Clinical Genomics Domain Analysis Model Joyce Hernandez Mukesh Sharma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Printer Working Group Face-to-Face Meeting December 8, 2010
Advertisements

IHE Cardiology Implantable Cardiac Device Interrogation (ICDI) Profile Nicholas Steblay 2/3/2006.
Longitudinal Coordination of Care All Hands SWG Wednesday, August 28, 2013.
Omics Modeling 12/06/2011. Classes reviewed until last meeting – Person – BiologicEntity – Subject – SubjectIdentifier – Performer – ExperimentalStudy.
Depicting EHRs Immunization capability HL7 WGM – September 11, 2006 Immunization Storyboard project update.
HL7 Version 3 Adverse Event Assessment CMET Specification Jennifer Neat Project Leader, City of Hope August 7, 2007.
RCRIM September 2007 Working Group Meeting Clinical Research Filtered Query Service Tuesday, September 18, 2007 (Q4) Sheraton Hotel Atlanta, GA.
IEHR Standards Project HL7 PC Presentation HL7 WGM Boca Raton September 2006.
HDF: HL7 Methodology Ioana Singureanu M&M co-chair, HDF Editor Eversolve, LLC.
HL7 Version 3 Laboratory Result-based Adverse Event Assessment Message Specifications RCRIM Technical Meeting September 18, 2007 Jennifer Neat Project.
HL7 XML ITS R1.1 Charlie McCay
1 HL7 Jan 2007 Working Group MeetingsPharmacogenomics Update RCRIM TC Philip M. Pochon Covance Enterprise Architecture.
1 Intermountain Healthcare Clinical Genetics Institute Marc S. Williams, M.D. Director Grant M. Wood Senior IT Strategist Introduction to HL7 Clinical.
1 HL7 Educational Session – eHealth Week Budapest 2011 © Health Level Seven International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven.
Joint TC Meeting: EHR – RCRIM RCRIM Overview HL7 Working Group Meeting January, 2007 Presented by: Ed Tripp Program Director, eSubmissions Abbott (RCRIM.
CDISC Content to Message HL7 Development Overview Jason Rock
Financial Management (FM) v3 Orientation HL7 Baltimore September 30, 2002.
1 HL7 Jan 2010 Working Group MeetingsCTLAB Pharmacogenomics Update JOINT RCRIM and CG Session CTLAB Message Pharmacogenomics Results Overview.
HL7 Working Group Meeting Orlando, Florida 14 January
HL7 Clinical Genomics and Structured Documents Work Groups CDA Implementation Guide: Genetic Testing Report DRAFT PROPOSAL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD
CDISC-HL7 Project Update Armando Oliva, M.D. FDA Sponsor HL7 Workgroup Meeting January 14, 2008 San Antonio TX.
Clinical Genomics Sub-team Sub-team is one of three that evolved out of the DIA Pharmacogenomics Standards Workshop. Workshop was product of collaborative.
1Copyright © 2010, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary Status Report Workgroup for Imaging Management Solutions (WIMS/PMP) Printer.
BRIDG Overview Clinical Observation Interoperability March 18, 2008.
Comprehensive Review of Quality Measurement and Reporting Brief Profile Proposal for 2011/12 presented to the Quality, Research & Public Health (QRPH)
IHIC 2011 – Orlando, FL Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics WG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator HL7 Structured Documents WG.
Office of Sponsored Projects & Industry PartnershipsHuman and Animal Regulatory Committee Office Protocols vs. Proposals (research involving humans and/or.
May 2014 Work Group Meeting Clinical Genomics Minutes Pheonix, AZ.
Christopher Carr Director of Informatics, RSNA
Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 Fall Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 4e Basic Health Data Standards Component 9/Unit.
BUILDING INTEROPERABILITY STANDARDS FOR VITAL RECORDS Public Health Data Standards Consortium 2012 Annual Business Meeting November 9, 2012 Michelle Williamson,
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4: Updating a Cancer Research Standard Ann Setser 1, Ranjana Srivastava 2, Lawrence Wright 1,
Hl7 and the Clinical Genomics Work Group
Clinical Genomics Work Group (HL7) Mukesh Sharma Washington University in St. Louis.
EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM IN TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH Panel Session Goals:  To discuss how CTSA training programs currently prepare clinical and translational.
Specimen-Related Classes in BRIDG BRIDG Overview for HL7 O&O WG Conference Call July 1, 2015 Wendy Ver Hoef NCI Contractor.
IDR Snapshot: Quantitative Assessment Methodology Evaluating Size and Comprehensiveness of an Integrated Data Repository Vojtech Huser, MD, PhD a James.
HL7 Clinical Genomics – Implementation Roadmap The HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Amnon Shabo (Shvo), PhD HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG Co-chair and Modeling Facilitator.
 BRIDG R3.0.2 was released in August 2010  The BRIDG Model passed the initial ISO Joint Initiative Council ballot as a Draft International Standard (DIS)
Changes without Prior Approval Breakout Session Summary Rick Smith Aventis Pasteur, Inc.
Second Annual Japan CDISC Group (JCG) Meeting 28 January 2004 Julie Evans Director, Technical Services.
Clinical Genomics Work Group (HL7) Mukesh Sharma Washington University in St. Louis June 16, 2011.
The Team Science Toolkit is an interactive website that provides resources to help users support, engage in, and study.
CaMATCH Pilot Project1 Pilot Project : caMATCH Matching Patients to Clinical Trials A Contribution to Strategic Research and Standards Development for.
Clinical Genomics Joint with RCRIM Amnon Shabo Joyce Hernandez Mukesh Sharma.
RCRIM Projects: Protocol Representation and CDISC Message(s) January 2007.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
1 LS DAM Overview and the Specimen Core February 16, 2012 Core Team: Ian Fore, D.Phil., NCI CBIIT, Robert Freimuth, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Elaine Freund,
1 ECCF Training Computationally Independent Model (CIM) ECCF Training Working Group March 2011.
Networking and Health Information Exchange Unit 5b Health Data Interchange Standards.
Public Health Reporting Initiative Stage 3 Sprint: Implementation Guide Development 1.
1 LS DAM Overview January 31, 2012 Core Team: Ian Fore, D.Phil., NCI CBIIT, Robert Freimuth, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Elaine Freund, Ph.D., 3 rd Millennium,
CDISC Update December 2007 / January 2008 Pierre-Yves Lastic, PhD CDISC Board of Directors & E3C February 5, Paris.
S&I Public Health Education Series: Data Provenance July 9th, 2014 Johnathan Coleman Initiative Coordinator – Data Provenance ONC/OCPO/OST (CTR)
Interchange vs Interoperability Main Entry: in·ter·op·er·a·bil·i·ty : ability of a system... to use the parts or equipment of another system Source: Merriam-Webster.
HL7 Clinical-Genomics SIG: Tissue-Typing Models and a Reusable Genotype Module HL7 V3 Compliant IBM Research Lab in Haifa together with Hadassah University.
BRIDG Imaging Project Nov. 25th, Agenda Project Goals & Objectives Imaging Projects of interest Rationale for aligning with BRIDG Principles on.
Query Health Distributed Population Queries Implementation Group Meeting November 15, 2011.
1 ICR IRWG Update Feb 16, Information Representation Working Group (IRWG) The caBIG Integrative Cancer Research (ICR) Information Representation.
1 CDISC HL7 Project FDA Perspective Armando Oliva, M.D. Office of Critical Path Programs FDA.
“ Jericho / UT Austin Pilot” Privacy with Dynamic Patient Review April 30, 2013 Presented by: David Staggs, JD, CISSP Jericho Systems Corporation.
BRIDG Update RCRIM Working Group Meeting Rio de Janeiro 17 May 2010 Julie Evans Senior Director, Technical Services, CDISC Wendy Ver Hoef Senior Analyst,
1 LS DAM Overview August 7, 2012 Current Core Team: Ian Fore, D.Phil., NCI CBIIT, Robert Freimuth, Ph.D., Mayo Clinic, Mervi Heiskanen, NCI-CBIIT, Joyce.
Information Representation Working Group: Kickoff ‘08 IRWG Working Group May 13, 2008.
Submission Standards: The Big Picture Gary G. Walker Associate Director, Programming Standards, Global Data Solutions, Global Data Management.
Dave Iberson-Hurst CDISC VP Technical Strategy
BRIDG Adverse Event Sub-domain Summary
Clinical Interoperability Council Working Group (CIC)
BR&R Biomedical Research & Regulation
Retrieve Protocol for Execution (RPE)
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Genomics Domain Analysis Model Joyce Hernandez Mukesh Sharma

Project Objective To develop a robust Domain Analysis Mode (DAM) which will eventually cover information needed for all – omics areas and support linking to clinical data results contained in other models such as CDISC BRIDG, LSDAM or an EHR. Integration of information from clinical and research is an important to step to facilitate translational medicine. To develop a robust Domain Analysis Mode (DAM) which will eventually cover information needed for all – omics areas and support linking to clinical data results contained in other models such as CDISC BRIDG, LSDAM or an EHR. Integration of information from clinical and research is an important to step to facilitate translational medicine.

Domain Modeling History Original Domain Analysis Model Original Domain Analysis Model Genetic Variation (based on V3 message) and Gene Expression (balloted portion) Genetic Variation (based on V3 message) and Gene Expression (balloted portion) Our initial DAM was part of the Gene Expression CMET project. During our initial modeling efforts we recognized the need to add a "generic" layer to our model that would represent concepts that are common to multiple –omics technologies as well as allow integration of clinical results. By including these classes it will facilitate extension of the model to support other technologies. Our initial DAM was part of the Gene Expression CMET project. During our initial modeling efforts we recognized the need to add a "generic" layer to our model that would represent concepts that are common to multiple –omics technologies as well as allow integration of clinical results. By including these classes it will facilitate extension of the model to support other technologies.

-Omics Modeling -omics Model -omics Model As part of the analysis, representatives of the HL7 CG team are acting as liaisons to the NCI caBIG ® ICR WS IRWG (National Cancer Institute caBIG ® Integrative Cancer Research Workspace Information Representation Work Group) in the development of a Experiment Model. The work done by the NCI project was brought in as one of the analysis inputs to our HL7 CG DAM development effort. As part of the analysis, representatives of the HL7 CG team are acting as liaisons to the NCI caBIG ® ICR WS IRWG (National Cancer Institute caBIG ® Integrative Cancer Research Workspace Information Representation Work Group) in the development of a Experiment Model. The work done by the NCI project was brought in as one of the analysis inputs to our HL7 CG DAM development effort. Currently, starting point is the Experiment model (Life Sciences DAM) with changes done by Joyce and Mukesh. Currently, starting point is the Experiment model (Life Sciences DAM) with changes done by Joyce and Mukesh. We are also including CG Gene Expression DAM (i.e. uses cases and information represented in the original model). We are also including CG Gene Expression DAM (i.e. uses cases and information represented in the original model). The completed model will have: The completed model will have: One high level generic backbone (right now based on Experiment section of LSDAM) One high level generic backbone (right now based on Experiment section of LSDAM) Each –omics area will have its own submodel. Each –omics area will have its own submodel. Some –omics areas might be complex enough to have their own submodels. Some –omics areas might be complex enough to have their own submodels.

Approach Objectives Represent most important common concepts for Clinical Genomics that will have stability across technology platforms. Represent most important common concepts for Clinical Genomics that will have stability across technology platforms. Harmonization Process Harmonization Process Started with Experiment model (LSDAM) Started with Experiment model (LSDAM) Harmonized information from CG Gene Expression DAM/BRIDG DAM to experiment model Harmonized information from CG Gene Expression DAM/BRIDG DAM to experiment model Work out details for representing the data Work out details for representing the data

Approach Steps Continue harmonization effort Continue harmonization effort Identify gaps between (use cases or the CG DAM classes) and the experiment model Identify gaps between (use cases or the CG DAM classes) and the experiment model Address gaps Address gaps Provide feedback to LSDAM and/or BRIDG Provide feedback to LSDAM and/or BRIDG

References CG Gene Expression DAM (previously balloted) CG Gene Expression DAM (previously balloted) me/downloads/downloads.htm me/downloads/downloads.htm me/downloads/downloads.htm me/downloads/downloads.htm LSDAM v2.2.1 LSDAM v Domain+Analysis+Model+%28LS+DAM%29 +Domain+Analysis+Model+%28LS+DAM%29 +Domain+Analysis+Model+%28LS+DAM%29 +Domain+Analysis+Model+%28LS+DAM%29 BRIDG v3.0.2 BRIDG v

Weekly Meeting information -omics Modeling Sessions Event Number: Event Number: Tuesday 4-5 pm (EDT) Tuesday 4-5 pm (EDT) D= D= D= D=804198

Notes Summarize unresolved issues from the harmonization effort until now (Mukesh). Summarize unresolved issues from the harmonization effort until now (Mukesh). Areas already visited for harmonization: Person, BiologicEntity, Subject, SubjectIdentifier, Experiment and ExperimentalStudy, Protocol, Document (Publication). Areas already visited for harmonization: Person, BiologicEntity, Subject, SubjectIdentifier, Experiment and ExperimentalStudy, Protocol, Document (Publication). In scope uses cases from Gene Expression DAM ( previously balloted; Gene Expression Domain Analysis Model_Version2_May-2010_Ballot ) In scope uses cases from Gene Expression DAM ( previously balloted; Gene Expression Domain Analysis Model_Version2_May-2010_Ballot ) 2.1 Sponsor-Agency Storyboard 2.1 Sponsor-Agency Storyboard 2.2 Sponsor-Lab Storyboard: 2.2 Sponsor-Lab Storyboard: 2.3 Healthcare Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk Assessment Using Gene Expression Profiling 2.3 Healthcare Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk Assessment Using Gene Expression Profiling ?