Status and Preliminary Agenda. Agenda - Sunday, May 23, 2004 1200-1300 Registration 1300-1330 Plenary Session 1330-1500 SWSA Discussion: 1330-1430.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 23, 2004OWL-S straw proposal for SWSL1 OWL-S Straw Proposal Presentation to SWSL Committee May 23, 2004 David Martin Mark Burstein Drew McDermott Deb.
Advertisements

0 OWL-S: Brief Overview David Martin SRI International Chair, OWL-S Coalition Co-chair, Semantic Web Services Language Committee DARPA Distribution Statement.
©2003, Karl Aberer, EPFL, School of Computer and Communication Sciences Some Requirements for Semantic Web Serivce from CROSSFLOW and OPELIX Karl Aberer.
Semantic Web Services Initiative Architecture Committee (SWSA) Co-chairs: Mark Burstein BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA Christoph Bussler.
May 6, Service agents Publish white page services description content and register the services at a yellow page site Understand ontology and answer.
1DAML PI meeting, October DAML and Agents DAML and Agents Breakout Session DAML PI Meeting 17 October 2002 Tim Finin.
Semantic Web Services Initiative Architecture Committee co-chaired by Mark Burstein BBN Technologies Christoph Bussler Digital Enterprise Research Institute.
Ontology Mapping for Dynamic Service Invocation on the Semantic Web Mark H. Burstein BBN Technologies In collaboration with Drew McDermott,
Outbrief of SWSI Architecture Committee F2F Sat, April 12, 2003 Miami, FL Mark H. Burstein BBN Technologies.
May 24, 2004 SWSL outbrief 1 Outbrief from SWSL group at SWSI F2F May 24, 2004.
David Martin for DAML-S Coalition 05/08/2003 OWL-S: Bringing Services to the Semantic Web David Martin SRI International
Research Issues in Web Services CS 4244 Lecture Zaki Malik Department of Computer Science Virginia Tech
Policy based Cloud Services on a VCL platform Karuna P Joshi, Yelena Yesha, Tim Finin, Anupam Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County.
1 University of Namur, Belgium PReCISE Research Center Using context to improve data semantic mediation in web services composition Michaël Mrissa (spokesman)
31242/32549 Advanced Internet Programming Advanced Java Programming
Pronalaženje Skrivenog Znanja
1 st COCOON review – March 8 th -9 th, SIXTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME PRIORITY e-Health COCOON (FP ) Building knowledge driven & dynamically.
1 Intention of slide set Inform WSMOLX of what is planned for Choreography & Orhestration in DIP CONTENTS Terminology Clarification / what will be described.
1 UIM with DAML-S Service Description Team Members: Jean-Yves Ouellet Kevin Lam Yun Xu.
Preliminary Agenda. Agenda – August 16&17, : Each day: Make Progress Monday 16 August 8:30-9:00 Arrive, Coffee 9:00-10:00 Discuss.
Semantic Web Services Peter Bartalos. 2 Dr. Jorge Cardoso and Dr. Amit Sheth
SmartER Semantic Cloud Sevices Karuna P Joshi University of Maryland, Baltimore County Advisors: Dr. Tim Finin, Dr. Yelena Yesha.
Surfing the Service Web Sudhir Agarwal, Siegfried Handschuh, and Steffen Staab Presenter: Yihong Ding.
6/11/2015Page 1 Web Services-based Distributed System B. Ramamurthy.
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S). Introduction OWL-S –OWL-based Web service ontology –a core set of markup language constructs for describing.
Web Services By Ethan Justin Yuli. Web Services in Action Information through Integration (Google Example)Google Example What do Web.
Semantic Web Fred Framework and Demonstration or ‘my PhD-Thesis in 30 min’ Michael Stollberg, 14-Dec-2004.
The WSMO / L / X Approach Michael Stollberg DERI – Digital Enterprise Research Institute Alternative Frameworks for Semantics in Web Services: Possibilities.
The UMBC TAGA Demo What we have developed and achieved –Travel Agent Game in Agentcities (TAGA) –A FIPA compliant agent framework that extends and enhances.
Kmi.open.ac.uk Semantic Execution Environments Service Engineering and Execution Barry Norton and Mick Kerrigan.
Web Service Architecture Part I- Overview and Models (based on W3C Working Group Note Frank.
1 Adapting BPEL4WS for the Semantic Web The Bottom-Up Approach to Web Service Interoperation Daniel J. Mandell and Sheila McIlraith Presented by Axel Polleres.
