Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Whats a P20, and why would I want one? Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Margaret Merlyn Ropp, Ph.D. Director.
Advertisements

FBOE K-20 Accountability Project CEPRI Workgroup June 13, 2002 Orlando, Florida.
Center of Excellence in Leadership of Learning October 5, 2010.
Criteria for High Quality Career and Technical Education Programs National Career Pathways Network Orlando, FL November 14, 2014.
Selecting and Identifying Programs of Study Division of School and Community Academic Programs Camden County College Camden Pathways Professional Development.
The ADE-Post- Secondary SLDS Project Presented to: CTE Administrators Meeting February 7, 2013 Mark T. Masterson Chief Information Officer.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
A Systemic Approach February, Two important changes in the Perkins Act of 2006 A requirement for the establishment of Programs of Study A new approach.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement: November 17 th, 2011 A Conversation with members of the Montana Education and Local Government Interim Committee.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
P-20 Longitudinal Data Systems What is the information we need, how do we get it, what do we do with it? Elizabeth Laird & Helene Stebbins.
Task Force CTE Career and Technology Education Task Force Governor’s P-20 Leadership Council of Maryland Career and Technology Education Task Force Draft.
Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of Education Career and Technical Education Section Sherry A. Key, Director Alabama State Department of.
Building a Connected Infrastructure for Youth Success from Cradle to Career Nevada’s 2010 Dropout Prevention Summit Highlights and Accomplishments Since.
Bridging Research, Practice, and Policy in the Field of Early Childhood Education Wingspread Recommendations and Next Steps.
Jim Schoelkopf Reflect, Transform, Lead: A New Vision for Career Technical Education.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Florida’s Race to the Top R e d a c t e d. 2 Florida’s Courage to Reform School and district grades A – F Differentiated Accountability High School Grades.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
PARENT, FAMILY, AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
Using Longitudinal Data to Improve Student Achievement US Chamber of Commerce Institute Aimee Rogstad Guidera February 23, 2010.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
KEYS to School Improvement Missouri National Education Association Teaching and Learning Director.
PROFESSIONAL ORGAINIZATIONS LEADERSHIP FORUM AUGUST 6-7, 2013 NYSACTE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS.
Governor’s Commission on College and Career Success Making Pennsylvania Competitive: Educating the Next Generation of Workers, Innovators & Entrepreneurs.
Leveraging Race to the Top to Maximize the Use of Data To Ensure College & Career Readiness Aimee R. Guidera Achieve ADP September 10, 2009.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Considerations for Developing a New Accountability System Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow, State Board of Education.
Quality Breakfast/ Tea April 1 – 8:30 am April 3 – 4:00pm.
Race To The Top (RttT) MSDE Division of Accountability and Assessment Data Systems (DAADS) Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation Three Years in a Row.
Research and Planning Commission 2012Conference November 9, 2012 Katie Weaver Randall Education Research and Data Center Office of Financial Management.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers October 20, 2009.
Developing a New Accountability System
@EdDataCampaign Mining the Data: What States Have and Where to Find It February 7, 2012 Elizabeth Laird Director, Communications and External Affairs Data.
Seattle Community Colleges. What is Tech Prep? A federally funded program Links k-12, community colleges, business, and labor Emphasizes career and technical.
Higher Education Policy Conference Common Data Standards: tsup? Higher Education Policy Conference August 12, 2010 John Blegen, State Higher Education.
Moving Beyond Compliance: Four Ways States Can Support Districts and Local Data Use 2012 MIS Conference Dan Domagala, Colorado Department of Education.
Longitudinal Data Systems: What Can They Do for Me? Nancy J. Smith, Ph.D. Deputy Director Data Quality Campaign November 30, 2007.
March 2015 Learning in the Innovation State. A Ten-Year Look at Student Performance 2 Percent of Students Proficient and Advanced by Subject, 2004 through.
David Simpson ONGL – Division of Next Generation Professionals BOY July 24- PM………………………Begins at 1:00.
Using Data for Program Quality Improvement Stephanie Lampron, Deputy Director.
Accessing Student Data What Reporters Need to Know Aimee Guidera| Founder & Executive Director May 2014.
Loosely formed geographic area  Voluntary collaboration of five universities and colleges, six career techs and two councils of government.  Formed.
Vision for Education in Tennessee Our Strategic Priorities ESEA Directors Institute Kathleen Airhart, Deputy Commissioner August 2014.
1 CollegeKeys Compact: An Action Plan to Remove Barriers to College Access for Students from Low-Income Backgrounds Massachusetts Association of Student.
P-20 Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS) Update Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI)
AASBO September 9,  Governor Brewer is responsible for all ARRA funds ◦ 1607 Certification.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
DRAFT STRATEGIC PLAN 2015 FOR ADULT EDUCATION AND LITERACY Anson Green Director Adult Education and Literacy Texas Workforce Commission.
SMART Tool: Data Accessibility Made Easier The Cal-PASS Way.
The Minnesota Common Course Catalogue January 19, 2012 Presenter: Cathy Wagner.
Cross-System Data Capacity Developing State Level Strategies for Integration and Interoperability.
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations July 30, 2015 CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
Is Not A Winter-Weight Oil Michael Carter, EdS Laurie Kash, PhD.
UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS-PAN AMERICAN Approved by President Cárdenas November 21, 2005 Goals reordered January 31, 2006.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Kansas Education Longitudinal Data System Update to Kansas Commission on Graduation and Dropout Prevention and Recovery December 2010 Kathy Gosa Director,
Make Data Work for Students:
Promoting College Access & Success
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Aimee Rogstad Guidera April 7, 2010
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Hans P. L’Orange State Higher Education Executive Officers
Presentation transcript:

Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Aimee R. Guidera Director, Data Quality Campaign National Center for Education Accountability April 23, 2007

Framing Thoughts… Without data, you are just another person with an opinion….. Culture change underway in education community: View data not as a hammer, but as a flashlight.

The Power of Longitudinal Data Longitudinal Data — data gathered on the same student from year to year — makes it possible to: –Follow individual student academic growth –Determine the value-added of specific programs –Identify consistently high-performing schools/classrooms/systems worthy of study

Longitudinal Data Systems & Accountability (the “reporting” aspect of accountability) With state longitudinal data systems, state approaches to accountability are enriched: Permits calculation of alternative accountability models such as growth; Facilitates more efficient collection/analysis of data for federal reporting requirements (grad rates, teacher quality, other NCLB reporting) Improves the quality of information on disaggregated data since all data doesn’t need to be collected separately each year Ensures all users of data are accessing/using the same data to conduct analyses/report rates

Longitudinal Data & a Broader View of Accountability With longitudinal data, states can have richer conversations about: Alignment of secondary education and postsecondary education and training (accountability through the education pipeline) Impact of teacher preparation/professional development on student learning (school of education accountability) Transparency of information on inputs and outcomes in education system (public/taxpayer accountability)

Longitudinal Data Systems and Improvement Efforts Longitudinal data systems also inform good decision making: Teachers, administrators are able to tailor instruction and programs to individual student needs. Policymakers are far better informed if based on student level data over time. Researchers can better evaluate impact of specific programs, approaches, pedagogy on student achievement.

Data Quality Campaign: Building Support and Political Will Among Policymakers to: Fully develop high-quality longitudinal data systems in every state by 2009 Increase understanding and promote the valuable uses of longitudinal and financial data to improve student achievement Promote, develop, and use common data standards and efficient data transfer and exchange

DQC Managing Partners Achieve Alliance for Excellent Education Council of Chief State School Officers Education Commission of the States The Education Trust National Association of State Boards of Education National Association of System Heads National Center for Educational Accountability* National Center for Higher Education Mgt Systems National Governors Assoc. Center for Best Practices Schools Interoperability Framework Association Standard & Poor’s School Evaluation Services State Educational Technology Directors Association State Higher Education Executive Officers * The campaign is supported by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and managed by the National Center for Educational Accountability.

Creating a Longitudinal Data System 10 Essential Elements: 1.Unique statewide student identifier (42, up from 36) 2.Student-level enrollment, demographic and program participation information (46, up from 38) 3.Ability to match individual students’ test records from year to year to measure growth (41, up from 32) 4.Information on untested students (30, up from 25) 5.Teacher identifier system with ability match teachers to students (16, up from 13) 6.Student-level transcript information, including information on courses completed and grades earned (12, up from 7) 7.Student-level college readiness test scores (9, up from 7) 8.Student-level graduation and dropout data (40, up from 34) 9.Ability to match student records between the Pre-K-12 and post- secondary systems (18, up from 12) 10.State data audit system assessing data quality, validity, and reliability (36, up from 19)

Fundamental Design & (not so) Future Issues Regarding Quality Data Systems Fundamental Design Issues –Privacy Protection –Data Architecture –Data Warehousing –Interoperability –Portability –Professional Development around Data Processes and Use –Researcher Access Future Issues –Connect school performance with spending –Connect school performance to employment and other systems –Transfer records across systems and states

State of the State Data Systems

Policy Implications of Data Systems Does your system have the data system in place in to address these issues using student-level longitudinal data? –Identify which schools produce the strongest academic growth for their students. (23 states) –Know what achievement levels in middle school indicate that a student is on track to succeed in rigorous courses in high school. (5 states) –Calculate each school's graduation rate, according to the 2005 National Governor's Association graduation compact? (26 states) –Determine which high school performance indicators (e.g., enrollment in rigorous courses or performance on state tests) are the best predictors of students' success in college or the workplace. (4 states) –Identify the percentage of high school graduates who go on to college take remedial courses. (14 states) –Identify which teacher preparation programs produce the graduates whose students have the strongest academic growth. (9 states)

Data Quality Campaign Approach Build Policymaker understanding and will to invest in and use quality data infrastructures –Success Stories—Case Studies of 4 states; Implementation Papers –Recognition of leadership—Awards in November Provide tools, materials and information –Examples of the powerful use of data to inform policy & practice –Toolkits for various audiences on uses of data to improve achievement –Quarterly Issue Meetings: June 2007 on Interoperability Create national forum to ensure collaboration, develop consensus and reduce duplication of effort –Leverage existing efforts to maximize impact –Collaborate/communicate through national partnership whenever possible –One-stop resource center:

DQC—Year 2 Driving the USE of Longitudinal Data DQC will promote the powerful and indispensable use of data to all education stakeholders: Build longitudinal data systems with end users in mind Create toolkits for education stakeholders that demonstrate the power of longitudinal data Advocate for continued investments in state data systems Generate opportunities for states to learn from one another.

Questions? Aimee R. Guidera Thank You!