Town Meeting Aims Introduce the project and partners Present our baseline technologies Outline current and planned work Understand your perspectives on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OMV Ontology Metadata Vocabulary April 10, 2008 Peter Haase.
Advertisements

An Approach to Cope with Ontology Changes for Ontology-based Applications Yaozhong LIANG, Harith ALANI, David DUPPLAW, Nigel SHADBOLT {y.david.liang |
Visualizing Scholarly Discourse in eScience Simon Buckingham Shum Knowledge Media Institute Open University, UK In collaboration with: John Domingue, Enrico.
Language Technologies Reality and Promise in AKT Yorick Wilks and Fabio Ciravegna Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield.
Opportunistic Reasoning for the Semantic Web: Adapting Reasoning to the Environment Carlos Pedrinaci Tim Smithers and Amaia Bernaras.
Frank van Harmelen Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam The Information Universe of the (Near) Futur e Creative Commons License: allowed to share & remix, but.
Large Scale Knowledge Management across Media Prof. Fabio Ciravegna, Department of Computer Science University of Sheffield
DRIVER Step One towards a Pan-European Digital Repository Infrastructure Norbert Lossau Bielefeld University, Germany Scientific coordinator of the Project.
Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau, AHDIT, ES2002 E-Business Workshop AHDIT: Ad Hoc Data Interoperability Tool Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau Dept. of Computing Science University.
Smart Qualitative Data: Methods and Community Tools for Data Mark-Up SQUAD Libby Bishop Online Qualitative Data Resources: Best Practice in Metadata Creation.
Prototype Knowledge Base: an on-line information service in dependability and security Hugh Glaser Electronics & Computer Science University of Southampton.
Terminologies: An e-Science perspective Nicholas Gibbins Intelligence, Agents, Multimedia University of Southampton.
From AgentLink II to AgentLink III Co-ordinators: Peter McBurney, University of Liverpool, UK Terry Payne, University of Southampton, UK.
Information Society Technologies Third Call for Proposals Norbert Brinkhoff-Button DG Information Society European Commission Key action III: Multmedia.
Distributed search for complex heterogeneous media Werner Bailer, José-Manuel López-Cobo, Guillermo Álvaro, Georg Thallinger Search Computing Workshop.
AIM Operational Concept
Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau, AHDIT, August 2002 AHDIT: Ad Hoc Data Interoperability Tool Dr. Bruce A. Scharlau Dept. of Computing Science University of Aberdeen.
SEVENPRO – STREP KEG seminar, Prague, 8/November/2007 © SEVENPRO Consortium SEVENPRO – Semantic Virtual Engineering Environment for Product.
Autonomous & Intelligent Systems ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL Dr Simon Crook (Senior Manager, Aerospace, Defence & Marine)
Using the Semantic Web to Construct an Ontology- Based Repository for Software Patterns Scott Henninger Computer Science and Engineering University of.
The Experience Factory May 2004 Leonardo Vaccaro.
Why I Find The Semantic Web Interesting Hugh Glaser DSSE Seminar 1/11/2.
Shared Ontology for Knowledge Management Atanas Kiryakov, Borislav Popov, Ilian Kitchukov, and Krasimir Angelov Meher Shaikh.
The Subject Librarian's Role in Building Digital Collections: Where Information Management and Subject Expertise Meet Ruth Vondracek Oregon State University.
Next Generation eLearning Can Technology Learn from the Learners: The case for Adaptive Learning Objects Vincent Wade Research Director, Knowledge & Data.
Jj/mm/yyyy An introduction to NESSI Frédéric Gittler HP Labs NESSI Steering Committee Vice-Chairman.
Enhance legal retrieval applications with an automatically induced knowledge base Ka Kan Lo.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Knowledge based Learning Experience Management on the Semantic Web Feng (Barry) TAO, Hugh Davis Learning Society Lab University of Southampton.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
