© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Practical Erlang Programming Process Error Handling.
Advertisements

Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 3.1 Chapter 3.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PHY OAM Baseline Proposal June
G.8032 Ethernet Ring Protection Overview March, 2008 ITU-T Q9 – SG 15
MPLS-TP Alarm Suppression tool
Nortel Confidential Information 1 MPLS & Ethernet OAM Interworking (draft-mohan-pwe3-mpls-eth-oam-iwk) L2VPN WG, IETF-71 (Philadelphia) Mar 13, 2008 Dinesh.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-sfv-mpls-tp-fault-00 George Swallow
Igor Umansky Huub van Helvoort
Yaacov Weingarten Stewart Bryant Nurit Sprecher Daniele Ceccarelli
MPLS-TP Ring Protection draft-weingarten-mpls-tp-ring-protection
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
George Swallow. Current Status: Two formats Global-ID as per RFC5003 ITU Carrier Code Issue: Should these be combinable with all other identifiers that.
1 Luyuan Nabil Raymond Zhang
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
1 GMPLS RSVP-TE Recovery Extension for data plane initiated reversion and protection timer signalling draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt.
Extensions to PCEP for Backup Ingress and Egress of LSP draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-ingress-01 draft-chen-pce-compute-backup-egress-01 Huaimo Chen
NTT 2002 © 1 General Principles and Requirements for OAM Functions July 10, 2002 Hiroshi Ohta (NTT, Q.3/13 rapporteur)
Network Protection and Restoration Session 5 - Optical/IP Network OAM & Protection and Restoration Presented by: Malcolm Betts Date:
Satoshi NARIKAWA NTT (G.8032 Acting Co-editor)
0 - 0.
Addition Facts
1 After completing this lesson, you will be able to: Compose, address, and send messages. Format the body of a message. Attach a file to a message. Check.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v Complex MPLS VPNs Introducing Central Services VPNs.
Chapter 1: Introduction to Scaling Networks
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v MPLS TE Overview Configuring MPLS TE on Cisco IOS Platforms.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v MPLS VPN Technology Introducing the MPLS VPN Routing Model.
© S Haughton more than 3?
1 DRNI Examples and DAS position Maarten Vissers Version 01.
1 7912G IP PHONE LCD SCREEN TYPE OF PHONE SOFT KEYS NAVIGATION BUTTON FOOT STAND HAND SET VOLUME BUTTON  MENU  HOLD DIAL PAD.
Route Optimisation RD-CSY3021.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. ICND v2.3—2-1 Extending Switched Networks with Virtual LANs Introducing VLAN Operations.
Addition 1’s to 20.
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—5-1 MPLS VPN Implementation Configuring BGP as the Routing Protocol Between PE and CE Routers.
Week 1.
1 68th IETF, Prague, March 2007 Graceful Shutdown in MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown-02.txt Zafar Ali
1 Extensions to Resource Reservation Protocol For Fast Reroute of Traffic Engineering GMPLS LSPs draft-tsaad-ccamp-rsvpte-bidir-lsp-fastreroute-05 Author.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco Public ITE PC v4.0 Chapter 1 1 Link-State Routing Protocols Routing Protocols and Concepts – Chapter.
Ethernet Automatic Protection Switching (EAPS)
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-02 George Swallow IETF78 July 2010.
MPLS additions to RSVP Tunnel identification Tunnel parameter negotiation Routing policy distribution Routing debugging information Scalability improvements.
1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-03 George Swallow IETF79 November 2010.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 12 FastReRoute (FRR) - Big Picture.
A General approach to MPLS Path Protection using Segments Ashish Gupta Ashish Gupta.
draft-kompella-mpls-rmr Kireeti Kompella IETF 91
Proactive Connection Verification, Continuity Check and Remote Defect indication for MPLS Transport Profile draft-ietf-mpls-tp-cc-cv-rdi-02 editors: Dave.
1 © 2002, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. draft-nadeau-pwe3-vccv-00.txt IETF #56 San Francisco, CA USA Thomas D. Nadeau Monique.
LSP-Ping and BFD encapsulation over ACH draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures Nitin BahadurRahul Aggarwal Dave WardTom Nadeau Nurit SprecherYaacov.
A Snapshot on MPLS Reliability Features Ping Pan March, 2002.
Slide 1 MPLS-TP Linear Protection / Author / RTP IE Fixed CET I insert classification level © Nokia Siemens Networks MPLS-TP Linear Protection.
Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-00 IETF 78 July 2010 Rafi Ram Masahiro Daikoku
1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-02 MPLS WG, 77th IETF - Anaheim.
RSVP-TE Extensions to Notification for Shared Mesh Protection CCAMP WG, IETF 81th draft-he-ccamp-notification-shared-mesh-protection-00 Wenjuan He
Kireeti Kompella draft-kompella-mpls-rmr-01
Luyuan Fang Nabil Bitar Raymond Zhang Masahiro DAIKOKU Ping Pan
Refresh Interval Independent facility FRR draft-chandra-mpls-enhanced-frr-bypass-00 Chandra Ramachandran Yakov Rekhter.
Simplified BFD Procedures for Bi-Directional LSPs for MPLS OAM (particularly MPLS-TP OAM) George Swallow cisco.
1 Protection in SONET Path layer protection scheme: operate on individual connections Line layer protection scheme: operate on the entire set of connections.
Draft-rkhd-mpls-tp-sd-03 IETF 81 Jul 2011 Rafi Ram Daniel Cohn Masahiro Daikoku.
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
MPLS P2MP OAM <draft-swallow-mpls-mcast-cv-00.txt>
Guoman Liu ) ) Yuefeng Jian Jinghai ) Zongpeng )
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 MPLS –TP Fault OAM draft-ietf-mpls-tp-fault-01 George Swallow IETF77 March 2010

