Ocean Engineering Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department Marine radar wave observations at the mouth of the Columbia River Merrick.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Flood Risk Analysis – the USACE Approach
Advertisements

Environmental Application of Remote Sensing: CE 6900 Tennessee Technological University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Course Instructor:
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
2. The WAM Model: Solves energy balance equation, including Snonlin
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021
INVESTIGATION OF LOCAL STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TURBULENT WIND FLOW IN ATMOSPHERE BOUNDARY LAYER WITH OBSTACLES Yuriy Nekrasov, Sergey Turbin.
Coherent and Electro-Optics Research Group (CEORG)
Surface Transportation Weather Research Center University of North Dakota Pavement Precipitation Accumulation Precipitation Data Sources Presenter: Mark.
Ocean Vocabulary The energy is being passed through the water as a wave. 2.Wave: the movement of energy through a body of water.
1 Verification of wave forecast models Martin Holt Jim Gunson Damian Holmes-Bell.
GPS-Cellular Drifter Technology for Coastal Ocean Observing Systems
Introduction To Navigation
Mary Pagnutti Kara Holekamp Robert E. Ryan Innovative Imaging and Research Building 1103 Suite 140 C Stennis Space Center, MS ASPRS 2012 Annual Conference.
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Lightning Imager and its Level 2 products Jochen Grandell Remote Sensing and Products Division.
Lesson 12: Technology I Technology matters Most of the topics we’ve learned so far rely on measurement and observation: – Ocean acidification – Salinity.
Using a DPS as a Coherent Scatter HF Radar Lindsay Magnus Lee-Anne McKinnell Hermanus Magnetic Observatory Hermanus, South Africa.
Motivation The Carolinas has had a tremendous residential and commercial investment in coastal areas during the past 10 years. However rapid development.
EE535: Renewable Energy: Systems, Technology & Economics Tidal (1)
The Logistic Requirements for Wave Field Measurement Prof. Dr.-Ing. Chia Chuen Kao Director, Coastal Ocean Monitoring Center, National Cheng Kung University.
GOES-R 3 : Coastal CO 2 fluxes Pete Strutton, Burke Hales & Ricardo Letelier College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences Oregon State University 1. The.
Types Ocean Observations and Weather Information Wave Height and Frequency Current Weather Synoptic Situation Atmospherics (Temp, Winds, Barometric Pressure,
Long-Term Ambient Noise Statistics in the Gulf of Mexico Mark A. Snyder & Peter A. Orlin Naval Oceanographic Office Stennis Space Center, MS Anthony I.
Progress Towards a Regional Coastal Ocean Observing System for the Southeast (SEACOOS) Harvey Seim / University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill University.
Interested in developing a new, clean source of energy from the sea? We want you!!! Graduate research at Oregon State University
Argus as an Coastal Engineering Tool - Validation through Comparisons with Traditional Methods Joan Oltman-Shay, Matt Pruis, and Dave Berliner Sponsored.
Weather Forecasting Yean Lee Low 6 th December 2010.
1 Status of Ring-diagram Analysis of MOTH Data Kiran Jain Collaborators: F. Hill, C. Toner.
Space Weather Major sources of space weather ● Solar wind – a stream of plasma consisting of high energy charged particles released from the upper atmosphere.
UNCW Ocean Observing: Providing Infrastructure, Data, and Products to Support State and Federal Agency Needs AQUARIUS NOAA’s Undersea Research Center (NIUST,
4-D COASTAL OCEAN DYNAMICS DETECTED BY SURFACE CURRENT RADAR AND AUVs L. K. Shay Meteorology and Physical Oceanography University of Miami P. Edgar An.
Aerial Photographs and Remote Sensing Aerial Photographs For years geographers have used aerial photographs to study the Earth’s surface. In many ways.
ARSF Data Processing Consequences of the Airborne Processing Library Mark Warren Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Plymouth, UK RSPSoc 2012 – Greenwich, London.
Quantitative Estimates of Biomass and Forest Structure in Coastal Temperate Rainforests Derived from Multi-return Airborne Lidar Marc G. Kramer 1 and Michael.
CODAR Ben Kravitz September 29, Outline What is CODAR? Doppler shift Bragg scatter How CODAR works What CODAR can tell us.
