Page - 175th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Evolutive OTNs control draft-ceccarellifuxh-ccamp-gmpls-extensions-for-evolutive-otn-00.txt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fill in missing numbers or operations
Advertisements

1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Appendix 01.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Flexible Grid Label Format in Wavelength Switched Optical Network
Page - 1IETF 76, Hiroshima, November 8-13, 2009 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Evolutive OTNs control draft-fuxh-ccamp-gmpls-extension-for-evolutive-otn-03.txt.
Page th IETF – Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 WSON Signal Characteristics and Network Element Compatibility Constraints for GMPLS Greg
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Fatai Zhang Guoying Zhang Sergio Belotti Daniele Ceccarelli GMPLS Signaling.
IETF 78, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Requirement and Framework for Multi Stages Multiplexing Configuration in G.709 network draft-fuxh-ccamp-multi-stage-multiplex-config-req-01.
Slide title In CAPITALS 50 pt Slide subtitle 32 pt GMPLS RSVP-TE Extensions for OTN and SONET/SDH OAM Configuration draft-kern-ccamp-rsvp-te-sdh-otn-oam-ext-00.
ITU-T/OIF Report IETF 76 – Hiroshima – Nov09 L. Ong (Ciena) Thanks to Malcolm Betts & Kam Lam for ITU- T slides.
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-04 CCAMP WG, IETF 80 th Prague.
LMP Test Messages Extensions for Evolutive OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-g709-lmp-test-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 76 th Hiroshima.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709-02/03 CCAMP WG, IETF 78 th Maastricht.
Page - 1IETF 76, Hiroshima, November 8-13, 2009 Explicit Control of Region Boundary for PCE-Based Inter-Layer draft-lin-pce-ccamp-multilayer-lsp-00.txt.
LMP Behavior Negotiation CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-li-ccamp-lmp-behavior-negotiation-00.txt Dan Li
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-03 CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
IETF 77, Maastricht, Netherlands, July 25-30, 2010Page - 1 Information Modele Electro-Optical Multi- Layer G.709 network draft-xie-ccamp-multi-elec-opt-network-ext-req-00.
78th IETF CCAMP Working Group1 CCAMP Working Group Online Agenda and Slides at: Tools start page:
IETF 77, Anaheim, March 21-26, 2010Page - 1 Requirements for Path Ownership Transfer between Management Plane and Control Plane in a MPLS-TP network draft-bao-mpls-tp-path-transfer-reqs-00.txt.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolutive G.709 OTN
Business Transaction Management Software for Application Coordination 1 Business Processes and Coordination.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Multiplication Facts Review. 6 x 4 = 24 5 x 5 = 25.
Multiplying binomials You will have 20 seconds to answer each of the following multiplication problems. If you get hung up, go to the next problem when.
0 - 0.
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
FACTORING ax2 + bx + c Think “unfoil” Work down, Show all steps.
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 10 second questions Numbers and number system Numbers and the number system, fractions, decimals, proportion & probability.
Around the World AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision AdditionSubtraction MultiplicationDivision.
ZMQS ZMQS
© S Haughton more than 3?
VOORBLAD.
1..
Lets play bingo!!. Calculate: MEAN Calculate: MEDIAN
1 First EMRAS II Technical Meeting IAEA Headquarters, Vienna, 19–23 January 2009.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
A SMALL TRUTH TO MAKE LIFE 100%
PSSA Preparation.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g709v3-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-00.txt Fatai Zhang Dan Li Jianrui.
Information model for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-bccg-ccamp-otn-g709-info-model-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 78 th Maastricht.
OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS Control of Evolving G.709 OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-ospf-g CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control Fatai Zhang.
CCAMP WG, IETF 76th, Hiroshima, Japan draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-g709-lmp-discovery-02.txt LMP extensions for G.709 Optical Transport Networks Fatai Zhang.
Framework for G.709 Optical Transport Network (OTN) draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-05 CCAMP WG, IETF 82 nd Taipei.
CCAMP WG, IETF 75th, Stockholm, Sweden draft-zhang-ccamp-gmpls-evolving-g txt Fatai Zhang Guoying
LMP Test Messages Extensions for Evolutive OTN draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-g709-lmp-test-01 CCAMP WG, IETF 77 th Anaheim.
Technology agnostic OSPF-TE extensions for GMPLS draft-bccgd-ccamp-gmpls-opsf-agnostic-00 CCAMP WG, IETF 79 th Beijing.
CCAMP WG, IETF 79th, Beijing, China draft-ietf-ccamp-gmpls-g709-framework-03.txt Framework for GMPLS and PCE Control of G.709 Optical Transport Networks.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for G
RSVP-TE Signaling Extension for Explicit Control of LSP Boundary in MRN/MLN draft-fuxh-ccamp-boundary-explicit-control-ext-02.txt Xihua Fu Qilei Wang.
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
GMPLS Signaling Extensions for the Evolving G.709 OTN Control
Iftekhar Hussain (Presenter),
draft-merge-ccamp-otn-b100g-fwk-01
Presentation transcript:

Page - 175th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Evolutive OTNs control draft-ceccarellifuxh-ccamp-gmpls-extensions-for-evolutive-otn-00.txt Xihua ZTE Daniele Ericsson Marco Altran

Page - 275th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Authors/Contributors Xihua Fu (editor) ZTE Daniele Ceccarelli (editor) Ericsson Marco Corsi (editor) Altran Diego Caviglia Ericsson Ming Ke ZTE Francesco Fondelli Ericsson Yuanlin Bao ZTE Lizhong Jin NSN

