Production Cost Model Fundamentals

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Midwest ISO from a Transmission Owner Perspective.
Advertisements

MISO Day 2: A Transmission Users (Marketers) Perspective Leon White August 8, 2007.
Demand Resource Operable Capacity Analysis – Assumptions for FCA 5.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE MIDWEST ISO By Bill Malcolm Manager-State Regulatory Affairs Pierre, South Dakota June 9, 2006.
Transparent, Repeatable, Defendable, and Published Generation, Transmission & Nat Gas Network Co-Optimizations
Software Analysis Tools
1 The Midwest ISO At the Crossroads of America International Meeting of Very Large Power Grid Operators October 24 & 25, 2005 Beijing, China.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Congestion Management in a Market Environment 2 nd CIGRE / IEEE PES International Symposium San Antonio, Texas October 5, 2005 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6, also Chapter 2.4 (Network Equations). HW 5 is 2.38, 6.9, 6.18, 6.30, 6.34, 6.38; do by October 6 but does not need.
1 Dale Osborn Midwest ISO February 27, Wisconsin Renewable Energy Summit Transmission Expansion Opportunities with Wind Energy.
INTEGRATION COST. Integration Cost in RPS Calculator While “Integration Cost” is included in NMV formulation, the Commission stated that the Integration.
ECE 530 – Analysis Techniques for Large-Scale Electrical Systems Prof. Hao Zhu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Announcements Be reading Chapter 7
Lecture 5 Power System Operation, Transmission Lines Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Preliminary Analysis of the SEE Future Infrastructure Development Plan and REM Benefits.
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
EE 369 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
Least Cost System Operation: Economic Dispatch 1
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
IMO Market Evolution Program Drew Phillips Market Evolution Program
Energy Business Solutions Michigan IRP Working Group Meeting June 10, 2005.
1 Transmission Development at Ameren and in the Midwest ISO Mid-America Regulatory Conference Maureen A. Borkowski June 8, 2010.
©2003 PJM Factors Contributing to Wholesale Electricity Prices Howard J. Haas Market Monitoring Unit November 30, 2006.
PJM©2012 Offshore Wind Integration Studies at PJM September 13, 2012 Steven Herling Vice President, Planning PJM Interconnection.
PJM © PJM Overview ARIPPA Valley Forge, PA November 8, 2007.
NASUCA Meeting Integration of Intermittent Renewable Resources Panel Michael McMullen MISO June 10, 2013.
Optimization for Operation of Power Systems with Performance Guarantee
RELIABILITY and RENEWABLES: Two Case Studies Using the SuperOPF Tim Mount Department of Applied Economics and Management Cornell University
Avoided Costs of Generation
Base Case Draft – For Comment Rocky Mountain States Sub-Regional Transmission Study December 9, 2003.
Network Customer Meeting Access Metric Update November 16, 2006.
Power Plant BI POWER GENERATION Evolution of Plant Ownership From Regulated Era Regulated Utility Monopolies To “Partially” Deregulated Era Independent.
Cork June Dynamic modelling of transmission systems: costs of seasonal-zonal transmission loss factor charging and the impact of large-scale offshore.
April, 2008 Maximum Shadow Price. April, 2008 Protocol Requirement: Transmission Constraint Management (2)ERCOT shall establish a maximum Shadow.
Market Evolution Program Day Ahead Market Project How the DSO Calculates Nodal Prices DAMWG October 20, 2003.
Leader-Follower Framework For Control of Energy Services Ali Keyhani Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering The Ohio State University
1 Electricity System and Energy Market Basics David J. Lawrence Manager, Auxiliary Market Products Prepared for: RGGI I&L Workshop June 15, 2006.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Proposed Generation Expansion Process For Review and Discussion March 1, 2011.
“DRAFT” RMATS 2008 Base Case (To be presented at the RMATS Stakeholders Meeting) March 17, 2004.
Dale Osborn Midwest ISO October 13, 2008 EE 590 Transmission Planning with Significant Energy Resources.
IWWG Annual Conference Wind Management at MISO July 22, 2011.
Lecture 17 Optimal Power Flow, LMPs Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting September 16, 2008 Austin, TX.
Announcements Homework 8 is 11.19, 11.21, 11.26, 11.27, due now
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
SPP.org 1. Status Update for Reliability and Economic Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 20 th, 2008 Austin, TX.
Operating Reserves and Extended Locational Marginal Pricing 1.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 18: LMP Markets, Symmetrical Faults and Components Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM)
ERCOT – MISO DC Tie Study Regional Planning Group November 20, 2015.
Lecture 15 Economic Dispatch Professor Tom Overbye Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS.
Congestion Management Work Group 2008 Overview CMWG Marguerite Wagner, Reliant Energy Inc.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Draft Wholesale Power Price Forecasts Maury Galbraith Generating Resource Advisory Committee Meeting.
0 Balanced 3 Phase (  ) Systems A balanced 3 phase (  ) system has three voltage sources with equal magnitude, but with an angle shift of 120  equal.
EE590 Transmission Planning Projects and Cost Allocation Ming NI Economic Studies, Midwest ISO.
Pan-Canadian Wind Integration Study (PCWIS) Prepared by: GE Energy Consulting, Vaisala , EnerNex, Electranix, Knight Piésold Olga Kucherenko.
Minnesota Renewable Energy Integration and Transmission
Wind Management at MISO
Analysis of the Effects of a Flexible Ramping Ancillary Service Product on Power System Operations Ibrahim Krad Eduardo Ibanez Erik Ela.
ECE 476 POWER SYSTEM ANALYSIS
ISO New England System R&D Needs
penetration of wind power
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
LMP calculations Congestion evaluation
PJM & Midwest ISO Market-to-Market Coordination (APEx Conference 2007)
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Software Analysis Tools
Presentation transcript:

