LDP IP and PW Capability draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt Kamran Raza Sami Boutros draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Analysis of VPLS Deployment R. Gu, J. Dong, M. Chen, Q. Zeng (Huawei) Z. Liu (China Telecom) IETF80 L2VPN Mar Prague draft-gu-l2vpn-vpls-analysis-00.
Advertisements

Pseudowire freeze mechanism draft-jin-pwe3-pw-freeze-00 Lizhong Jin Bhumip. Khasnabish.
Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS draft-ietf-isis-genapp-00.txt Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Mike Shand.
Update on LDP Extensions for Optimized MAC Address Withdrawal in H-VPLS draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-ldp-mac-opt-04 Geraldine Calvignac
Leaf discovery mechanism for mLDP based P2MP/MP2MP LSP
LDP extensions for Explicit Pseudowire to transport LSP mapping draft-cao-pwe3-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-02.txt Mach Chen Wei Cao.
MPLS-TP Lock Instruct MPLS WG, IETF 76, Hiroshima, 9 Nov 2009 draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00draft-dai-mpls-tp-lock-instruct-00 ZTE Corporation Xuehui.
March 2010IETF 77, MPLS WG1 Carrying PIM-SM in ASM mode Trees over P2MP mLDP LSPs draft-rekhter-pim-sm-over-mldp-01.txt Y. Rekhter, Juniper Networks R.
1 GMPLS RSVP-TE Recovery Extension for data plane initiated reversion and protection timer signalling draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt draft-takacs-ccamp-revertive-ps-04.txt.
CR-LDP for ASON Signalling Session 7 – Signalling and Routing Presented by: Stephen Shew Date:
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v Frame-Mode MPLS Implementation on Cisco IOS Platforms Troubleshooting Frame-Mode MPLS on Cisco.
IETF Differentiated Services Concerns with Intserv: r Scalability: signaling, maintaining per-flow router state difficult with large number of flows r.
OLD DOG CONSULTING Challenges and Solutions for OAM in Point-to-Multipoint MPLS Adrian Farrel, Old Dog Consulting Ltd. Zafar Ali, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Leading Edge Routing MPLS Enhancements to Support Layer 2 Transport Services Jeremy Brayley
1 © 2000, Cisco Systems, Inc. Integrated-ISIS Route Leaking.
Protection Mechanisms for LDP P2MP/MP2MP LSP draft-zhao-mpls-mldp-protections-02.txt Quintin Zhao, Emily Chen, Tao Chou Huawei Technology Daniel King OldDog.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—2-1 Label Assignment and Distribution Introducing MPLS Label Allocation, Distribution, and Retention.
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—2-1 Label Assignment and Distribution Introducing Typical Label Distribution in Frame-Mode MPLS.
MAC Withdraw Signaling for static PW draft-boutros-l2vpn-mac-wd-03.txt Himanshu Shah - Ciena Siva Sivabalan, Sami Boutros – Cisco Sam Aldrin - Huwei.
Application-aware Targeted LDP draft-esale-mpls-app-aware-tldp-01
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 7. CS Summer 2003 MPLS Forwarding MPLS forwarding can be described in terms of: Label imposition Label disposition.
MPLS H/W update Brief description of the lab What it is? Why do we need it? Mechanisms and Protocols.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 8. CS Summer 2003 Populating LFIB with LDP Assigned/Learned Labels Changes in the LFIB may be triggered routing or.
CS Summer 2003 Lecture 15 MPLS Fault-Tolerance Architecture ( For details, see class notes)
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Implementing Secure Converged Wide Area Networks (ISCW) Module 4: Frame Mode MPLS Implementation.
A Study of MPLS Department of Computing Science & Engineering DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY, LEICESTER, U.K. By PARMINDER SINGH KANG
1 MPLS Architecture. 2 MPLS Network Model MPLS LSR = Label Switched Router LER = Label Edge Router LER LSR LER LSR IP MPLS IP Internet LSR.
LSP-Ping extensions for MPLS-TP draft-nitinb-mpls-tp-lsp-ping- extensions-00 Nitin Bahadur Sami Boutros Rahul Aggarwal Eric Gray.
IETF 68 Prague: draft-dolganow-ospf-pwe3-ms-pw-ext authors: Alex Zinin (Alcatel-Lucent) Andrew Dolganow (Alcatel-Lucent) Dimitri Papadimitriou (Alcatel-Lucent)
MPLS Evan Roggenkamp. Introduction Multiprotocol Label Switching High-performance Found in telecommunications networks Directs data from one network node.
1 Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) presented by: chitralekha tamrakar (B.S.E.) divya krit tamrakar (B.S.E.) Rashmi shrivastava(B.S.E.) prakriti.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco ConfidentialPresentation_ID 1 IETF 84 – Vancouver August 2012 LSP Ping Support for P2MP PWs (draft-jain-pwe3-p2mp-pw-lsp-ping-00.txt)
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. MPLS v2.2—1-1 MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts.
1 Multi Protocol Label Switching Presented by: Petros Ioannou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, UCY.
1 LSP-Trace over MPLS tunnels draft-nitinb-lsp-ping-over-mpls-tunnel-01 Nitin BahadurJuniper Networks Kireeti KompellaJuniper Networks George SwallowCisco.
IP/MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
1 © 2001, Cisco Systems. MPLS Architecture Overview Jay Kumarasamy Adopted from Stefano Previdi’s presentation.
Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech.
MPLS Concepts Introducing Basic MPLS Concepts. Outline Overview What Are the Foundations of Traditional IP Routing? Basic MPLS Features Benefits of MPLS.
MPLS Some notations: LSP: Label Switched Path
LDP Typed Wildcard PW FEC Elements draft-raza-l2vpn-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt Kamran Raza Sami Boutros draft-raza-l2vpn-pw-typed-wc-fec-01.txt.
MPLS WG1 Targeted mLDP Base mLDP spec didn’t consider use of LDP multipoint extensions over Targeted mLDP sessions LDP speaker must choose “upstream LSR”,
MPLS-TP Loopback Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-loopback-02.txt Sami Boutros and a Cast of Thousands.
LDP extension for Inter-Area LSP draft-decraene-mpls-ldp-interarea-04 Bruno DecraeneFrance Telecom / Orange Jean-Louis Le RouxFrance Telecom / Orange Ina.
PG 1 Multi-hop Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance using LDP draft-balus-mh-pw-control-protocol-00.txt David McDysan, MCI Florin Balus, Nortel.
© 2009 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Cisco Public Presentation_ID 1 Upstream mapping in Echo Request draft-ankur-mpls-upstream-mapping-00 Ankur.
Label Distribution Protocols LDP: hop-by-hop routing RSVP-TE: explicit routing CR-LDP: another explicit routing protocol, no longer under development.
Signaling Color Label Switched Paths Using LDP draft-alvarez-mpls-ldp-color-lsp-00 Kamran Raza Sami Boutros Santiago.
Pseudo Wire (PW) Virtual Circuit Connection Verification (VCCV) Update Thomas D. Nadeau Cisco Systems, Inc Rahul Aggarwal (Presenter) Juniper Networks.
Copyright © 2004 Juniper Networks, Inc. Proprietary and Confidentialwww.juniper.net 1 MPLS Upstream Label Assignment for RSVP- TE and LDP draft-raggarwa-mpls-rsvp-ldp-upstream-
Precision Time Protocol over MPLS draft-ronc-ptp-mpls-00.txt PWE3 WG IETF Chicago 2007 Ron Cohen
Tunnel SAFI draft-nalawade-kapoor-tunnel- safi-03.txt SSA Attribute draft-kapoor-nalawade-idr- bgp-ssa-01.txt.
Draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-01IETF 82: 14 November LDP DoD draft-beckhaus-ldp-dod-01.txt Thomas Beckhaus (Deutsche Telekom AG) Bruno Decraene (France.
BGP-based Auto-Discovery for L2VPNs draft-hlmu-l2vpn-bgp-discovery-00.txt Sue Hares - Vasile Radoaca -
1 MTU Extended Community for BGP-4 Q. Zeng, J. Dong (Huawei Technologies) IETF81 IDR July 2011 Quebec draft-zeng-idr-bgp-mtu-extension-00.
BGP extensions for Path Computation Element (PCE) Discovery in a BGP/MPLS IP-VPN draft-kumaki-pce-bgp-disco-attribute-03.txt Kenji Kumaki KDDI R&D Labs,
Advertising Generic Information in IS-IS
MPLS-TP Fault Management Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-fault-01
Draft-nalawade-kapoor-tunnel-safi 03.txt
MPLS LSP Instant Install draft-saad-mpls-lsp-instant-install-00
IETF 95 – Buenos Aires April 2016
Yimin Shen (Juniper) Rahul Aggarwal (Arktan Inc)
ISIS Route Tag sub-TLV draft-ietf-isis-admin-tags-02.txt
78th IETF Meeting - Maastricht 27th, July 2010
RFC 3036 FECs RFC 3036 defines FECs used to bind labels to address prefixes in routing table Two FECs defined: Address Prefix FEC Host Address FEC Not.
PW Setup & Maintenance Using LDP ATM Encapsulation
MPLS Basics 2 2.
Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping for IPv6 Pseudowire FECs
Use of p2mp BFD in PIM-SM (over shared-media segment) draft-mirsky-pim-bfd-p2mp-use-case Greg Mirsky Ji Xiaoli
MPLS-TP Loopback Draft draft-boutros-mpls-tp-li-lb-02
Presentation transcript:

LDP IP and PW Capability draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt Kamran Raza Sami Boutros draft-raza-mpls-ldp-ip-pw-capability-00.txt

Background No LDP capability is exchanged for IP label switching and L2VPN/PW signaling. When operating in Downstream Unsolicited mode, an LDP speaker may unnecessarily advertise its local state for IP/PW to another speaker who doesnt need it. This document proposes a solution by which an LDP speaker announces it "incapability" or disability or non- support for IP label switching or L2VPN/PW application. Two new capabilities are being introduced using mechanisms in LDP Capabilities [RFC5561]RFC5561

IP Label Switching Capability TLV |1 |0 | IP Label Sw. Cap (IANA) | Length (2) | |1| Reserved | AF Bitmap | U bit set to 1 silently ignore S Bit set to | AF bitmap | Where: bit0: IPv4 label switching application bit1: IPv6 label switching application bit2-7: Reserved.

PW Signaling Capability TLV |1 |0 | PW Sig. Cap (IANA) | Length (2) | |1| Reserved |E| Reserved | U bit set to 1 silently ignore S Bit set to 1 E-bit Enable PW application respectively.

Operation-1 Disabling IP/PW label applications on an ICCP session 1.LSR-1 and LSR-2 support "Dynamic Announcement" capability [RFC5561]. 2.LSR-1 includes both the "IP Label Switching" capability TLV (with bit0-1 of "Address Family Bitmap" set to 0) and "PW Signaling capability TLV (with E-bit set to 0) in the Initialization message. 3.Upon receipt of those TLVs in Initialization message, LSR2 will disable any IP/PW address/label binding state advertisement towards LSR1.

Operation-2 Disabling IP application on an established IP/PW session 1.LSR1 will first withdraw all its IP label state, and Address Withdraw message to withdraw its addresses. 2.LSR1 will then send IP Label Switching capability TLV in Capability message towards LSR2 with bit0-1 (IPv4, IPv6) in "Address Family Bitmap" set to zero. 3.LSR2 will disable IP application towards LSR1 and withdraw all previous IP application label/address state Both LSRs should continue to exchange PW Signaling application related state.

Thank You