Durability of Response and Rate of Re-emergence of Wild Type at Boceprevir (BOC) Resistance-Associated Variant (RAV) Loci in Genotype 1a and 1b Patients:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Un percorso realizzato da Mario Malizia
Advertisements

HIV/HCV Coinfection News – HCV Protease Inhibitors
Multiplication X 1 1 x 1 = 1 2 x 1 = 2 3 x 1 = 3 4 x 1 = 4 5 x 1 = 5 6 x 1 = 6 7 x 1 = 7 8 x 1 = 8 9 x 1 = 9 10 x 1 = x 1 = x 1 = 12 X 2 1.
Division ÷ 1 1 ÷ 1 = 1 2 ÷ 1 = 2 3 ÷ 1 = 3 4 ÷ 1 = 4 5 ÷ 1 = 5 6 ÷ 1 = 6 7 ÷ 1 = 7 8 ÷ 1 = 8 9 ÷ 1 = 9 10 ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = ÷ 1 = 12 ÷ 2 2 ÷ 2 =
OPTN Modifications to Heart Allocation Policy Implemented July 12, 2006 Changed the allocation order for medically urgent (Status 1A and 1B) patients Policy.
Douglas T. Dieterich, Juergen K. Rockstroh, Kenneth E. Sherman, Nathalie Adda, Lisa Mahnke, Varun Garg, Shahin Gharakhanian, Scott McCallister, Vincente.
Frequencies of Resistance-Associated Amino Acid Variants Following Combination Treatment with Boceprevir (BOC) Plus PEGINTRON (PegInterferon Alfa-2b) and.
HCV RESPOND-2 Final Results High Sustained Virologic Response Among Genotype 1 Previous Non-Responders and Relapsers to Peginterferon/Ribavirin when Re-
Adherence to HCV Therapy: Relation with Virologic Outcomes and Changes in Adherence Over Time Vincent Lo Re, MD, MSCE V. Teal, R. Localio, V. Amorosa,
CALENDAR.
1 1  1 =.
1  1 =.
Optimal therapy in genotype 1 patients 3 rd Paris Hepatitis Conference January 2009 Stefan Zeuzem, MD J.W. Goethe University Hospital Frankfurt,
Look at This PowerPoint for help on you times tables
Least Common Multiples and Greatest Common Factors
PROCESS vs. WA State SCS Study A Comparison of Study Design, Patient Population, and Outcomes August 29,2007.
Hepatitis C The next generation of Treatment for Hepatitis C.
Before Between After.
Management of non naïve patients with hepatitis C "Non-Responders" 3rd Paris Hepatitis Conference, Paris, Christoph Sarrazin J. W. Goethe-University.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir Retreatment with HCV Genotype 1 NIAID Retreatment Phase 2a Treatment Experienced Osinusi.
Using Lowest Common Denominator to add and subtract fractions
Bruix J, et al. Presented at the 44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), April 24, 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark.04/28/09.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 1,4 SOLAR-1 (Post Transplant) Phase 2 Treatment Naïve and Treatment.
What’s new in HCV genotype 2? Alessandra Mangia S.Giovanni Rotondo,ITALY PARIS HEPATITIS CONFERENCE January 2012.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-1 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Source: Afdhal N, et al. N.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Source: Afdhal N, et.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV GT1 ION-3 Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Kowdley K, et al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin to Prevent Post-Transplant HCV Recurrence Phase 2 Curry MP, et al. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:100-7.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir in Treatment-Experienced GT1 with Cirrhosis SIRIUS Phase 2 Treatment Experienced Bourliere.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Sofosbuvir + Ribavirin in HCV GT 4 Egyptian Ancestry Trial Phase 2 Ruane PJ, et al. J Hepatol. 2015;62:
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
SPRINT-2/RESPOND-2 Boceprevir Plus Standard of Care Phase 3 Clinical Trials Analysis of Resistance Associated Variants by HCV Genotype 1 subtypes 1a and.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
Gastroenterology Volume 142, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages 790–795 Tom W. Chu.
VALENCE SOF + RBV Not randomised Open label* ≥ 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 2 or 3 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Treatment naïve or prior IFN-based.
ALAN FRANCISCUS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEPATITIS C SUPPORT PROJECT EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, HCV ADVOCATE WEBSITE JOIN ME ON TWITTER & FACEBOOK – HCVADVOCATE BLOG:
Response Guided Therapy Fabien Zoulim Hepatology Department & INSERM Unit 1052, Lyon University Lyon, France.
COSMOS SOF + SMV + RBV SOF + SMV Randomisation 2 : 1 : 2 : 1* Open-label * Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b) in both cohorts, IL28B in.
Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Vall Hebron Barcelona-. Spain Relapser or Non Responder? Chronic Hepatitis C.
How to optimize treatment of G1 patients? Prof. G. K. K. Lau 2012.
FUSION  Design  Objectives –SVR ≥ 20% compared with historical control of 25%, 97% power –Difference of SVR > 20% between the 2 groups, 82% power SOF.
Response Guided Vs.Response Unguided Therapy K.Rajender Reddy M.D Professor of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, USA.
Hepatitis C Nonresponders
 Design Open-label years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 HCV RNA > 10,000 IU/mL HIV co-infection Stable ART* with HIV RNA < 50 c/mL ≥ 24 weeks.
Trends in Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation Kate Forgan-Smith KA Stuart 1,4, C Tallis 1,4 GA Macdonald 1,3,4, J Fawcett 2,3.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
R2. 임형석 / Pf. 김병호. I NTRODUCTION Chronic hepatitis C infection 130~150 million worldwide 7 genotypes genotype 1 predominates(about 70% in USA): most difficult.
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
DAA’s in the treatment of HCV: The Beginning of the end or the end of the beginning for HCV?
Resistance to Direct Acting Antiviral Therapy
Elbasvir + Grazoprevir + Ribavirin in PI-experienced HCV GT1 C-SALVAGE
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Elbasvir + Grazoprevir +/- Ribavirin in Treatment-Naïve HCV GT 2, 4, 5, or 6 C-SCAPE Brown A, et al. EASL 2015; Abstract P0771.
HCV Protease Inhibitors in Clinical Practice
Diagnostics in hepatitis C: The end of response-guided therapy?
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2012)
Analysis of Sustained Viral Response and Boceprevir Resistance Following Combination Treatment With Boceprevir Plus Peginterferon Alfa-2a/Ribavirin in.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin for 8 or 12 weeks in HCV GT1 ION-3
Phase 2b Treatment Naïve and Treatment Experienced
ASPIRE Study: SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 experienced patients
HCV Protease Inhibitors in Clinical Practice
New HCV therapies on the horizon
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2012)
CONCERTO-4 Study: SMV + PEG-IFNa-2b + RBV for genotype 1
Incidence of HCC after HCV treatment with DAAs: ERCHIVES
Pei-Yuan Su,Yu-Chun Hsu,Shun-Sheng Wu,Wei-Wen Su,Maw-Soan Soon
Presentation transcript:

