Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meaningful Use and Health Information Exchange
Advertisements

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday, April 29, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday, April 8, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) Review of HITPC MU Stage 3 Request For Comments (RFC) January 09,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, June 20, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday August 1, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday July 25, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Monday July 29, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Monday August 5, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, August 8, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday July 22, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG) LCC All Hands Meeting February 7,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Template IMPACT 8/19/2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 19, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday, May 13, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Pilots Template Insert the Name of Your Pilot / Organization Here MM/DD/YYYY.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Monday July 22, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care All Hands SWG Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
ONC S&I Longitudinal Coordination of Care Work Group From the Present To the Future Missing from the Health Care Discussion: LTPAC.
Functional Requirements and Health IT Standards Considerations for STAGE 3 Meaningful Use for Long-Term and Post-Acute Care (LTPAC) Update to the HITPC.
Care Plan Christopher Lamer, PharmD, MHS, BCPS, CDE CDR U.S. Public Health Service.
How To Get To The Winners Circle with Your Patient Portal; Our Challenges To Get To The Finish Line. Julie Patterson, Baptist Health Carey Ronan, MHA,
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
Quality Measures Vendor Tiger Team January 30, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Workgroup (WG)
Understanding Meaningful Use Presented by: Allison Bryan MS, CHES December 7, 2012 Purdue Research Foundation 2012 Review of Stage 1 and Stage 2.
HITPC - Information Exchange Work Group Meaningful Use Stage 3 Subgroup 2: Care Coordination and Patient and Family Engagement Co-Chairs: Jeff Donnell.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
Companion Guide to HL7 Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use Stage 2
Paul Tang, Chair George Hripcsak, Co-Chair Meaningful Use Workgroup December 2, 2013.
Overview of Longitudinal Coordination of Care (LCC) Presentation to HIT Steering Committee May 24, 2012.
Interoperability and Health Information Exchange Workgroup April 17, 2015 Micky Tripathi, chair Chris Lehmann, co-chair.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Meaningful Use Personal Pace Education Module: Transitions of Care.
New Opportunity for Network Value: Using Health IT to Improve Transitions of Care 600 East Superior Street, Suite 404 I Duluth, MN I Ph
NWH TRANSITION OF CARE DOCUMENT FOR MU STAGE 2 JUNE 6, 2014.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Transitions of Care Initiative Companion Guide to Consolidated CDA for Meaningful Use.
Patient Engagement Some of the events that will shape your definition. 1.Meaningful Use – strong emphasis on patient engagement w Stage 2 MU 2.Growth.
HIT Policy Committee: Meaningful Use Workgroup Stage 3 – Preliminary Recommendations Debrief Paul Tang, Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Chair George Hripcsak,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Monday, August 12, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday July 18, 2013.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
HITPC – Meaningful Use Workgroup Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Stage 3 Planning July 27, 2012.
Provider Data Migration and Patient Portability NwHIN Power Team August 28, /28/141.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 6, 2014.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care. Agenda Confirm Community Work Streams Use Case and Policy Whitepaper Approach Recommendation for Use Case scoping.
Larry Wolf Certification / Adoption Workgroup May 13th, 2014.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Referral Request and Referral Report Connie Sixta, PhD.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Improving Care Coordination – Subgroup 3 Charlene Underwood, Chair September 2012.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
Meaningful Use Workgroup June 24, 2013 Paul Tang, chair George Hripcsak, co-chair 1.
HITPC – Information Exchange Workgroup Care Coordination Discussions Stage 3 Planning July 26, 2012.
Meaningful Use Workgroup Subgroup 2 - Engaging Patients and Families Christine Bechtel, Subgroup Chair Paul Tang, MU WG Chair July 2,
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, May 23, 2013.
David W. Bates, MD, MSc Chief Quality Officer, Brigham and Women’s Hospital Member, HIT Policy Committee President-elect, ISQua Medinfo, 2013.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care Use Case Scoping Discussion 3/19/2011.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care LCP SWG Thursday, July 11, 2013.
 Proposed Rule by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on 11/03/2015Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services11/03/2015  Revises the discharge.
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #8 – Patient Electronic Access Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 19, 2016 Today’s presenter:
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Referral Request and Referral Report
Presentation transcript:

