VISION PLAN SUMMARY Fairfax County Transportation Advisory Commission Amy Inman Manager of Transit Planning Department of Rail and Public Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Advertisements

1 The Role of Bus Transit in the Regional Transportation, Present and Future Howard Benn, Chair, TPB Regional Bus Subcommittee TPB Regional Priority Bus.
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Outside the Beltway CTB Briefing
Transportation Demand Management: Transport Canada Initiatives Canadian TDM Summit, November RDIMS
The Sustainable Communities Partnership and U.S. DOT’s Livability Initiative 6 th Annual East and Southeast Fort Worth Economic Development Summit Don.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Spokane Transportation Planning Partnerships August 23, 2013.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Regional Transportation Commission, Washoe County Lee Gibson, Executive Director Roger Hanson, Senior Planner.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
Goal: 10,000 interactions in 2015 –Extensive civic engagement Goal: To develop a great regional transit system –Update every five years –All options considered.
ICM San Antonio – IH-10 Corridor Brian Fariello, TxDOT.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
1 Metrolinx delivers The Big Move Regional Transportation Plan: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area November 5, 2012 Bruce.
Enter Presentation Name Public Works Transportation Division ACT Canada Sustainable Mobility Summit Hamilton, Ontario Transit Plenary November, 7, 2012.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Transportation Policy Board Project Briefing Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Orange County Business Council Infrastructure Committee December 14, 2010 Draft Long-Range Transportation Plan Destination 2035.
Planning & Implementing Transportation Alternatives for Energy Efficiency and the Future Is Now Foundation October 4, 2011 Debbie Griner, Environmental.
Greater Mankato Transit Redesign Study Study Overview and Initial Existing Conditions September 2011 In association with: LSA Design and Public Solutions.
Transit – Our transit services will provide modern, innovative, and viable travel options. Because transit facilities and services are an essential element.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
Multimodal Corridor System Management – Incorporating Analysis of Transit, Demand Management Programs and Operational Strategies Presented by Bill Loudon,
VRE SYSTEM PLAN WEBINAR October 9, 2013 Christine Hoeffner, VRE Foster Nichols, Parsons Brinckerhoff.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
 City of Hamilton – Transportation Sustainable Mobility Summit – October 27, 2013.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
I-95 Transit & TDM Plan I-95 Transit and TDM Plan I-95 Corridor Stakeholder and Service Provider Meeting #2 June 13, 2011.
North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.
Dallas ICM Pioneer Site Stage 1 Lessons Learned Webinar July 24, 2008.
CEO, Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Regional Priority Bus Transit Conference June 24, 2009.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Overview of Metro’s Transportation Program Pam O’Connor Metro Chair July 25, 2007.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to 12 th Annual TRB Transportation Planning Application Conference presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Atlanta Regional Commission Tom Weyandt, Department Director Comprehensive Planning May 2008.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho Workforce Development Council February 24, 2010.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Transportation System Management & Intelligent Transportation Systems May 5, 2009 Steve Heminger Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
Shaping our Future Transportation Transportation trends Influencing trends through land use decisions Alternative futures: Base Case and Scenario Complementary.
The 2006 Constrained Long-Range Transportation Plan: Plan Performance Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item #7.
Board of Supervisors Transportation Committee June 25, 2013 (6/18 presentation draft) Proposed High Quality Transit Network Concept 1.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
The Partnership between Transportation and Technology Jennifer Mitchell, Director Department of Rail and Public Transportation ITSVA Conference.
Multi Agency Exchange May 16, 2017.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) ACEC Presentation May 25, 2017
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Transit for Tomorrow strategic plan
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Update on Route 1 Efforts Transportation Advisory Committee October 20, 2015 Leonard Wolfenstein, FCDOT Jane Rosenbaum, FCDOT Doug Miller, FCDOT Department.
Bus Rapid Transit Study
Transit Integration and Efficiency Study Transit Advisory Committee
April 23, 2018.
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Presentation transcript:

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Fairfax County Transportation Advisory Commission Amy Inman Manager of Transit Planning Department of Rail and Public Transportation

