Enhancing Communications Among Agencies Session 2 Kris Grbac, M.A., CCC-A. Missouri State University Springfield, Missouri Catherine Harbison, B.S.N.,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EHDI Systems and the Medical Home Carlos Quezada-Gomez, PsyD National Center of Medical Home Initiatives for Children with Special Needs American Academy.
Advertisements

Trainings in Early Intervention with Infants and Toddlers with Hearing Loss Nancy Grosz Sager, M.A. Deaf and Hard of Hearing Programs Consultant California.
Results of the National Consensus Conference on Intervention Topical Session 6 Dorothy K. Marge, Ph.D., Moderator SUNY Upstate Medical University Syracuse,
Iowa EHDI: Enrolling children in appropriate early intervention Lenore Holte, Ph.D., CCC-A Center for Disabilities and Development University of Iowa.
presented by: Betsy Moog Brooks, MS-CED Expectations for Children Receiving a Cochlear Implant at Age One The Moog Center for Deaf Education St. Louis,
Texas Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Finding Lost EHDI Babies The Answer May Be Right in Front of You Doug Dittfurth Texas Department of Assistive.
New Jersey Family Learning Day - A Collaborative Approach to Family Support Malia Corde, Coordinator, New Jersey Statewide Parent to Parent, A Program.
Taking EHDIs Pulse: Conferences as Strategic Change Agents National EHDI 2007 Conference Salt Lake City, UT March 26, 2007 Nicole Brown, MSN,PHN, CPNP.
Is Early Intervention Necessary for All? Ruth Fox, RN, MS, New Hampshire EHDI Program Coordinator Mary Jane Sullivan, Au D, New Hampshire EHDI Consulting.
Engaging Audiologists in EHDI Data Systems Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM & Arizona School of Health Sciences Randi Winston, Au.D. NCHAM & The EAR Foundation.
CDC EHDI RESOURCES for States. CDC EHDI Website CDC EHDI Website Purpose: To provide up-to-date.
Demographic Variations in EHDI Follow-up in New Jersey Kathryn Perko Aveni, RNC, MPH New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services Trenton, NJ National.
Missouri Newborn Hearing Screening Program: A Report on the First Two Years Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services.
Current Status of Hearing Screening in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Shana Jacobs, B.S. Jackson Roush, Ph.D. Division of Speech and Hearing Sciences.
Minnesota: “1-3-6” Early Intervention by 6 Mo.
How Parent Advocacy Groups Can Support EHDI Programs K. Todd Houston, Ph.D. Executive Director/CEO Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf & Hard.
An Audiological Management Manual for UNHS Referrals Antonia Brancia Maxon, Ph.D. Karen Ditty, M.S. Kathleen Watts, M.A. Diane Sabo, Ph.D. Karen Munoz,
Collecting and Reporting EHDI Data in New Jersey Kathryn Aveni, RNC, MPH Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program, New Jersey Department of Health.
Hearing Coordination Centers: A Model to Improve Loss to Follow-up Hallie W. Morrow, MD, MPH, FAAP California Department of Health Services Sacramento,
Development of a Newborn Hearing Screening Training Curriculum Randi Winston, AuD Lylis Olsen, MS, MPH.
Attitudes, Knowledge and Practices of Physicians Related to EHDI National EHDI Conference Feb, 2006 Mary Pat Moeller, Ph.D. Boys Town National Research.
Data Linkages Between Birth Defects Registry and EHDI in Michigan Rupali Patel, Glenn Copeland, Yasmina Bouraoui, Joan Ehrhardt, Erin Estrada Michigan.
Western States Early Intervention Outcomes Project Kathryn Kreimeyer, Ph. D. Shirin Antia, Ph. D. Tucson, Arizona Arlene Stredler Brown, CCC-SLP, CED Allison.
Creating Partnerships from Apples and Oranges 2006 National Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference, Washington, DC Beth S. Benedict, Ph.D.,
The Ethics of Serving Infants and Their Families Les R. Schmeltz, Au.D. NCHAM & Arizona School of Health Sciences Karen Munoz, M.S. NCHAM & Northern Illinois.
DEVELOPING EFFECTIVE SAFETY MEETINGS PRESENTED BY ORM Loss Prevention Unit.
Junior Achievement Ireland “Generating impact through your partnerships with business.”
Team Meetings in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 4 By: Brenda Amos-Moss and Donna DeSanto.
To Refer or Not Refer… that is the question! Presentation to PAT Coordinator Meeting September 10, 2013 Sarah Walters.
Students in Private School Placed by Their Parents Developed by Contra Costa SELPA
Model Part C/EHDI Coordinated Consent Form Jeff Hoffman, MS, CCC-A National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management EHDI Network Consultant
Missouri Newborn Hearing Screening: A status report Jenna M. Bollinger, B.A. Department of Communication Disorders & Deaf Education Fontbonne University.
1 Slide 1 Follow-up of Refer Babies in the Universal Newborn Hearing Screen Program: Strategies for Family Support Brenda Sommer, RN Pediatrix Newborn.