THE NEXT STEP IN WEB SERVICES By Francisco Curbera,… Memtimin MAHMUT 2012.
Ontology-derived Activity Components for Composing Travel Web Services Matthias Flügge Diana Tourtchaninova
Turning Software into a Service By Mark Turner, David Budgen and Pearl Brereton.
A Survey on Service Composition Languages and Models Antonio Bucchiarone Antonio Bucchiarone and Stefania Gnesi Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell’Informazione.
The Semantic Web Service Shuying Wang Outline Semantic Web vision Core technologies XML, RDF, Ontology, Agent… Web services DAML-S.
Filtering & Selecting Semantic Web Services with Interactive Composition Techniques By Evren Sirin, Bijan Parsia, and James Hendler Presenting By : Mirza.
SWSI Update Carnegie Mellon University Katia Sycara Carnegie Mellon University
Agent Model for Interaction with Semantic Web Services Ivo Mihailovic.
Bringing Semantics to Web Services with OWL-S. 指導教授:吳秀陽 報告人:陳建博 學號:
* * 0 OWL-S: Ontology Web Language For Services Reyhan AYDOĞAN Emre YILMAZ 21/12/2005OWL-S: Ontology Web Language for Services.
25./ Final DIP Review, Innsbruck, Austria1 D11.22 DIP Project Presentation V5 Oct 2006 Presented at Final Review Innsbruck, Oct, 2006.
Semantic Web Fred: Goal and Service Description Language Michael Stollberg - 05 June
Semantic Web Fred: Project Objectives & SWF Framework Michael Stollberg Reinhold Herzog Peter Zugmann - 07 April
10/18/20151 Business Process Management and Semantic Technologies B. Ramamurthy.
UT DALLAS Erik Jonsson School of Engineering & Computer Science FEARLESS engineering Semantic Web Services CS - 6V81 University of Texas at Dallas November.
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
Using WSMX to Bind Requester & Provider at Runtime when Executing Semantic Web Services Matthew Moran, Michal Zaremba, Adrian Mocan, Christoph Bussler.
An Ontological Framework for Web Service Processes By Claus Pahl and Ronan Barrett.
Review of Projects Related to Agent + Web Services Youyong Zou UMBC Feb 17, 2004.
DAGIS : Automatic Discovery of Geospatial Information Services Ashraful Alam Ganesh Subbiah Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham Dr. Latifur Khan.
©Ferenc Vajda 1 Semantic Grid Ferenc Vajda Computer and Automation Research Institute Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
NMI End-to-End Diagnostic Advisory Group BoF Fall 2003 Internet2 Member Meeting.
Introduction to Semantic Web Service Architecture ► The vision of the Semantic Web ► Ontologies as the basic building block ► Semantic Web Service Architecture.
AN SLA-BASED RESOURCE VIRTUALIZATION APPROACH FOR ON-DEMAND SERVICE PROVISION Gabor Kecskemeti MTA SZTAKI International Workshop on Virtualization Technologies.
16/11/ Semantic Web Services Language Requirements Presenter: Emilia Cimpian
WSDL – Web Service Definition Language  WSDL is used to describe, locate and define Web services.  A web service is described by: message format simple.
1 G52IWS: Web Services Chris Greenhalgh. 2 Contents The World Wide Web Web Services example scenario Motivations Basic Operational Model Supporting standards.
MFI-7: Metamodel for Service Registration 1 Zaiwen Feng, Keqing He, Chong Wang, Jian Wang Peng Liang, Jianxiao Liu, Yangfan He SKLSE, Wuhan University,
Providing web services to mobile users: The architecture design of an m-service portal Minder Chen - Dongsong Zhang - Lina Zhou Presented by: Juan M. Cubillos.
 Copyright 2005 Digital Enterprise Research Institute. All rights reserved. Tomas Vitvar SemanticGov 4 rd Planetary.
Semantic Interoperability of Web Services – Challenges and Experiences Meenakshi Nagarajan, Kunal Verma, Amit P. Sheth, John Miller, Jon Lathem
Discussion about MFI-7: Metamodel for Service Registration Wang Jian, He Keqing, He Yangfan, Wang Chong SKLSE, Wuhan University, China
A Semi-Automated Digital Preservation System based on Semantic Web Services Jane Hunter Sharmin Choudhury DSTC PTY LTD, Brisbane, Australia Slides by Ananta.
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
Business Process Modelling & Semantic Web Services
Distributed and Grid Computing Research Group
OWL-S: Bringing Services to the Semantic Web
Presentation transcript:

Status and Preliminary Agenda

Agenda - Sunday, May 23, Registration Plenary Session SWSA Discussion: Review meeting goals and schedule, including –Sign-off on Requirements Document –Objectives for Upcoming Months –F2F Meeting goals METEOR demonstration (Amit Sheth) Break SWSA Discussion: –Summary of WSMO approach and trajectory wrt SWSA –TAGA (Agent Trading Game) Demo and Use case –Mapping of SWSA requirements onto B2C scenario –Discussion of approaches to and roles for mediation

Meeting Objectives Sign off on Requirements Document Set objectives for this year –Identify set of key protocols and ontologies to specify in next few months –Determine approach to layering on existing standards –Plan for finishing small set of detailed use cases.

METEOR Demonstration Amit Sheth, Kunal Verma, U Ga –Tools for acquiring semantics elements of WSDL definitions (in presence of multiple ontologies) –Relationships to existing WS standards –Matchmaking protocols

TAGA Demonstration Trading Agent Game in AgentCities Seen as illustrative scenario for commercial use of Semantic Web Services –Other similar use cases now being discussed by SWSL to identify language requirements, approaches

TAGA Agent Classes Customer Agents (CA) represent individual customers with travel constraints and preferences Travel Agents (TA) broker business services Service Agents (SA) offer travel services (airline, lodging, entertainment) Bulletin Board Agent (BA) is the service matchmaker (between CA and TA) Auction Service Agents (ASA) operate auctions (between CA and TA) Market Oversight Agent (MOA) monitors financial transactions.

Interactions, Protocols CAs and TAs registers with BBA –BBA as Community membership manager –To play in game, be found, matched TAs advertise with BBA (matchmaker) CAs specify service requirements to BBA –Includes QoS and reputation constraints BAA matches candidates, forwards to TA TAs request proposals from ASAs, SAs –Negotiation, Bidding TAs propose sale of package to CA TAs attempt to purchase package –May fail resulting in aborted transaction, compensation

Agenda - Monday, May 24, SWSA Discussion: WSMO Architectural Approach Mapping and Translation during Invocation (Mark) Break Elaboration of SWSA Objectives for 2004 Review of Discovery Architectures (Katia, Massimo) SWSA Roadmap Key elements to define this year Ties to existing Standards and Layers Lunch SWSA Roadmap Discussion Break SWSA Wrapup and Tasking for coming Months Plenary Session – Outbriefs 1800 Adjourn

OWL-S Virtual Machine and Matchmaker Katia Sycara, Massimo Paolucci

Chris Proposal Focus on defining a few critical protocols –Advertising –Service Match Query –Invocation –Ontology and Mapping Lookup/Translation –Enactment/Management

SWSA Functional Areas Discovery –Advertise and Match Query Process Enactment –Invoke, Status, Response, Exception Negotiation and Contracting Community Services –Membership, Authorization, Privacy, Trust Lifecycle –Resource relationship modeling, management –Life generation, status, resurection, substitution –Version management

