Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rates, Ratios, and Proportions
Advertisements

C HAPTER Elasticity of Demand and Supply price elasticities of demand and supply, income and cross elasticities of demand, and using elasticity to forecast.
Math 7 Unit 6 Test Review.
Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and Profitability Analysis
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
2 Draft of proposed metrics for the WEQ BPS to conduct analysis and evaluation of the Parallel Flow Visualization pilot project. (PFV Pilot)
Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Houston, December 1-2, 2010.
Commercial Implications of ERR Calculations Option 3 method vs. Transaction method.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 – 2, 2010 (Revised based on Requests/Suggestions During Review) 1.
First to Curtail – Last to Curtail Examples December 1 - 2,
Parallel Flow Visualization/Mitigation Proposal
Flowgate Allocation Method
Future NERC Congestion Management Tool Option 3A (Proposed by NERC/NAESB TLR TF) 5/11/2005.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update August 17, 2010.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz – IDCWG Chair November 9 th, 2011.
Interchange Distribution Calculator Working Group (IDCWG) Update IDCWG October 12 th, 2011.
©2005 PJM 1 Redispatch Credit NERC/NAESB TLR Task Force Feb 2-3, 2005 Houston, Texas Operations Reliability Subcommittee Feb 8-9, 2005 Scottsdale, AZ.
1 Credit for Redispatch Small Group Review of Unconstrained MFs NAESB BPS Meeting December 14-15, 2011.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update October 26, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 2, 2010.
Business Practices Subcommittee Update February 1, 2011.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Overview Seams Coordination Process. 2 Introduction Midwest ISO Non-profit organization that manages the reliable flow of electricity across much of the.
Pacific Gas and Electric Company Long Term Procurement Plan Proceeding Renewable Integration Model Results and Model Demonstration October 22, 2010 Workshop.
You will need some paper!
0 - 0.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Simplify All mixed up Misc. AddingSubtract.
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
GEPA Lessons 1-5 Review. Directions: You may work with a partner to complete the following questions in order as they appear in the slideshow. Use a separate.
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?
£1 Million £500,000 £250,000 £125,000 £64,000 £32,000 £16,000 £8,000 £4,000 £2,000 £1,000 £500 £300 £200 £100 Welcome.
Welcome to Who Wants to be a Millionaire
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
INVENTORY AND OVERHEAD
FERC Order minute Scheduling.
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
Copyright 2007 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Macroeconomics by Jackson and McIver Slides prepared by Muni Perumal 10-1 Chapter 10 How banks create.
Strategic Capacity Planning
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter Eleven Cost Behavior, Operating Leverage, and CVP Analysis.
Enhanced Curtailment Calculator (ECC) Task Force Joint Guidance Committee Presentation and Motion to the OC & MIC Standing Committee Meetings March 27-29,
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
25 seconds left…...
Equal or Not. Equal or Not
Week 1.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 A Monetary Intertemporal Model: Money, Prices, and Monetary Policy.
PSSA Preparation.
TASK: Skill Development A proportional relationship is a set of equivalent ratios. Equivalent ratios have equal values using different numbers. Creating.
1 PART 1 ILLUSTRATION OF DOCUMENTS  Brief introduction to the documents contained in the envelope  Detailed clarification of the documents content.
Multiplication Facts Practice
0 x x2 0 0 x1 0 0 x3 0 1 x7 7 2 x0 0 9 x0 0.
FEBRUARY 27, 2013 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS Parallel Flow Visualization Overview 1.
7x7=.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS February 2015 A video presentation reviewing the webSAS UFMP methodology changes going into effect March.
NERC Congestion Management Congestion Management Option 3 Vendor Meeting Julie Pierce – NERC IDCWG Chair.
Reload PFV September 12, Reload PFV  Concern that need to be addressed:  The RC need to have an option in PFV to allow gradual reload of markets.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
AFC METHODOLOGY EMS USER GROUP SEP 12, 2004 AFC – New Developments EMS USER GROUP Sep
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
1 Parallel Flow Visualization Goals NAESB BPS Meeting September 15-16, 2010.
RELIABILITY COORDINATOR TOPICS 2006 FRCC SYSTEM OPERATOR SEMINAR.
Frank Koza – PJM Dave Zwergel – Midwest ISO
UFMP methodology changes in the updated webSAS
Two-Tier Firm Curtailment Overview
Presentation transcript:

Flowgate Allocation Method Examples of Proportional Curtailment of FIRM PTP and GTL Minneapolis, November 10-11, 2010

