Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group 2002-06-24 - 2002-06-26 Part 2: Functional Testing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2017/3/25 Test Case Upgrade from “Test Case-Training Material v1.4.ppt” of Testing basics Authors: NganVK Version: 1.4 Last Update: Dec-2005.
Advertisements

e-PPAP User_Manual Arnaud Mangin Managing Partner Evalidate Inc.
Requirements Engineering Processes – 2
Implementation of a Validated Statistical Computing Environment Presented by Jeff Schumack, Associate Director – Drug Development Information September.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Quality Assurance – D14.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET The REGNET Demonstration (Trial service) – D10.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Validation and Preparation of Demonstration – D7.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Management and Coordination.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Implementation of the version 2 of the REGNET-Demonstrator – D8 Implementation of the version 2 of the REGNET-Demonstrator.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Report on Content Group Meeting Extended Project Management Group Meeting
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Review Meeting (REV-01-01), , Brussels.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. October 2001Project presentation REGNET 2 Definition of supported Business Functions BUSINESS PROCESS MODELLING.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 1: Usability Testing.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET WP2: Implementation of the System and Preparation of Services and Product Generation Structure and deliverables.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Status of Task 2.1 Project Management Group Meeting
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET T2.4: Business Process Re-engineering.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. 4. July 2002REV02 Luxembourg – Management Issues 2 Management Issues January 2002 – June 2002 Reporting.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Results, open issues, workplan
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Den Haag Meeting (RN-PTG014) 21-22/11/2002.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET WP 4 Demonstration, Assessment and Evaluation.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Status of WP 2 / WP 3 Extended Project Management Group Meeting
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET. July 2002Project presentation REGNET 2 WP 7 - Management Task 7.1 – Project Management Task 7.2 – Quality.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET ALI Status Report.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Exploitation of Results.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Technological Implementation Plan – D12.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Trial Service and Recommendations – D11.
By Rick Clements Software Testing 101 By Rick Clements
One Sky for Europe EUROCONTROL © 2002 European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL) Page 1 FAA/Eurocontrol Technical Interchange.
State of New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Patient Safety Reporting System Module 2 – New Event Entry.
Michigan Electronic Grants System Plus
Modern Systems Analyst and as a Project Manager
Making the System Operational
Pure Silver Reusing and Repurposing Bibliographic Data in a Current Research Information System and Institutional Repository 15 September.
Introduction Lesson 1 Microsoft Office 2010 and the Internet
Niagara Portal Introduction January 2007 Scott Muench - Technical Sales Manager.
Week 2 The Object-Oriented Approach to Requirements
© Telcordia Technologies 2004 – All Rights Reserved AETG Web Service Tutorial AETG is a service mark of Telcordia Technologies. Telcordia Technologies.
Configuration management
Text 1 July, 2010 DCMS: Training Manual Campaign Management.
SERVICE MANAGER 9.2 PROBLEM MANAGEMENT TRAINING JUNE 2011.
Project Scope Management
Testing Workflow Purpose
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
“The Honeywell Web-based Corrective Action Solution”
July 31, Disclaimer: TREx under development, minor modifications may occur pending final release. Prepared for Education Service Center TREx Training.
Checking & Corrective Action
Request Management Mirror-. A random three day sample of Incidents revealed that about 86% of the registered Incidents were legitimate Requests Many other.
Heppenheim Producer-Archive Interface Specification Status of standardisation project Main characteristics, major changes, items pending.
Creating and Submitting a Necessary Wayleave Application
A centre of expertise in digital information managementwww.ukoln.ac.uk QA for Web Sites Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY
April 2003 ONLINE SERVICE DELIVERY Presentation. 2 What is Online Service Delivery? Vision The current vision of the Online Service Delivery program is.
The Re-Start Meeting Warren County School Strategic Planning Process Action Team Leaders September 25, 2013.
IAEA Training in Emergency Preparedness and Response Development of Simulation Exercise Work Session (Drill) Module WS-012.
Visions of Australia – Regional Exhibition Touring Fund Applicant organisation Exhibition title Exhibition Sample Support Material Instructions 1) Please.
8th EIONET Workshop AQ,Oslo 1 06 Nov ‘03 EoI 2003 EoI Report Upload process DEMv7.
Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool 1. Module 12 WSP quality assurance tool Session structure Introduction About the tool Using the tool Supporting materials.
12 January 2009SDS batch generation, distribution and web interface 1 ExESS IT tool for SDS batch generation, distribution and web interface ExESS IT tool.
Systems Analysis and Design
1 Distributed Agents for User-Friendly Access of Digital Libraries DAFFODIL Effective Support for Using Digital Libraries Norbert Fuhr University of Duisburg-Essen,
Software Quality Assurance Plan
Agenda Teams Responsibilities Timeline Homework and next steps.
Automatic Software Testing Tool for Computer Networks ADD Presentation Dudi Patimer Adi Shachar Yaniv Cohen
Web Engineering Web engineering is the process used to create high quality WebApps. Web engineering is not a perfect clone of software engineering. But.
NEM201 Week 4 Project Plan Create and complete outstanding items. 01. Front Cover 02. Document details 03. Scope Document 04. Technical Design 05. Creative.
Description of Revision
{Project Name} Organizational Chart, Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET Project Meeting Content Group Part 2: Functional Testing

