT Plunger Lifetime Measurements Workshop, GSI 2007 Workshop, GSI 2007 R. Julin -JYFL On behalf of the JYFL-Köln-Liverpool-Saclay-Munich collaboration.
ATLAS Research projects (DOE milestone NS8) W. Loveland Oregon State University.
Advanced Gamma Tracking Array Andy Boston The Advanced Gamma Tracking Array
Ultra fast SF57 based SAC M. Raggi Sapienza Università di Roma
Efficiency versus energy resolution
Prototype production and test
Direct measurement of 4He(12C,16O)g reaction at KUTL*
Nucleosynthesis 12 C(
Efficiency versus energy resolution
GRETINA experiments with fast beams at NSCL
The Estimated Limits For A 5g LE-Ge Detector
Presentation transcript:

A typical case of SD structure at high spin in 194Hg! sig_tot = 1barn Atarget = 186, thikness = 0.5mg/cm 2 beam intensity = 5pnA, N = which gives a reaction rate of R = /s the probability of any given particle to induce a reaction is P = R/N = Assuming a beam pulse frequency of 10 MHz, i.e. t = 100ns There are n = pps/ 10 7 = particles in every pulse! The probability to have x reactions within a the beam pulse is p x = (P. n) x e –(P.n) /x! In our case P.n = thus, the probability to have 0 reaction in a pulse = the probability to have 1 reaction in a pulse = the probability to have 2 reactions in a pulse = If we increase the beam by a factor 10 i.e, 50pnA (100pnA) P.n = 0.05 (0.1) thus, the probability to have 0 reaction in a pulse = 0.95 (0.9) the probability to have 1 reaction in a pulse = 0.05 (0.09) the probability to have 2 reaction in a pulse = ( )

As you can see here up to 100pnA intensity and 10MHz beam pulsing the probability of 2 reactions per beam pulse is < 1%! One could go to 50MHz beam pulsing (as typical Ge detectors have a 20ns time resolution) and be able to use up to 500pnA with the same probability of double reaction per beam pulse Note: that if recoils are detected in coincidence in a focal plan of a spectrometer this sets an additional limitation i.e. time distribution of the recoils around 50ns! This means the fastest beam pulsing would be 20 MHz!

BUT in reality : the limitation will be set already by the individual counting rates of the Ge detectors 10Khz! going to Agata (digital electronics) a factor 5 to 10 gain is expected ! The overall gains will allow to use beams with intensities not higher than 100pnA

Multiple reactions per beam pulse ( in general cases)! the probability of two reaction in a pulse seems to be already 10% for a value of P.n = 0.5! P.n = R/N. N/HF = R/HF R : reaction rate N : nombre of particle/s in the incident beam HF: beam frequency Taking a HF= 10MHz, P.n = R That means that at a reaction rate of the limit is reached! in barn). I (in pps) = For a target of mass A=100 and thickness of 1mg/cm2 For 1barn, the limit is pps (of the order of 500pnA) For 0.1 barn the limit is pps (of the order of 5p A) For 0.01 barn the limit is 1014 pps (of the order of 50p A)