Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June Smart Grid Architecture 2. Risk Scenarios 3. Comparison with other markets 4. Methods 5. Certification IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210 IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Smart Grid Architecture Based on: NIST SP 1108 NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210 IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Smart Grid Architecture  Challenges: Introduction and expansion of a communication network for the current and future electricity grid Introduction of new technology Introduction of intelligent control and connectivity between different domains  Constraints: Long-term use of legacy assets in the domains of operation, bulk generation, transmission and distribution In some parts, use of a large-scale homogeneous technical environment, e.g. Smart Meters There are currently no common or aligned standards designed to achieve an architecturally compatible technology.

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Customer Data – Confidentiality Aggregating and sharing of customer data throughout different grid actors Different legal environments  Fraud – Integrity Tampering with customer data Energy theft and fraud IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Risk Scenarios Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Technical threats IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Risk Scenarios Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210 IntentionalUnintentional Malicious E.g. a dedicated attack by criminal individuals, groups, terrorists or nations E.g. an undirected attack by a ‘common’ Botnet virus Non-malicious E.g. a disgruntled employee/ outsourcing vendor intentionally manipulates sensor data E.g. malfunction of software or procedures

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Financial Market Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX)  adapted to EuroSOX, JSOX - global rule set for activities such as governance, reporting and enterprise risk management. COSO  guidance on organizational governance, business ethics, internal control, enterprise risk management, fraud and financial reporting COBIT  control framework for technical compliance IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Comparison with other markets Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Compliance for Telecommunications Signaling System 7 (SS7)  enabling interconnectivity between large networks  basis for telecommunication services that are compliant with different legal requirements EU formed Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications (BEREC)  Ensure compliance with EU regulatory framework IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Comparison with other markets Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Existing frameworks/standards (ISA 99 series, NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP) series, NIST )  Maps or models to apply such standards (e.g. Zone Model / Zoning Principles)  Avoid compliance with standard A implies non-compliance with standard B  Currently heavy technical focus  Currently no common / complete standards that steer and enable Smart Grid development considering all aspects (customer privacy, technical issues, fraud)  Target: framework of mutually compliant standards to enable compliant development of Smart Grids and build trust / acceptance IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Methods Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  From competitive advantage to operational requirement Quality Management ISO 9000 series IT Service Management ISO series Information Security Management ISO series  Certifications for certain areas are available, giving currently competitive advantage  Focus area for certification could be Smart Meter (huge amount of homogeneous devices) IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Certification Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Increasing interconnectivity in Smart Grid architecture  New risk scenarios e.g. increasing amount of customer data throughout different grid actors  IT Compliance with a framework of mutually compliant standards could help to build secure systems and trust  Certification - from competitive advantage to operational requirement IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Summary Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210

Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 IT COMPLIANCE IN SMART GRIDS Thank you for your attention! Martin Schaefer – Sweden – Session 6 – 0210