Vendor Records: A Brief Survey 2007 OCLC CJK Users Group Meeting Karen T. Wei University of Illinois March 24, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CJK Joint Program -- March 30, :00 am to 12:35 p.m Wednesday, March 30, 2011 South Pacific Ballroom I &II Hilton Hawaiian Village Honolulu, HI.
Advertisements

Committee on Korean Materials Report on the Korean Collections Consortium of North America Yunah Sung March 22, 2007.
Asian Art Library: Comparative Perspectives
OCLC Online Computer Library Center Connexion Overview Session OCLC CJK Users Group 2007 Annual Meeting March 24, 2007, Boston.
FROM RLIN TO OCLC CONNEXION DIFFERENT WORKFLOWS AND DIFFERENT PRACTICE Teresa Mei East Asian Catalog Librarian Cornell University Library.
Cataloging Outsourcing: Berkeleys East Asian Librarys Experience March 24, 2007 Evelyn Kuo East Asian Library University of California Berkeley.
LC-CEAL Cataloging Internship Program a Progress Report April 2008 by Joy Kim Chair, Task Force on LC-CEAL Cataloging Internship Program.
Outsourcing Cataloging for Japanese Language Materials -- a progress report from Yale -- Keiko Suzuki Japanese Catalog Librarian East Asia Library, Yale.
Looking to the Future: CJK Processing at the Crossroads Presentation at the 2007 CEAL Committee on Technical Processing Karen T. Wei University of Illinois.
National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services The PEPH Resource Center: A New, More Convenient Login.
The University of Iowa as a Newly Joined Member CEAL Conference Boston, March 21, 2007 Jia Xu The University of Iowa.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository We’re Preserving the Past, What About the Present? NISO Webinar: Ensuring the Preservation of E-Books May 23, 2012.
What’s Next for HathiTrust?. We’re Growing Up! Partnership Arizona State University Baylor University Boston University California Digital Library Columbia.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust current work, challenges, and opportunities for public libraries Creating a Blueprint for a National.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository Bibliographic Metadata and HathiTrust ALCTS CaMMS Catalog Management Interest Group Meeting American Library Association.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
Highlights of the Survey on Metadata Standards and Best Practices for Chinese E-Resources Susan Xue, UC Berkeley March 25, 2014.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust: A Second Life for Library Collections Jeremy York Exploring Humanities Cyberinfrastructure April 30,
Cataloging Outsourcing: Berkeley’s East Asian Library’s Experience March 24, 2007 Evelyn Kuo East Asian Library University of California Berkeley.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository A Preservation Infrastructure Built to Last: Preservation, Community, and HathiTrust UNESCO Memory of the World.
EAALC Meeting (10/05 San Diego)1 California Digital Library East Asian Digital Resources Project: An Update Shirley W. Leung.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository Why Digitize? or The Limits of Preservation 2014 TEI/DHCS Plenary Session Evanston, IL Mike Furlough Executive Director,
Creative Outsourcing Can Be a Good thing. Presented by: Saad Dagher, Library Specialist Senior Saad Dagher, Library Specialist Senior University of Arizona.
NCC’s E-Resource Training Initiative and the E-Resource Training Session at UCSD Report Toshie Marra, UCLA, EAALC Meeting, October 7, 2005, UCSD.
Board of Regents Strategic Planning Study Session A Brief Discussion of UCB Peer Financial Comparative Data April 10, 2006.
Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA) Presentation for ALA Annual, Chicago July 11, 2009 Barbara Bushman Assistant Head, Cataloging Section National.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust Past, Present, and Future A Brief Introduction.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository More, Better, Together: HathiTrust Accomplishments and Aspirations The Researcher of Tomorrow Universidad Complutense.
March 30, 2011CEAL- Joint CJK Meeting11 China-North America Collaboration on Chinese Rare Book Digitization and Metadata Sharing: East Asian Libraries.
