© 2006 Open Grid Forum Glue-WG Sergio Andreozzi – INFN-CNAF 31 January 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 6-1 Created by Cheryl M. Hughes, Harvard University Extension School Cambridge, MA The Web Wizards Guide.
Advertisements

By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
1 of 18 Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities IMARK Investing in Information for Development Information Dissemination New Digital Opportunities.
OLAC Process and OLAC Protocol: A Guided Tour Gary F. Simons SIL International ___________________________ OLAC Workshop 10 Dec 2002, Philadelphia.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Ellen Stokes, IBM Michel Drescher, Fujitsu Information Model, JSDL and XQuery: A proposed solution OGF-19 Chapel Hill, NC USA.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Build, Test and Certification of Grid and distributed software Community Group Current practices and short term plans in Building,
OGF19 Grid Information Retrieval Working Group January 30, 2007 Chapel Hill, NC.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum SAGA: Simple API for Grid Applications Steven Newhouse Application Standards Area Director.
GLUE 2.0 and GLUEMan Sergio Andreozzi, INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) OGF Feb 2008, Cambridge, MA, USA.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Build, Test and Certification of Grid and distributed software Community Group Overview and Status update Marc-Elian Bégin ETICS.
© 2007Open Grid Forum OGF22, 25th February 2008 OGSA Data Architecture Mario Antonioletti.
OGSA-WG charter discussion Dec. 3, 2003 F2F meeting at ANL.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources OGF 20 - Manchester, 7 May 2007.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session 1 OGF25 – General Session 11:00-12:30, 3 March 2009 Catania.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum GIN-CG Session I – Charter/Docs Morris Riedel (Forschungszentrum Jülich & OMII - Europe) GIN Secretary …and many others…
© 2006 Open Grid Forum SAGA and SD OGF19 Chapel Hill, NC Steve Fisher.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGSA-RUS Specification Update, Adoption and WS-RF Profile Discussions (Molly Pitcher) Morris Riedel (Forschungszentrum Jülich –
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources (OGSA Modeling Activities) OGF 21 - Seattle, 16 October 2007.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum INFOD-WG Status and Plans OGF21, Seattle, WA, USA
© 2006 Open Grid Forum GGF18, 13th September 2006 OGSA Data Architecture Scenarios Dave Berry & Stephen Davey.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 1 NASA Earth Science Data Systems (ESDS) Software Reuse Working Group CEOS WIGSS-22 Annapolis, MD September.
1Copyright © 2007, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary Status Report WIMS/CIM Working Group December 12, 2007 Austin, TX PWG F2F Meeting.
1 Copyright © 2009, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. IPP Working Group Session 9 December 2009 Austin, TX - PWG F2F Meeting.
1 Copyright © 2009, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. 1 IPP Working Group Session 14 October 2009 Cupertino, CA - PWG F2F Meeting.
Grid Standardization from the NorduGrid/ARC perspective Balázs Kónya, Lund University, Sweden NorduGrid Technical Coordinator ETSI Grid Workshop on Standardization,
18 Copyright © 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved. Distributing Modular Applications: Introduction to Web Services.
Grid Initiatives for e-Science virtual communities in Europe and Latin America The VRC-driven GISELA Science Gateway Diego Scardaci.
WHO Good Distribution Practices for Pharmaceutical Products
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
Addition Facts
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Information and Monitoring Status and Plans GridPP18, Glasgow, Mar 2007.
The National Grid Service Mike Mineter.
|epcc| NeSC Workshop Open Issues in Grid Scheduling Ali Anjomshoaa EPCC, University of Edinburgh Tuesday, 21 October 2003 Overview of a Grid Scheduling.
The National Grid Service and OGSA-DAI Mike Mineter
Current status of grids: the need for standards Mike Mineter TOE-NeSC, Edinburgh.
UKOLN, University of Bath
June 22, 2007 CMPE588 Term Project Presentation Discovery of Composable Web Services Presented by: Vassilya Abdulova.
Session 2: Introduction to the Quality Criteria. Session Overview Your facilitator, ___________________. [Add details of facilitators background, including.
31242/32549 Advanced Internet Programming Advanced Java Programming
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Astro-CG C. Vuerli - INAF.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Dr. Alexandra I. Cristea XHTML.
25 seconds left…...
Week 1.
1 Web Services Based partially on Sun Java Tutorial at Also, XML, Java and the Future of The Web, Jon Bosak. And WSDL.
A conceptual model of grid resources and services Authors: Sergio Andreozzi Massimo Sgaravatto Cristina Vistoli Presenter: Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF Bologna.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGF Modeling Activities DMTF Alliance Partner Symposium Portland, 2007 July 18 Ellen Stokes
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Information Modeling of Grid Resources: the OGF GLUE WG Approach DMTF Symposium - Portland, 17 July 2007 Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF,
Managing Computational Activities on the Grid - from Specifications to Implementation: The GLUE 2 information model OGF25, 2nd March 2009, Catania Balázs.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks Felix Ehm CERN IT-GD EGEE 2008 GLUE 2.0.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract INFSO-RI Copyright (c) Members of the EGEE Collaboration GLUE Schema Sergio.
Towards a WBEM-based Implementation of the OGF GLUE Information Model Sergio Andreozzi, INFN-CNAF, Bologna (Italy) Third EGEE User Forum 13 Feb 2008, Clermont-Ferrand,
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Summary of NAREGI discussions on GLUE/CIM Sergio Andreozzi INFN-CNAF March 24, 2006 – JRA1.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources OGF 21, Seattle, Tuesday 16 October 2007.
GGF - © Birds of a Feather - Policy Architecture Working Group.
Implementation of GLUE 2.0 support in the EMI Data Area Elisabetta Ronchieri on behalf of JRA1’s GLUE 2.0 Working Group INFN-CNAF 13 April 2011, EGI User.
EMI is partially funded by the European Commission under Grant Agreement RI EMI Status And Plans Laurence Field, CERN Towards an Integrated Information.
© 2010 Open Grid Forum GLUE WG - Introduction OGF30, Brussels – 28 Oct 2010 Sergio Andreozzi (EGI.eu) Balazs Konya (Lund University) Laurence Field (CERN)
Management and Manageability in OGSA
Status and Future Steps
A conceptual model of grid resources and services
Report on GLUE activities 5th EU-DataGRID Conference
Management Area Session
Sergio Andreozzi (speaker) Laurence Field Balazs Konya
GLUEMan: A WBEM-based Implementation of GLUE 2.0
Sergio Andreozzi Laurence Field Balazs Konya
GIN & the Standards Activity
Presentation transcript:

© 2006 Open Grid Forum Glue-WG Sergio Andreozzi – INFN-CNAF 31 January 2007

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 2 Agenda Introduction Charter Group organization Lists, Webpages, Gridforge, Wikis Meetings and phone calls Expected results Use Case Document Glue-2.0 schema Relationships with other Groups Actions Use case collecting Responsibilities for each area Identifying main entities Draft Schema Responsibilities for each service Open Discussion

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 3 Glue Origins GLUE: Grid Laboratory Uniform Environment Collaborative effort between DataTAG and iVDGL focusing on interoperability –started in April 2002 Produced an information schema Version 1.0 September 2002 Version 1.1 April 2003 Version 1.2 May 2005 Version 1.3 December 2006 Contributors: DataGrid, Globus, PPDG, GriPhyn, APACGrid, NorduGrid, UNICORE, EGEE, OSG, NGS Web page:

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 4 Glue 1.3 Core

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 5 Glue 1.3 Computing Element

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 6 Glue 1.3 Storage Element

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 7 A Selection of Open Issues 1.x versions were kept backwards compatible Non-backwards compatible changes required To address structural issues To reflect OGF standards Cover missing semantics Consolidate production experience From EGEE, OSG, Nordugrid and Naregi

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 8 GIN-CG Short term information system interoperability What can we do for SC06? Between 9 grids and 300 sites 5 different systems and 4 different schema What was the minimal set of attributes needed? Depends on the use case Can we create information system translators? non-existing information can not be translated! Conclusion We can live with different systems but not content Agreement need on information for common use cases

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 9 Google Earth Demo

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 10 Existing Production Schemas Glue Schema Version 1.3 Nordugrid Schema Started in 2002 Describes; Computing resources including grid jobs and user views Other services such as Storages Naregi extensions to CIM CIM is missing Grid information 4-5 years of production experience

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 11 Glue Meeting Oct 2006 Participation EGEE, OSG, Nordugrid, OMII-UK, OMII-EU, Unicore, NGS Main Purpose. To Finalize Glue version 1.3 Preliminary discussions on Glue 2.0 Suggested moving into OGF Agreement by a unanimous decision Scope Glue 2.0 Must meet existing use cases For existing Glue users, Nordugrid and Naregi Fix problems with Glue 1.3 Reflect existing OGF standards Add new uses cases but with lower priority Use cases which span multiple grid infrastructures

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 12 SD Meeting Dec 2006 Discuss a common way to do Service Discovery between Grids. EGEE, OSG, Nordugrid, Teragrid Service Discovery is the question asked and the answer which is returned Questions can be anything that is generic for all services The answer is a handle Service Access Point Service Information Endpoint A resource is seen as a properly as a service Resources need a unique identifier to avoid double counting Requires a generic Service Schema

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 13 SD Meeting Dec 2006 Selecting services requires service specific information A schema needs to be defined for each service type Dynamic Vs Static Attributes All attributes can change Different is the expected frequency Schema design needs to take into consideration expected frequency. High frequency values should be grouped Other outcomes: A common Service Discovery API is needed The API will be defined in the SAGA-WGs. Similar plugins were developed as part of the gin activity A common information provider interface would be helpful It was decided that this would be just a command returning XML

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 14 Glue-WG Glue Schema activity now in OGF Co-chairs Balázs Kónya Laurence Field Sergio Andreozzi Subscribe: GridForge:

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 15 Initial Supporters Infrastructures EGEE, OSG, Nordugrid, NGS, Naregi MiddleWare ARC, gLite, R-GMA, Unicore, OMII-UK, OMII-EU

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 16 Glue in the News

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 17 Focus – From the Charter The GLUE-WG will provide a recommendation for an abstract information model which is expressed via a schema, independent of information system implementations. The schema will define the set of attributes and attribute semantics, the relationship between the attributes and the syntax for attribute values where applicable. The main purpose of the schema is to facilitate interoperation between grid infrastructures via enabling the development of interoperating grid middleware components and as such the schema will be designed in response to existing use cases. The focus will be on use cases which span multiple grid infrastructures that may rely on different middleware. The collected use cases will be published as a information document. The existing version 1.3 of the Glue Schema document and Norudgrid Schema will be used as a starting point for the work. The abstract schema definition will enable concrete schema to be rendered in various formats. These renderings are not seen as an output of the group but is the ultimate result of the work.

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 18 Scope - From the Charter The schema will be based on the already existing Glue schema (version 1.3), which is already being used in many production Grids. The work will be a major revision of this schema and the result will become Glue version 2.0. The work will document the existing use cases of the Glue 1.3 schema, NorduGrid schema and the CIM vendor extension from NAREGI, to ensure that all existing use cases can still be met. Additional use cases will be collected, evaluated and prioritized. The Glue 1.3 schema will be redesigned so that it incorporates the existing experiences of the current production schemas and meets the requirements imposed by the use cases.

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 19 Milestones MilestoneDue DateDeliverabileDescription M1OGF19D1BOF to define initial document coverage, outline, and solicit authors M2OGF 19D2Collection of existing and additional use cases M3OGF 20D2Use Case Document ready M4OGF 20D3Draft of Schema Document M5OGF 21D3Final Schema Document

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 20 Glue-WG Relationships SAGA and Friends Service Discovery API JSDL WG Resource elements GSM WG Storage entities GIN WG Use cases OGSA WG Information model for BES OGSA-BES Information model Planning to have F2F meetings with groups and OGF 20

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 21 Organizational Issues Mailing Lists Old Glue mailing list will be closed next week Subscribe to the new list –Invitation will be sent Web Pages Old Glue site will be kept Glue 2.0 related things will moved to GridForge Issue Tracker Current Glue 2.0 Issues will be moved into GridForge Documents Latest Glue 1.3, Nordugrid and Naregi schema documents Will be added to GridForge for background information Everyone should use the new list and wiki! Phone calls every two weeks or when necessary Notices will be sent to the list

© 2006 Open Grid Forum 22 Agenda Introduction Charter Group organization Lists, Webpages, Gridforge, Wikis Meetings and phone calls Expected results Use Case Document Glue-2.0 schema Relationships with other Groups Actions Use case collecting Responsibilities for each area Identifying main entities Draft Schema Responsibilities for each service Open Discussion