Richard The Management Model of the Centralized Network Architecture IETF 75th meeting, Stockholm draft-richard-opsawg-cna-mib-00.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Network Inventory Conceptual Framework Tony Breach, Optical Network Manager 6. februar 2014.
Advertisements

Submission Page 1 August 2002 doc.: IEEE /503r0 Daryl Kaiser, Cisco Systems Radio Measurement: A Candidate Approach Daryl Kaiser (Cisco Systems)
March 2004 doc.: _L2_Upper_Layer_Interaction_r1 Samsung AIT Interaction between L2 and Upper Layers in IEEE Xiaoyu Liu
1 IEEE Media Independent Handoff Overview of services and scenarios for 3GPP2 Stefano M. Faccin Liaison officer to 3GPP2.
Doc.: IEEE xxx Submission May 10-14, 2004 Alan Carlton, Interdigital CommunicationsSlide 1 Defining Layer 2.5 Alan Carlton Interdigital Communications.
1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Doc.: IEEE /481r3 Submission May 2004 Lily Yang, Steve Shellhammer, IntelSlide 1 Thoughts on AP Functional Descriptions L. Lily Yang Steve Shellhammer.
(omniran TG) Short introduction into OmniRAN P802.1CF Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia.
Communication and Functional Models
CAPWAP Architecture draft-mani-ietf-capwap-arch-00 Mahalingam Mani Avaya Bob O’Hara Airespace Lily Yang Intel.
Doc.: IEEE /250r2 Submission March 2004 Lily Yang, IETF CAPWAP Design Team EditorSlide WLAN Architectural Considerations for IETF CAPWAP.
Transmission of IP Packets over Ethernet over IEEE draft-riegel-16ng-ip-over-eth-over Max Riegel
69th IETF Chicago IETF BMWG WLAN Switch Benchmarking Tarunesh Ahuja, Tom Alexander, Scott Bradner, Sanjay Hooda, Jerry Perser, Muninder Sambi.
Omniran TG 1 Cooperation for OmniRAN P802.1CF Max Riegel, NSN (Chair OmniRAN TG)
IEEE 802.1ABrev Extension for Auto Attach Nigel Bragg Dan Romascanu Paul Unbehagen.
COMP4690, by Dr Xiaowen Chu, HKBU
Ethernet Passive Optical Networks PON Definition ● Point to multipoint optical networks ● Architecture build up from two elements  An Optical Line Terminal.
SNMP Simple Network Management Protocol
IETF72 ANCP WG1 ANCP Applicability to PON draft-bitar-wadhwa-ancp-pon-00.txt Nabil Bitar, Verizon Sanjay Wadhwa, Juniper Networks.
55 th IETF 1 55 th IETF Network Management for GSMP Interface draft-cha-gsmp-management-01.txt YoungWook Cha Andong National.
MESH Implementation With AP5131 version R.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.ISCW-Mod3_L7 1 Network Security 2 Module 6 – Configure Remote Access VPN.
Module 4 - Networking MIS5122: Enterprise Architecture for the IT Auditor.
OmniRAN SoA and Gap Analysis Date: [ ] Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Antonio de la Juan Carlos
PPSP Tracker Protocol draft-gu-ppsp-tracker-protocol PPSP WG IETF 82 Taipei Rui Cruz (presenter) Mário Nunes, Yingjie Gu, Jinwei Xia, David Bryan, João.
© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicNew CCNA Jianxin Tang IT 1 V4.0 Ch8. Fundamental Networks.
20 LAN Hardware Overview Version A.01 H3065S Module 2 Slides.
ITED 328 Lecture 4 12 Feb 2004 Loosely covering Chapter 5 Internet and LAN Technology.
INTRODUCTION Bluetooth technology is code name for Personal Area Network (PAN) technology that makes it extremely easy to connect a mobile, computing device.
IEEE R lmap 23 Feb 2015.
Fundamentals of Network Management by Behzad Akbari Fall 2008 In the Name of the Most High.
Standard for a Convergent Digital Home Network for Heterogeneous Technologies Zhimeng Du 12/5/2013.
1 © 2003, Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. CCNA 4 v3.0 Module 6 Introduction to Network Administration.
Yang Shi, Chris Elliott, Yong Zhang IETF 73 rd 18 Nov 2008, Minneapolis CAPWAP WG MIB Drafts Report.
Jun Li DHCP Option for Access Network Information draft-lijun-dhc-clf-nass-option-01.
Optical Edge / Access Networks for GENI Lokesh Mandvekar Dr. Chunming Qiao (PI)‏ Department of Computer Science.
Designed to configure regardless of IP address on computer Will display 195E by Ethernet MAC address Configures IP Address to 195EUpdate FirmwareOpen.
Yang Shi (Richard), Yong Zhang IETF 74 th 26 March 2009, San Francisco CAPWAP WG MIB Drafts Report.
CAPWAP Taxonomy Recommendations Pat R. Calhoun, Cisco Systems Bob O’Hara, Cisco Systems Inderpreet Singh, Chantry Networks.
62 nd IETF – CAPWAP Working Group1 CAPWAP Objectives Saravanan Govindan March 2005.
Broadband Communication Solution. 2  Passive Optical Network (GEPON)  Fiber Optical Network  VDSL (Very-high-data-rate Digital Subscriber Line)  VDSL.
CAPWAP Working Group MIB documents IETF 65 David T. Perkins.
Presentation at ISMS WG Meeting1 ISMS – March 2005 IETF David T. Perkins.
Wireless Network Management SANDEEP. Network Management Network management is a service that employs a variety of tools, applications, and devices to.
IP Over InfiniBand Working Group Management Information Bases 55th IETF Atlanta Sean Harnedy InfiniSwitch Corporation
Policy-Based Management MIB Steve Waldbusser Jon Saperia Thippanna Hongal.
Re-cap & Next Steps Mahalingam Mani. The WG Now and from Now The main deliverables have progressed close to completion for this charter Problem statement.
IETF CAPWAP Protocol Objectives China Mobile,Huawei Technology, Intel Corporation,ZTE,RITT Nov. 8,2004.
CHAPTER 8 Communication and Network Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Basic Edge Core switch Training for Summit Communication.
© 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential 1 © 2010 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Confidential.
David T. Perkings Shi Yang IETF 70 th 2 Dec 2007, Vancouver CAPWAP WG MIB.
Packaging and Deploying Windows Applications
Cisco implementation of ACL yang model
By Sachin Kumar Korenga & Rochita Thakkallapally
Shi Yang David T. Perkins IETF 70th 3 Dec 2007, Vancouver
SUPA/YMCA (Yang Models for Configuration and topology Abstraction)
Marc Holness Version May 2016
EA C451 Vishal Gupta.
PON Extra Material.
Virtual Network Management
ANCP Applicability to PON draft-bitar-wadhwa-ancp-pon-00
WLAN Mesh in CAPWAP Architecture
WLAN Mesh in CAPWAP Architecture
AP Functional Needs of CAPWAP
Thoughts on AP Functional Descriptions
Chapter 4 Network Management Standards and Models
Chapter 4 Network Management Standards and Models
Standards, Models and Language
Presentation transcript:

Richard The Management Model of the Centralized Network Architecture IETF 75th meeting, Stockholm draft-richard-opsawg-cna-mib-00

For the Network Access Technologies such as PON, WLAN and so on, there is a Generic Management Model behind them. The presentation is to discuss the Model and give an example using SNMP MIB. Preface

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

Typical Network Access Technologies (1/3) OLT POS ONU Passive Optical Network (PON) PON defines an architectures of fiber to the home. OLT (Optical Line Termination) provides the interface between the PON and the service providers network ONU (Optical Network Units) terminates the PON and offer interfaces such as xDSL, Ethernet to users OLT can manage and control the ONUs according to IEEE 802.3ah and IEEE 802.1ag

Typical Network Access Technologies (2/3) AC Centralized WLAN Architecture IETF CAPWAP WG defines RFCs for it. AC (Access Controller) manages and controls multiple WTPs (Wireless Terminal Point) by the tunnel between WTP and AC. WTP can forward the stations data to AC by the tunnel. WTP use certain wireless technologies such as radio interface to communicate with the station. WTP station

Typical Network Access Technologies (3/3) The PON and Centralized WLAN Architecture give some typical examples to the Network Access Technologies, the multiple access units (ONU, WTP) under control by a controller unit (OLT, AC) is a an emerging trend. There are generic models behinds Network Topology The Operation and Management Model

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

Centralized Network Architecture Access Controller (AC) Terminal Point (TP) Station 1234 AC manages multiple TPs through a tunnel protocol. Tunnel offers a management channel to the AC The interfaces on the TP are important entities which offers the access service to the station TP are under management by the AC Through the tunnel The Centralized network architecture (CNA) offers the access service to stations (user) by distributing functions among AC and multiple TPs. ONU WTP OLT AC Ethernet, , 3G…

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

Generic Management Model (1/2) To manage a CNA, the basic operation steps are: 1) The operator prepares the configurations for TPs to be managed before they connect to the AC and can change TPs' configuration after they connect to the AC. The configuration for a TP is identified by TPs base MAC address. 2) The TP discovers AC and establishs the tunnel with AC. 3) TP downloads configuration by match its base MAC address with configurations Id. 4) TP MAY not run SNMP service, while AC SHOULD. TP reports Its status info to AC through the tunnel. AC provides the management Interfaces to the operators