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 2 Why MPLS-TP OAM? Goals Support the requirements of transport Build better OAM for MPLS Be compatible with deployed MPLS equipment There is existing MPLS equipment that cannot run BFD at 3.3, 10 or even 50 ms at scale There is a desire among owners of that equipment for faster failover

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 3 Hold off Timer? In Sonet equipment AIS is sent continuously Lack of an LDI signal is handled with a hold-off timer which allow time for the server layer to recover before the client layer reacts This prevents unnecessary protection switches In MPLS-TP AIS is sent at a max rate of 1 per sec and does not time out for 3.5 seconds There appears to be no reasonable and useful timer setting for a hold-off timer! This is the motivation for the Link Down Indication

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 4 Link Down Indication (LDI) LDI carries all the same semantics as AIS plus the indication of a hard failure In fact it would be fine to have just an AIS message and a flag for LDI Flag clear = Protecting State; Flag set = Unavailable State LDI is only need when CC is running slowly If CC is running fast (detect time ~500 ms or less) then LDI is treated just like AIS

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 5 Link Down Indication (LDI) The decision to send AIS or LDI is driven from the APS state LDI must be sent whenever the server layer enters the unavailable state When LDI is received by an MPLS-TP LSPs MEP it is used to Suppresses alarms due to any CC failure – just like AIS If the LSP is protected and CC is running slowly, and if no CC failure has occurred (i.e. BFD is up), may trigger path protection

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 6 AIS / LDI Fault Generation Client LSP Server Working LSP Server Protection LSP

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 7 Case 1: An unprotected link Server Path is unprotected Control function sets Server MEP W to send LDI on CC failure Server Path W Server MEP W Client Path Server APS/Control

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 8 Case 2: Both Working and Protection are Up CC functions are reporting that both W and P are up APS is in the Normal State Control Function sets both MEPs to send AIS on CC failure Server LSP P Server LSP W Server MEP P Server MEP W Client Path Server APS/Control

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 9 Case 3: Protection Up, Working Fails Server LSP W fails, Server MEP W begins sending AIS Server LSP P Server LSP W Server MEP P Server MEP W Client LSP X Server APS/Control

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 10 Case 3: Protection Up, Working Fails Server LSP W fails, Server MEP W begins sending AIS APS / Control Function moves selector to Protection LSP AIS ceases to be inserted in Client LSP APS enters Protecting State, Control Function sets Server MEP P to send LDI Server LSP P Server LSP W Server MEP P Server MEP W Client LSP X Server APS/Control

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 11 Case 4: Working has failed; Protection Fails Server LSP P fails, Server MEP P begins sending LDI APS enters Unavailable State Server LSP P Server LSP W Server MEP P Server MEP W Client LSP X Server APS/Control X

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 12 Case 5: Protection Up; Working comes Up Server MEP W CC fault clears APS enters Normal State APS / Control Function sets Server MEP P to send AIS Server LSP P Server LSP W Server MEP P Server MEP W Server APS/Control Client LSP X

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 13 Default sending behavior OpCode set to AIS, LDI or LKR R-flag set to zero (not used) Refresh Timer default value is 1 sec Message continuously transmitted until condition clears

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 14 For existing MPLS equipment, receiving control packets can be taxing, particularly if many LSP terminating at a node are receiving fault messages Solution is to allow back-off after transmitting 3 times at one second Optional Sending Behavior

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 15 OpCode set to AIS, LDI or LKR R-flag set to zero Refresh Timer set to configured value (default 20 sec) Message transmitted three times at one second intervals Message continuously transmitted according to refresh timer until condition clears Optional Sending Behavior

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 16 Used when refresh timer is set long When fault / lock condition clears Set R-bit to one Transmit three times at refresh interval of 1 sec Optional Clearing Behavior

© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 17 Next Steps Address Liaison comments Incorporate other comments Republish