17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke The Second Generation HAPPEX Experiments Kent Paschke for The HAPPEX Collaboration California State University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy 1 Spin Dance.
Advertisements

R. Michaels PREX at HE06 July 2006 Lead ( Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons ( T.W. Donnelly,
Antonin Vacheret DAPNIA/SPhN, CEA Saclay.HAPPEX II Jlab Hall A Electron detectors for HAPPEX2 and He Installation in HRS Linearity tests 4.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy 1 Spin Dance.
Robert J. Feuerbach Jefferson Lab Constructed from contributions from the HAPPEX Collaboration Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 5, 2005 HAPPEX-II.
Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise measurement of the density -dependence.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
1 New target transverse spin dependent azimuthal asymmetries from COMPASS experiment Bakur Parsamyan INFN & University of Turin on behalf of the COMPASS.
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky for the JLab Hall A Collaboration College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA.
The Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 : A Measurement of the Extended GDH Integral Vincent Sulkosky (for the JLab Hall A Collaboration)
Jin Huang PhD Candidate, MIT For MENU 2010 May 31, Williamsburg.
R. Michaels PVDIS at Nov 2009 Beam Requirements for PVDIS Property ValueRun-Avg Hel. Correl. 1-Day Hel. Correl. Energy 6 and 4.8 GeVdE/E < 1 ppm < 5 ppm.
1/22 MOLLER Juliette M. Mammei. 2/22 Working Groups Polarized Source Hydrogen Target Spectrometer Integrating Detectors Tracking Detectors Polarized Beam.
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
1 Electron Beam Polarimetry for EIC/eRHIC W. Lorenzon (Michigan) Introduction Polarimetry at HERA Lessons learned from HERA Polarimetry at EIC.
The Strange Form Factors of the Proton and the G 0 Experiment Jeff Martin University of Winnipeg Collaborating Institutions Caltech, Carnegie-Mellon, William&Mary,
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Strange Quarks in the Nucleon Sea Konrad A. Aniol, Fall 2010 Physics and Astronomy.
Parity Violation in Electron Scattering Emlyn Hughes SLAC DOE Review June 2, 2004 *SLAC E122 *SLAC E158 *FUTURE.
PN12 Workshop JLab, Nov 2004 R. Michaels Jefferson Lab Parity Violating Neutron Densities Z of Weak Interaction : Clean Probe Couples Mainly to Neutrons.
PAVI ’06 Milos May 20, 2006 Kent Paschke – University of Massachusetts Controlling Helicity-Correlated Asymmetries in a Polarized Electron Beam Kent Paschke.
New Methods for Precision M ø ller Polarimetry Dave Mack Jefferson Lab ( for Dave Gaskell ) May 20, 2006 PAVI06 Precision M ø ller polarimetry Beam kicker.
Polarimetry of Proton Beams at RHIC A.Bazilevsky Summer Students Lectures June 17, 2010.
Collimator June 1-19, 2015HUGS The collimator is placed about 85 cm from the target and intercepts scattered electrons from 0.78° to 3.8° Water cooled.
Strange Quarks in the Nucleon Sea Results from Happex II Konrad A. Aniol, CSULA.
A study of systematic uncertainties of Compton e-detector at JLab, Hall C and its cross calibration against Moller polarimeter APS April Meeting 2014 Amrendra.
Nuruzzaman ( Hampton University Group Meeting 1 st November 2011 Beamline Optics Using Beam Modulation for the Q-weak Experiment.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Polarized Proton Acceleration and Collisions Spin dynamics and Siberian Snakes Polarized proton acceleration.
Short Tutorial on Causes of Position Differences… …and what we can do about them (most slides stolen from Cates PAVI ’04 talk)
Compton polarimetry for EIC Jefferson Lab Compton Polarimeters.
PR : A Measurement of the Strange Nucleon Form Factors at High Q 2 Kent Paschke University of Massachusetts, Amherst Paul Souder Syracuse University.
Precision Measurement of R L and R T of Quasi-Elastic Electron Scattering In the Momentum Transfer Range 0.55GeV/c≤|q|≤1.0GeV/c* Yan Xinhu Department of.
Richard Wilson Harvard University Pert of the HAPPEX Collaboration Summary of more detailed seminars at JLab by K. Paschke and APS by Paul Souder Parity-Violating.
Pb Electroweak Asymmetry in Elastic Electron-Nucleus Scattering : A measure of the neutron distribution PREX and CREX 48 Ca Neutron Skin Horowitz.
May 17, 2006Sebastian Baunack, PAVI06 The Parity Violation A4 Experiment at forward and backward angles Strange Form Factors The Mainz A4 Experiment Result.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Vina Punjabi Norfolk State University Hall A Collaboration Meeting June 10-11, 2010 GEp-V Experiment to Measure G Ep /G Mp.
Lecture 9: Inelastic Scattering and Excited States 2/10/2003 Inelastic scattering refers to the process in which energy is transferred to the target,
Proton Charge Form Factor Measurement E. Cisbani INFN Rome – Sanità Group and Italian National Institute of Health 113/Oct/2011E. Cisbani / Proton FF.
Measuring the Spin Structure of 3 He and the Neutron at Low Q 2 Timothy Holmstrom College of William and Mary For the Jefferson Lab Hall A Collaboration.
April 23, 2006PV in Electron Scattering on H and He P. A. Souder Parity-Violating Electron Scattering on Hydrogen and Helium … and Strangeness in the Nucleon.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
Compton polarimetry for EIC. Outline Polarized electron beam Compton process Compton polarimeters at Jefferson Laboratory – Parity experiments at Jlab.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
TMD flavor decomposition at CLAS12 Patrizia Rossi - Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, INFN  Introduction  Spin-orbit correlations in kaon production.
Moller Polarimeter Q-weak: First direct measurement of the weak charge of the proton Nuruzzaman (
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, 2001 Proton Polarimetry Proton polarimeter reactions RHIC polarimeters.
Beam Optics for Parity Experiments Mark Pitt Virginia Tech (DHB) Electron beam optics in the injector, accelerator, and transport lines to the experimental.
Injector Status & Commissioning QWeak Collaboration Meeting May 24, 2010 P. Adderley, J. Clark, S. Covert, J. Grames, J. Hansknecht, M. Poelker, M. Stutzman,
Parity Experiments and JLab Injector Riad Suleiman February 5, 2016.
G0 Backward Angle Request: Q 2 = 0.23, 0.48 GeV 2 Main points G0 goal is to measure G E s, G M s and G A e over range of momentum transfers with best possible.
Operated by Jefferson Science Associates, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Polarized Electron Beams.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy The Department.
Hall A Collab. Mtg, 6/ 2010R. Michaels, JLAB Lead ( 208 Pb) Radius Experiment : PREX E = 1 GeV, Elastic Scattering Parity-Violating Asymmetry PREX : precise.
Understanding the 3 He Nuclei: Asymmetry Measurements in Quasi- Elastic Ge Jin University of Virginia For the E Collaboration.
Pb-Parity and Septum Update Presented by: Luis Mercado UMass - Amherst 12/05/2008 Thanks to Robert Michaels, Kent Pachke, Krishna Kumar, Dustin McNulty.
Parity Quality Beam (PQB) B-Team Meeting September 10, 2008.
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
Polarized Injector Update
Parity Violation Experiments & Beam Requirements
Nucleon Strangeness: What we know and what we are still missing
Sanghwa Park (Stony Brook) for the PREX/CREX Collaboration
Parity Violation in eP Scattering at JLab
A Mini-Primer for Parity Quality Beam (as seen from the Accelerator)
G0 Backward Angle Accelerator Preparations
Parity Violation Experiments at JLEIC
Accelerator Issues Raised in Hall A Parity Collaboration Meeting, April B-Team Meeting April 29, 2009.
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
Thoughts on why G0 needed position feedback and HAPPEX didn't
A Precision Measurement of GEp/GMp with BLAST
Presentation transcript:

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke The Second Generation HAPPEX Experiments Kent Paschke for The HAPPEX Collaboration California State University, Los Angeles - Syracuse University - DSM/DAPNIA/SPhN CEA Saclay - Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility - INFN, Rome - INFN, Bari - Harvard - Indiana University - University of Virginia - University of Massachusetts - Florida International University - University of New Hampshire - Massachusetts Institute of Technology - College of William and Mary in Virginia (Thanks to Rich Holmes for.ppt from PAVI 04)

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Spin Longitudinal momentum Strange mass Strange vector FF Strangeness in the Nucleon

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke PVES Leading contribution to parity-violating scattering asymmetry is from interference of EM and weak exchange amplitudes

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke PVES and strange form factors For hydrogen: => Measurement of A PV yields linear combination of G s E, G s M Related at Q 2 =0 to s, s.

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke The HAPPEX Experiments A look back: HAPPEX, ep Q 2 =0.5 (GeV/c) 2 HAPPEX-H: ep, Q 2 =0.1 (GeV/c) 2 HAPPEX-He: e 4 He, Q 2 =0.1 (GeV/c) 2 PREX: ePb, Q 2 =0.01 (GeV/c) 2

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke A look back: HAPPEX Hall A Proton Parity Experiment (E91-010) ep at Q 2 =0.5 (GeV/c) 2, 12.3 degrees G s E G s M = ± (exp) ± (FF) Phys. Rev. Lett. 82: ,1999; Phys. Lett. B509: ,2001; Detailed paper accepted for PRC - arXiv nucl-ex/

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke HAPPEX results A PV = ppm ± 0.98 (stat) ppm ± 0.56 (syst) ppm

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke The next step Increase sensitivity Choose different Q 2 range Separate G s E, G s M => Two new experiments at smaller Q 2

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke HAPPEX-H (JLAB E99-115) Polarized e - on 1 H Q 2 = 0.1 (GeV/c) 2, LAB = 6 A PV = 1.6 ppm A = 5% (stat) + 2.5% (syst) => 80 ppb (stat) + 40 ppb (syst)

