FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Welcome!. Guiding Questions “Alberta Education has set the direction – each district must now set the course…..” (Special Education Conference, 2010)
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
Elementary School Counselor
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Campus Improvement Plans
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Building a Data Culture Data Guru Roles, Responsibilities & Expectations.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Oregon’s Initiatives & Grants  Roadmap  Action  Responsibility Nancy Latini, Ph.D. Oregon Department of Education 2008.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
SYSTEMS COACHING AND BUILDING LOCAL CAPACITY Utah Multi-Tiered System of Supports SPDG, 2014.
Timberlane Regional School District
Scaling-Up Within a Statewide Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS) SPDG National Meeting miblsi.cenmi.org.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person, regardless of audience, of the following resources found on.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Anchor Presentation: Inclusive Education for ALL Students Hour 3 Project #H325A Inclusive Service Delivery.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
MULTI-TIERED SYSTEM OF SUPPORTS Presented by Adrienne T. Dixson, Specialist, Response to Intervention Antonio Burgess, MTSS Instructional Facilitator March.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION: INSTALLATION
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
SAM (Self-Assessment of MTSS Implementation) ADMINISTRATION TRAINING
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
February 21-22, 2018.
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
Presentation transcript:

FewSomeAll

Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series d Unit 1: What is a Multi-Tiered System of Supports? Unit 2: Data-based Decision Making Unit 3: Instructional Practices and Supports Unit 4: Leadership for Implementation of MTSS

By the end of this unit, you will be able to: 1.Identify the stages of implementation for MTSS 2.Identify the key members of a district or site implementation team 3.Describe the functions of a leadership team 4.Describe the self-correcting feedback loop 5.Identify the status of your district or school site leadership in implementation of MTSS Learning Objectives

Rethinking Scale-up Challenge VIDEO: Rethinking the Scale-Up Challenge (Stumbo & Hill, 2009) (West Wind)

Rethinking the Scale-up Challenge Key Points 1.The multiple initiatives at both the district and site levels must be aligned to the overall vision and to each other. 2.Teams must develop the capacity to implement multiple initiatives in a coherent and cohesive manner. 3.Educational systems need a new type of leadership that can attend to both the technical challenges as well as the hearts and minds of those who implement the change.

Culture of Alignment Alignment of initiatives, transparency, accountability, collaboration, and joint responsibility for student learning equals successful implementation

Alignment of Initiatives, Policies and Practices How do the vision, mission, and goals of the school district support or hinder the implementation of MTSS? How can district resources be allocated to support the implementation? What will be the role of the information technology department? How can school district and individual school-site initiatives be aligned with MTSS?

District Initiative Inventory Examine current and past district initiatives in terms of – Expected outcomes – Target populations – Whether they were mandated or voluntary – Financial support provided – Relationship to district priorities and strategic plans – How successful they were – Evidence of the level of success

District Initiative Inventory

Stages of Implementation 1. Exploration 2. Installation 3.Initial Implementation 4.Full Implementation 5.Improvement and Innovation Work to do it right! Work to improve it! Should we do it? Educators make decisions regarding their commitment to adopting the proposed program and practices, and support successful implementation Set up an infrastructure for successful implementation District and school site teams try out the practices, work out the details, and use what they have learned Programs and practices can be expanded to other locations, individuals, and times Team members will begin to suggest and implement ways to make the innovation easier, more efficient, and to embed and align it with other practices

Implementation Takes Time A great deal of planning and support is required to change long-established practices and cultures District and school site teams should expect 2-3 years from initial implementation to reach full implementation Build in supports for all involved

Time to Reflect Reflect on your own district – Are there initiatives that are being proposed and/or considered? – Has the district considered the stages of implementation that will lead to sustainable programs and practices? – What steps have been taken prior to initial implementation?

Systemic Levels District LevelSite Level Grade/Course Level Student Level

Exploration and Initial Implementation Require – Clear and unbiased understanding of the current practices and the way these practices impact outcomes for students – Strong vision and commitment at all levels of leadership – Careful consideration of district and site cultures – Developing and navigating a course for improvement – Formal leadership and stakeholders must fully participate in problem-solving and decision making (Schmoker, 2006)

Successful MTSS Leadership Collaborative and facilitative leadership Provide the basis for embedding and sustaining MTSS Align supports and practices to effectively implement MTSS Develop a communication plan for communicating consistent and timely MTSS information to site teams and the community.

District Leadership Crucial to ensure that systemic support for MTSS is in place prior to, and continuing as, site leadership teams are developed

Leadership Within MTSS Functions of leadership teams: – Align policies, practices, and procedures to support site implementation – Design the MTSS to support the learning of all students To accomplish these functions: – Include district and site administrators to provide leadership, support, and authority – Include all other individuals with decision making authority over curriculum, instruction, and assessments.

District Model (Adapted from Michigan Dept. of Education) Cabinet Level Team Implementation Planning Team Provides vision for the district, political support for innovation, and visibility for MTSS Ensures allocation of resources Works to remove barriers to implementation Collects, summarizes, and evaluates data Analyzes the data to develop a district-wide implementation plan Coordinates and monitors the plan Creates and modifies support materials Identifies barriers to implementation Coordination

PLANDO STUDY ACT The Continuous Improvement Feedback Loop District Leadership Team COMMUNICATE

District Level Implementation Team Gathers and examines data on student progress, practices, policies, and procedures Develops a plan to implement MTSS Coordinates, supports, and monitors the plan

MTSS Coordinator Directs the implementation – Trains and coaches support staff and other members of the leadership team – Ensures there are experts available for content – Provides materials – Conducts evaluations

Systemic Levels District Level Site Level

Site Implementation Leadership Team Membership Principal Teachers – General educators – Special educators – English Learner educators Support staff – Psychologists – Speech and language specialists – English Language development specialists – Reading Specialists – Paraprofessionals Parents and families Other members where appropriate

Site Implementation Leadership Team Roles and Responsibilities Align current initiatives and activities Collect and analyze current academic and behavioral data Complete a site MTSS needs assessment – Determine what supports are in place – Use the resulting data to establish priorities Build necessary infrastructure to establish and sustain MTSS practices Facilitate and evaluate the implementation of data- informed problem-solving Continuously monitor the implementation of MTSS Consistently communicate

The Continuous Improvement Feedback Loop Site Leadership Team Communicate PLANDO STUDY ACT COMMUNICATE

PLANDO STUDY ACT The Continuous Improvement Feedback Loop Grade / Course Level Team COMMUNICATE

DO STUDY ACT COMMUNICATE PLAN DO STUDY ACT COMMUNICATE STUDY ACTPLAN Self-Correcting Feedback Loop District Leadership Team Grade/Course Level Team Site Leadership Team Improving the system Improving Instruction

MTSS Needs Assessment and Action Planning Tool

1: Not Yet Implementing / Planning3: Proficient - The required system is in place and is beginning to have an impact 2: Implementing at Marginal Level – Just beginning the process of building the required systems 4: Exemplary – Full implementation with an effective outcome MTSS Needs Assessment and Action Planning Tool

Time to Reflect What did you learn in Unit 4? What questions do you have?

FewSomeAll

Dona Meinders WestEd Center for Prevention and Early Intervention Further Information