Environmental and Water Resources Engineering Division Civil Engineering Dr. Soumendra Nath Kuiry Assistant Professor Hurricane Gustav (2008) Simulation.
MESOSCALE OCEANIC VARIABILITY EXPERIMENT (MOVE) Shay et al. SCIENTIFIC GOAL: To observe and understand the role of mesoscale oceanic processes on littoral,
L. K. Shay 1, J. Martinez-Pedraja 1, B. K. Haus 1, Brad Parks 1, Peter Vertes 1, Lew Gramer 2, and J. Brewster 1 1 Division of Meteorology and Physical.
Assimilation of HF Radar Data into Coastal Wave Models NERC-funded PhD work also supervised by Clive W Anderson (University of Sheffield) Judith Wolf (Proudman.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Modeling the upper ocean response to Hurricane Igor Zhimin Ma 1, Guoqi Han 2, Brad deYoung 1 1 Memorial University 2 Fisheries and Oceans Canada.
Argus at North Head, WA USA Science for Decision Making Joan Oltman-Shay Chad Budworth Sponsored by: USACE Portland District.
Argus at North Head, WA USA Science for Decision Making Joan Oltman-Shay Chad Budworth Sponsored by: USACE Portland District.
SCCOOS Web Site Training Surface Currents and Wave Conditions.
Airborne Measurements of the Columbia River Plume Andy Jessup and Bill Plant APL-UW Determine Plume Location/Characteristics –SST –Water Type/Sediment.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
Why We Care or Why We Go to Sea.
Cloud Evolution and the Sea Breeze Front
Relationships between Lightning and Radar Parameters in the Mid-Atlantic Region Scott D. Rudlosky Cooperative Institute of Climate and Satellites University.
Further information Results 19 tournaments surveyed : 415 interviews; 579 fishing locations; 1,599 fish hooked/landed Variable.
Determining Relationships between Lightning and Radar in Severe and Non-Severe Storms Scott D. Rudlosky Florida State University Department of Earth, Ocean,
NASA Earth Observing System Visualization Tools ARSET - AQ Applied Remote SEnsing Training – Air Quality A project of NASA Applied Sciences Introduction.
REAL-TIME ESTIMATION OF OCEAN WAVE FIELDS FROM MARINE RADAR DATA David R. Lyzenga, Okey G. Nwogu, and Robert F. Beck University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Contributing to the Prediction Coastal Flooding:
Ocean Surface Current Observations in PWS Carter Ohlmann Institute for Computational Earth System Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA.
Observations to Operations: Why validation is important? Julie Thomas Scripps Institution of Oceanography Hydrographic Review Panel Los Angeles, CA April.
INTEGRATING SATELLITE AND MONITORING DATA TO RETROSPECTIVELY ESTIMATE MONTHLY PM 2.5 CONCENTRATIONS IN THE EASTERN U.S. Christopher J. Paciorek 1 and Yang.
Instruments. In Situ In situ instruments measure what is occurring in their immediate proximity. E.g., a thermometer or a wind vane. Remote sensing uses.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
Surface Current Mapping in the Lower Chesapeake Bay INTRODUCTION High frequency RADAR antennas are used to observe the surface circulation patterns in.
Learning Objectives I can compare photographs with other types of remote sensing images. I can describe the uses & importance of the global positioning.
4-D COASTAL OCEAN DYNAMICS DETECTED BY SURFACE CURRENT RADAR AND AUVs
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
COSA Committee Meeting
EG2234 Earth Observation Weather Forecasting.
