DRAFT Recommendation Preemption & Competition CHALLENGER COUNTEROFFER June 25, 2013 NAESB OS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
W. WeathersModeled after Redirect Examples Examples: Reservations that are dotted show Capacity Available to Resell or Transfer. MWs in Gray are.
Advertisements

11 OASIS Subcommittee - Notification Task Force UPDATE May
NAESB OASIS Recommendation
NAESB OASIS Recommendation
WEQ EC Scoping Task Force on Coordination of Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems In Order 890, FERC directed transmission providers, working through.
WEQ EC Scoping Task Force on Coordination of Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems In Order 890, FERC directed transmission providers, working through.
1 Defender Mitigation Proposed Name Change: Defender Reservation True-up Jan 15, 2012 NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Progress Report.
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition EC Meeting 4/30/13.
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition EC Meeting 8/20/13.
Lottery Method in BPA’s Simultaneous Submission Windows and Potential Application to the Simultaneous Defender Matching Process NAESB Meeting 05/01/13.
Preemption and Competition Redirect Issues NAESB OS Meeting June 6, 2012 BPA Presenting.
Timing and Flowchart Assignment
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition EC Meeting 2/19/13.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Timing Considerations for Short-term Preemption and Competition Automation NAESB OS Presentation.
NAESB OASIS 1A Subcommittee Wendy Weathers, Chair ESS Meeting May 2005 Resale Recommendation.
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
Network Integration Transmission Service (NITS) EC Single Topic Review January 24, 2012.
Tiers 1 & 3 Assignment Flat Profile Recommendation.
NAESB OASIS Subcommittee Long Term Competition Mike Norris, Rebecca Berdahl May 13, /13/141.
Standards Development Improvement Opportunities February 18, 2014.
DRAFT E-Tag Notification Presentation NAESB OS Mar 26-28, 2013 Seattle, WA.
EC Meeting 2/24/ AP Item 7(b) Modify NAESB standards WEQ , WEQ , and related standards to be consistent with the Commission’s policy.
Treatment of Firm Redirects Recent FERC Order. Entergy Order Docket Nos. ER OA ER Issued May 16, 2013
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, January 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EST 4 th Quarter
Short-Term Competitions and Preemption.  Overview  Standards being covered are:  Motion 2 - Fixed Capacity Over Term of Request. ▪ Tier 1 Service –
NAESB WEQ UPDATE Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting Salt Lake, UT August 26, 2015 Bob Harshbarger Puget Sound Energy.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Resales, Aggregations & Redirects of Resales NAESB OS July 22-24, 2014 BPA Presenting.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 13th, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP) May 2015 Presenter: Marie Pompel Bonneville Power Administration.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, April 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
Electronic Scheduling /Information Technology Subcommittees (ESS/ITS) Update 2008 Review November 4, 2008.
E-Tag Notification Assignment NAESB OS Sep 17-19, 2013 Seattle, WA Assignee – Robin Cross Seattle City Light Interested Resources: Marie Pompel - BPA Power.
Resale Business Practice Standards 3 Options remain.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Capacity Reassignments, Aggregation & Redirects of Reassignments NAESB OS – May 13th, 2014 BPA.
Consolidation (API 5.d R09015) Business Practice Standards Draft WEQ OS Marie Pompel – July 2015.
NAESB WEQ EC Meeting 10/20/2015.   Workload  Long-Term Competition for Rollover Rights OASIS Subcommittee.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Conditional Resales NAESB Assignment Update April 16th, 2014 Bob Zerfing, Rebecca Berdahl.
NAESB Update Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting.
02/19/14 REVIEW AND UPDATE FLOWCHART AND TIMING. Goals Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
03/11/14 RECOMMENDATION FLOWCHART AND TIMING. GOALS Finish going through the process flowchart listing the steps and various options for each. Develop.
UNCONDITIONAL AND LEAD TIMES PREEMPTION AND COMPETITION TIMING.
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13. NT Assignment Update Resources: CompanyResources BPARebecca Berdahl, Milos Bosanac, Ann Shintani, Bob Zerfing ClarkBrenna.
NITS on webSmart OASIS. NITS on webSmart OASIS Agenda  Company and User Permissions  Electronic Industry Registry requirement  WebSmart OASIS NITS.
NAESB NITS, and Long-term Competition
Preemption-ROFR Notification
NT Assignment Update: 9/17/13.
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Development Update to the
BPA Formal Comments Overview to NAESB OS
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
Recommended Appendix B Redirect Standards Examples
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Development Update to the
Preemption & Competition Standards BPA – Southern Compromise Proposal October 24, 2017 PURPOSE: Review and discuss the inequity with the Short-Term Firm.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
BPA Formal Comments Recap of ‘Best Offer’ Proposal
Short-term Competition and Preemption (STCP)
Interchange Scheduling and Accounting Subcommittee Meeting
FERC Guidance – Long Term Competition
Assigned to the WEQ OASIS and WEQ OASIS/BPS Subcommittees
NITS on webSmart OASIS.
Kathy Anderson October 2015 MIC Meeting
OASIS Subcommittee Status Preemption and Competition
NAESB WEQ OASIS Subcommittee Report NAESB WEQ Executive Committee
OASIS Notification Recommendation.
Presentation transcript:

DRAFT Recommendation Preemption & Competition CHALLENGER COUNTEROFFER June 25, 2013 NAESB OS

2 Recommendation No Harm No Foul If capacity must be taken from a Defender to accommodate a Challenger and/or a Match, that capacity will only be taken away from Defenders once the Challenger has reached a final state. Charge Timing/Flowchart Lead to Develop Process Flows

3 Justification FERC 890 Orders do not address COUNTEROFFER to Challenger in the context of Preemption and Competition Existing NAESB Standards /1 do not address COUNTEROFFER to Challenger in the context of Preemption and Competition NAESB Motions to date are ambiguous/incomplete maybe even contradictory(?) on the process flow /2 /1 WEQ to 4.27 & WEQ & /2 Motion 20, 22, 35

4 FERC Pro-Forma OATT & 890 Orders FERC Pro-Forma OATT Provides General Guidance No specific recognition of COUNTEROFFER in the context of Preemption & ST Competition Pro forma OATT Section 13.2(iii) …Before the conditional reservation deadline, if available transfer capability is insufficient to satisfy all requests and reservations, an Eligible Customer with a reservation for shorter term service or equal duration service and lower price has the right of first refusal to match any longer term request or equal duration service with a higher price before losing its reservation priority…

5 NAESB Guidance NAESB standards are further ambiguous WEQ to 4.13 Negotiations w/out Competing Bids Describes COUNTEROFFER related processes WEQ to 4.27 Negotiations with Competing Bids Describes Preemption & Competition with no instructions on COUNTEROFFER WEQ Displacement No ROFR Silent on Counteroffer to Challenger WEQ Displacement with ROFR /2 Directs TSP to REFUSE Challenger if Defender confirms MATCHING Request Provides no guidance on alternative OASIS states to offer to Challenger other than REFUSED /1 Pro Forma OATT section 13.2(iii) /2 WEQ …if the Primary Provider accepts and the Transmission Customer confirms the MATCHING request, the Primary Provider shall set the competing request to REFUSED…

6 Process Flow from NAESB OS Motions to date Ambiguous ???? No Motion to Bind Defender to Match if Challenger Declines COUNTEROFFER Motion 20 – If capacity must be taken from Defenders in order to accommodate Challenger, that capacity will only be taken from Defenders once Challenger has reached a final state. Motion 22 – All Matching requests must be submitted pre- confirmed. Motion 35 - When final action is to be taken on the Challenger, and one or more defenders with ROFR have successfully exercised their ROFR, the challenger will be extended a counteroffer for service based on the remaining capacity based on the remaining available capacity, including the benefit from defenders that do not have or have not exercised their ROFR, on the transmission system according to the TPs business practices for granting of partial service based on the challenger's service requests.

7 Conclusion 1.FERC/Existing NAESB Standards are ambiguous or do not even address… 2.Motions to date are ambiguous on the process flow (e.g. no motion to bind defender) 3.NAESB OS free to develop process flows that take a No Harm No Foul approach 4.Charge Timing/Flowchart Lead (Matt Schingle) to develop process flows that can be incorporated into standards