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Helium and strange form factors For helium: => A PV sensitive only to G s E

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke HAPPEX-He (JLAB E00-114) Polarized e - on 4 He Q 2 = 0.1 (GeV/c) 2, LAB =6 A PV = 8.4 ppm A = 2.2% (stat) + 2.1% (syst) =>.18 ppm (stat) +.18 ppm (syst)

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Experimental impact

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Experimental impact

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Tough new measurement: How do you do it? Small forward angle => new Septum magnets High statistical precision => Thick new targets, high current, rad-hard integrating detectors, improved DAQ, new photocathode High relative accuracy => improved polarimetry, new integrating focal plane profile scanner High systematic accuracy => improved polarized source, close attention to beam optics, lumi monitor.

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Overview Hall A CEBAF Injector Polarized source

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Septum magnets Minimum scattering angle 12.5° -> 6.0° Installed and commissioned

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke 100 x 600 mm 12 meter dispersion sweeps away inelastic events L geometry design Hydrogen geometry Cerenkov detectors overlap the elastic line above the focal plane : HAPPEX-H Detector geometry He detector = (H detector) / 2 !

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Brass-quartz stack Light guide Filter box PMT Assembly at Saclay

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Luminosity monitors Target boiling Beam parameters Electronics noise Tested to ~200 ppm resolution, expecting about ~100 ppm Current A ppm

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Target cells "Beer can" – 15 cm, worked well for HAPPEX-I New "race track" design – 20 cm, boiling untested

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Luminosity Fluctuations Beer can cells good enough, as measured in HAPPEX Racetrack cells never tried (Transverse flow good, curvature of window bad) Cold (6.6K), dense (230 psi) cryogenic 4 He gas target… boils! Widths go down with increasing raster… … and UP with increasing current!

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Møller: Main uncertainty is foil polarization; p/p = 3 – 3.4% expected Compton: Added electron recoil detector since HAPPEX-I; p/p = 2% in ~1 hour seen – 1.3% probably achievable at 3 GeV Polarimetry Big challenge for PREX – high current, low energy. Plan to upgrade Compton with green laser => 1% in ~16 hours Compton GEANT4 monte carlo

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Main Challenge: extreme requirements on halo/tail are necessary to reduce background 100 Hz / A at 5mm from the beam centroid ( )! Compton Polarimeter Photon detector Electron detector

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Profile scanners Q 2 measured at low current with VDCs verified and monitored at high current with scanners.

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Beam Requirements PropertyNominalJitter (30 Hz)Hel corr (run) Energy3.2 GeV< 80 ppm< 13 ppb Current100 A< 1000 ppm< 600 ppb Position0< 12 m< 2 nm Angle0< 12 rad< 2 nrad Halo<100 Hz/ 5 mm Specifications driven by sensitivities and estimates of quality of corrections. CASA and EGG have worked closely with HAPPEX to meet these requirements

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Polarized source Pockels cell voltage (PITA) used to tune A Q, x Intensity Attenuator (IA) PZT mirror IHWP for slow helicity reversal RHWP for control of position/intensity asymmetries Superlattice photocathode: >80% polarization, 100 A

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Controlling Position Differences Identify and control sources of position differences Intrinsic birefringence gradient in the Pockels cell Steering from distortions due to piezo-electric deformation of the Pockels cell Analyzing power gradients Lisa Kaufman, Brian Humensky, Gordon Cates, Ryan Snyder, Kent Paschke, and the EGG.

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke ITS Laser Room Studies in the laser room conducted over the past year have been crucial in developing our understanding of the sources of position differences. Characterization of Pockels cells on parameters relevant to sources of position differences Identification and characterization of the history effect in optical properties of the Pockels cells Development of alignment techniques to reduce effects from Pockels cell steering

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Injector Beam Studies Electron beam studies allows studies of effects from the photocathode, as well as other idiosyncratic elements such as vacuum windows. Set points for source elements (PC voltages, rotating waveplate angle) can only be determined from beam data. Injector transmission becomes an important issue in getting the well- tuned beam to the Hall.

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke Phase Trombone Goal: vary betatron phase while preserving the shape and orientation of the phase space ellipse implemented with eight existing quads at the beginning of the Hall A arc Allows for independent betatron phase control in horizontal and vertical planes Uses: Allows one to trade off position and angle differences Periodic phase changes can be used to randomize or reverse the sign of position differences Phase Trombone Setpoint ( x, y ) x ( m) 0.3 m y ( m) 0.3 m x ( rad) 0.01 rad y ( rad) 0.02 rad (0 o,0 o ) (30 o,0 o ) (-30 o,0 o ) (30 o,30 o )

17 June 2004HAPPEX-II ExperimentsK. Paschke HAPPEX Has Started Installation started June 4, optics commissioning done June 9 Luminosity limited by septum heating, improvement possible Progress on beam conditions (Helicity-correlated, Compton halo), spectrometers, detectors, target