Generic Management Model (2/2) The following management objects are important: 1) AC Such as the number Of TPs connecting to AC. 2) TP Such as status, software version, current configuration 3) Interfaces on the TP Such as if Name, status, configuration 4) Tunnel Such as peer of the tunnel, the establishment time 5) Station Such as Id, the interface attached AC TP1 STA STA2 TP STA3 SNMP, Netconf

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

MIB Operation Steps Create TP profile to prepare Configuration Specify a TP profile used by which TPs Use the MIBs such as the Network Access Technologies to configure parameters for TPs and their interfaces TP boots up and connects to AC through the tunnel It triggers the AC automatically creates the TP Virtual Interface. To allow multiple TPs share a TP profile A access technology such as IEEE usually already defines the MIBs, We should reuse it. Through the SNMP to query TP, station, SNMP Agent on the AC It triggers the AC automatically creates the TP Profile Interface.

TP Template Interface For any network access technology, the configuration and management of interface is very important, and a technology usually already defines the MIB modules on their own. For example, the MIB tables such as Dot11OperationTable [IEEE ] are able to support WLAN radio interface configuration, while the MIB tables such as adslLineTable [RFC2662] are able to support ADSL interface configuration. In such MIBs, the tables of the interface parameters usually use the ifIndex as the Index. To prepare the configuration for the TPs interfaces, it need the logic interfaces on the AC: TP Template Interfaces. Creation of the interface is triggered by TP profile.

TP Virtual Interface For each PHY interface on the TP, it can have a TP Virtual Interface Corresponding to it on the AC. TP1 1 TP MAPPING PHY Interface identified by Id TP Virtual Interface identified by ifIndex It looks like that PHY interfaces are located on the AC, and PHY location of the TP (interface) is hidden to the operator. AC IfIndex is used as a common handler for a corresponding interfaces in the draft and the specific network access technologies' MIB modules AC

Differences between the logic Interfaces TP Template InterfaceTP Virtual Interface Function To help the operator to do configuration, and it is related to the TP profile Look like an interface corresponding to the real PHY interface on the TP, and operator could use it (by ifIndex) to query the PHY interfaces info. Event to Create Once the operator creates a TP profile Once TP connects to the AC, and gets Configuration Interface status Keep the up status to allow configuration Status is same as PHY interface on the TP (as TP could report its info to the AC through the management tunnel )

TP Profile CnaTpProfileEntry ::= SEQUENCE { cnaTpProfileId CnaTpProfileIdTC, cnaTpProfileName SnmpAdminString, cnaTpProfileTpModelNumber SnmpAdminString, cnaTpProfileTpName OCTET STRING, cnaTpProfileTpLocation OCTET STRING, cnaTpProfileRowStatus RowStatus } A TP profile is used to make configurations such as the name of a TP before and after it connects to the AC. The profile could be shared by multiple TPs (TP is identified by base MAC). The tunnel protocol message received from the TP MUST contains its base MAC address. The AC uses the base MAC address to find the corresponding TP profile for a specific TP.

Create the TP Template Interfaces (3/4) CnaTemplateIfMappingEntry ::= SEQUENCE { cnaTemplateIfMappingIfId CnaInterfaceIdTC, cnaTemplateIfMappingTemplateIfIndex InterfaceIndex, cnaTemplateIfMappingPhyIfType IANAifType } Another important function of TP profile is to trigger the creation of TP Template Interfaces on the AC. To implement this function, a TP profile MUST include the TP's model name [RFC4133], which reflects the number of PHY interfaces on the TP. In this way, the creation of a TP profile triggers the AC to automatically create the same number of TP Template Interfaces corresponding to the TP's PHY interfaces without manual intervention. CnaTemplateIfMappingEntry keeps the mapping between Interface Id And the ifIndex of TP Template Interface.

Reusing of the Entity MIB To model a TP, besides its status, the properties such as the model name are well defined by the Entity MIB [RFC4133]. It should reuse such existing standards. From the ENTITY-MIB module's perspective, the overall physical entity (AC) is a 'compound' of multiple physical entities (that is, the TPs connected to AC), and all entities are each identified by a Physical index. When the draft models a TP object, it also keeps the mapping value to the Physical index. Through it, the operator could query the model name, hardware version through the ENTITY-MIB. AC TP1 STA STA2 TP STA3 Each TP Identified by Physical Index

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

Next Steps Current draft draft-richard-opsawg-cna-mib-00.txt post in the web site is a MIB draft. David Harrington suggests describing the management Model as an the Information Model, as described in RFC3444, and make it apply to SNMP and Netconf. We would follow it and intend to publish one draft for Information Model, another one is for SNMP. Later, we can have a Netconf one.

Typical Network Access Technologies Centralized Network Architecture A Generic Management Model MIB Objects for the Model Next Steps Need Your Guidance Agenda

Need Your Guidance You are welcomed if you have an interest to be co-editor.

Any Question? Thank You