Durability of Response and Rate of Re-emergence of Wild Type at Boceprevir (BOC) Resistance-Associated Variant (RAV) Loci in Genotype 1a and 1b Patients: Interim Analysis of Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Treated With Boceprevir + PegIntron +/- Ribavirin Richard J.O. Barnard, John Howe, Donald J. Graham, Robert A. Ogert, Jianmin A. Long, Navdeep Boparai, Patricia Mendez, Clifford Brass, Janice Albrecht, Robert Ralston

Summary of Boceprevir Boceprevir is a NS3 protease inhibitor that has completed phase 3 clinical trials o RESPOND-1; Phase 2 Dose finding-study in previous null responders + IFN +/- RBV o SPRINT-1; Phase 2 Safety/Efficacy Study in treatment naïve patients +IFN/RBV o SPRINT-2; Phase 3; Response-guided therapy vs 48-week therapy study + IFN/RBV in treatment naïve patients (800mg BOC TID) o RESPOND-2; Phase 3; Response-guided therapy vs 48-week therapy study + IFN/RBV in previously treated patients (800mg BOC TID) SVR rates were superior to control arms in RESPOND-2, (59-66% vs 21%) and SPRINT-2 (63-66% vs 38%) Resistant Associated amino acid Variants (RAVs) were detected in 53% of non-SVR patients in SPRINT-2/RESPOND-2 studies As HCV does not integrate into the human genome, the issue of the longevity of RAVs selected in non-SVR patients is unknown IFN = Pegylated Interferon, RBV = Ribavirin