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 2 Functional tests are based on use cases. The goals of these tests are to verify: - to ensure proper system functionality, including navigation, data entry, processing, and retrieval Goals are not to define additional requirements (=> usability tests, task-oriented). Goals Functional Tests - An introduction Based upon black box techniques: Verifying the application and its internal processes by interacting with the application via the Graphical User Interface (GUI) and analysing the output or results Methodology Based on the Use Cases already prepared during the requirements phase

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 3 UC Import / export existing data from local system Upload and conversion for different data management systems Functional Tests - An introduction Use Case => Test Case (An Example)

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 4 Functional Tests - Status 72 Test cases for data generation, search & retrieval completed High level test cases for the other components (56) Test cases available

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 5 Problems & Open Issues Functional Tests - Problems Problems: Test cases are all not complete: - it is not defined how the output should look like - it is not defined how the input should look like - false and right inputs are not specified (actions which occure when false input was made) Suggestion (original draft): Carry out the tests for the available test cases at first (content provider). 3 content partners, effort estimation: 2 days per partner! Report not only incidents but also further specifications, e.g. if the output is not formatted appropriately it could be defined now. ? Problem: Use cases are not very specified! Could be a possibility to detect white spots in requirement definition

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 6 Validation schedule: Start on 1st of July 2002 ! Step-by-Step approach Sofia Meeting Test finalising Functional tests Usability tests (heuristic, scenarios) 06/28/0207/05/0207/19/0215/08/2002 Which functionality is available ? Content (integrity and quality) tests Red light: external solution Orange light:improvements necessary/possible before carrying out further tests Green light: go for usability tests Functional Tests - Schedule draft

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 7 Strategy for pragmatic testing!? High-level testing - functionality available or not? Detailed testing could be carried out by using the test cases already worked out and/or the pure use case list !? The modelling of further test cases is very time-intensive... - Estimation: 300 test cases for all use cases quality level 5 until End of June (VALT), Modelling: 10 days, testing: 25 days - Responsiblities (CP/TP) for modelling and testing Must be carried out in the first 2 weeks of July! Functional Tests - Strategy

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 8 Functional Tests - Discussion - Reponsible content partners - Test cases for the other functionalities vs. pragmatic approach - Agreement on reporting workflow Working groups: Practical exercises ? After Sofia: Creation of test manual, Carrying out tests, Reporting and monitoring, Functional tests QA To be done in this session/working groups Reporting Workflow E-Shop/Catalogue Management Auction System E-Publishing Topic Map (Generator), Viewer? Data Generation Search (Multi-Site search?) Portal (Heuristic Evaluation)

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 9 - To define communication worflows during (also after ?!) the validation phase - To enable tracking of all incidents - To enable tracking of tests carried out - To enable priorisation of work to be done - To enable the consortium to define dates for the release of the system Functional Tests - Incident Reporting and Change Management Why? Decision already made: no automatic tool

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 10 Tester Tests with test cases Submit one report per incident to tech-partner Validation PM Adds incident to open incidents list Keeps track of reported incidents Keeps track of timelines Tech Partner Receives incidents Functional Tests - Incident Reporting

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 11 Tester Receives reports on resolved incidents Validation PM Sets status of incidents in open incidents list to resolved Tech Partner Resolves incidents Reports resolved incidents to tester and Validation PM Functional Tests - Incident Solving

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 12 Tester Tests resolved incidents with test cases Submits reports on resolved incidents to Validation PM Validation PM Sets status of incidents to closed Functional Tests - Closing Incidents

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 13 Tester Tests with test cases Re-opens incidents (if necessary) Validation PM Sets status of incident to re-opened Keeps track of reported incidents Keeps track of timelines Tech Partner Receives re-opened incident reports for resolving Functional Tests - Re-opening Incidents

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 14 Validation PM Sends weekly status reports on incidents to Technical Partners and all Testers Reminds Technical Partners on all important pending issues Reminds Testers on all outstanding tests to be carried out Functional Tests - Weekly Reporting

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 15 The next page is for developers comments Reporting Form

June 2002REGNET Project Team Meeting Content Group 16 Reporting Log