Production Cost Model Fundamentals Midwest ISO

Outline What is a Production Cost Model? Basics of Security Constrained Economic Dispatch What is PROMOD? PowerBase Database PROMOD Input Files and Assumptions PROMOD Output Economic Benefits Calculation PROMOD GUI Demo

What is a Production Cost Model?

What is a Production Cost Model? Captures all the costs of operating a fleet of generators Originally developed to manage fuel inventories and budget in the mid 1970’s Developed into an hourly chronological security constrained unit commitment and economic dispatch simulation Minimize costs while simultaneously adhering to a wide variety of operating constraints. Calculate hourly production costs and location-specific market clearing prices.

What Are the Advantages of Production Cost Models? Allows simulation of all the hours in a year, not just peak hour as in power flow models. Allows us to look at the net energy price effects through LMP’s and its components. Production cost. Enables the simulation of the market on a forecast basis Allows us to look at all control areas simultaneously and evaluate the economic impacts of decisions.

Disadvantages of Production Cost Models Require significant amounts of data Long processing times New concept for many Stakeholders Require significant benchmarking Time consuming model building process Linked to power flow models Do not model reliability to the same extent as power flow

Production Cost Model vs. Power Flow SCUC&ED: very detailed Hand dispatch (merit Order) All hours One hour at a time DC Transmission AC and DC Large numbers of security constraints Selected security constraints Market analysis/ Transmission analysis/planning Basis for transmission reliability & operational planning

Basics of Security Constrained Economic Dispatch

What is covered in this section Understanding constrained dispatch Shift factor concept Shadow price of constraints LMP calculation and its components;

Economic Dispatch Formulation Objective function – total cost System Balance Transmission Constraints Capacity Constraints Where is a shift factor of branch k to the generator i, is an incremental price of energy at the generator i.

Economic Dispatch Solution Non-linear optimization problem Quick Solution Using Linear Programming (LP) Desired generation dispatch for every dispatchable generator. Shadow prices corresponding to each constraint. Binding constraints

Shift Factor Shift Factor (SF) shows how the flow in the branch will change if the injection at the bus changes by one (1) MW. All shift factors are computed relative to the reference bus, shift factor is dependent on the location of the reference bus. The shift factor at the reference bus equals to zero. Shift factors are solely dependent on the network topology and impedance.