Supporting Young Homeless Children with Developmental Delays: A Successful Cross- System Model July 10, 2007.
EEC’s Parental Consent Form Authorization to Collect and Use Child Data January 31, 2013 and February 1,
Georgia’s Newborn Surveillance & Tracking System (NSTS) Akilah Heggs, MA, CCC-A Susan Bertonaschi, M.S. Elisa Stamey, R.N. Georgia Division of Public Health.
1 Overview of IDEA/SPP Early Childhood Transition Requirements Developed by NECTAC for the Early Childhood Transition Initiative (Updated February 2010)
Massachusetts Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Roberta J. Perry Lead Case Manager/Children Specialist June 10, 2013.
Parents Working Together to Shape Education in Elk Island Public Schools (EIPS) ASCA School Councils Connection Conference 08 Saturday, April 26, 2008.
Infant Hearing Screening in the US, 2001: Results from the ECLS-B Study May S. Chiu, B.S. Magdaliz Gorritz, B.S. Howard J. Hoffman, M.A. National Institute.
WHY is EHDI a part of the HIT conversation A first encounter between providers and public health As an encounter, communication becomes essential Communication.
February 2, 2006 Ruth F. Howell, Ed.D. Maryland School for the Deaf Columbia, Maryland The Importance of Interagency Collaboration by Early Intervention.
Enhancing Communication Among Health Care and Educational Programs How Privacy Regulations Impact Delivery of Effective Services by Karl R. White National.
Session 8 EHDI Data Collection & Management in Washington State Washington State Department of Health Richard Masse, MPH Karin Neidt, MPH Caroline Maundu,
Communications in the Face of Crisis Lesley Bruinton Tuscaloosa City Schools.
FERPA: What you Need to Know The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act & SEI.
Yaoli Li, MD, MS, MA CCC-A Penny Hatcher, RN, MSN, DrPH, PHN
Regional Genetics Collaboratives: A Hidden EHDI Resource Penny Hatcher, MSN, DrPH Nancy Vanderburg, BSN, PHN Minnesota Department of Health St. Paul, Minnesota.
How Parent Advocacy Groups Can Support EHDI Programs Barbara Raimondo, J.D. American Society for Deaf Children Camp Hill, Pennsylvania.
1 Transition: Part C to Part B Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Spring/Summer 2007.
Measuring Benchmarks and Quality Indicators for Early Intervention Dawn M. O’Brien, M.Ed. EI/ECSE Nannette C. Nicholson, Ph.D. CCC-A Judith E. Widen, Ph.D.
Collecting Early Intervention Data 2005 National EHDI Conference Atlanta, Georgia Anne M. Jarrett, MA- CCCA Follow-up Consultant Michigan Department of.
EVALUATING AN EHDI SYSTEM: PARENT SURVEY PROJECT Vickie Thomson, MA State EHDI Coordinator Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Janet DesGeorges.
Children with Hearing Loss in Hawai`i: Early and Late Identified (Session #8) 2006 Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Conference Washington, D.C.
Evaluating Families Satisfaction with EHDI in Massachusetts Jessica MacNeil, MPH Massachusetts Department of Public Health Boston, MA.
Pediatricians, Medical Students and the Early Intervention System in Hawaii Marge Wada CCC-SLP State of Hawaii Early Intervention Programs Jeffrey Okamoto.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
NCLB Supplemental Educational Services Meeting SEPTEMBER 17, 2010.
PTA PROGRAMS ENRICH YOUR SCHOOL BY IMPLEMENTING CREATIVE AND EFFECTIVE PROGRAMS Peninsula District PTA Leadership Training Pam Croom, Hampton Council President.
Infants, Toddlers, & Young Children with Disabilities ECSE 641 Spring 2015 (Lee, 2010)
The birth hospital is the first step to identifying newborn hearing loss and to educate and guide families on newborn hearing. There are many opportunities.
Better Futures Project David D. Baker & Beth Dauber Missouri Rehabilitation Association 2016.
Team Meetings in Early Intervention
The Early Hearing Detection & Intervention Program Overview
Factors that Influence Hospital Screening Programs
Barriers to Follow-up in Newborn Hearing Screening Programs
Welcome to the FERPA training for Faculty and Staff.
First Annual National EHDI Meeting
Results of the National Consensus Conference on Intervention
(Responses from 50 states and Territories)
Presentation transcript:

Enhancing Communications Among Agencies Session 2 Kris Grbac, M.A., CCC-A. Missouri State University Springfield, Missouri Catherine Harbison, B.S.N., M.A. Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services Jefferson City, Missouri

Faculty Disclosure Information In the past 12 months, I have not had a significant financial interest or other relationship with the manufacturer(s) of the product(s) or provider(s) of the service(s) that will be discussed in my presentation. This presentation will (not) include discussion of pharmaceuticals or devices that have not been approved by the FDA or if you will be discussing unapproved or off-label uses of pharmaceuticals or devices.

