Kinematics Related Systematic Uncertainties via MCEEP P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University 12/11/02 Hall A Analysis Workshop.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Α s from inclusive EW observables in e + e - annihilation Hasko Stenzel.

Advertisements

VDC Tracking P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University Expert … or, nobody else wanted to talk about it; You decide Hall A Analysis Workshop December 11, 2001.

Status: Version 3.6 P.E. Ulmer 12/11/01 Hall A Analysis Workshop MCEEP.

Testing the Limits of the Single Particle Model in 16 O(e,ep) - Update to E THOMAS JEFFERSON NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY Arun Saha Jefferson.

E EXPERIMENT FEB09 – PART 1 1-FEB-09 UCM. WHAT WE HAVE? Analyzed Kin A – Kin E in Madrid Obtained similar result as the ones obtained at ODU/JLab.

Status Report: JLAB Experiment E Hall A (e,ep) Studies of the Deuteron at High Q 2 Luminita Coman Florida International University Spokespersons:

06-NOV-08 E00102 EXPERIMENT- ANALYSIS RESULTS Kinematics A± and D±

L/T separation in the 3 He(e,ep) reaction Javier R. Vignote and Eric Voutier Laboratoire de Physique Subatomique et de Cosmologie, Grenoble, France Jlab.

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering from the Proton and the Neutron ( E & E03-106: DVCS/nDVCS ) Hall A Collaboration MeetingDecember 6, 2005 Spokespersons:

Hall A collaboration meeting 17 May, 2004 E00-102: Testing the Limits of the Single Particle Model in 16 O(e,ep) Mattias Andersson.

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.

Spectroscopic Factors and A TL from Quasielastic (e,e'p) Reaction in 208 Pb, 12 C and 16 O at JLab J.L. Herraiz 1, J.M. Udías 1 J.C. Cornejo 2, A. Camsonne.

Data Analysis (ODU) and Simulations (J. Udias, Madrid)

Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.

The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)

Update on Data / MC Comparisons for Low Hadronic Energy CC-like Events Reminder of problem Fiducial studies with more MC statistics Effect of offset in.

P Spring 2003 L2Richard Kass Relativistic Kinematics In HEP the particles (e.g. protons, pions, electrons) we are concerned with are usually moving.

PANEL DATA 1. Dummy Variable Regression 2. LSDV Estimator

Ioana Niculescu James Madison University August 15, 2013.

Low x workshop Helsinki 2007 Joël Feltesse 1 Inclusive F 2 at low x and F L measurement at HERA Joël Feltesse Desy/Hamburg/Saclay On behalf of the H1 and.

1 Data Analysis II Beate Heinemann UC Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Hadron Collider Physics Summer School, Fermilab, August 2008.

Richard Lindgren - UVa Cole Smith - UVa Khem Chirapatimol - Chiang Mai University E04- Status Report Precision Measurements of π 0 Electroproduction near.

Jin Huang & Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Boson 2010 Workshop Sept 20, JLab.

Status Analysis pp -> D s D s0 (2317) Overview Reconstruction Some QA plots Figure of merit First approach/strategy.

Sequential Perturbation. Basic method Three step process –Calculate the basic result –Calculate the result based on each error limit Put this into a spread.

01/08/2002Ramon Miquel, LBNL1 Multiparameter Fits in tt Threshold Scan Manel Martinez, IFAE (Barcelona) Ramon Miquel, LBNL (Berkeley) Introduction. The.

Deviation = The sum of the variables on each side of the mean will add up to 0 X

TOPLHCWG. Introduction The ATLAS+CMS combination of single-top production cross-section measurements in the t channel was performed using the BLUE (Best.

Introduction to Systems Analysis and Design Trisha Cummings.

Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.

E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.

K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.

CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating Facility(CEBAF) is the central particle accelerator at JLab. CEBAF is capable of producing electron beams.

School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT School of Geography FACULTY OF ENVIRONMENT GEOG5060 GIS & Environment Dr Steve Carver

Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.

PREX Mtg, July 2008R. Michaels, JLab Hall A Monte Carlo -- HAMC Similar to A. Deur’s ``Single Arm Monte Carlo’’ “Fast” Monte Carlo -- not Geant ROOT /

NWS Calibration Workshop, LMRFC March, 2009 slide - 1 Analysis of Temperature Basic Calibration Workshop March 10-13, 2009 LMRFC.

Jin Huang M.I.T. For Transversity Collaboration Meeting Mar 26, JLab.

Calorimetry for Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne Hall A Jefferson Laboratory Workshop on General Purpose High Resolution.

Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.

SWADHIN TANEJA (STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY) K. BOYLE, A. DESHPANDE, C. GAL, DSSV COLLABORATION 2/4/2016 S. Taneja- DIS 2011 Workshop 1 Uncertainty determination.

1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.

Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.

Results on Inclusive Diffraction From The ZEUS Experiment Data from the running period The last period with the ZEUS Forward Plug Calorimeter.

BlueFin Best Linear Unbiased Estimate Fisher Information aNalysis Andrea Valassi (IT-SDC) based on the work done with Roberto Chierici TOPLHCWG meeting.

CHAPTER- 3.1 ERROR ANALYSIS.  Now we shall further consider  how to estimate uncertainties in our measurements,  the sources of the uncertainties,

QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.

Test Beam Meeting Monday, January 31, 2000 Fpix1 Calibration Status 1.What we have 2.What to do Monitor Software to use now 1.Current Version 2.Calibration.

1 CLAS-eg1 pol.-proton analysis H.Avakian (JLab) semi-SANE Collaboration Meeting April 21, 2005.

1 Proton Structure Functions and HERA QCD Fit HERA+Experiments F 2 Charged Current+xF 3 HERA QCD Fit for the H1 and ZEUS Collaborations Andrew Mehta (Liverpool.

Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008

Searching for CHAMPs at CDF

Marco Incagli – INFN Pisa

Target Effect, Beam correction and T0 Adjustment

Pi0 Simulation for BigCal

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

presented by Werner Boeglin Florida International University Miami

Polarized PDF (based on DSSV) Global Analysis of World Data

I.Larin, PrimEx Analysis meeting

Compton Data Analysis Jing Feng China Atomic Institute Liping Gan

Florida International University

Chris Crawford Blast Analysis Meeting 2004/05/21

HyCal Energy Calibration using dedicated Compton runs

CLAS Simulations for the E5 Data Set

Energy Calibration with Compton Data

E19 result Ryuta Kiuchi (SNU)

Propagation of Error Berlin Chen

The Q+ Pentaquark Search at HERMES Wolfgang Lorenzon Collaboration

Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momenta PR Hall C Collaboration Experiment Probe two nucleon dynamics at short space-time distances.

° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.

Presentation transcript:

Kinematics Related Systematic Uncertainties via MCEEP P.E. Ulmer Old Dominion University 12/11/02 Hall A Analysis Workshop

Breaking News: Cross sections depend on kinematics! Uncertainties run wild! Coincidence cross section can vary strongly with kinematics. Results in systematic uncertainties: –need to evaluate changes in cross section for variations of kinematical quantities. Account for kinematical constraints: –For example, fixed missing mass. –May include constraints from various calibration measurements, such as H(e,ep) Must acceptance average derivatives. Its a snap with new MCEEP tools: –Cross sections handled at present. –Other observables could be added easily. –Satisfaction guaranteed or your money back.

Procedure MCEEP Hbook file Process MCEEP Ntuple: Get cross sections for variations of kinematical quantities Determine cross section derivatives and total uncertainty, including any kinematical correlations

Process Ntuple Fortran Program: systerr Start with MCEEP Ntuple, containing Transport coordinates at target Vary nine quantities, in turn: (beam, scatt. electron, ejectile) x (delta, phi, theta) Produce new Ntuple, consisting of original variables plus 10 cross sections (nominal and nine shifted). Program links to MCEEP subroutines and has access to its physics models.

Acceptance Average PAW: systerr.kumac Error sum: positive definite quantity –Must first acceptance average. Sum the weights: –Produce vectors of summed cross sections (10 in total). –Bin vectors in terms of any kinematical quantity within Ntuple. Diagnostic histograms: –Fractional derivatives of cross section with respect to each of the nine varied kinematical quantities.

Combine Errors Fortran Program: toterr Produce cross section uncertainty, given kinematical uncertainties and correlations. For each bin, form:

/mceep.html –Includes: Sources Installation Instructions User manual –In particular, see: ~/mceep/systerr/README JLAB-TN Systematic Uncertainties in E (K. Fissum & P.E. Ulmer) See: files/2002/ ps More Information

Figures Both figures are based on Experiment E D(e,ep)n cross section vs. Pm –Cross section derivatives for each of the nine quantities: Kinematics centered on Pm=100 MeV/c Units: fractional derivatives per 1 mr or per 10^-3 in momentum. –Total error vs. Pm All kinematics for E included, from Pm=0 to Pm=500 MeV/c (central values) Uncorrelated analysis Correlated analysis: assumes constraints from 1H(e,ep)