Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-genapp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Mike Shand.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SHIM6 Update Geoff Huston Kurtis Lindqvist SHIM6 co-chairs.
Advertisements

Tal Mizrahi Marvell IETF Meeting 81, July 2011
MPLS-TP BFD for CC-CV proactive and RDI functionalities
LDP extensions for Explicit Pseudowire to transport LSP mapping draft-cao-pwe3-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-02.txt Mach Chen Wei Cao.
LDP IP and PW Capability draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt Kamran Raza Sami Boutros draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt.
PCEP extensions for GMPLS
IS-IS ESN TLV draft-chunduri-isis-extended-sequence-no-tlv-01 Uma Chunduri, Wenhu Lu, Albert Tian Ericsson Inc. Naiming Shen Cisco Systems, Inc. IETF 83,
IS-IS WG IETF-80 Prague Chris Hopps Dave Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF.
BFD MIB Extensions for MPLS and MPLS-TP Networks draft-vkst-bfd-mpls-mib-01 Sam Aldrin Tom Nadeau Venkatesan Mahalingam Mukund Mani Kannan KV Sampath.
OSPF WG - IETF 66 OSPF Protocol Evolution WG Re-Charter Acee Lindem/Cisco Systems.
90th IETF, Toronto, July 2014 IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability draft-ginsberg-isis-route-preference-00.txt Les Ginsberg
EAP Channel Bindings Charles Clancy Katrin Hoeper IETF 76 Hiroshima, Japan November 08-13, 2009.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 BGP Diverse Paths draft-ietf-grow-diverse-bgp-paths-dist-02 Keyur Patel.
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
1 Introduction to ISIS SI-E Workshop AfNOG The Gambia Noah Maina.
Release 5.1, Revision 0 Copyright © 2001, Juniper Networks, Inc. Advanced Juniper Networks Routing Module 4: Intermediate System To Intermediate System.
ISIS IETF 70 Chris Hopps, David Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
BFD protocol update IETF 62
OSPF Operator Defined TLVs for Agile Service Deployment (previous name self-defined TLVs) draft-chunduri-ospf-operator-defined-tlvs-00 (previously: draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-03)
82 nd IETF – Taipei, Taiwan, November 2011 GMPLS OSPF Enhancement for Signal and Network Element Compatibility for Wavelength Switched Optical Networks.
LSP-Ping and BFD encapsulation over ACH draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping-bfd-procedures Nitin BahadurRahul Aggarwal Dave WardTom Nadeau Nurit SprecherYaacov.
1 Version 3.1 Module 4 Learning About Other Devices.
Light Weight Access Point Protocol (LWAPP) IETF 57 Pat Calhoun, Airespace.
Reverse Metric TLV draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric-01 draft-amante-isis-reverse-metric Authors: Shane Amante Tony Li Naiming Shen Mikael Abrahamsson Proposed.
TRILL with Multicast draft-hares-trill-mutlicast.00.txt Susan Hares.
1 Multi Topology Routing for OSPFv3 (draft-mirtorabi-mt-ospfv3-00.txt) Sina Mirtorabi
BGP Link-State extensions for Segment Routing
Simplified Extension of LSP Space for IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-wg-extlsp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Mike Shand.
86th IETF, Orlando, March 2013 IS-IS Support for Unidirectional Links draft-ginsberg-isis-udl-00.txt Les Ginsberg
92nd IETF, Dallas, March, 2015 IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-00.txt Les Ginsberg
91st IETF, Honolulu, November 2014 IS-IS Route Preference for Extended IP and IPv6 Reachability draft-ietf-isis-route-preference-00.txt Les Ginsberg
1 MPLS-TP BFD for CC- CV proactive and RDI functionalities draft-asm-mpls-tp-bfd-cc-cv-02 MPLS WG, 77th IETF - Anaheim.
OSPF WG – IETF 67 OSPF WG Document Status or “You can bring a Horse to Water …” Rohit Dube/Consultant Acee Lindem/Cisco Systems.
1 Multicast Routing Blackhole Avoidance draft-asati-pim-multicast-routing-blackhole-avoid-00 Rajiv Asati Mike McBride IETF 72, Dublin.
OSPFv3 Auto-Config IETF 83, Paris Jari Arkko, Ericsson Acee Lindem, Ericsson.
NVO3 VDP Gap Analysis VM to NVE Specific Control Plane Requirements Paul Bottorff (HP) Joseph Pelissier (Cisco) Patricia Thaler (Broadcom)
88th IETF, Vancouver, November 2013 IS-IS Support for Unidirectional Links draft-ietf-isis-udl-01.txt Les Ginsberg
ISIS IETF 68 Chris Hopps, David Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Express Path Updates draft-giacalone-ospf-te-express-path-01.txt Spencer Giacalone, Alia Atlas, John Drake, Stefano Previdi,
ISIS IETF 71 Chris Hopps, David Ward. Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft.
1IETF69-Chicago-July 2007 Multi-Instance ISIS draft-previdi-isis-mi-mt-01.txt Stefano Previdi - Les Ginsberg - Mike.
Tunnel SAFI draft-nalawade-kapoor-tunnel- safi-03.txt SSA Attribute draft-kapoor-nalawade-idr- bgp-ssa-01.txt.
IS-IS WG IETF-90 Toronto Chris Hopps Hannes Gredler
86th IETF, Orlando, March 2013 Flooding Scope PDUs draft-ginsberg-isis-fs-lsp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi.
Prof. Alfred J Bird, Ph.D., NBCT Office – McCormick 3rd floor 607 Office Hours – Monday 3:00 to 4:00 and.
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
Update on Advertising L2 Bundle Member Link Attributes in IS-IS
Zhenbin Li, Li Zhang(Huawei Technologies)
draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-02
Multi-Instances ISIS Extension draft-ietf-isis-mi-08.txt
LMP Behavior Negotiation
ISIS Route Tag sub-TLV draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-02.txt
LIME CL Model Updated
Explicitly advertising the TE protocols enabled on links in OSPF
IS-IS Reverse Metric IETF 97, Seoul
draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-05
Proposal for IEEE 802.1CQ-LAAP
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-00
Draft-jain-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt Parag Jain, Samer Salam, Ali Sajassi (Cisco), Sami Boutros (VMware), Greg Mirsky (ZTE) IETF 99, July 2017 Prague.
Technical Issues with draft-ietf-mpls-bfd-directed
IETF BIER, November 2017, Singapore
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
ISIS extensions for SRv6 draft-bashandy-isis-srv6-extensions-03
Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for EVPN Ethernet Segment Failover Use Case draft-zwm-bess-es-failover-00 BESS WG IETF104# Prague Sandy Zhang.
OSPF WG Status IETF 80, Prague CZ
draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-04
E. Bellagamba, Ericsson P. Sköldström, Acreo D. Ward, Juniper
Presentation transcript:

Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-genapp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Mike Shand

Changes since previous version Now a WG document Standards track Applicability statement

Applicability Statement The GENINFO TLV supports the advertisement of application specific information in IS-IS LSPs which is not directly related to the operation of the IS-IS protocol. Information which is not directly used by the IS-IS Decision process falls into this category. The Decision Process is defined by [ISO10589] and extended by [RFC1195] and [RFC3906].

Applicability Statement May be interpreted to cover existing information Migration to use of GENAPP is seen as desirable WG is the authority

What existing info MIGHT be candidates for GENAPP? TE/G-MPLS sub-TLV info (from TLVs 22/23/222/223) TE Mesh Group sub-TLV (TLV 242) PCE sub-TLV info (TLV 242)

Ready for Last Call

IS-IS and BFD draft-ietf-isis-bfd-tlv-00.txt Chris Hopps Les Ginsberg

Changes since previous version Now a WG document Standards track TLV now includes MTID

Problem Statement BFD used to detect IPv4/IPv6 forwarding failures IS-IS PDUs do not always share fate with IP packets Adjacencies may be established even when IP forwarding problems are detectable

A B IP IS-IS 1.IS-IS PDUs exchanged 2.Adjacency UP 3.BFD session requested (neighbor IP address) If BFD session doesnt come up could be: IP forwarding failure No BFD Config/Support

Advertise support for BFD in IIHs Type 139 (proposed) Length # of octets in the value field (1 to 255) Value: No. of octets | R|R|R|R| MTID | | NLPID | : : | R|R|R|R| MTID | | NLPID |

Why was MTID Added? BFD sessions apply to specific topologies NLPIDs are not SAFI specific

When BFD is supported by both neighbors… Hold adjacency in Init state until BFD session is UP Bring adjacency down when BFD session goes down P2P – 3 way state is DOWN when BFD is down LAN – omit neighbor MAC address when BFD is down

Determining when new rules apply For each MTID/NLPID shared by the neighbors, if BFD support is configured for both neighbors, BFD session must be UP to use that topology At least one topology must be useable in order for adjacency to come up

A B IP IS-IS MTID: 0(IPv4), 2(IPv6) BFD: 0/IPv4, 2/IPv6 MTID: 0 (IPv4) BFD: 0/IPv4 IPv4 BFD Session MUST be UP before adjacency comes up.

A B IP IS-IS MTID: 0(IPv4), 0(IPv6) BFD: 0/IPv4, 2/IPv6 MTID: 0 (IPv4,IPv6) BFD: 0/IPv4 Single Topology/Multiple AFIs IPv4 Session MUST be UP before adjacency comes up.

A B IP IS-IS MTID: 0 (IPv4), 2 (IPv6) BFD: 0/IPv4, 2/IPv6 MTID: 0 (IPv4), 2 (IPv6) BFD: 0/IPv4 Multi-topology (one AFI/topology) Normal adjacency establishment rules. IPv4 BFD Session MUST be UP for MTID #0 to be useable.

Transition – enable BFD Detected by addition of NLPID in BFD-TLV For existing adjacencies, do not update hold time on receipt of IIH until BFD session is UP

A B IP IS-IS MTID: 0 (IPv4) BFD: 0/IPv4 MTID: 0 (IPv4) BFD: 0/IPv4 1.Adjacency is Up 2.B configures IPv4 BFD support 3.IIH from B includes BFD-TLV for MTID 0/IPv4 – hold time not updated 4.BFD session comes up 5.Normal hold time update resumes

Transition – disable BFD Detected by transition of BFD session state to admin down For existing adjacencies, do not update hold time on receipt of IIH until corresponding NLPID is no longer advertised in BFD-TLV

A B IP IS-IS MTID: 0 (IPv4) BFD: 0/IPv4 MTID: 0 (IPv4) BFD: 0/IPv4 1.Adjacency is Up/BFD session Up 2.B deconfigures IPv4 BFD support 3.IPv4 BFD session admin down on A 4.IIH from B has no BFD-TLV for MTID 0/IPv4 5.Normal hold time update resumes

Questions?