In vitro Characterization of Boceprevir NS3 RAVs in Enzymatic Studies Position 170 is Isoleucine in genotype 1a and Valine in Genotype 1b V36M a T54A T54S V55A R155K a A156S I/V170A Fold Change Ki* Genotype 1a Genotype 1b Majority Variants Detected from Clinical Studies (Present in >25% of Patients) Genotype 1a; V36M, R155K Genotype 1b; T54A, T54S, A156S, V170A Variants also detected at Position V55, V158 and M175L

Long-Term Follow-Up Study These analyses were undertaken to characterize the rates of re-emergence of wild-type at boceprevir resistant loci in non-SVR patients with detectable RAVs Study Description o Patients are being monitored for at least 3.5 years post-therapy o Resistance variants were detected by population sequencing of the NS3 protease region (aa codons 1-181) Patients who received at least one dose of study medication in a previous Phase 1, 2, or 3 Boceprevir Clinical Study EOT a Study duration max 3.5 years after EOT Screenin g/ Baseline Mo 3 Mo 6 Mo 12 Year 1 Mo 18 Mo 24 Year 2Year 3 Mo 30 Mo 36 a patients may have rolled over at different times after enrollment in the previous treatment protocol.

Objectives and Criteria for the Interim Analysis of Resistance Initial aim was to characterize the presence of boceprevir RAVs over time by population sequencing (~20-25% Sensitivity) Patients in interim analysis had to have viruses with at least one of the majority RAVs (detected in 25% of non-SVR patients) V36M, T54A/S and/or R155K Patients had to have viruses that were wild-type at that position prior to receiving boceprevir Patients had to have at least two years of follow-up data (183 patients in this interim analysis); majority of patients from RESPOND-1

Baseline Demographic and Disease Characteristics Demographic and baseline characteristics of age, sex, race, ethnicity, weight, BMI and viral load are consistent with previously studies in HCV patients Patients enrolled in the long-term follow up study were typically white males; average age was 49 to 52 years The distribution of genotypes was similar among the patient groups The average length of time since probable exposure to HCV was 25 to 30 years

Return of Wild-Type at Individual RAV Loci by Population Sequencing Genotype 1b RAV not individual RAV Loci, % 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Time Since the End of Treatment (Yrs) T54A T54S *All RAVs Genotype 1a *Refers to any Boceprevir RAV (Includes V36, Q41, F43, T54, V55, R155, A156, V158, I/V170) RAV not individual RAV Loci, % 2 Time Since the End of Treatment (Yrs) % 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% V36M T54S R155K *All RAVs 0

Median Rates of Return of Wild-Type at Specific RAV Loci # Refers to any Boceprevir RAV (Includes V36, Q41, F43, T54, V55, R155, A156, V158, I/V170) *By population sequencing

Individual Viral Load Plots from Patients infected with Genotype 1b Virus BL WT Log 10 Viral Load (IU/mL) T54A/S & V170A T54S & V55A T54S WT Time (Weeks) Genotype 1b Patient 1 Time (Weeks) WT -16BL WT T54A V158I/M T54A Log 10 Viral Load (IU/mL) Genotype 1b Patient 2 WT = Wild Type BL = Baseline IFN/RBV Lead-In IFN/RBV + BOC Follow-up

Viral Load Plot from a Patient infected with Genotype 1a Virus V36M R155K Variant Frequency, % Quantification of Variants By 454-Sequencing Week 28 V36M R155K Week 100 LOQ= Limit of Quantification WT = Wild-Type IFN/RBV + BOC Follow-up Longitudinal Analysis Wk 28 Week Log 10 Viral Load (IU/mL) LOQ WT V36M/R155K

Conclusions Different RAVs are selected in genotype 1a and 1b viruses WT at each RAV loci re-emerged at different rates depending on the specific RAV selected o WT re-emerged most rapidly in genotype 1a or 1b viruses with V36M or T54A, as compared to viruses with either T54S or R155K Variation in the appearance of resistance and rates of re-emergence of WT at each loci reflects relative fitness of the specific RAVs in the specific genetic background In patients that fail with multiple RAVs, individual RAVs can decline at different rates o Studies are ongoing to analyze the linkage in viruses with multiple RAVs The majority of patients in this interim analysis are from phase 2 studies