East Meets Rest Adding East Asian Scripts to Harvard’s ILS Prepared for presentation to the North American Aleph Users’ Group 2 June 2003 Charles Husbands,
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust: Putting Research in Context HTRC UnCamp September 10, 2012 John Wilkin, Executive Director, HathiTrust.
PLASC Member Survey: Who’s our crowd? Conducted by Stephanie Bennett and Adrienne Pruitt Presented at the PLASC annual business meeting, Friday, August.
OVGTSL 2015: ECIP Cataloging Partnership Programp.1 OVGTSL 2015: ECIP Cataloging Partnership Program Angela Murphy-Walters Literature Program Manager Caroline.
Music Score Processing GREATER EFFICIENCY THROUGH ANALYSIS CHUCK PETERS WILLIAM & GAYLE COOK MUSIC LIBRARY INDIANA UNIVERSITY 1.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Custom Services Update Chris Mottayaw OCLC Library Services Manager x6476
What is Going on with Kuali? Jennifer Foutty Executive Director, Kuali Foundation.
Cataloging and Metadata at the University Library.
Berkeley’s Participation in the CJK NACO Project March 21, 2007 Evelyn Kuo East Asian Library University of California Berkeley.
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
Looking to the East: Challenges in Connecting Asian Libraries in the World of Information Karen T. Wei University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Hong.
E-book survey: CJK cases 2012 Committee on Korean Materials CEAL/AAS Hyokyoung U of Washington.
Library of Congress Report to Committee on Technical Processing CEAL Young Ki Lee Regional and Cooperative Cataloging Division Library of Congress.
On RDA Implementation 2013 CEAL Annual Meeting 3:30-4:45 PM, Thursday, March 21, 2013 Manchester Ballroom A, Manchester Grand Hyatt, San Diego Complimentary.
KCCNA (KOREAN COLLECTIONS CONSORTIUM OF NORTH AMERICA) Mikyung Kang, KCCNA Chair Harvard-Yenching Library, Harvard University.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust and TRAC DigitalPreservation 2012 July 25, 2012 Jeremy York, Project Librarian, HathiTrust.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
ILS Futures. Background Changes 95/96 to 06/07 –Stacks circ= 179,996 to 160,970 ILS’s are no longer the center of the library universe. To most users,
E-books and E-Journals in US University Libraries: Current Status and Future Prospects James Michalko Vice President, OCLC Research Symposium Keio University.
1 Task Force on Metadata and Electronic Resources Interim Report OCLC CJK Users Group 2003 Annual Meeting Friday, March 28, 2003 Flushing Branch Library.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust and the Future of Research Libraries American Antiquarian Society March 31, 2012 Jeremy York, Project.
David Whitehair Product Manager OCLC Cataloging and Metadata Services Future Direction of Technical Processing Committee on Technical Processing, CEAL.
An ILS with CJK Functionality: Implementation and Impact The Experience of the University of Michigan Library Michael Meng April 5, 2006 CEAL, San Francisco.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository Institution Uses of HathiTrust Jeremy York University of Maine May 24, 2013.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
2012 Annual Meeting Toronto, Ontario OCLC CJK USERS GROUP.
US MAP TEST Practice
Association for Asian Studies Council on East Asian Libraries Annual Meeting 2001 Committee on Technical Processing Thursday, March 22, :30 p.m.
HATHITRUST A Shared Digital Repository HathiTrust Large Digital Libraries: Beyond Google Books Modern Language Association January 5, 2012 Jeremy York,
Improving Cataloging Workflows at LMU Walter Walker, Loyola Marymount University.
HathiTrust: A valuable and visionary Partnership.
NEADA Winter Meeting February 28, 2017.
Faculty Salary Study Comparison to AAU Data Exchange Institutions
Loading Chinese Vendor Acquisitions MARC Records
Automated acquisitions & collaborative projects
Rebecca L. Mugridge Jeff Edmunds Pennsylvania Library Association
Tweaking an existing workflow
Update May 5, 2008.
How to Evaluate a Library Service: Methods and Examples
2019 CEAL ERMB Cooperative Cataloging for E-resources Project: Updates
Presentation transcript:

Vendor Records: A Brief Survey 2007 OCLC CJK Users Group Meeting Karen T. Wei University of Illinois March 24, 2007

The Survey Purposes: Originally, to collect vendor records information for UIUC purposes (we are exploring vendor records in all languages); to share findings with the Users Group Survey sent out electronically in January 2007 with follow-up as late as early March Total survey sent: 43 Total survey received back: 38 Return rate: 88%

Does your East Asian Library use vendors records for: 38 Acquisitions only: 7 Cataloging only: 2 Acquisitions/Cataloging: 2 Neither: 27 29% uses vendor records 71% does not use vendor records

Do you use vendor records for: 11 Chinese: Acquisitions: 7 Cataloging: 2 Japanese: Acquisitions: 4 Cataloging: 3 Korean: Acquisitions: 1 Cataloging: 0

If you use Chinese vendors, whose records do you use? CIBTC: Acquisitions: 6 Cataloging: 2 CNPITC: Acquisitions: 6 Cataloging: 2 Shanghai Library: Cataloging (CJCAT): 1 5 libraries use both for acquisitions

If you use Japanese vendors, whose records do you use? Kinokunya: Acquisitions: 2 Cataloging: 3 TRC from RLG: Acquisitions: 2 Issedo, Gannando, JPTC: Acquisitions: 1

If you use Korean vendors, whose records do you use? Panmun: Acquisitions: 1 Eulyoo – One library is providing them with training so that they can send brief records in the future

Are there fees involved for acquisitions records in: Chinese: Yes: 1 No: 6 Japanese: Yes: 2 No: 2 Korean: No: 1

Are there fees involved for cataloging records in: Chinese: Yes: 2 No: 0 Japanese: Yes: 3 No: 0

Are you satisfied with the quality of the acquisitions records in: Chinese: Yes: 7 Note: so far Japanese: Yes: 4 Korean: Yes: 1

Are you satisfied with the quality of the cataloging records in: Chinese: Yes: 2 Note: Each vendor is different; some are satisfactory, some require checking for authority work; with modifications and localization by both the Chinese librarian and cataloger Japanese: Yes: 3 Note: Mostly ok; some minor problems with subject headings; but no authority work is contributed

Have you experienced any problems in loading vendor records into your local system? No problems: 5 Note: loading one record one at a time; can revise some minor problems Yes: 5 Note: initially; lots of problems but solved and settled at long last; only in the beginning stage; it is also possible when there is a shift in staff; correct some typos; record transferring

What is your local system? Voyager: 12 III: 10 Ex Libris: 7 Sirsi: 6 Aleph: 1 Horizon: 1 Gladis: 1

If you are not currently using vendor records, how likely are you in using them in the near future? Highly likely: 6 Likely: 4 Not Likely: 8 Dont know: 7 Did not answer: 2

Reasons for not considering the vendor records (1) Quality control: concerned about quality of subject headings and classifications Compatibility with local systems: Need efforts/times to resolve issues between US, China, Japan, and Korea; complication in loading Workflow issues: if vendor records are not received in time that will affect our workflow; need to review workflow in addition to solving the technical difficulties; concern on limitation on records supply Systems priorities; need their assistance to test and/or implement vendor records

Reasons for not considering the vendor records (2) May not be cost-effective Not satisfied with Chinese test records Smaller collection; no need for vendor records Have trained cataloging staff in house Cant create order records in RLIN anymore and OCLC does not allow acquisitions records Our librarys system does not support CJK input or display Already outsourced to OCLC Have not had discussion Decision made by Library administration

Comments/Experiences to share (1) Takes resolve/time to fine-tune the download and merging of records though it is cost-effective in the long run Even if libraries chose to use vendor records, they still need professionals to oversee the project and perform quality maintenance Received excellent initial bibliographic records from CNPITC Not too strict on acquisitions records as they will be replaced eventually; for cataloging records vendors need to follow AACR2r rules Vendor records are great service; save time and quality is better than the ones that our students create Would love to hear from other libraries experience

Comments/Experiences to share (2) Will have vendor records for Chinese e-books Successfully test-loaded vendor records from CIBTC and Beijing Guotu into Voyager May look at Japanese vendor records as more Japanese books have only provisional records from Waseda University or no records at all May outsource CJK acquisitions/cataloging because of shortage of quality CJK librarians Doubt the quality of vendor records first; short acquisitions records may be acceptable; if vendors do not produce fast enough it will affect workflow

Thank You!

Special Thanks To: Arizona; ASU; Brown; Chicago; Columbia; Cornell; Duke; Emory; Florida; Harvard; Hawaii; Illinois; Indiana; Iowa, Kansas; LC; Michigan; Minnesota; North Carolina; Oregon; Ohio State; Penn State; Pittsburgh; Princeton; Stanford; Texas; UBC; UC- Berkeley; UC-Davis; UCLA; UC-Riverside; UCSB; UCSD; USC; Virginia; Washington U at St. Louis; Wisconsin; Yale