Writing a Discussion Section. Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. In this critical part of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introductory Mathematics & Statistics for Business
Advertisements

Dept of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling STATISTICS Hypotheses Test.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing
Hypothesis Tests Steps and Notation (1-Sample)
There are two statistical tests for mean: 1) z test – Used for large samples (n ≥ 30) 1) t test – Used for small samples (n < 30)
Hypothesis Testing making decisions using sample data.
Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis is a claim or statement about a property of a population (in our case, about the mean or a proportion of the population)
Writing for Publication
Theory Deduction Hypothesis Researchdesign Findings Datagathering Operationalization Measurement Analysis Induction.
COURSE: JUST 3900 INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE Instructor: Dr. John J. Kerbs, Associate Professor Joint Ph.D. in Social Work and Sociology.
Chapter 10 Section 2 Hypothesis Tests for a Population Mean
Writing a Research Paper
DISCUSSION CONCLUSION RECOMMENDTIONS.  Discussion section is where you begin to add your interpretations to the work.  you start the process of explaining.
Section 9.2: What is a Test of Significance?. Remember… H o is the Null Hypothesis ▫When you are using a mathematical statement, the null hypothesis uses.
HYPOTHESIS TESTING Four Steps Statistical Significance Outcomes Sampling Distributions.
1 Analysis of Variance This technique is designed to test the null hypothesis that three or more group means are equal.
Evaluating Hypotheses Chapter 9. Descriptive vs. Inferential Statistics n Descriptive l quantitative descriptions of characteristics.
An Inference Procedure
Chapter 6 Hypotheses texts. Central Limit Theorem Hypotheses and statistics are dependent upon this theorem.
Lecture 2: Basic steps in SPSS and some tests of statistical inference
© 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Active Learning Lecture Slides For use with Classroom Response Systems Introductory Statistics: Exploring the World through.
SOCIAL SCIENCE INQUIRY MODEL
Section 7-2 Hypothesis Testing for the Mean (n  30)
Determining Statistical Significance
Copyright © 2005 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc Chapter 11 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing.
How to Write an Introduction. Introduction Knowing how to write an introduction is yet another part in the process of writing a research paper. In the.
Chapter 8 Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing Hypothesis testing is a statistical procedure Allows researchers to use sample data to.
The EZ way to write a prospectus, thesis, publishable paper John M. Hoenig, Ph.D. Department of Fisheries Science.
Intermediate Statistical Analysis Professor K. Leppel.
Statistical Techniques I
Jump to first page HYPOTHESIS TESTING The use of sample data to make a decision either to accept or to reject a statement about a parameter value or about.
Results and Discussion Let’s revisit this assignment!
1 Chapter 10: Section 10.1: Vocabulary of Hypothesis Testing.
Signposting L 5 Ing. Jiří Šnajdar
How to Write a Literature Review
Chapter 9 Comparing More than Two Means. Review of Simulation-Based Tests  One proportion:  We created a null distribution by flipping a coin, rolling.
Is this quarter fair? How could you determine this? You assume that flipping the coin a large number of times would result in heads half the time (i.e.,
Health and Disease in Populations 2001 Sources of variation (2) Jane Hutton (Paul Burton)
Paper 2 Source Skills. Candidates’ weaknesses (according to examiners’ reports) Not supporting your answers with source detail Simply reproducing knowledge.
Module 5 Week 11 Supplement 12. SPEAKING TRUTH EFFECTIVELY How to provide insightful and effective peer reviews.
1 Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics Section 8-2.
Critical Analysis Key ideas to remember. What's the Point? Here are some questions you can ask yourself to help you analyze: So what? How is this significant?
CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim
Hypothesis Testing An understanding of the method of hypothesis testing is essential for understanding how both the natural and social sciences advance.
Fall 2002Biostat Statistical Inference - Confidence Intervals General (1 -  ) Confidence Intervals: a random interval that will include a fixed.
Introduction to Hypothesis Testing: the z test. Testing a hypothesis about SAT Scores (p210) Standard error of the mean Normal curve Finding Boundaries.
Research Report Writing Presentation How to write a complete research report Part 1: Introduction.
Hypothesis Testing Errors. Hypothesis Testing Suppose we believe the average systolic blood pressure of healthy adults is normally distributed with mean.
+ The Practice of Statistics, 4 th edition – For AP* STARNES, YATES, MOORE Unit 5: Hypothesis Testing.
The Final Report.  Once scientists arrive at conclusions, they need to communicate their findings to others.  In most cases, scientists report the results.
Major Steps. 1.State the hypotheses.  Be sure to state both the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis, and identify which is the claim. H0H0.
Understanding Statistics © Curriculum Press 2003     H0H0 H1H1.
Today: Hypothesis testing. Example: Am I Cheating? If each of you pick a card from the four, and I make a guess of the card that you picked. What proportion.
The Practice of Statistics, 5th Edition Starnes, Tabor, Yates, Moore Bedford Freeman Worth Publishers CHAPTER 9 Testing a Claim 9.1 Significance Tests:
New FOCUS or OBSERVATION Critical Thinking Cyclic Model: QUESTION or HYPOTHESIS CONTENT ANYALYSIS and DELIBERATION scrutinize data using most rigorous.
Chapter 7 Hypothesis Testing with One Sample Let’s begin…
-what you should include for the different questions. Section A- there is NO choice of question in this section- it will focus on either Vietnam or the.
Psychology Investigations A handy guide to module 2542 Nicola Santamaria January 2001.
+ Testing a Claim Significance Tests: The Basics.
15 Inferential Statistics.
9.3 Hypothesis Tests for Population Proportions
SOCIAL SCIENCE INQUIRY MODEL
Chapters 20, 21 Hypothesis Testing-- Determining if a Result is Different from Expected.
Hypothesis Testing: Hypotheses
Chapter 9: Hypothesis Testing
Exercise #4: Cell Biology Research Paper
SOCIAL SCIENCE INQUIRY MODEL
Statistics 300: Elementary Statistics
Research Methods: Data analysis and reporting investigations.
Graphs and Chi Square.
Presentation transcript:

Writing a Discussion Section

Writing a discussion section is where you really begin to add your interpretations to the work. In this critical part of the research paper, you start the process of explaining any links and correlations [1] apparent in your data. If you left few interesting leads and open questions in the results section [2], the discussion is simply a matter of building upon those and expanding them.

The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null [3] or alternative hypotheses [4] according to the significance levels found by the statistics. That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that. It is rarely clear-cut, and you will need to interpret your findings.

For example, one of your graphs may show a distinct trend, but not enough to reach an acceptable significance level. Remember that no significance [5] is not the same as no difference, and you can begin to explain this in your discussion section. Whilst your results may not be enough to reject the null hypothesis [3], they may show a trend that later researchers may wish to explore, perhaps by refining the experiment [6].

Self-Criticism at the Heart of Writing a Discussion Section For this purpose, you should criticize the experiment, and be honest about whether your design [7] was good enough. If not, suggest any modifications and improvements that could be made to the design. Maybe the reason that you did not find a significant correlation is because your sampling was not random [8], or you did not use sensitive enough equipment.

The discussion section is not always about what you found, but what you did not find, and how you deal with that. Stating that the results are inconclusive is the easy way out, and you must always try to pick out something of value.

Using the Discussion Section to Expand Knowledge You should always put your findings into the context of the previous research that you found during your literature review [9]. Do your results agree or disagree with previous research? Do the results of the previous research help you to interpret your own findings? If your results are very different, why?

Either you have uncovered something new, or you may have made a major flaw with the design of the experiment [10]. Finally, after saying all of this, you can make a statement about whether the experiment has contributed to knowledge in the field, or not. Unless you made so many errors that the results are completely unreliable, you will; certainly have learned something.

Try not to be too broad in your generalizations [11] to the wider world - it is a small experiment and is unlikely to change the world. Once writing the discussion section is complete, you can move onto the next stage, wrapping up the paper with a focused conclusion [12].