TI Three Year Hiring Results

Three year TI Progress By Level School Year New Hire Teachers Elementary Schools Average TI Percent Below 68 NH= % NH= % NH= % Middle Schools Average TI Percent Below 68 NH= % NH= % NH= % High Schools Average TI Percent Below 68 NH= % NH= % NH= % Senior High Schools Average TI Percent Below 68 NH= % NH= % NH= % Sp. Programs Average TI Percent Below 68 NH= % NH= % NH= %

Three year TI Progress By Cluster School Year New Hire Teachers District Average TI Percent Below % 68 47% 67 56% East Cluster Average TI Percent Below % 69 47% 66 58% Central Cluster Average TI Percent Below % 68 48% 68 45% West Cluster Average TI Percent Below % 67 49% 67 61% Sp. Programs Average TI Percent Below % 65 57% 63 73%

Gallup TeacherInsight™ 2.0

TeacherInsight™ 2.0 ► A new interview which builds on a proven knowledge base ► The original TI used the standards of teacher ratings by principals and students ► 2.0 is based on a study of teachers (1,000 and 13,000 candidates) whose students have grown academically, regardless of the beginning level of the student

TeacherInsight™ 2.0 ► 2.0 measures a different set of attributes than TI, thus it can be expected that the applicants score will differ if they complete both assessments. ► February 1, 2011 launch of 2.0. ► Candidate may re-take within one year. ► Need 40 minutes of uninterrupted time

TeacherInsight™ Assessment Score As of the end of March, 40,000 applicants have completed the 2.0 TI Median Score = 72 Mean Score= 72.6 Top Quartile Score= will be the reference point for PISD Approvals by your supervisor will be required for scores less than 72

TeacherInsight™ Assessment Score ► Starting with the highest-scoring candidates and “drilling down” in the pool will provide the best return on principals' interview time investment. ► Apply the PISD Rubric for knowledge and skill. ► Complete the FIT on your finalists. FIT allows opportunity to hear candidates’ responses to questions that sample information assessed in the TI.

2.0 new Talent Dimension Report ► The TDR provides a wealth of information that is descriptive of candidates’ talent ► TDR provides bar graphs that compare an individual candidate to the comparison group across 3 domains

Interpreting the TeacherInsight™ Assessment Score 1. Achievement Drive, Student and Parent Relationships, Classroom Structure and Planning 2. The Talent Dimensional Report (TDR) will indicate potential at the elementary and secondary levels. P or HP 3. An Engagement Creation Index will indicate a candidate’s potential for involving and engaging others among team or co-workers. P or HP

Interpreting the Talent Assessment Score Talent Dimensional Report (TDR) components provide greater insight into a candidate’s relative talents and indicate how two candidates, sharing the same overall score, differ in their talent areas

TeacherInsight™ Domains Achievement Drive Describes the individual’s motivation to enable students to succeed in the classroom ► Inner drive to succeed ► History of success ► Push themselves and students ► Confident of creating student success ► Use measurement systems, goals, monitor progress ► Focus and take ownership on student success

TeacherInsight™ Domains Classroom Structure and Planning These teachers are thoughtful and creative while establishing a sense of order in the classroom ► Seek what works think about new approaches to teaching, learning, and discovery ► Create structure ► Own classroom inputs and outputs ► Search for new ideas, strategies ► Are busy, active, well prepared ► Sought for skills, knowledge

TeacherInsight™ Domains Student and Parent Relationships Strong relationships are the foundation for creating a successful learning environment ► Need to contribute ► See an individual student- make a commitment to understanding and developing every student ► Satisfaction from student growth ► Communicate caring ► Create excitement around learning, energetic, generate positive feelings ► Relationships outside the classroom with parents and peers are equally important

Sample and “live” data Elementary Indicator HP

Sample and “live” data Secondary Indicator HP

Sample and “live” data Engagement Creation Index HP

Teacher Further Insight into Talent 2011