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Overview Growth from 6 million to more than 8 million people in 30 years Long commutes and significant congestion Transit capacity challenges Vision Safe, strategic, and seamless mobility options for rail, transit, and TDM in greater Northern Virginia region Mission Visioning mobility beyond boundaries Goals Increase mobility and transportation choice through strategic investments in transit and TDM Efficiently use transportation infrastructure to meet current and future transportation needs Integrate transportation and land use planning and policy Support sustained economic growth and prosperity WASHINGTON D.C. ARLINGTON

VISION PLAN SUMMARY What did we do? Provided a forum to take a super regional view Listened to voices in the planning process Developed a regional vision for transit &TDM Focused on the traveler Identified need Provided policy, program, facility, and service recommendations

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Public and Stakeholder Outreach What We Heard

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Super NoVa Regional Transit and TDM V I S I O N

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Super NoVa Regional Transit Vision SUMMARY OF SUPER NOVA RECOMMENDATIONS Expansion of rail and bus services in the I-95 and I-66/US 29 corridors Regional bus network Circumferential transit services and facilities Streetcar in inner areas High-capacity transit services on urban arterials Increase all-day transit services in the I-95/395, Dulles, and I-66 corridors System of regional intermodal transportation hubs The recommended transit network is comprised of an interconnected network of corridor and area focused transit facilities and services.

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Higher Capacity Transit Network Growth in the center of the region will create a tremendous need for a new higher-capacity transit facilities and services. A dramatic investment in Rapid Bus, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT), and Light Rail Transit (LRT) will be needed along major arterial and freeway corridors throughout the center of the region SUMMARY OF SUPER NOVA RECOMMENDATIONS Fully dedicated transit runningways (most BRT and LRT lines) Partially dedicated transit runningways (some BRT, most Rapid Bus lines) Queue jump lanes (Rapid Bus and some BRT lines), Transit signal priority Level or nearly level passenger boarding, off-board and fare collection Real-time passenger information Branding

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Transit Facilities Major region-serving transit facilities often become a burden to individual jurisdictions. Critical facilities are often delayed due to the burden. Transit facilities will need to be viewed as regionally beneficial infrastructure. SUMMARY OF SUPER NOVA RECOMMENDATIONS Network of transfer, intermodal, and multimodal hubs oConvenient location to make travel connections oAccess to TDM services Transit storage and maintenance facilities oNeed for additional facilities oNeed to be planned and developed cooperatively at a super regional level oCould improve service efficiency oOpportunity for public/private partnership

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Significant capacity constraints threaten the ability of existing transit systems in the center of the region to expand and meet demand. Core capacity investments need to become a high regional priority to support regional transit demand. Some of the recommended services could help to alleviate some core capacity issues. SUMMARY OF CHALLENGES Capacity at transfer stations Line capacity on critical system links Inadequate fleet size Aging fleet Aging and undersized infrastructure Inadequate mid-day transit vehicle storage Core Capacity

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Local Transit Service Projected growth in the Super NoVa area will create a tremendous need for additional local transit service. The Super NoVa area is currently underserved and will need a significant investment in local transit service to meet regional needs. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 2040 population increases by 58% in Virginia portion of study area Service needs increase by 111% to 137% to meet area needs More cross-jurisdictional local transit services are needed Examples of Rural Transit Service Demand response, deviated fixed route, commuter/express bus, rural regional route Examples of Urban Transit Service Fixed route, deviated fixed route, community circulator, streetcar, commuter bus, bus rapid transit, light rail, heavy rail, commuter rail, ADA paratransit Fairfax County Arlington County Alexandria Loudoun County Prince William County Fauquier County Stafford County Spotsylvania County Caroline County King George County Orange County Culpeper County Rappahannock County Clarke County Frederick County Warren County