Longitudinal Coordination of Care LTPAC SWG Monday August 5, 2013

TopicPresenterTime Allotted Announcements and RemindersEvelyn5 minutes Transitions of Care C-CDA RevisionsLantana55 minutes Agenda 2

Upcoming HITPC MU Meetings to review Care Plan Recommendations. Final recommendations to be presented to HITPC in August HITPC: Aug 7th :30 to 3:00pm EST researchers-implementers/hit-policy-committee-19http:// researchers-implementers/hit-policy-committee-19 Call for Pilot Participation! –LCC Pilot Wiki Page: Contains Pilot Survey, Pilot Overview Document, and Planning Template –STAY TUNED!! New Pilot WG to launch in August Meeting Reminders –LCP SWG meeting – Monday at 5pm ET –LCC HL7 Tiger Team SWG meeting – Wednesday at 11am ET –LCP SWG meeting – Thursday at 5pm ET 3 Announcements & Reminders

January 30 th : HITPC MU WG Presented Draft Recommendations for MU3 –recommendations to be presented to HITPC on August 7 th : committee-19 committee-19 –Care Coordination Objectives for Care Summary (SGRP303) align with LCC WG Five Transition Datasets: Shared Care Encounter Summary Consultation Request Transfer of Care Test/Procedure Report Test/Procedure Request –Care Plan (SGRP304) proposed for future stages Transcript and meeting information available at: implementers/policy-meaningful-use-workgroup-2 implementers/policy-meaningful-use-workgroup-2 4 Care Plan Recommendations to HITPC

Stage 2 Final RuleStage 3 Recommendations EP/EH CORE Objective: The EP/EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another setting of care or provider of care or refers their patient to another provider of care provides summary care record for each transition of care or referral. CORE Measure: 1. The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 50 percent of transitions of care and referrals. – Data Sets 3, 4, 5 2. The EP, eligible hospital or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another setting of care or provider of care provides a summary of care record for more than 10% of such transitions and referrals either (a) electronically transmitted using CEHRT to a recipient or (b) where the recipient receives the summary of care record via exchange facilitated by an organization that is a NwHIN Exchange participant or in a manner that is consistent with the governance mechanism ONC establishes for the nationwide health information network. 3. An EP, eligible hospital or CAH must satisfy one of the two following criteria: (A) conducts one or more successful electronic exchanges of a summary of care document, as part of which is counted in "measure 2" (for EPs the measure at §495.6(j)(14)(ii) (B) and for eligible hospitals and CAHs the measure at §495.6(l)(11)(ii)(B)) with a recipient who has EHR technology that was developed by a different EHR technology developer than the senders EHR technology certified to 45 CFR (b)(2); or (B) conducts one or more successful tests with the CMS designated test EHR during the EHR reporting period. EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/EH/CAH who transfers their patient to another setting of care (including home), requests a consult from a provider in another setting of care, or provides consultation results to a provider in another setting of care provides a summary of care record that pertains to the type of transition: Transfers of care from one site of care to another (e.g.. hospital to PCP, SNF, HHA, etc., SNF, PCP, etc… to HHA) Consult requests (e.g., PCP to consulting physician, PCP, SNF to ED, etc.) Consult note (e.g. ER note, consult note)) Transfer of care and consult requests must include the following: 1.Concise narrative in support of care transitions (free text that captures current care synopsis and expectations for transitions and / or consult) 2.Contact information for professional care team members, including primary care provider, role and contact information (free text is permissible) 3. Indication of whether there is a designated family or informal caregiver who is playing a significant role in the patients care (Yes/No) Transfers of care must also include the following: 4. Overarching patient goals and/ or problem specific goals (free text is permissible) 5. Patient Instructions and / or orders for care during transition and / or for 48 hours afterwards (free text is permissible) Measure: The EP, EH, or CAH that transfers their patient to another setting of care (including home), requests a consult from a provider in another setting of care, or provides consultation results to a provider in another setting of care, provides a summary of care record for 6550% of transitions (consult note, consult request, transfer of care, as indicated above) and at least 30 10%* electronically. Certification criteria #1: EHR is able to set aside a concise narrative section in the summary of care document that allows the provider to document clinically relevant rationale such as reason for transition and / or consult request. Certification criteria#2: Ability to automatically populate a consult request form for specific purposes, including a referral to a smoking quit line. Certification criteria #3: Care team should include all care team members as defined in the consolidated CDA 5 Care Summary - 303

6 Stage 2 Care Summary ItemsStage 3 Additions Must include the following information if the provider knows it: Patient name. Referring or transitioning provider's name and office contact information (EP only). Procedures. Encounter diagnosis Immunizations. Laboratory test results. Vital signs (height, weight, blood pressure, BMI). Smoking status. Functional status, including activities of daily living, cognitive and disability status Demographic information (preferred language, sex, race, ethnicity, date of birth). Care plan field, including goals and instructions. Care team including the primary care provider of record and any additional known care team members beyond the referring or transitioning provider and the receiving provider. Discharge instructions (Hospital Only) Reason for referral (EP only) In circumstances where there is no information available to populate one or more of the fields listed previously, the EP, eligible hospital or CAH may leave the field (s) blank and still meet the objective and its associated measure. All summary of care documents used to meet this objective must include: Current problem list (Providers may also include historical problems at their discretion) Current medication list, and Current medication allergy list. An EP or hospital must verify these three fields for current problem list, current medication list, and current medication allergy list are not blank and include the most recent information known by the EP or hospital as of the time of generating the summary of care document. High priority family history (not required) Indication of an advance directive for patients 65 or older (not removing as a separate objective) Concise narrative in support of care transitions (free text that captures current care synopsis and expectations for transitions and / or referral) Contact information for care team members, including primary care provider and caregiver name, role and contact info, placeholder for advancing care planning in the future (free text is permissible) Indication of whether there is a designated family caregiver who is playing a significant role in the patients care (Yes/No) Overarching patient goals and/ or problem specific goals (free text is permissible) Patient Instructions and / or orders for care during transition and / or for 48 hours afterwards (free text is permissible) Now Required: Care team including the primary care provider of record and any additional known care team members beyond the referring or transitioning provider and the receiving provider. UDI? Care Summary (contd)

7 ID # Stage 2 Final Rule Stage 3 Recommendations Proposed for Future StageQuestions / Comments 304New EP/ EH / CAH Objective: EP/ EH/CAH who transitions their patient to another site of care or refers their patient to another provider of care For each transition of site of care, provide the care plan information, including the following elements as applicable: Medical diagnoses and stages Functional status, including ADLs Relevant social and financial information (free text) Relevant environmental factors impacting patients health (free text) Most likely course of illness or condition, in broad terms (free text) Cross-setting care team member list, including the primary contact from each active provider setting, including primary care, relevant specialists, and caregiver The patients long-term goal(s) for care, including time frame (not specific to setting) and initial steps toward meeting these goals Specific advance care plan (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST)) and the care setting in which it was executed. For each referral, provide a care plan if one exists An up-to-date interdisciplinary problem list inclusive of versioning in support of collaborative care (formerly 127) Measure: The EP, eligible hospital, or CAH that transitions or refers their patient to another site of care or provider of care provides the electronic care plan information for 10% of transitions of care to receiving provider and patient/caregiver. Certification Criteria: Develop standards for a shared care plan, as being defined by S&I Longitudinal Coordination of Care WG. Some of the data elements in the shared care plan overlap content represented in the CDA. Adopt standards for the structured recording of other data elements, such as patient goals and related interventions. How might we advance the concept of an electronic shared care planning and collaboration tool that crosses care settings and providers, allows for and encourages team based care, and includes the patient and their non-professional caregivers? Interested in experience to date and the lessons learned. Think through these priority use cases: 1.Patient going home from an acute care hospital admission 2.Patient in nursing home going to ED for emergency assessment and returning to nursing home 3.Patient seeing multiple ambulatory specialists needing care coordination with primary care 4.Patient going home from either hospital and / or nursing some and receiving home health services What are the most essential data elements to ensuring safe, effective care transitions and ongoing care management? How might sharing key data elements actually improve the communication? Consider health concerns, patient goals, expected outcomes, interventions, including advance orders, and care team members. What data strategy and terminology are required such that the data populated by venue specific EHRs can be exchanged. How might existing terminologies be reconciled? What are the requirements (legal, workflow, other considerations) for patients and their identified team to participate in a shared care plan? Is it useful to consider role- based access as a technical method of implementing who will have access to and be able to contribute to the care plan? How will such access be managed? Future Stage Care Plan - 304

Transitions of Care - CDA Revisions Zabrina Gonzaga August 5, 2013