Five Bus System Example - Generation Cost Incremental Cost Unit 1 Incremental Cost Unit 5 30 $/mw Inc Cost 15 $/mw Inc Cost 600 400 MW Output MW Output

Economic Dispatch (No Transmission) Load: 600 MW G1 = 400 MW G5 = 200 MW (Marginal) Cost = 400 x $15 + 200 x $30 = $12,000

5 Bus Power Network 1 a 2 b d f 5 e c 4 3 400mw unit @$15 200 MW Shift Factors Bus 1 0.1818 Bus 2 0.3636 Bus 3 0 Bus 4 -0.1818 Bus 5 0.0909 400mw unit @$15 200 MW Customer b d f 5 c e 3 4 600 mw unit @$30 100 MW 300 MW

5 Bus Power Network 2 1 5 4 3 200 MW 300 MW 100 MW Supplier Supplier 400mw unit @$15 Supplier Shift Factors Bus 1 0.1818 Bus 2 0.3636 Bus 3 0 Bus 4 -0.1818 Bus 5 0.0909 Flow (from load) Flow (from generation) Flow on d from load: -200 * 0.3636 + -100 * 0 + -300 * -0.1818 = -18.18 mw 5 Flow on d from gen: 400 * 0.1818 + 200 * 0.0909 = 90.90 mw Supplier Total Flow on d: -18.18 + 90.90 = 72.72 mw 600 mw unit @$30

Flow “d” Components Load Component Shift Factors Flow on Line d = -18.18 + .1818 G1 + .0909 G5 = -18.18 + .1818 400 + .0909 200 = -18.18 + 72.73 + 18.18 = 72.73 Megawatts total flow

Transmission Constraint Applied If dmax = 50 MW , the dispatch is not acceptable! Flow: d = -18.18 +.1818 G1 + .0909 G5 = 50 Load Balance: G1 + G5 = 600 G1 = 150 G5 = 450 Cost = $15,750 Both Marginal !

Constraint Shadow Price What if the constraint were 51 mw? The incremental increase in cost is the shadow price Flow: d = -18.18 +.1818 G1 + .0909 G5 = 51 Load Balance: G1 + G5 = 600 Cost = $15,585 G1=161MW, G5=439MW Shadow price = 15,585 – 15,750 = -165 $/mw

Bus Locational Marginal Prices How much will the next mw of load cost? Is it simply the marginal unit cost? LMP definition: A change in the total cost of production due to increment of load at this location. Bus LMPs can be calculated by adding one MW of load at each bus and determining the corresponding change in the total production cost

5 Bus System Incremental Network 1 2 g1 0 MW 0 mw 5 g5 3 4 0 MW 1 MW

The Incremental Flow Equation The change in generation must result in zero flow change Power changes at the marginal units, and at the load bus The sum of power change must be zero Bus 4: Add 1 MW Load New flow equation... .1818 g1 + .0909 g5 - .1818 (-1) = 0

Incremental Equations Load Balance: g1 + g5 = 1 Flow “d” : .1818 g1 + .0909 g5 = - .1818 Solution: g1 = - 3 g5 = + 4 (wow !) lmp = -3 x $15 + 4 x $30 = 75 $/mw

g5 = -2 lmp = 3 x 15 - 2 x 30 = - 15 $/mw (!) Price at Bus 2 Bus 2: Add 1 MW Demand. New equations... .1818 g1 + .0909 g5 + .3636 (-1) = 0 g1 + g5 = 1 Solution: g1 = 3 g5 = -2 lmp = 3 x 15 - 2 x 30 = - 15 $/mw (!)

g5 = +2 lmp = (-1*15) + (2*30) = 45 $/mw What about Bus 3 (slack bus)? Bus 3: Add 1 MW Demand. New equations... .1818 g1 + .0909 g5 + .0000 (-1) = 0 g1 + g5 = 1 Solution: g1 = -1 g5 = +2 lmp = (-1*15) + (2*30) = 45 $/mw

Buses 1 and 5? These are the “price setting buses” LMP at these buses will be the gen price LMP1 = $15 LMP5 = $30

LMP Calculation LMP at any location is calculated based on the shadow prices out of LP solution. The following fundamental formula is used to calculate LMPs. For any node i: where  is a shadow price of the system balance constraint.

