8 November 2006 (c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 1 Technical Demonstrator SLA-driven Service Management Bastian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Secondary Market with Transmission Capacities ČEPS, a.s. 11/2006.
Advertisements

EP & Boundary Questions
THE PROJECT LIFECYCLE National Contact Point
Credit Card Processing 101
Chocoholic Anonymous: Scenario. 1. John goes to ChocoAn to join as a member: a.Member information is added. b.Insurance plans are shown and John buy one.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
Requirements Engineering Process
Axel Pawlik. LACNIC III, November 2002, Mexico City. 1 6bone Address Registry Proposal Axel Pawlik / Mirjam Kühne RIPE NCC.
September, 2005What IHE Delivers 1 IHE Quality Domain February 26, 2008.
Copyright (c) 2002 Japan Network Information Center Introduction of JPNICs New Registry System Izumi Okutani IP Address Section Japan Network Information.
_______________________________________________________ Book Industry Communication The UK Industry Returns Initiative Brian Green BISAC SCEDI, 10 March.
1 RXQ Customer Drop Submitted by Supplier Process Flow Diagram Customer Supplier Distribution Company Supplier sends Drop Request to Distribution.
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
REQ Enrollment in Demand Response Programs Process Flow Engineering Firm Retail Customer Demand Response Service Provider (DRSP) Distribution Company.
REQ Drop from Demand Response Programs Process Flow Retail Customer Demand Response Service Provider (DRSP) Distribution Company 1 Drop Request.
1 RXQ Ad Hoc Historical Usage Using a Registration Agent Process Flow Supplier Registration Agent Registration Agent sends Historical Usage Request.
RXQ Dual Billing Process Flow Distribution Company Supplier Customer Distribution Company reads meter(s) ( ) Supplier receives and processes.
Cultural Heritage in REGional NETworks REGNET E-SHOP.
On the Use of Service Level Agreements in AssessGrid.
4. May 2007 Workshop on Dynamic Service Level AgreementsPage 1 Dynamic SLA Negotiation in BREIN Bastian Koller High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum GGF18, 13th September 2006 OGSA Data Architecture Scenarios Dave Berry & Stephen Davey.
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Registry/Repository in a SOA Environment SOA Brown Bag #5 SWIM Team March 9, 2011.
1 2 nd Shanghai, 19/02/06 Architecture for Next Generation Grids Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Shanghai, 20th of February 2006.
The Next Generation Grid Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Beijing, 22 of June 2005.
4QC – Tampere September QC Common Assessment Framework CAF self-assessment eTool.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
1 The Aon approach to reform May 2007 Nigel Roberts.
UKOLN is supported by: Put functionality Augmenting interoperability across scholarly repositories 20/21 April 2006 Rachel Heery, UKOLN, University of.
All rights reserved © 2005, Alcatel Grid services over IP Multimedia Subsystem  Antoine Pichot, Olivier Audouin, Alcatel  GridNets ’06.
BT Wholesale October Creating your own telephone network WHOLESALE CALLS LINE ASSOCIATED.
MyFloridaMarketPlace Roundtable June 3, 2003 MyFloridaMarketPlace.
Ron Chapman, MD, MPH Director and State Health Officer California Department of Public Health.
1 Module 1.2 Analyze Your Credit Report and Score Core PFRP for Transition Module 1.2.
Multi-level SLA Management for Service-Oriented Infrastructures Wolfgang Theilmann, Ramin Yahyapour, Joe Butler, Patrik Spiess consortium / SAP.
Policy based Cloud Services on a VCL platform Karuna P Joshi, Yelena Yesha, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
FP6 IT System 1 ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM.
5.9 + = 10 a)3.6 b)4.1 c)5.3 Question 1: Good Answer!! Well Done!! = 10 Question 1:
New EU Rules on Derivatives Trading The EMIR Reporting Technical Standards Victoria Cooley OTC Derivatives & Post Trade Policy Financial Conduct Authority.
ITIL 1 Oklahoma Office of State Finance Information Services Division Instructions: Service Catalog Request.
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and REN Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
1 Priority-Based Budgeting Performance Measurement: What’s New for FY 2008 A techie & manager training of performance measures changes for FY 2008 A techie.
Summer SOC July 2 nd – July 7 th Aniketos platform: Design of a trustworthy composite service 1.
Addition 1’s to 20.
15 November th SG meeting Enagás and TIGF Coordinated implementation of the Network Code on Capacity Allocation Mechanisms.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
1.Name the quadrant a. (-5, 1)b. (6, -4) c. (5, 8) d. (-8, -1) e. (7, 2)f. (-9, 4)
Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT)
1 Validation and registration Verification and issuance Technical Workshop on CDM Paramaribo, 20 June 2008 Adriaan Korthuis.
SBIR or any other Contracts
Extending XDW in Cross-Community Editor: Charles Parisot Notes for the March 19 th, 2013 – ITI Tech Committee.
Cloud Management Mechanisms
NextGRID & OGSA Data Architectures: Example Scenarios Stephen Davey, NeSC, UK ISSGC06 Summer School, Ischia, Italy 12 th July 2006.
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
I.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=. i.1 ii.2 iii.3 iv.4 1+1=
Fawaz Alsaadi Fahad Alsolmai.  Role Based Multi-Agent System for providing effective and secure Bank transaction services  To provide seamless access.
Conditions and Terms of Use
AMPol-Q: Adaptive Middleware Policy to support QoS Raja Afandi, Jianqing Zhang, Carl A. Gunter Computer Science Department, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
EbXML (Electronic Business XML) Kanda Runapongsa Dept of Computer Engineering Khon Kaen University.
Resource negotiation Two-tier negotiation protocol:  Provider and Mediator  Mediator and Client Provider provides resources/services Mediator aggregates.
 The processes used for RE vary widely depending on the application domain, the people involved and the organisation developing the requirements.  However,
E-GRANT: EGI Resource Allocation Tool Current status
Ontogrid’s Negotiation Service – WS-Agreement Negotiation
Status after last telco
E-GRANT development plans
Universal Dynamic Activity Package - Concepts
On the Use of Service Level Agreements in AssessGrid
Presentation transcript:

8 November 2006 (c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 1 Technical Demonstrator SLA-driven Service Management Bastian Koller, Philipp Wieder,

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 2 All services in NextGRID need a SLA To offer an SLA it must be possible to manage the service otherwise the cost to the service provider can become prohibitive Demonstrate a generic framework to provide this management functionality parameterised for each application

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 3 SLA Lifecycle Discovery and Negotiation Telemanagement Forum

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 4 Customer Management Framework Service Provider SLA Based Service Management Allocator Customer Client Template Registry Discovery Coordinator Template Generator Signer Constraint Checker BLO Retriever Negotiation Coordinator Deployer Service Evaluator MID Service Supervisor Service Utilisation SP Template Repository BLOs Accounting + Billing QoS Analyser Operational QoS History SP Relation History Policy Generator QoS Info Provider Demonstration covers SLA Lifecycle Stages 2-5 and components from WP4/5

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 5 Scenario The Service: The Credit Card Check service allows the customer to check whether a credit card is valid. Customer Requirements from Service: Functionally Accurate Reliable Performance Transparent Pricing

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 6 The SLA As part of this agreement the SP guarantees the following service level: The service will process 5000 transactions per hour 95% of these 5000 transactions will complete within a second The SP promises to complete 99.99% of all submitted transactions up to the defined limit of 5000 transactions per hour. The customer constraints are: Maximum of 100 transactions submitted in 1 min

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 7 Customer Domain Bob Service Provider Domain HLRS Components SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator Service Provider Domain BT SLATemplate Repository Service Provider Negotiator Registry UDAP Customer GUI HLRS NEC FZJ * Colour-Legend *

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 8 Service Provider Domain BT SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator Service Provider Domain HLRS SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator Prerequisites Registry BT & HLRS have registered their services at the registry CreditCardServiceGold … CreditCardServiceGold …

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 9 UDAP Customer Domain Bob Discovery I Registry Customer GUI 1.Define Udap Request 2. Send Udap Request 3. Query Registry 4. Request Templates from the different SLA Template Repositories ? ! AUniqueRequestID CreditCards1 CreditCardResource <udap:ResourceDescription Dialect=" ccquality"> Gold

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 10 UDAP Service Provider Domain BT SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator Service Provider Domain HLRS SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator Discovery II 1.Request Templates from the different SLA Template Repositories

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 11 UDAP Customer Domain Bob Discovery III Customer GUI 1.Receive Addresses of Service Providers (Negotiators) as well as information about offered services 2. Decide on candidates for negotiation

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 12 Service Provider Domain BT Service Provider Domain HLRS Negotiation I SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator SLATemplate Repository Service Provider Negotiator Customer Domain Bob Customer GUI 1.Create Bid based on template … 2.Send Bid and request offer from the respective Service Providers …

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 13 Negotiation II Service Provider Domain SLATemplate Repository Service Provider Negotiator 1.Query Repository for matching Service Templates 2. Decide whether to offer an SLA Offer 3. (Create Offer) 4.(Send Offer to Customer) ? ….

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 14 Negotiation III Customer Domain Bob Customer GUI 1.Analyze Offer(s) 2.Decide whether to accept or reject the offer(s) …. (In this case the customer selects the service with the maximum possible submission rate)

(c) 2006 BT, HLRS, FZJ, UoE and other members of the NextGRID consortium 15 Service Provider Domain BT Service Provider Domain HLRS Negotiation IV SLA Template Repository Service Provider Negotiator SLATemplate Repository Service Provider Negotiator Customer Domain Bob Customer GUI 1.Send Acceptance 2.Send Rejection Reject Accept