University of Waterloo Staff Compensation June 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Planning, Feedback and Merit Allocation TMG Open Meeting May 1, 2008.
Advertisements

Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
What is Pay & Performance?
Your Career at Queen’s The annual review process for QUFA faculty Brenda Brouwer Vice-Provost and Dean School of Graduate Studies.
MISA Conference 2014 Human Resources Update MISA Conference 2014 Human Resources Update.
HR Contacts Meeting May 23, 2013 Human Resource Mgmt Services Office of Management & Budget.
Leading the Public Service to Higher Productivity JOB STANDARDISATION: INTERNAL AUDIT JOBS MPUMALANGA INTERNAL AUDITOR’S RETREAT.
University of Waterloo Salary Administration October 2009.
Membership Recruiting Workshop 2014 Chapter Leader Training NMA...THE Leadership Development Organization Understanding the NMA Draft!
How to Complete a Stipend Request Campus Human Resources Employment & Compensation Services.
Effort Certification 2012 By Trimester To reduce administrative burden, the University of Alaska is moving to an effort certification solution for salaried.
1 FY 2014 Merit Presentation July 2, AGENDA – MERIT PROCESS  Merit Policy Overview and Timeline  Templates and Instructions, Forms Signature.
Symposium on SALARY POLICY, SALARY SCALES, SALARY STRUCTURE
PAYING THEM RIGHT: TOOLS FOR SALARY ADMINISTRATION HR Liaison Network Spring Meeting Texas A&M University, Human Resources DIVISION OF FINANCE February.
EVULATION OF RESULTS OF WORK OF CIVIL SERVANTS Yuriy Pizhuk, Director of the Department of the Personnel of Government Bodies and Local Self-Government.
Payroll Distribution Confirmation Report Training June / July 2003.
No 1 REVIEW OF ACADEMIC STRUCTURE PROPOSED GENERAL STAFF STRUCTURE 3 June 2008.
Compensation Deborah Marsh November Total Rewards Total Rewards definition Total Rewards definition Why Total Rewards? Why Total Rewards? Elements.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & COMPENSATION SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS Tuesday 2nd September pm.
Compensation Model Supervisor Training Presented by: Jennifer Larson
Career Banding Employee Competency Assessment Training September 17&18, 2008.
Management Forum Presentation November 3, 2008 Lynne Gervais, Associate Vice-Principal Human Resources 1.
1 Classified Staff Salary Study. 2 Overview Provide an overview of study Provide an overview of study Review study methodology Review study methodology.
Compensation management “Attracting, retaining and motivating magic people”
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Classified Exemption Review Project March AGENDA  WHY? Recent Legislation Absence of Salary Increases for Classified Increases in Benefit Premiums.
COMPREHENSIVE REFORM TRANSPARENCY, FAIRNESS AND OBJECTIVITY RESPONSIVENESS AND AGILITY BASIC PRINCIPLES.
Compensation “What’s in it for me?” Ron Kamahele, Director UAA Human Resource Services.
BUILDING A UNIVERSITY FOR THE GLOBAL CENTURY Presented by: Terri Phillips and Sheila Wright Associate Vice President for HR and Compensation Manager.
JOB EVALUATION & SALARY STRUCTURE DESIGN
Framework Agreement – Associate Tutors. Background on framework agreement Benefits of framework Job evaluation Associate Tutor grades Moving to the new.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
The University of Texas at San Antonio June 19, 2013 Merit Policy.
P AY DELIVERY ADMINISTRATION Jayendra Rimal. I NTRODUCTION Employees develop an unique view of the relationship between pay and assigned job, pay and.
Human Resources1 PART TIME COMPENSATION AND CLASSIFICATION PROCESS Module I Policies and Procedures.
The Performance Management And Appraisal System (PMAS) Principal Performance Appraisal.
Chapter 5 Compensation & Benefits
FACULTY RELATIONS Overview of the Changes to the UBC Faculty Agreement 1 Faculty Relations.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT HOW TO GET THE MOST OUT OF THE PROCESS.
COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON FACULTY COMPENSATION COMMITTEE Report to Faculty Senate November 5, 2013.
School of Medicine Staff Human Resources Administration The Nuts and Bolts of Managing Staff HR.
Compensation Options for Regular Faculty and 9 Month Staff Faculty Compensation & Classification Contact: Melinda Lilly at or
BPC – 1/15/2016 Staff Compensation Update 1. FY16 Compensation Updates  Annual Reappointment Increases– 2%  $2,858,234  Equity Increases – 1%  $1,134,993.
1 MERIT PROCESS Area Lead Presentation June 21, 2012.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Policies & Procedures 10/23/2012. Background:  To match with new strategic plan and based on the recommendations of the midterm evaluation.
Strategic Resource Planning Council June 26, 2013 Merit Policy.
COMPENSATION 101 CREATING & ADMINISTERING YOUR BASE PAY STRATEGY Consulting Inc.
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Classification and Compensation
Wage and Salary Management
MARS Merit Appraisal Recognition Scheme
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
Human Aspects of Organizing Reading: pp. 173 – 183.
Annual Performance Appraisal Program
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Performance Appraisal and Management at CERN
My UI Career Process improvement for more meaningful and
Annual Title I, Part A Meeting
Professor Salary Incentive Program
Staff Compensation Update
2018 UCPEA One-time Performance Awards
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Classification and Compensation Department of Human Resources
Pay Structure Chapter 9 HRM-300.
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