5 Bus System – LMP Calculation using Shadow Price

What is PROMOD

Background PROMOD is a Production Cost Model developed by Ventyx (Formerly known as NewEnergy Associates, A Siemens Company). Detailed generator portfolio modeling, with both region zonal price and nodal LMP forecasting and transmission analysis including marginal losses

Visualization & Reporting How PROMOD Works - PROMOD Structure PSS/E™ Common Data Source Common API Report Agent Visualization & Reporting Access, Excel, Pivot Cube… Detailed unit commitment and dispatch Detailed transmission simulation Asset Valuation with MarketWise FTR Valuation with TAM - Easy-to-use interface Powerful scenario management Complete NERC data with solved powerflow cases

How PROMOD Works – Input and Output of PROMOD Hourly LMP of buses and hubs, include energy, loss and congestion components. Hourly unit generation and production cost Hourly binding constraints and shadow prices Hourly line flows Hourly company purchase/sale Environmental emissions. Fuel consumptions. etc. Generation Data: heat rate, different costs, etc. Demand & Energy Fuel Forecasts: Gas, Coal, Oil Environmental Costs: Sox, Nox, Mercury Power Flow Case Monitored Flowgates Other Information: reserve requirement, market territory, etc. PROMOD

Magnitude of the Challenge Real System Dimensions – MTEP 08 PROMOD Cases Footprint: East interconnection excluding FRCC Generators: ~ 4,700 Buses: ~ 47,500 Branches: ~ 60,000 Monitored Lines: ~ 1,500 Contingencies: ~ 500 Run Time: 60-90 Hrs (for one year 8760 hours)

Powerbase Database

Data in PowerBase Generation Demand & Energy Transmission Network Data Fuel Forecasts Coal, Uranium, Gas, Coal, Oil Environmental Effluent and Costs CO2, Sox, Nox, Mercury

PROMOD Input Files and Assumptions

PROMOD input files PFF file Load data file Main input file, includes units, fuels, environmental and transmission data, pool configuration, reserve requirement, run option switches, etc. Load data file Hourly load profiles for each company for a selected study period. Based on the 8760 hour load shape and each year’s peak load and annual energy for each company defined in PowerBase. Gen Outage Library and automatic maintenance schedule Same outage library and maintenance schedule used by all cases

PROMOD input files Event files Define the monitored line/contingency pairs which are the transmission constraints Combine MISO and NERC Book of Flowgates Modify existing events or add new events according to member’s comments. Create new events which have the potential of overflow using PAT tool

PROMOD Assumptions Study Footprint East interconnection excluding Florida Hourly fixed transactions modeled to include the influence of external areas to the study footprint SETRANS sale to Florida

PROMOD Assumptions (Cont’) Pool Definition a group of companies in which all its generators are dispatched together to meet its loads. Hurdle rates are defined between pools to allow the energy exchange between pools. Hurdle rates are based on the filed transmission through-and-out rates, plus a market inefficiency adder. In current MISO cases, 11 pools are defined: MISO, PJM, TVA, MRO, East Canada, SPP, IMO, MHEB, ISONE,NYISO,SERC

PROMOD Assumptions (Cont’) Loss Calculation Option1: Load is equal to actual load plus loss. Loss and LMP loss component are not calculated. Option 2: Load is equal to actual load plus loss. Loss is not calculated while LMP loss component is calculated using an approximation method – Single Pass Loss Calculation. Option 3: Load is equal to actual load. Loss and LMP loss component are calculated – Multi Pass Loss Calculation. Run time is 4 times of Option 2. Option 2 is used in MISO PROMOD cases.