Fig 1: Basic DAML-S Use model Requesting Agent A Service Provider B OWL-S Matchmaker (1) Advertise Service Profile (2) Issue Service Query (Profile for Goal A) (3) Return Match Candidates (Profiles w. Service Model URIs) WorldWideWeb (5a) Get Service Model B (5b, 6) Construct, Issue Request (Goal or Query) (8-10) Apply Grounding, Translate, Interpret Reply Ontology O B Ontology O A OWL-S Ontology (1) Publish Service Model B Service Model B (3) Find Candidate Profiles (4) Select Service (7) Perform Service, Generate Reply

Books4Sale.com MyAgent Current Goal: (Owns :owner Mark :item <Book :name XML for Dummies :by Fat Parens>)) KB: (User MyAgent ) (Owns Mark )) (ccardOf Mark ) (ccardOf Mark ) (Residence Mark ) Using ontologies: mylife.owl, mystuff.owl, owl-s.owl econ101.owl Econ101.owl Defines OWNS, axioms for PURCHASE transactions Owl-S.owl Defines Service Profile, Process, Grounding Publishes: Process: BuyBook LocalVars: ?item :, ?ccard : Inputs: B4STitle : string = ?item.title B4SAuthor: string = ?item.author B4SQty: int = ?item.qty B4Sccname: string = ?ccard.name B4Sccnum: string = ?ccard.idno B4Sshipto: a postalAddress Effects: (Owns :owner ?client :item ?item) (Shipped :item ?item :addr ?B4Sshipto :carrier ?B4Scarrier) (DebitCC :cc ?ccard :amt ?item.cost)) Using ontologies: Books4Sale.owl (uses Inventory.owl, econ101.owl, ccard.owl, shipping.owl, owl-s.owl…) imports mystuff-inventory-map.owl Book ~> Item (qty 1) name title by author mylife-ccard-map.owl CC ~> CreditCard Holder.fullname name ccno idno uses

SWSA Outbrief Requirements Document final comments incorporated for scheduled release June 1 Discussion of METEOR-S tools for semantic annotation and matching w. WSDL, BPEL Discussion of UMBC Trading Agent Game architecture as a use case for investigating SWSA protocol interactions. Discussion of Service Invocation and Translation Issues Discussion of alternative matchmaking and brokering topologies Roadmap and Document Outline

Documents to produce Requirements Note Submission to SWS-IG to augment current doc: –Discussion of building on existing standards W3C WS Architecture Abstraction of UDDI-like registry support –Roadmap to stages/degrees of automation

Draft Roadmap Dimensions/Issues: discovery, invocation, mapping, exception handling Stage 1: Simple service invocation and response handling –User directed manual discovery –User directed composition –Ensuring semantic interoperability during invocation and responses exception handling –Mapping: predefined, lossless, simple translation engines Stage 2: SWS with Automated Discovery and Mapping –Goal characterization for matchmaker querying and service selection reasoning –Mapping: add mapping infrastructure (registries), partial mapping Stage 3: Complex Discovery Models and Negotiation/Contracting –Proxy/Broker based interaction protocols »Includes forwarding of QoS and Privacy requirements –Negotiation dialogs for refining discovery, establishing service requirements

Architectural Elements and Protocols Note Focus on primitive elements and capabilities for –Discovery mechanisms and associated protocols, –Kernel (bootstrapping) support Semantic community registry seed discovery and use protocols For finding Service registries and ontology mapping registries –Agent internal SWS support for goal description, process model interpretation, invocation reasoning, response interpretation, process monitoring –Support for ontology mapping and alternative translation mechanisms (middleware and agent internal) –Protocols to include support for communication of security, privacy (information ownership), QoS, Service Lifecycle and Ontology/Protocol Versioning

Schedule SWSA Requirements draft release June 1 Requirements Note by Aug 1 Draft Architecture Note by Sept 30 Final Architecture Note by October 30