GOES-R Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) Requirements
GOES Data Collection System
788.11J Presentation “Atmospheric Observatory”
Comparison of Aircraft Observations With Surface Observations from
Natalie Laudier Operational Oceanography 13Feb2009
Presentation transcript:

Ocean Engineering Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Department Marine radar wave observations at the mouth of the Columbia River Merrick C. Haller, H. Tuba Özkan-Haller, Patricio Catalan,J.D. Lentine, Justin Brodersen, Hai-Ying Jao, and Lisa Andes, Merrick C. Haller, H. Tuba Özkan-Haller, Patricio Catalan, J.D. Lentine, Justin Brodersen, Hai-Ying Jao, and Lisa Andes, Civil and Construction Engineering, College of Oceanic & Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University New Observing Technologies for the NANOOS-Pilot Project Conventional marine radar technology is being adapted as a tool for wave observing in coastal areas. Recently, researchers within the Ocean Engineering Program at Oregon State University in cooperation with Imaging Science Research, Inc. have developed a high-resolution wave observation system using an X-band marine radar with a customized data acquisition system. These observation systems offer the potential for providing real-time wave information over large nearshore areas (~20 km 2 ). We expect that remote sensing technology such as this can provide a considerable benefit at navigational entrances where wave conditions are often hazardous and highly variable and where traditional in-situ sensors are often ineffective or cannot be safely deployed. Top left: Aerial photo of the north jetty; Top right: Temporary radar tower and support vehicles; Bottom left: View of waves at Benson Beach during the Jan. 16, 2006 storm. Bottom right: View of Benson Beach and north jetty from atop the radar tower. Top: Portions of single radar images expanded to show the area near Benson Beach, WA. Waves were consistently breaking as far out as 1 km from shore leading to the bright radar returns as far out as the end of the north jetty. Bottom: Frequency spectra calculated from radar pixel time series located approximately 600 m offshore of Benson Beach. Estimated peak periods are compared with those measured by NDBC Buoy located approximately 37 km to the southwest. North Head (USACE camera station) south jetty north jetty Sampling capabilities Image frequency - 44 rotations per minute (1 image every 1.36 seconds) Image resolution - 3 m in range, 1 o in azimuth Image footprint - 6 km radius (adjustable) Duration - user specified, typical image sequences are 15 min long (640 images) and repeated every hour Radar image time series provide a synoptic picture of the ocean surface over a large area. This is similar to having a wave buoy located every 10 meters! For wave analysis, image pixels from areas of interest are selected and processed with Fourier analysis routines and wave frequency and direction information can be determined at essentially the same resolution as the image pixels. This gives a detailed description of the spatial variability of wave conditions throughout the area. In addition, with calibration, radar systems can provide direct estimates of wave heights and signify the presence of breaking waves. Finally, large scale ocean density fronts can be identified in these images due to the changes in radar scattering they induce. Radar images from the mouth of the Columbia River. Images span 6 km in range distance from the radar (located at center of each image). The left image covers 170 degrees in azimuth, the right covers 260 degrees. North Head is visible directly north from the radar, to the south are the Columbia River jetties. Image rectification Raw image Rectified image In order to geo-locate the wave data, each radar image needs to be rectified to the local real-world coordinate system. The figure at left shows a raw radar image and the image at left is after partial rectification. Full rectification requires GPS measurements of Ground Control Points visible in the images (such as the jetties) and interpolation onto a uniform grid. Radar - T p =10 sec NDBC T p =10 sec Radar - T p =16.7 sec NDBC T p =13 sec Radar - T p =16.0 sec NDBC T p =14.3 sec Radar - T p =13.1 sec NDBC T p =14.3 sec Wave Analysis Wave Modeling Left: Wave heights predicted by the SWAN nearshore wave model, Jan. 17 th 1pm. Center: Predicted wave directions, colors represent degrees from North. Right: Corresponding radar image from Jan. 17 th 1pm. The Future North jetty The flow out of the Columbia River varies depending on the stage of the tide and during periods of strong currents the wave field can be significantly modified. For example, during strong ebb flows waves over the Columbia River Bar are highly steepened and often break, which leads to dangerous navigational conditions. Left: Radar image taken Jan 18 th during a mid-tide condition when currents were not strong shows little breaking offshore. Right: Radar image taken on Jan 18 th at 705PM during a strong ebb tide current shows a strong increase in wave breaking just offshore of the river mouth. Range distance azimuth Wave heights (m) - SWANWave directions - SWAN N In the near term, we are assembling a mobile radar trailer and tower similar to the one depicted at right. The tower is retractable and will extend 30 ft high, which will allow the radar to see over dunes and jetties. We are also considering a renewable energy power system using a combination of solar and wind power technologies. When completed, the mobile system will allow for long-term radar deployments and radar wave observations can be made available in real-time to the NANOOS observatory. Finally, model-data comparisons are ongoing in an effort to calibrate a high-resolution wave modeling system for the Columbia River mouth.