PROMOD Assumptions (Cont’) Wind Units – fixed load modifier transactions Set at a same capacity factor for every hour (~ 33%); Set different capacity factors for different months (15% for summer months, and 20% for winter months); Set hourly profile for each unit to capture geographical diversity. Smelter Loads modeled as transactions

PROMOD Output

PROMOD Output LMPs (include the energy, loss and congestion components): Hourly LMP of selected buses, defined hubs. Hourly Load Weighted and Gen Weighted LMP of defined zones. Constraints: Hourly shadow price; Number of hours at Pmax, total shadow price at Pmax; Number of hours at Pmin, total shadow price at Pmin;

PROMOD Output (Cont’) Generators: Hourly generation Hourly production cost (sum of fuel, variable O&M, environmental cost) Hourly fuel consumption, BTU consumption Hours on line, hours of startup, hours at margin, Hours profitable. Monthly variable O&M cost, fuel cost, emission, and emission cost.

PROMOD Output (Cont’) Fuel: Power Flow: Company: Hourly fuel consumption. Power Flow: Hourly flow for selected lines, interfaces, and DC lines. Monthly transmission losses (only for marginal loss calculation option) Company: Hourly purchase/sale. Hourly dump and emergency energy.

Economic Benefits Calculation

Economic Benefit To capture the economic benefit of transmission upgrade: run two PROMOD cases, one with transmission upgrade, one without. For each case, calculate (for each region): Load Cost = Load LMP * Load Adjusted Production Cost = Production Cost + Import * Load Weighted LMP (or) - Export *Gen Weighted LMP Economic Benefit: Load Cost Saving: Load Cost difference between two cases; Adjusted Production Cost Saving: Adjusted Production Cost difference between two cases RECB II Benefit = sum over all regions (30%* Load Cost Saving + 70%*Adjusted Production Cost Saving)

Example: 5 Bus Power Network 1 2 400 MW unit @$15 200 MW Load d Region 1 5 Region 2 3 4 600 MW unit @$30 100 MW Load 300 MW Load

5 Bus Power Network (Original) – PROMOD result Gen: 150 MW LMP: 15$/MWH Prod. Cost: 2,250$ Load: 200 MW LMP: -15$/MWH Load Cost: -3,000$ 1 2 Region 2: Export: 150 MWH Gen Weighted LMP =30$/MWH Load Cost = 22,500$ Adjusted Production Cost = 13,500$ - 150MWH*30$/MWH =9,000$ Line is binding Region 1: Import: 150 MWH Load Weighted LMP = (-3,000+4,500)/(100+200) =5$/MWH Load Cost = -3,000 + 4,500 = 1,500$ Adjusted Production Cost = 2,250$+150MWH*5$/MWH =3,000$ 50 MW 5 3 4 Gen: 450 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Prod. Cost: 13,500$ Load: 100 MW LMP: 45$/MWH Load Cost: 4,500$ Load: 300 MW LMP: 75$/MWH Load Cost: 22,500$

5 Bus Power Network (After upgrade) – PROMOD result Gen: 400 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Prod. Cost: 6,000$ Load: 200 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Load Cost: 6,000$ 1 2 Region 2: Import: 100 MWH Load Weighted LMP =30$/MWH Load Cost = 9,000$ Adjusted Production Cost = 6,000$+ 100MWH*30$/MWH =9,000$ New Line Region 1: Export: 100 MWH Gen Weighted LMP = =30$/MWH Load Cost = 6,000 + 3,000 = 9,000$ Adjusted Production Cost = 6,000$-100MWH*30$/MWH =3,000$ 47 MW 5 3 4 Gen: 200 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Prod. Cost: 6,000$ Load: 100 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Load Cost: 3,000$ Load: 300 MW LMP: 30$/MWH Load Cost: 9,000$

5 Bus Power Network – New Transmission RECB II Benefit Original Case Case with New Line Saving Load Cost $1,500 $9,000 $-7,500 Region 1 Adjusted Production Cost $3,000 $0 $3,000 Load Cost $22,500 $9,000 $13,500 Region 2 Adjusted Production Cost $0 $9,000 $9,000 RECB II Benefit = 70% * 0 +30% * (-7,500+13,500) = $1,800