Progress in Estimating Loads at Mallard Island Nicole David Lester McKee Item #4.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
Advertisements

Flood Routing & Detention Basin Design
R. L. Buckley and C. H. Hunter Atmospheric Technologies Group Savannah River National Laboratory Recent Improvements to an Advanced Atmospheric Transport.
Mallard Island Large Rivers Loading: Monitoring WY 2010 Nicole David Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 27, 2009 Item #4.
1 WATERSHED SPECIFIC AND REGIONAL SCALE SUSPENDED SEDIMENT LOAD ESTIMATES FOR BAY AREA SMALL TRIBUTARIES Mikołaj Lewicki and Lester McKee Sources Pathways.
Bay Sediment Budgets: Sediment Accounting 101 David Schoellhamer Megan Lionberger Bruce Jaffe Neil Ganju Scott Wright Greg Shellenbarger U.S. Geological.
Concentrations and loads of PCBs and OC pesticides in the Guadalupe River watershed Jon Leatherbarrow 1,2, Lester McKee 1, John Oram 1 1 San Francisco.
Zone 4 Line A Preliminary Suspended Sediment Load Estimates HY08 Rand Eads RiverMetrics LLC Sources.
Suspended Sediment Loads from Bay Area Small Tributaries Mikolaj Lewicki and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loading Workgroup May 14 th 2008 Item #3a.
Mallard Island cross-sectional variability: low-flow, moderate-flow, and high-flow events SF Bay Sediment Project U.S. Geological Survey Sacramento, CA.
1 PCBs and PBDEs on the Guadalupe River WYs 2003 – 2006 John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup November.
Measurements of Mercury Concentrations and Loads in a Large River System Tributary to San Francisco Bay, California, USA Nicole David, SFEI Lester McKee,
High Flow Studies (WY 2005) Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup.
Pollutant Loads to the Bay: Measuring the L in TMDL Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup and Watershed Program Manager SFEI RMP Annual.
1 PCB and PBDE Loads in Coyote Creek: Conceptual models and Estimates of Regional Small Tributaries Loads Lester McKee, John Oram and, Jon Leatherbarrow.
Comparative Analysis of Loads of Mercury in Coyote Creek and Guadalupe River Lester McKee RMP SPLWG Chair San Francisco Estuary Institute
San Francisco Estuary Institute Small Tributaries Loading Study #2 Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 2 – Draft Data To-date Sources Pathways and.
1 Trace element loads in urbanized watersheds and the potential for treatment of NPS loads Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup May 22.
Mercury Transport to San Francisco Bay through the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. Nicole David, Lester J. McKee, Jon E. Leatherbarrow December 15,
River Loads The Mallard Island Study Nicole David, John Oram, Lester McKee, SFEI Russ Flegal, UCSC.
1 PCB and PBDE loads at Mallard Island on the Sacramento River: WYs John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow, and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings.
1 Guadalupe Watershed Model Year 2 update Presentation to SPLWG May 27, 2009 Michelle Lent, John Oram, Lester McKee Item #7.
1 Guadalupe Small Tributaries Loads Study WYs (PCBs and PBDEs) John Oram and Lester McKee Sources Pathways and Loadings Workgroup November 13 th.
Mallard Island and the Largest Flood Event Since 1997 Nicole David Lester McKee San Francisco Estuary Institute.
NTTS conference, February 18 – New Developments in Nonresponse Adjustment Methods Fannie Cobben Statistics Netherlands Department of Methodology.
1 Correlation and Simple Regression. 2 Introduction Interested in the relationships between variables. What will happen to one variable if another is.
Simple Linear Regression 1. review of least squares procedure 2
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Key Concepts and Skills
Time Value of Money Time value of money: $1 received today is not the same as $1 received in the future. How do we equate cash flows received or paid at.
Discrete Event (time) Simulation Kenneth.
Hydrologic Statistics Reading: Chapter 11, Sections 12-1 and 12-2 of Applied Hydrology 04/04/2006.
Tax Base Volatility (Update) Thomas Stinson Matthew Schoeppner July 22, 2008.
Determining How Costs Behave
Reporting and Analyzing Cash Flows
Correlation and Linear Regression
Multiple Regression and Model Building
1 McGill University Department of Civil Engineering and Applied Mechanics Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March 2009 Slide 1 Calibration of Local Areas 1 2 Headwater basin Local area.
Continuous Hydrologic Simulation of Johnson Creek Basin and Assuming Watershed Stationarity Rick Shimota, P.E. Hans Hadley, P.E., P.G. The Oregon Water.
Surface Water Hydrology Summarized in one equation V = velocity, fps or m/s A = channel cross-sectional area, sf or m 2.
Harmonic Analysis – use in calibrating models Larry Smith USGS retired.
Regression Analysis of Phosphorous Loading Data for the Maumee River, Water Years Charlie Piette David Dolan Pete Richards Department of Natural.
WinTR-20 Project Formulation Hydrology Computer Program
Hydrologic Routing Reading: Applied Hydrology Sections 8.1, 8.2, 8.4.
Hydrologic Statistics
Linear Trend Lines Y t = b 0 + b 1 X t Where Y t is the dependent variable being forecasted X t is the independent variable being used to explain Y. In.
Nonpoint Source Pollution u Some basic principles u Example study of total pollution loads in the Corpus Christi Bay System –rainfall-runoff relationship.
1 Small Tributaries Loading Study #2: Zone 4 Line A, Cabot Blvd. Hayward Year 1 – Draft FINAL report Lester McKee and Alicia Gilbreath Sources Pathways.
Table 1. The hydrologic budget summary where the measured hydrologic field data compared to the GIS and survey data are unfortunately not equal. Computing.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Applications of Regression to Water Quality Analysis Unite 5: Module 18, Lecture 1.
Small Tributary Loads The “Guadalupe River Study” Lester McKee, John Oram, Jon Leatherbarrow SFEI Autumn Bonnoma, Mark Stephenson, Wes Heim MLML Item #8.
The influence of local calibration on the quality of UV-VIS spectrometer measurements in urban stormwater monitoring N. Caradot, H. Sonnenberg, M. Riechel,
Review of SWRCB Water Availability Analysis Emphasis on Dry Creek Water Availability Analysis.
Item 3b Guadalupe River Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt, Ben Greenfield, Sarah Lowe, Lester McKee Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 6th, 2010.
Shingle Creek Chloride TMDL Abby Morrisette and Josh Kuhn 9/10/11.
Lucy McKergow and Rob Davies-Colley
1 Towns and reservoirs for aluminum dilution factor studies Settling velocity reservoir 2.
Flood Routing Applied Hydrology
Copper Source Loading Estimates (Process Profiles) Physical & Chemical Characterization of Wear Debris (Clemson University) Water Quality Monitoring (ACCWP)
MRC-MDBC STRATEGIC LIAISON PROGRAM BASIN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING TRAINING MODULE 3 SCENARIO-BASED PLANNING for the MEKONG BASIN Napakuang, Lao PDR 8-11 December.
1 Optimizing sampling methods for pollutant loads and trends in San Francisco Bay urban stormwater monitoring Aroon Melwani, Michelle Lent, Ben Greenfield,
Sanitary Engineering Lecture 4
Sources, Pathways, and Loadings Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances Annual Meeting, March 23 rd 2002 Lester McKee Watershed Program Manager.
Day 17 – September 20th and 21st Objective:
Creating a Generalized Hydrologic Water Budget for Cache Valley, UT/ID
Conclusions & Future Work
Hydrology CIVL341.
Hydrology CIVL341 Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Progress in Estimating Loads at Mallard Island Nicole David Lester McKee Item #4