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Transportation Demand Management TDM Strategies for Hubs as multimodal centers with services & retail TDM Strategies for major Corridors and travel sheds Transit facilities and services will need to be complemented by robust TDM programs and services. TDM can have a tremendous effect on increasing peoples travel choices and ultimately, their mobility. SUMMARY OF SUPER NOVA RECOMMENDATIONS Inner ring: promote a car-free lifestyle with multimodal options for all trips Middle ring: promote a car-light lifestyle focusing on options for work trips Outer ring: focus on providing access to employment and essential services All rings: promote improvements for last mile connectivity

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Policies OPERATIONS Super Northern Virginia region cooperative transit service provider(s) or Coordinated operating plan(s) Simplify bus routes Local bus services coordinated to interface with regional transit services such as commuter bus, commuter rail, intercity passenger rail, and Metrorail Public/private partnership in operations Fare structures (reduce penalty for transfers, route pricing, private and public) to incentivize transfers Universal transit payment system Integrated corridor management Regional transit interoperability Operating cost sharing for cross-jurisdictional service Performance standards FACILITIES Capacity improvements for VRE & Metrorail System of intermodal transit centers (including P&Rs) with supporting infrastructure, services, programs, and technology Development of a system of hubs Innovative delivery methods for transit facilities Quality, context-sensitive community growth related to transit facilities Transit vehicle storage and maintenance facilities Guidance on the shared use of roadway/HOT/HOV facilities for transit Accommodations for private bus and shuttle operations Shared- or joint-use facilities (i.e. park-and- ride at sports facility) that benefit transit and TDM

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Policies MARKETING AND COMMUNICATION Coordinated marketing (services, programs, and facilities) Consistent branding (i.e. route names, service types) Common language to refer to transit and TDM services, facilities, and programs Educational programs tailored to serve different purposes including: Users (young, old, captive riders, choice riders) Travel markets (long distance, local, specific corridors, destinations) Cross-marketing with related industry and other modal (bicycle, pedestrian, HOV) efforts Consolidated locations for consumers to obtain information on services, facilities, and programs Social media and mobile device application support PLANNING Multi-jurisdictional transit and TDM planning Coordinated land use and transportation planning and policy-making Context-sensitive regional transit performance standards Regional interoperability planning Continued Super NoVa transit & TDM dialogue (regular) DRPT guidance on transit-supportive land use characteristics and densities Evaluate Super NoVa (greater Northern Virginia) regional transit governance

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Policies ACCESS TO AND FROM TRANSIT Pedestrian and bicycle facilities in transit corridors Programs to expand bicycling and walking to/from transit Transit stops and stations that offer good access by walking and bicycling Secure bicycle parking at transit stops and stations Vehicle-sharing systems at transit stops and stations Para-transit support Guidance for access to transit provisions in local development ordinances Facilitate access for transit-dependent populations TECHNOLOGY Comprehensive, simple travel information (i.e. 511) for transit and TDM Develop a regional AVL system Open-source data Private investment in traveler information applications Intelligent transportation systems (ITS) as transportation infrastructure Inter/intra agency technology integration Multi-jurisdictional technology planning Consistent policy on technology infrastructure and platforms Expand and coordinate regional transit signal priority application and deployment

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Develop a Super NoVa Action Plan To Achieve MOBILITY BEYOND BOUNDARIES Next Step

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Achieving Mobility Beyond Boundaries Develop Super NoVa Transit and TDM Action Plan – Follow the policies, service, and facility recommendations articulated in the Vision Plan – Identify local, regional, and state roles and responsibilities to advance the recommendations – Integrate Vision Plan recommendations into local and regional policies, plans, and programs Create a Mechanism for Regular Super Regional Coordination for Transit and TDM Planning and Implementation – Ongoing dialog will be critical to the success of advancing the transit and TDM recommendations – Foster regional collaboration to build upon incremental success that will be required to achieve the long-term Super NoVa Transit and TDM Vision Identify and Support Strong and Comprehensive Regional Leadership and Champions – Foster and encourage multimodal leadership at all levels of state, regional, and local government – Continue public, stakeholder, and community involvement that provides local and context sensitive perspective to achieving Mobility Beyond Boundaries

VISION PLAN SUMMARY Thank you!! Questions??