Page - 375th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 History of Document 1. draft-ceccarelli-ccamp-gmpls-g709-am3-00.txt June 27, draft-fuxh-ccamp-gmpls-extension-for-evolutive- otn-01.txt July 6, merging document: draft-ceccarellifuxh-ccamp- gmpls-extensions-for-evolutive-otn-00.txt July 27, 2009

Page - 475th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Requirement of GMPLS Signaling Extension for G.709 Amendment3 and G.sup43 GMPLS signaling extensions for G.709 (2003/03) has been described in RFC4328 including the Generalized Label Request and the Generalized Label (i.e., just for ODU1, ODU2 and ODU3).RFC4328 In terms of the evolutive OTN hierarchy, GMPLS signaling extensions for the new applications (i.e., ODU0, 1.25G ODU1, 1.25G ODU2, ODU2e, 1.25G ODU3, ODU3e1, ODU3e2, ODUflex and ODU4) are needed.

Page - 575th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Content of this document Extend GMPLS signaling: a.Signal Type (ST) b.Number of Multiplexed Components (NMC). c.Generalized Label. To control new signal types: - ODU0 - ODU1 (1.25G TS) - ODU2 (1.25G TS) - ODU2e - ODU3 (1.25G TS) - ODU3e1, ODU3e2 (Non Normative) - ODU flex (1.25G and 2.5G TS) - ODU4 (1.25G TS)

Page - 675th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Extension of Signal Type Value Type Not significant 1 ODU1 (i.e., 2.5 Gbps) /*The size of OPU1 TS is 2.5G or mapping into 2.5G TS of OPU2 or OPU3 */ 2 ODU2 (i.e., 10 Gbps) /*The size of OPU2 TS is 2.5G or mapping into 2.5G TS of OPU3 */ 3 ODU3 (i.e., 40 Gbps) /*The size of OPU3 TS is 2.5G*/ 4 Reserved (for future use) 5 Reserved (for future use) 6 OCh at 2.5 Gbps 7 OCh at 10 Gbps 8 OCh at 40 Gbps 9 OCh at 100 Gbps 10 ODU0 11 ODU1 /* The size of OPU1 TS is 1.25G or mapping into 1.25G TS of OPUk (K > 1) */ 12 ODU2 /* The size of OPU2 TS is 1.25G or mapping into 1.25G TS of OPUk (K > 2) */ 13 ODU3 /* The size of OPU3 TS is 1.25G or mapping into 1.25G TS of OPUk (K > 3) */ 14 ODU4 15 ODU2e /* 10Gbps for FC1200 and GE LAN */ 16 ODU3e1 /* Non-Normative */ 17 ODU3e2 /* Non-Normative */ 18 ODUflex /* Mapping into 1.25G TS of OPU2/OPU3/OPU4 */ 19 ODUflex /* Mapping into 2.5G TS of OPU2/OPU3 */ Reserved (for future use) New Signal Type extended for G.709 Amendment3 and G.sup43

Page - 775th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Extension of NMC NMC Description ODU0 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU1. 1 ODU0 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU2. 1 ODU0 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU3. 1 ODU0 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU4. 2 ODU1 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU2. 2 ODU1 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU3. 2 ODU1 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU4. 8 ODU2 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU3. 8 ODU2 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU4. 9 ODU2e is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU3. 8 ODU2e is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU3e2. [Non-Normative] 8 ODU2e is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU4. 32 ODU3 is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU ODUflex is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU ODUflex is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU ODUflex is mapped into 1.25G tributary slots of OPU4. 1 ODU1 is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU2. 1 ODU1 is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU3. 4 ODU2 is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU3. 5 ODU2e is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU3. 4 ODU2e is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU3e1. [Non-Normative] 1-4 ODUflex is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU2. [Non-Normative] 1-16 ODUflex is mapped into 2.5G tributary slots of OPU3. [Non-Normative]

Page - 875th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Extension of Generalized Label New Generalized Label format is only defined for the new OTN application (i.e., ODU0, 1.25G ODU1, 1.25G ODU2, 1.25G ODU3, ODU2e, ODU3e1, ODU3e2, ODUflex and ODU4) Genralized Labels defined in RFC4328 and this draft can be used at the same time.RFC4328

Page - 975th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 The extension defined for new application must be backward compatible with RFC4328 for ODU1, ODU2 and ODU3 in order to protect the asset of deployment based on G.709 (2003/03).RFC4328 This document uses the Signal Type charactering the ODU multiplex structure and NMC to infer the format of Generalized Label. Backward Compatibility with RFC4328 Considerations

Page th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Interworking Considerations There must be some considerations on interworking between G.709 (2003/03) and new OTN. Node DXC2, DXC4 and DXC5 should have the interworking capability.

Page th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Interworking Considerations One 2.5G bandwidth LSP between DXC1 and DXC6: In the case of one end-to-end session, the tributary slot, Signal Type and NMC can be changed along the path.

Page th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Interworking Considerations The LSP also can be setuped with multiple segment session (i.e., ODU1 LSP1, ODU1 LSP2, ODU1 LSP3, ODU1 LSP4). Signal Type and NMC in each segment LSP don't need to be changed any more.

Page th IETF - Stockholm, Sweden, July 2009 Next Step… Request feedbacks and comments. Further merging work for one single solution in the long term.