Objective Obtain contaminant data collected at Mallard Island Use concentrations in combination with sediment data to estimate loads Calculate long-term averages beginning with WY 1995 Make recommendations to improve TMDLs Item #4

Methods 1.Use SSC data from USGS from 1995 to present 2.Use instantaneous SSC and contaminant data to develop a regression relationship (WY ) 3.Estimate 15 minute contaminant concentrations 4.Calculate daily average concentrations 5.Use linear interpolation to fill data gaps 6.Combine estimated daily concentrations with Delta Outflow to estimate daily advective loads 7.Correct loads for the effect of tidal influence and dispersion Item #4

Step by Step SSC Turbidity measurements taken at MI in 15 minute intervals with optical sensor (USGS) Data processing system utilized to erase unusual high voltage outputs of short duration Data converted to SSC concentrations using linear regression equation and calibrated with instantaneous samples Item #4

SSC data for the Period of Record Item #4

Step by Step DAYFLOW Discharge calculated continuously by DWR Input data for discharge include the principal Delta stream inflows, Delta precipitation, Delta exports, and Delta gross channel depletions DAYFLOW (computer program for determining Delta hydrology) accounts for advective flux only Item #4

Dayflow for the Study Period Item #4

Step by Step Load Analysis Scatter plot for contaminant and SSC relationship including all data collected Item #4

Step by Step Load Analysis 15 minute contaminant concentrations estimated using regression line DAYFLOW combined with daily SSC to estimate daily advective loads Tidally driven advective and dispersive fluxes estimated with velocity and SSC data (USGS) Freshwater advective loads adjusted with estimates for tidally driven fluxes Errors associated with calculation and an additional error for lab analysis are estimated Item #4

Step by Step Load Analysis =0.11*SSC+2.98 Dayflow*3600*24*1000*HgT dayAv/1,000,000,000,000 Dispersive=-Advective*Dispersive Flux Ratio Advective+Dispersive=Total Item #4

Samples Collected * Preliminary data Item #4

SSC – Hg Relationship y = 0.11x R 2 =0.74 y = 0.22x R 2 =0.66

Low Flow Data Item #4

Results Revised annual mercury load for Delta Particles leaving Delta during high flows are more contaminated New load estimates for mercury about 33% higher than previously predicted Item #4

Flows and Mercury

Loads from the Delta * Preliminary data, still missing September DO NOT QUOTE! Item #4

Unique contaminant dataset from Delta gained through January 2006 flood Item #4

Delta Outflow from 12/20/05 to 01/25/06 370,000 cfs Item #4

THANK YOU Item #4