Risk analysis (UVER). Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

“Train the trainers” seminar

Advertisements

Financial Institute for Regional Development, PI Understanding the roles and functions of Certifying and Audit Authorities in European Territorial Cooperation.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.

AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 

1. Management Income Statement Balance Sheet Stmt of CF Management Prepares 1 Users Basic Mistrust 2 Auditors Independent Auditor 3 Lends Credibility.

Learning Objectives LO1 Explain the importance of auditing. LO2 Distinguish auditing from accounting. LO3 Explain the role of auditing in information risk.

S11: Risk Based Audit Approach. Session Objectives  To define audit risks and establish the relationship between materiality and audit risk  To discuss.

Management Fraud and Audit Risk

SAMPLING. THIRD STANDARD OF FIELD WORK (AU ) “SUFFICIENT COMPETENT EVIDENTIAL MATTER IS TO BE OBTAINED THROUGH INSPECTION, OBSERVATION, INQUIRIES,

Internal Control and Internal Audit

Public sector compliance audit and its internal controls Meeting of the INTOSAI Subcommittee on Internal Control Standards, 27th of May 2014, Vilnius,

Learning Objectives LO1 Outline six general audit techniques for gathering evidence. LO2 Identify the procedures and sources of information auditors can.

Learning Objectives LO1 Distinguish between management and auditor’s responsibilities regarding an auditee organization’s internal controls. LO2 Explain.

Management of Risks in Audit RISK ANALYSIS AND STATISTICAL SAMPLING IN AUDIT.

Financial Audit Autonomous Bodies Internal Control and Risk Assessment Session Internal Control and Risk Assessment.

© SCS Global Services | 1 Emissions offset project auditing as quality assurance discipline: a forest inventory perspective 2013 Western Mensurationists.

Audit Sampling Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0294/Audit SI Lanjutan Tahun: 2009.

1 Chapter 9 Materiality and Audit Risk 2 3 Under which auditing approach(es) are auditors required to obtain an understanding of the internal controls?

Risk analysis (UVER) Luigi Guerci. Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The organisational principles at the foundation of the management and control.

1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.

EAAPAC EAAPAC TRAINING FOR MEMBERS OF NEW PACs – JUBA SOUTH SUDAN February 6 – 8, 2013.

Auditing Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Chapter Three IT Risks and Controls.

Internal controls. Session objectives Define Internal Controls To understand components of Internal Controls, control environment and types of controls.

Chapter 5 Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Considering Internal Control

How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,

Audit Risk. "Audit risk" means the risk that the auditor gives an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated Audit.

Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit

[Hayes, Dassen, Schilder and Wallage, Principles of Auditing An Introduction to ISAs, edition 2.1] © Pearson Education Limited 2007 Slide 8.1 Control Risk,

Learning Objectives LO5 Illustrate how business risk analysis is used to assess the risk of material misstatement at the financial statement level and.

S7: Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning.

Audit Planning. Session Objectives To explain the need for planning To outline the essential elements of planning process To finalise the audit approach.

Conducting an Information Systems Audit

REPUBLIC OF TURKEY PRIME MINISTRY Undersecretariat of Treasury REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS OPERATIONAL PROGRAM (RCOP) Ankara, 27 June 2012 AUDIT AUTHORITY.

Evaluation of Internal Control System. Learning Objective 1 Contrast management’s need for internal control with the auditor’s need to consider internal.

Slide4.11 Learning Objectives Illustrate risk model Determine level of OAA Identify risks Calculate detection risk.

Session Objectives To revisit the Audit Risk Model and Materiality concepts; To explain the Theory of Sampling as applied to audit To Explain the link.

BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services Lecture 21 Tests of Controls.

S5: Internal controls. What is Internal Control Internal control is a process Internal control is a process Internal control is effected by people Internal.

Click to edit Master title style 1 WINDING-UP DECLARATION Practical experience PORTUGAL Carlos Trigacheiro Inspecção-Geral de Finanças (IGF) General Inspection.

Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 11: Overall Audit Plan and Audit Program.

Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.

©2012 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Section 404 Audits of Internal Control and Control Risk Chapter.

1 Chapter 9 Materiality and Audit Risk 2 3 Under which auditing approach(es) are auditors required to obtain an understanding of the internal controls?

Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 9-1 Chapter 9: Internal Controls and Control Risk.

EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.

EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements.

Practical Use of International Standards in the Control and Auditing Activities of Federal Treasury Prague, March, 2016 Head of Internal Control (Audit)

©©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Considering Internal Control Chapter 10.

Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall. Chapter

EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Risk assessment and planning.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin © The McGraw-Hill Companies 2010 Internal Control in a Financial Statement Audit Chapter Six.

©2005 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 10/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Internal Control and Control Risk Chapter 10.

Improve 1st level control for greater efficiency of Structural Funds José Santos Soeiro President Financial Institute for Regional Development.

Internal Control Evaluation: Assessing Control Risk

Information Technology Controls

Assessing the Risk of Material Misstatement

MODULE 2 INTRODUCTION TO GOVERNANCE AUDIT

INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL AUDIT

Internal control objectives

Management Fraud and Audit Risk

Audit Risk Assessment Model

Management Verifications & Sampling Methods

Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,

MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE

Management Verifications & Sampling Methods

INTERNAL CONTROLS AND THE ASSESSMENT OF CONTROL RISK

Presentation transcript:

Risk analysis (UVER)

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER)

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) For assessment purposes, risks may be classified as: - inherent risks (IR) of the management system - control risks (CR), i.e. the possibility that a systematic control be unable to prevent or detect errors or irregularities.

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) Inherent risks (IR) of the management system are mainly related to: - number of activities into the macro- process - complexity of activities - number of administrative documents handovers - number of entity involved and number of level of responsibility - time planned to implement operations

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) Control risks (CR) are mainly related to: - organization chart for routine check (first level) and competence of professionals involved - presence of all point to be checked in accordance to audit trail - information from routine check (first level) - information from previous controls performed by the Certifying Authority

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) According to these factors we can identify different level of risk (High risk/Medium risk/Low risk) associated with a value expressing the likelihood of irregularities. Italian Court of Account defines, for Inherent Risk (I.R.), the following: High risk - 1 Medium risk – 0,65 Low risk – 0,45

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) In the same way Italian Court of Account defines, for Control Risk (C.R.), the following: High risk - 1 Medium risk – 0,28 Low risk – 0,17

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) Risk assessment is performed for each risk factor in every management and control process by multiplying IR*CR. Than the risk level of the process is counted as arithmetic mean of all risk factor in the specific process. Similarly the risk level of a group of operations is counted as arithmetic mean of level risk of all processes

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER)

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The risk level of the process is counted as arithmetic mean of all risk factor in the specific process.

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The risk level of a group of operations is counted as arithmetic mean of level risk of all processes

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) In the example the risk level of 26% is to be considered as an intermediate level with reference to the following

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The risk level of an Operational Program is the weighed mean of all risk level with reference to the financial weight of each group of operations

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) At the end of the assessment a judgement on the effectiveness and reliability of the management and control system has to be set out.

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The Annex IV of the regulation 1828/2006 state that “ …the audit authority first evaluates the reliability of the systems (high, average or low) taking into account the results of systems audits, so as to determine the technical parameters of the sampling, in particular the confidence level and the expected error rate. The combined level of assurance obtained from the systems audits and the audits of operations should be high. The confidence level used for sampling operations should not be less than 60 % with a maximum materiality level of 2 %. For a system evaluated as having low reliability, the confidence level used for sampling operations should not be below 90 %. The audit authority should describe in the annual control report the way assurance has been obtained.”

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) The confidence level related to the reliability suggested are:

Public Investment Verification Unit (UVER) Sampling the operations pursuant art. 17 EC Regulation 1828/2006