University of Waterloo Staff Compensation June 2002

Agenda u Provosts Advisory Committee on Staff Compensation (PACSC) u Hay Salary Classification System u Staff Salary Increase Program

Provosts Advisory Committee on Staff Compensation (PACSC) u Four Staff Association representatives u Four Administration representatives u Manager, Salary Admin-resource u responsible for revising and administering compensation-related policies and programs such as: u salaries (annual salary adjustments) u performance appraisals u overtime, paid holidays and vacations

Role of Human Resources u HR takes direction from the committee on the interpretation and implementation of policies and programs related to Salary Administration

Hay Evaluation Method u point-factor system which evaluates: u skill (Know How) u effort (Problem Solving) u responsibility (Accountability) u working conditions

A Hay job evaluation is comprised of: Know How u the knowledge required to do the job whether practical or intellectual (Know How) Problem Solving u the kind of thinking required to solve the problems which the job commonly faces (Problem Solving) Accountability u the responsibilities assigned (Accountability) (Working Conditions u the work environment in which the job is performed (Working Conditions)

How is the evaluation done? u the manager requests in writing u starts with an accurate, comprehensive, current job description u HR professional: u interviews manager u interviews staff member u discusses the results with manager

Frequently asked questions u My job has changed significantly. Should it be reviewed? u What if my manager doesnt agree with the result?

Annual Staff Compensation Program u all annual increases are based on performance u there are no scale / general / COLA increases u job-values are increased by an amount determined by the PACSC after reviewing market movement, CPI, funding and other relevant data

Performance Appraisals u conducted annually u forwarded to Human Resources, normally by mid-March u paper copy held for 3 years u ratings are from 1 to 5 u evaluators may add a.5 increment if performance exceeds one category but does not achieve the next.

How do performance ratings correspond to salary increases? Performance ratings from 1 to 5 represents a position in the salary range or a performance goal over a career % % % % % For complete descriptions of each rating see the Performance Appraisal documentation on the Human Resources website

Salary Range MINIMUM JOB- VALUE MAXIMUM 80% 100% 120% Compa-Ratio is the relationship of your salary to the job-value, expressed as a percentage.

Individual Salary Increases The departmental merit pool. Salary increases Salary increases have two components: a) a basic increase b) a supplementary increase Staff members Staff members receive salary increases based on their performance appraisal rating and their position in the salary range (compa-ratio).

Some additional comments: u basic increase may not be changed by department head. less u staff members with compa-ratios over their performance goals will receive less than the range adjustment. more u staff members with compa-ratios less than their performance goals will receive more than the range adjustment u system has been designed to mitigate the effects of lavish and stingy evaluators. u staff members at performance goals are not eligible to receive supplementary increases.

More frequently asked questions 1. What do I do if I dont like my performance rating? 2. My manager hasnt given me my performance review, what should I do? 3. I didnt receive the range adjustment, why? 4. What happens when I reach my target? 5. How long will it take?

Still more FAQs What happens if Im promoted to another job? 7. What happens if I transfer to another job? 8. Im handling a maternity leave at a higher grade. Should I get paid more? 9. Im seconded to a project for over a year, what can happen?

For more information Contact: u Alfrieda Swainston, extension 2950 u Karen Gallant, extension 6645 u your Staff Relations Coordinator u