Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process September 17 th, 2007 Atlanta WGM David Hamill Director, Project Management Office.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2013 Health Level Seven ® International. All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven International.
Advertisements

© 2006 Health Level Seven ® All Rights Reserved. HL7 and Health Level Seven are registered trademarks of Health Level Seven, Inc. Reg. U.S.
HL7 Project Management Tool Overview for HL7 Project Facilitators
The HL7 RIM Harmonization Procedure Government Projects Special Interest Group January 27, 2000.
Project Insight PM Tool Overview May th, 2010 Rio de Janeiro Working Group Meeting David Hamill Director, Project Management Office.
Charts and Diagrams in T3F Combination of two slides from Virginia Lorenzis set and Craig Parkers sketch.
Project Insight Overview January 11 th and 15 th, 2009 Orlando Working Group Meeting David Hamill Director, Project Management Office.
Project Insight Overview October 2008 Webinar David Hamill Director, Project Management Office.
Project Insight PM Tool Overview January 20 th, 2010 Phoenix Working Group Meeting David Hamill Director, Project Management Office.
New GSMP Governance Proposal (This recommendation provides the governance approach for the standards development only) ISDP Governance Team 2-September-2009.
Report to the IIJIS Implementation Board October 20, 2004 Dale Good – SEARCH Dave Usery – IJIS Institute.
Lesson 6D – Loops and String Arrays – split process By John B. Owen All rights reserved ©2011.
A BPM Framework for KPI-Driven Performance Management
New York City Department of Education Charter Matching – Facilities Upgrades/ Capital Improvements – FY 2014.
The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
Utilizing an Industrial Advisory Board in the Accreditation Process Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University.
An Overview of Some Issues Relating To the Accreditation Process Dr. Raymond Greenlaw Department of Computer Science Armstrong Atlantic State University.
Request Management Mirror-. A random three day sample of Incidents revealed that about 86% of the registered Incidents were legitimate Requests Many other.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel Co-Chair.
December 10, 2014 The Legislature Should Reauthorize the UW Medical Construction Contractor Alternative Process Because Timeliness and Quality Have Improved.
UNSW Strategic Educational Development Grants
Scope of TOGAF ADM The scope of the four architecture domains of TOGAF align very well with the first four rows of the Zachman Framework, as shown in the.
Delivery Business Solutions April 29, Nashville PMI Symposium April 29, 2013 Stephanie Dedmon, PMP Director, Business Solutions Delivery Department.
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
IT Governance and Management
Submitting Projects and the Approval Process Brownbag lunch February 9, 2005 Paul Craft.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
ECM Project Roles and Responsibilities
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
IS&T Project Management: How to Engage the Customer September 27, 2005.
Federal Geographic Data Committee: Coordination Group Meeting Proposal: FGDC Annual Planning Process & Monthly Performance Management Reviews Submitted.
Organize to improve Data Quality Data Quality?. © 2012 GS1 To fully exploit and utilize the data available, a strategic approach to data governance at.
Organisation and Method of Working of HGI Paolo Pastorino – Telecom Italia Lab.
Legislative Policy Committee ISAC Board approved concept at their meeting in December.
Proposal to Establish the Transportation/Land Use Connection Program Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning October 18, 2006 Item 14.
Project Portfolio Governance by the Executive Governance Committee (EGC) The EGC Jim Kneeland ©
Investment Management Process (IMP) ACF-1 John DiNofrio Gary Graybill Alex Storoz March 31, 2003.
HFTC Collaborative Council Strategic Plan Update.
Project Kick-off Meeting Presented By: > > > > Office of the Chief Information Officer.
IICWG VI Applied Science & Research Standing Committee Open Action Items for IICWG-7 Co-Chairs Lars-Anders & Breivik Dean Flett.
IR Governance Texas Juvenile Justice Department Last revised: 9/6/12.
IT Project Request UNF February 2015.
BOARD COMMITTEES ① Constitution and trust deed ② SIS and the Corporations Act ③ Prudential Standards and Prudential Practice Guides.
July 2008LBNL Sponsored Projects Office1 Bridge Funding Overview Presented by: David Garcia Contracts Officer.
How do You Fit within the Process? Roles and Responsibilities – Pre CAB (1/2) 1 Change Requestor Initiates the Change Request (CR) in Service-now Includes.
RESEARCH PROGRAMS GETTING OFF ON THE RIGHT FOOT AND STAYING THERE Sue Sillick Montana Department of Transportation July 28, 2010 Methods to Ensure the.
1 CCSAS Governance An Overview 2007 Annual Child Support Training Conference and Expo September 18, :30 – 12:00.
Child Support Directors Association of California in partnership with California Department of Child Support Services Annual Child Support Training Conference.
Structuring An Effective Project Management Office and IT Governance David Stokes, PMP Jane Matthews, PMP Florida Department of Health Division of Information.
Appendix L MiCSES IT Governance. 21 October 2016 Project Management Methodology Closeout Planning Execution Control Initiation Procurement Management.
Data Provenance Tiger Team April 28 th, 2014 Johnathan Coleman Johnathan Coleman - Initiative Coordinator Bob Yencha Bob Yencha – Subject Matter Expert.
PMO Processes & Procedures
Strengthening the Medical Device Clinical Trial Enterprise
TEXAS NODAL (ERCOT REVISIONS)
Implementation Strategy July 2002
ESMF Governance Cecelia DeLuca NOAA CIRES / NESII April 7, 2017
PREDA’s Governance Model
Guidance notes for Project Manager
By Jeff Burklo, Director
IEC Maintenance Committee Report
<Project Name> Milestone Summary Report
Data Governance at UMBC: Built from the Bottom Up
Standards Development Process
Project Management Method and PMI ® PMBOK ® Roles
Executive Project Kickoff
Project Name - Project Kickoff
Step 3. Initiate Proposal
CalACES JPA Board of Directors Meeting February 22, 2018.
Request for Change and Release of Funds
Presentation transcript:

Project Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process September 17 th, 2007 Atlanta WGM David Hamill Director, Project Management Office

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process2 Key Initiative With the T3F, develop the criteria/process for triaging and prioritizing project requests and put in place by the Plenary meeting

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process3 Current vs. New Current 1.Create Scope Statement 2.TC Review 3.PMO Review 4.ARB Review 5.PMO/TTPL Oversee Methodology New 1.Create Scope Statement 2.TC Review 3.SD Review 4.PMO/TSC Review 5.PMO/PSC Oversee Methodology

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process4 Current Process 1.Project Facilitator creates a Project Scope Statement. 2.Technical Committee reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues. 3.Project Facilitator (co-chair) submits Project Scope Statement to PMO. PMO reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues. 4.PMO submits the Scope Statement to the ARB for review. ARB reviews Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues brought forth by ARB 5.PMO and Project Lifecycle Transition Team insures that the HL7 project methodology is adhered to throughout the project.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process5 New Process Step 1 Project Facilitator creates a Project Scope Statement.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process6 New Process Step 2 Technical Committee reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process7 New Process Step 3 (replaces the approval work currently done by the ARB) Project Facilitator notifies the new TSC of the new Scope Statement Project Facilitator indicates the appropriate Steering Division needs to review/approve Scope Statement for criteria such as: Is this project within the scope of work done by HL7 Is it within the scope of the sponsoring committee How is it related to other projects How is it related to the activities of other committees SD indicates priority within SD, if necessary. Priority is based on resources, target dates and technical strategies.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process8 New Process Step 3 continued SD review could result in the following: Amended scope statement Project needs to be reviewed (jointly or separately) by another SD Board approval may be necessary if the project requires internal or external funding or collaboration with an external body Project Facilitator resolves any issues brought forth by the SD.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process9 New Process Step 4 Project Facilitator (co-chair) submits Project Scope Statement to PMO. PMO reviews and approves Scope Statement. Project Facilitator resolves any issues.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process10 New Process Step 4 continued Steering Division submits Scope Statement to TSC for approval. TSC approval includes the following: Validate points identified by SD and PMO Assign a TSC level priority The SD & TSC reviews replace the ARB review, however the ARB may be called upon to resolve architectural issues.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process11 New Process Step 5 PMO and Project Services Committee insure that the HL7 project methodology is adhered to throughout the project.

September, 2007 WGM - AtlantaProject Requests – Triage/Prioritization Process12 Questions / Discussion / Feedback or (734)