1 Dr Alexiei Dingli Introduction to Web Science Knowledge Management.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis -- Issues Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
DAME: The route to commercialisation Tom Jackson University of York.
Semantic Learning Instructor: Professor Cercone Razieh Niazi.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Semantic Web services Interoperability for Geospatial decision.
The Information Challenge Exponential growth of resources New researchers with new needs Multiple communication options New expectations and opportunities.
Knowledge Management and the Information Specialist: dancing in step or missing a beat? Hettie Groenewald Erica van der Westhuizen Johann van Wyk Academic.
EU Project proposal. Andrei S. Lopatenko 1 EU Project Proposal CERIF-SW Andrei S. Lopatenko Vienna University of Technology
Knowledge Management System Yeni Herdiyeni Magister Ilmu Komputer Dept of Computer Science, IPB Februari 2009.
VIRTUAL INFORMATION AND KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENT FRAMEWORK IP-FP
1. 2 Advanced Knowledge Technologies AIAI/IRR, Division of Informatics, The University of Edinburgh In association with University of Southampton (lead),
IST Programme - Key Action III Semantic Web Technologies in IST Key Action III (Multimedia Content and Tools) Hans-Georg Stork CEC DG INFSO/D5
Scenarios for a Learning GRID Online Educa Nov 30 – Dec 2, 2005, Berlin, Germany Nicola Capuano, Agathe Merceron, PierLuigi Ritrovato
A Context Model based on Ontological Languages: a Proposal for Information Visualization School of Informatics Castilla-La Mancha University Ramón Hervás.
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Semantic Web: The Future Starts Today “Industrial Ontologies” Group InBCT Project, Agora Center, University of Jyväskylä, 29 April 2003.
OWL Representing Information Using the Web Ontology Language.
Domain Modeling In FREMA Yvonne Howard David Millard Hugh Davis Gary Wills Lester Gilbert Learning Societies Lab University of Southampton, UK.
Trustworthy Semantic Webs Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham The University of Texas at Dallas Lecture #4 Vision for Semantic Web.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Digital Libraries1 David Rashty. Digital Libraries2 “A library is an arsenal of liberty” Anonymous.
National Library of Finland Strategic, Systematic and Holistic Approach in Digitisation Cultural unity and diversity of the Baltic Sea Region – common.
A Semantic Knowledge Base for the UK Government Web Archive Tom Storrar & Claire Newing Applying records management processes principles to the open government.
The Collaborative Semantic Grid David De Roure University of Southampton, UK
AKT Postgraduates Colloquium Planning Meeting 26/1/2005 Southampton Univ.
Achieving Semantic Interoperability at the World Bank Designing the Information Architecture and Programmatically Processing Information Denise Bedford.
LEFIS Virtual Campus Design Albarracin Meeting, May model for technical support to LEFIS Virtual Campus: a proposal Selahattin Kuru Isik University.
Clinical research data interoperbility Shared names meeting, Boston, Bosse Andersson (AstraZeneca R&D Lund) Kerstin Forsberg (AstraZeneca R&D.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Toward a common data and command representation for quantum chemistry Malcolm Atkinson Director 5 th April 2004.
Status Reports: Measuring against Mission National Institute of Standards and Technology U.S. Department of Commerce 1 Technology Program Evaluation: Methodologies.
A Ubiquitous Permeable Web: requirements for the next generation semantic internet Hamish Cunningham Department of Computer Science, University of Sheffield.
Grid Enabled Optimisation and Design Search for Engineering (GEODISE) Prof Simon Cox Southampton University
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
DRIVER Digital Repository Infrastructure Vision for European Research
From AgentLink II to AgentLink III Co-ordinators: Peter McBurney, University of Liverpool, UK Terry Payne, University of Southampton, UK.
Introduction to Web Science
Workshop Organization Support SAR Environment Schematic
Presentation transcript:

Town Meeting Aims Introduce the project and partners Present our baseline technologies Outline current and planned work Understand your perspectives on knowledge technolgies Re examine AKTs assumptions Instigate the AKTors Club Lay foundation for future possible future collaboration

The AKT Script The background The AKTors The context The challenges The assumptions The technologies The testbeds The AKTors Club

History of the bid EPSRC competition for computer-centric IRCs announced Outline bid submitted May 1999 Full bid submitted Nov 1999 – 12:120 London presentation Jan 2000 Awarded April 2000 – 4:12 Official start Oct 2000 for 6 years Full amount awarded - £ 7.5 million

The AKTors The Universities of Southampton (ECS), Aberdeen (CS), Edinburgh (CIS/AIAI), Sheffield (CS), the Open University (KMI) Around 36 investigators and reseach staff

AKT: The story so far AKT 0 infrastructure built 1 st Technical Workshop Jan 01 2 nd Technical Workshop June 01 1 st Town Meeting London

Context: Definitions Data – raw uninterpreted bits, bytes and signals Information – data equipped with meaning Knowledge – information applied to achieve a goal, effect an action, make a decision

Context: The Problem We are drowning in information and starving for knowledge Infosmog: The condition of having too much information to be able to take effective action or make an informed decision The deluge of data is overwhelming

Context: Aspirations getting the right information, to the right person/system, in the right form at the right time – the provision of knowledge services turning information into knowledge in some cases turning data into enriched, annotated information supporting the knowledge life-cycle

Context : Supporting the Knowledge Life Cycle

Challenges: Acquisition Diversity of sources Distributed nature Problems of scale Acquisition rationale and annotation Incidental KA is the Holy Grail

Challenges: Modelling What to model? How to model? How enriched? How personalised?

Challenges in the K Life Cycle: Retrieval Retrieval paradigms Framing queries Scope and extent of search Nature of search

Challenges in the K Life Cycle: Reuse What does reuse mean What can be reused How to identify reuse options How to model/capture for reuse

Challenges in the K Life Cycle: Publishing Dynamic document/content construction Richly linked content Integrating authoring, reviewing and presentation Personalised presentation

Challenges in the K Life Cycle: Maintainance How to capture and model for maintenance? What model of custodianship? Change control, certification and re- certification Decommissioning

Challenges to the IRC Reconciling short, medium and long term Achieving practical relevance Maintaining quality over 6 years Daring to be off the wall

Assumptions: AKT is interdisciplinary Knowledge Engineering WWW technology and standards Multimedia Information Systems Natural Language Processing Agent Based Computing

Assumptions: AKT meets Semantic Web

Assumptions: AKT and Ontologies Shared understanding or conceptualisation set of concepts (e.g. entities, attributes, processes), their definitions and inter- relationships Facilitate communication Normative models… Inter-operability: Sharing & Reuse Inter-lingua…

Assumptions: AKT aims to provide Knowledge Services on the Semantic Web Content with extensive meta {data,information,knowledge} Services that exploit this enriched content

AKT: KM and K Technology Technology crucial to meet the challenges Technology not 100% of the solution Technology to be usable by diverse organisations need to understand requirements should not provide monolithic system Aim to be a research locus for technologies to support knowledge services

Example work to date Tools and methods to develop, build and maintain ontologies Services for content annotation Investigating web based inference engines Integration of link services Characterisation of ABus Agents as knowledge services Multimedia KA Knowledge valuation

Challenges Test Beds AKT – Scientific KM Rolls Royce Aerospace – Supporting Design, Enriching objects Unilever – Knowledge Auditing UK E-Science – Grid Initiative

Definition of AKTors Club Players Those companies who are displaying an active interest in AKT. A named contact from each company would have a named contact from the AKT consortium. Each Player would be asked to produce a web page, which should be updated each year in order to remain on the Players' list. "Audience" Those companies who have expressed an interest in AKT but are not considered as being "active" (ie have not produced a web page). An annual Town Meeting will be held for the AKTors Club.