Introduction Project: Round Table Discussions on Intervention Meetings held throughout the state. Topic: Intervention for newborns identified with hearing loss. Original purpose was to collect information on the process of getting newborns with hearing loss into intervention. Additional purposes developed over time.

Department of Health and Senior Services Department of Elementary and Secondary Education BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MISSOURI

Characteristics of Missouris Part C Program Part C does not directly provide any service Service coordination and development of IFSP provided by contracted agencies known as SPOE (single point of entry) Service provided by independent providers who have enrolled as Part C providers BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON MISSOURI

Variables That Contributed to the Formation of Roundtable Meetings Inability to receive personally identifiable information (due to FERPA) from DESE re: enrollment in Part C, hearing aids, etc. Inability to receive personally identifiable information (due to FERPA) from DESE re: enrollment in Part C, hearing aids, etc. No reports from agencies (no requirement to do so) on intervention data elements and unusual occurrences, such as baby who passed birth screening but later was diagnosed No reports from agencies (no requirement to do so) on intervention data elements and unusual occurrences, such as baby who passed birth screening but later was diagnosed No relationship between DHSS and SPOEs No relationship between DHSS and SPOEs Unknown intervention resources in rural communities Unknown intervention resources in rural communities Families in contact with 4 different entities (audiologist, interventionist, DHSS staff and SPOE) Families in contact with 4 different entities (audiologist, interventionist, DHSS staff and SPOE) Many mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss diagnoses (40%) Many mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss diagnoses (40%)

Procedure: Planning and Completing the Meetings Invited audiologists, interventionists, SPOE staff and DHSS staff Invited audiologists, interventionists, SPOE staff and DHSS staff Solicited participants by and phone calls Solicited participants by and phone calls Planned first meetings for our biggest urban centers and surrounding rural areas Planned first meetings for our biggest urban centers and surrounding rural areas Scheduled meetings for 3 to 4 hours Scheduled meetings for 3 to 4 hours Provided free lunch

Procedure: Planning and Completing the Meetings Advertised meetings as true round table discussions – no formal agenda Provided participants with a list of topics that could be discussed and invited them to contribute additional topics

ST. LOUIS SPRINGFIELD KANSAS CITY COLUMBIA CAPE GIRARDEAU

Results: Attendance Good Attendance Good Attendance –100% of the invited audiologists attended –100% of the invited interventionists attended – 91% of the invited SPOE staff attended

Results: Topics Referral process to Part C Referral process to Part C Mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss Mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss Communication between agencies Communication between agencies Consent to release information from families Consent to release information from families Availability of intervention providers Availability of intervention providers Reporting procedures (from audiologists to DHSS) Reporting procedures (from audiologists to DHSS) Payment for hearing aids Payment for hearing aids

Results: What We Learned Missouris rural areas have very different concerns than the urban areas Missouris rural areas have very different concerns than the urban areas Newborns with bilateral moderate (or worse) sensorineural hearing loss in urban areas are receiving appropriate intervention Newborns with bilateral moderate (or worse) sensorineural hearing loss in urban areas are receiving appropriate intervention Intervention to newborns in rural areas is patchy Intervention to newborns in rural areas is patchy There is no uniform procedure or belief among audiologists, interventionists and SPOE staff regarding appropriate intervention for newborns with mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss There is no uniform procedure or belief among audiologists, interventionists and SPOE staff regarding appropriate intervention for newborns with mild, conductive and unilateral hearing loss Some SPOE agencies were very confident in their ability to coordinate services for newborns with hearing loss, others admitted that they did not know what to do unless it was written in report Some SPOE agencies were very confident in their ability to coordinate services for newborns with hearing loss, others admitted that they did not know what to do unless it was written in report

Results: DHSS Actions in Response to Concerns Developed Guideline for Reporting for audiologists in response to their concern about knowing when to report Developed Border Babies document in response to audiologists concerns about how to report for babies who live or receive services out of state Revised a resource document on agencies and individuals who provide services to newborns with hearing loss in response to the concern that the document was out-of-date Worked with DESE to develop training materials for SPOE Staff

Additional Benefits Opportunity to meet people previously only known by phone and mail, form relationships and gain insight into all aspects of the EHDI process in Missouri Establishment of DHSS as lead agency Generation of ideas for enhancing program. Illumination of program areas that need work.

For more information: