RTI Response to Intervention. Tier I Contents Review Review Paper work information Paper work information Procedures Procedures.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring: Data to Instructional Decision-Making Frank Worrell Marley Watkins Tracey Hall Ministry of Education Trinidad and Tobago January,
Advertisements

RTI RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION Creating Tier I/PIPs Cleaning the Windshield.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
RTI Response to Instruction. Better to be safe than Punch a 5th grader Better to be safe than Punch a 5th grader Strike while.
Tier III Meeting Outline. Roles of Team Members Coordinator –Set up meetings, contact parents, inform members of team about agenda, inform teachers about.
What to Expect During Your First Year of Implementation Giancarlo Anselmo School Psychologist/RTI Coordinator Cleveland County Schools Carolinas Innovations.
Current and Future Implementation of Response to Intervention.
QUESTIONS and ANSWERS: Implementing RTI in your School OR in your District Nuts and Bolts from Colleagues who are using RTI Giancarlo Anselmo School Psychologist/RTI.
Data Collection Benchmark (CBM Family) Progress Monitoring Interventions Tiers Training/Materials Problem Solving Model Allocation of Resources.
Teacher In-Service August, Abraham Lincoln.
 EC Professional Development Day February 18, 2013.
Response to Intervention In North Carolina Implementation of a Problem Solving Model Exceptional Children Division NC Department of Public Instruction.
What is RTI? RTI is a general education initiative aimed at improving student performance through the use of effective scientific research-based instructional.
Knox County Schools Transition to RTI2
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Reading Intervention “Today a reader, tomorrow a leader.” -Margaret Fuller-
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Margaret D. Anderson SUNY Cortland, April, Federal legislation provides the guidelines that schools must follow when identifying children for special.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Reading Comprehension and Math Computation Screening and Progress Monitoring Assessments for Secondary Students Carrie Urshel, Ph.D., School Psychologist.
RTI Levels  Schools must organize their interventions into levels of increasing intensity.  Three Tiers – Tier I, II, III  Higher the need of the student.
A NEW APPROACH TO IDENTIFYING LEARNING DISABILITIES RTI: Academics.
Department of Special Education August 3, 2010 iSTEEP Follow-up & Training Presented by: Raecheal Vizier, M.Ed. Special Education Program Effectiveness.
Understanding Response to Intervention (RtI) : What it Is & How it Works in Midway ISD.
Response to Intervention RTI – SLD Eligibility. What is RTI? Early intervention – General Education Frequent progress measurement Increasingly intensive.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Georgia’s Pyramid. Pyramid Vocabulary  Formative Assessment  Universal Screening  Intervention  Progress Monitoring.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
1. We can teach all children effectively 2. Intervene early 3. Use a continuum model of service delivery 4. Use a problem-solving method to make decisions.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
EC CHAIRPERSON/PSYCHOLOGIST MEETING Helpful Tips re: Interventions.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
1 Responsiveness to Instruction (RtI) Problem-Solving Model Tier II North Carolina Department of Public Instruction
Training for Problem Solving Teams Susan Clay Jefferson County Board of Education Fall 2014.
Problem Solving Team (PST)  Elkmont High School  Pilot Program  Response to Instruction  School Year.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
Response to Intervention within IDEIA 2004: Get Ready South Carolina Bradley S. Witzel, PhD Department of Curriculum and Instruction Richard W. Riley College.
 Three Criteria: Inadequate classroom achievement (after intervention) Insufficient progress Consideration of exclusionary factors  Sources of Data.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION.. What will you take away from today’s presentation? You will understand what Response to Intervention (RtI) is and its purpose?
Response to Intervention SPED 461. Basic Principles of RTI Response to intervention integrates assessment and intervention within a multi-level prevention.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Assistance Team Procedures Iredell-Statesville Schools.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
CASE STUDY - MATH PROBLEM SOLVING TO DESIGN & IMPLEMENT INTERVENTIONS.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Nuts and Bolts of Progress Monitoring Response to Instruction and Intervention RtII.
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Setting RTI Goals Adapted from :RTI Works’ Series © 2011 Jim Wright
CHAPTER 11: Assessing Academic Achievement: General Strategies
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Method for Monitoring Student Academic Progress in Basic Skills.
Response to Intervention
CHAPTER 2: Steps in the Assessment Process
Improved Outcomes For All Children Progress Universal Monitoring
Response to Intervention
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

RTI Response to Intervention

Tier I Contents Review Review Paper work information Paper work information Procedures Procedures

Level I Consultation Between Teachers-Parents Level II Consultation With Other Resources Intensity of Problem Amount of Resources Needed to Solve Problem Level III Consultation with the Problem Solving Team Level IV IEP Consideration Define the problem Develop a Plan Implement Plan Evaluate

RTI Procedures Activities at Tier I Activities at Tier I Parent and teacher working together to Define the Problem Parent and teacher working together to Define the Problem Based on data develop an intervention plan Based on data develop an intervention plan Evaluate Evaluate Teacher and parent use progress monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions Teacher and parent use progress monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions Intervention should last at least 6 weeks Intervention should last at least 6 weeks

Tier I Paperwork Consists of: Consists of: Student info Student info Initial Parent contact Initial Parent contact Define Problem, What does the student Know, What do they need to Know, Set Goal Define Problem, What does the student Know, What do they need to Know, Set Goal Progress Monitoring Information Progress Monitoring Information Evaluation of Plan Evaluation of Plan Rational for final decisions Rational for final decisions Decision to continue, modify, discontinue, or move to Tier II Decision to continue, modify, discontinue, or move to Tier II

Tier I Paperwork Tier I paperwork will take the place of the old PEP paperwork Tier I paperwork will take the place of the old PEP paperwork Teachers will keep copies of Tier I paperwork in a folder in their rooms Teachers will keep copies of Tier I paperwork in a folder in their rooms 1 folder for each student 1 folder for each student

Case Colleague Assignments

Tier I Paperwork Teachers will keep progress monitoring data in this folder along with Tier 1 paper work Teachers will keep progress monitoring data in this folder along with Tier 1 paper work

Ways to Enter Tier I Students who are At-Risk based on DIBELS data will automatically enter Tier I Students who are At-Risk based on DIBELS data will automatically enter Tier I 3-5 students will enter based on performance on Curriculum Based Measurements 3-5 students will enter based on performance on Curriculum Based Measurements Teacher input across grade levels Teacher input across grade levels EC students will also have a Tier I plan EC students will also have a Tier I plan

Progress Monitoring for Students in Tier I K-2 teachers will progress monitor reading progress using DIBELS K-2 teachers will progress monitor reading progress using DIBELS Progress monitoring using DIBELS will be done on a weekly basis Progress monitoring using DIBELS will be done on a weekly basis Space is provided on the Tier I and Tier II paperwork for progress monitoring data Space is provided on the Tier I and Tier II paperwork for progress monitoring data

Progress Monitoring for Students in Tier I K-2 subjects other than reading and 3-5 all subjects: K-2 subjects other than reading and 3-5 all subjects: Students will be monitored on a weekly basis using: Students will be monitored on a weekly basis using: Curriculum Based Measurements Curriculum Based Measurements How do these things really work How do these things really work

Curriculum Based Measurements CBMs are quick and usually take one minute to administer CBMs are quick and usually take one minute to administer CBM assessments can be administered frequently (daily if needed) and the results can be displayed graphically CBM assessments can be administered frequently (daily if needed) and the results can be displayed graphically This provides a visual representation of the students learning This provides a visual representation of the students learning If the student does not display progress, the instruction can be adjusted which allows for intervention before the student begins to fail (Espin et al., 2001) If the student does not display progress, the instruction can be adjusted which allows for intervention before the student begins to fail (Espin et al., 2001) DIBELS are a good example of a CBM DIBELS are a good example of a CBM

Curriculum Based Measurements Studies have shown that CBM aids teachers in generating superior student achievement regardless of whether the students are identified as learning disabled, low achieving, or achieving in the average range (Fuchs et al., 1994) Studies have shown that CBM aids teachers in generating superior student achievement regardless of whether the students are identified as learning disabled, low achieving, or achieving in the average range (Fuchs et al., 1994)

Curriculum Based Measurements Good predictors of success on EOG Good predictors of success on EOG Helpful in showing teachers specific skills that children are lacking and where we can begin to intervene. Helpful in showing teachers specific skills that children are lacking and where we can begin to intervene.

Using CBMs For Benchmark Data Every student will be given select probes for each grade level Every student will be given select probes for each grade level Same as we have done for K-2 with DIBELS but we will include all grades and probes dealing with reading, writing, and math Same as we have done for K-2 with DIBELS but we will include all grades and probes dealing with reading, writing, and math

3 rd Grade Mid Year Scores SkillMean25 th %ILE13 th %ILE10 th %ILE Blend Identification (Individual) Sight Word Fluency (Individual) Oral Reading Fluency (DIBELS) (Individual) Maze Fluency-Reading Comprehension (Group) Written Expression (Group) Double Digit Addition with Regrouping (Group) Double Digit Subtraction with Regrouping (Group) Multiplication (Multiply by 0-12) (Group) Word Problems (+ and -, Sums no Regrouping) (Group)

Tier I for Behavior Students enter Tier I for behavior when a student has two office referrals for the same or similar offense Students enter Tier I for behavior when a student has two office referrals for the same or similar offense Student will also enter Tier I when a teacher feels that after an initial parent contact the student is still having significant behavior problems Student will also enter Tier I when a teacher feels that after an initial parent contact the student is still having significant behavior problems Tier I interventions for behavior will last 2-4 weeks if students behavior does not improve Tier I interventions for behavior will last 2-4 weeks if students behavior does not improve

Progress Monitoring for Students in Tier I Progress monitoring with behavior students will be done using: Progress monitoring with behavior students will be done using: Classroom behavior plans Classroom behavior plans

Results of Tier I Tier l Exit 1.No longer At-Risk 2.No longer concerned Continue with intervention Student still needs support Move to Tier II After intervention student is still considered At-Risk

QUESTIONS?