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL – Problem Statement Provide equal treatment of FIRM Point-to-Point (PTP) Transaction impacts and FIRM Generation-to- Load (GTL) Impacts during a TLR event – Flowgate allocation does not downgrade FIRM PTP and GTL transactions to NON-FIRM – TLR curtailment of FIRM contributions requires the issuance of a TLR-5 or higher – FIRM contributions are NOT curtailed in TLR-3a, TLR-3b and TLR-4 Allocations are based on forecasted/reserved (Expected) FIRM usage of flowgates up to but not exceeding the flowgate limit – Expected FIRM usage is determined in the Day-Ahead and Hour-Ahead – All Expected FIRM contributions to the flow on the flowgate are included – The total Expected FIRM contributions does not exceed the flowgate limit: BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate that equals its total Expected FIRM contributions – The total Expected FIRM contributions exceeds the flowgate limit: BAs and TSPs are allocated FIRM limits to their contribution on the flowgate proportional to their contribution FIRM contributions are placed in two curtailment buckets – LAST TO CUT (LTC) and FIRST TO CUT (FTC) – Nomenclature: PTP transactions:FTC = 7-FLTC = 7-FC GTL:FTC = 7-FNLTC = 7-FCN – FIRM contributions in FTC and LTC are determined in real-time based on current system conditions – LTC: FIRM contributions in the LTC bucket are those that do NOT exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts – FTC: FIRM contributions in the FTC bucket are those that exceed the Expected FIRM usage of the flowgate for FIRM PTP and GTL impacts

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example Flowgate limit:800 MW Allocation: – All Firm PTP transactions – Firm GTL up-to flowgate limit Total Firm PTP allocation:520 MW Total Firm GTL allocation:800 – 520 = 280 MW GTL allocation ratio:280 / 480 = – GTL allocation = (Firm GTL Impact ) x (GTL allocation ratio) EntityDA/HA Firm GTL Impact DA/HA Firm PTP Impact Firm PTP Allocation (1) Firm GTL Allocation (2) Firm Allocation (1)+(2) A B C D E Total ,000800

Proportional Curtailment of Firm PTP and Firm GTL - Example Flowgate limit:800 MW EntityFirm Allocation (1) RT Firm GTL Impact (2) RT Firm PTP Impact (3) Total Firm Impact (4)=(2)+(3) Over/(Under) Allocation (5)=(3)-(1) Last to Cut 7F+7FN (6)=Min(1,4) First to Cut 7FC+7FCN (7)=(4)-(6) 7FCN FTC GTL (7)x(2)/(4) 7FC FTC PTP (7)x(3)/(4) A B (13.3) C (13.3)80000 D E Total (10)

FTC and LTC Calculations TLR 5a requires curtailment of 10 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments – 10 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 16.7 MW of FTC (7-FC and 7-FCN), using the existing TLR pro-rata formulas Total 7FCN Curtailment:2.5x10/16.7 = 1.5 MW Total 7FC Curtailment:14.2x10/16.7 = 8.5 MW Individual 7FC curtailment:8.5 MW distributed pro-rata among all 7FC transactions – MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN) are not curtailed EntityLast to Cut 7F+7FN 7FCN FTC GTL 7FC FTC PTP 7FCN Curtailment 7FC Curtailment (*) 7F+7FN Curtailment A x10/16.7 = 6.00 B C D E x2.5/16.7 = 1.510x4.2/16.7 = 2.50 Total (*) Assumes all PTP transactions with the same TDF

Proportional Distribution of Under-Allocated Amounts to Over-Allocated GTL/PTP – Issues To Be Resolved Sum of all LTC (7-F and 7-FN) in Real-Time can be smaller than the flowgate limit – Only the over-allocated entities/transactions are penalized for over- allocating Remaining of flowgate limit can be reassigned to over- allocated entities/transactions so that LTC equals the flowgate limit – Reduces the FTC bucket size – Distribution Proportion Options: FIRM limits of over-allocated entities/transactions Real-Time over-allocation impact Real-Time impacts Other – If TLR-5 cannot be resolved with curtailments from FTC bucket, may need to curtail pro-rata the LTC bucket Entities/Transaction that do not over-allocate may be curtailed (see next examples)

FTC and LTC Calculations with Reassignment Total RT Impact < Flowgate limit – Reassign all FTC to LTC TLR 5a requires curtailment of 10 MW of FIRM transactions after exhausting all NON-FIRM curtailments – 10 MW of relief will be provided pro-rata from 790 MW of LTC (7-F and 7-FN), using the existing TLR pro-rata formulas – All impacting GTL and PTP are curtailed, even for entities where RT firm GTL and PTP are below the allocation EntityLast to Cut 7F+7FN 7FCN FTC GTL 7FC FTC PTP Reassigned LTC 7F+7FN 7F+7FN Curtailment A Pro-rata between firm GTL and PTP for all entities B20000 C8000 D27000 E Total